Autonomous People: Identity, Agency, and Automated Driving

References

• D. Amira, “John Zimmer Would Rather Die Than Take an Uber,” The New York Times Magazine May 15, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• J. Anable and B. Gatersleben, “All Work and No Play? The Role of Instrumental and Affective Factors in Work and Leisure Journeys by Different Travel Modes,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39: 2–3 (2005) 163–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Anderson and A. Honneth, “Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice,” in J. P. Christman and J. Anderson, eds., Autonomy and the Challenges of Liberalism: New Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• K. W. Axhausen and T. Gärling, “Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis: Conceptual Frameworks, Models, and Research Problems,” Transport Reviews 12: 4 (1992) 323–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Basmajian, “‘Turn on the Radio, Bust Out a Song’: The Experience of Driving to Work,” Transportation 37: 1 (2010) 59–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Baynes, “Freedom as Autonomy,” in M. Rosen and B. Leiter, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Continental Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• A. L. C. Bazzan, F. Klügl, and S. Ossowski, “Agents in Traffic and Transportation: Exploring Autonomy in Logistics, Management, Simulation, and Cooperative Driving,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 13: 4 (2005) 251–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Bissell, “Automation Interrupted: How Autonomous Vehicle Accidents Transform the Material Politics of Automation,” Political Geography 65 (2018) 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Bissell, T. Birtchnell, A. Elliott, and E. L. Hsu, “Autonomous Automobilities: The Social Impacts of Driverless Vehicles,” Current Sociology 68: 1 (2020) 116–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. G. Boarnet, “A Broader Context for Land Use and Travel Behavior, and a Research Agenda,” Journal of the American Planning Association 77: 3 (2011) 197–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Boeglin, “The Costs of Self-Driving Cars: Reconciling Freedom and Privacy with Tort Liability in Autonomous Vehicle Regulation,” Yale Journal of Law and Technology 17: 1 (2015) 171–203.
   Google Scholar
• J.-F. Bonnefon, A. Shariff, and I. Rahwan, “The Social Dilemma of Autonomous Vehicles,” Science 352: 6293 (2016) 1573–1576.
   Google Scholar
• B. Brown and E. Laurier, “The Trouble with Autopilots: Assisted and Autonomous Driving on the Social Road,” paper presented at CHI (Chicago, May 6–11, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• L. Campbell, “Kant, Autonomy and Bioethics,” Ethics, Medicine and Public Health 3: 3 (2017) 381–392.
   Google Scholar
• C. Castoriadis, “Marxism and Revolutionary Theory (1964–1965): Excerpts,” in The Castoriadis Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997a).
   Google Scholar
• C. Castoriadis, “The Logic of Magmas and the Question of Autonomy,” in The Castoriadis Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997b).
   Google Scholar
• M. de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).
   Google Scholar
• T. D. Chen, K. M. Kockelman, and J. P. Hanna, “Operations of a Shared, Autonomous, Electric Vehicle Fleet: Implications of Vehicle and Charging Infrastructure Decisions,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 94 (2016) 243–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Clayton, D. Paddeu, G. Parkhurst, and J. Parkin, “Autonomous Vehicles: Who Will Use Them, and Will They Share?” Transportation Planning and Technology 43: 4 (2020) 343–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. E. Cohen, Configuring the Networked Self: Law, Code, and the Play of Everyday Practice (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• T. Cohen, J. Stilgoe, and C. Cavoli, “Reframing the Governance of Automotive Automation: Insights from UK Stakeholder Workshops,” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5: 3 (2018) 257–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Collingridge, The Social Control of Technology (London: Frances Pinter, 1980).
   Google Scholar
• G. Contissa, F. Lagioia, and G. Sartor, “The Ethical Knob: Ethically Customizable Automated Vehicles and the Law,” Artificial Intelligence and Law 25: 3 (2017) 365–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Correia and J. M. Viegas, “Carpooling and Carpool Clubs: Clarifying Concepts and Assessing Value Enhancement Possibilities Through a Stated Preference Web Survey in Lisbon, Portugal,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 45: 2 (2011) 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Duarte and C. Ratti, “The Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Cities: A Review,” Journal of Urban Technology 25: 4 (2018) 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Dworkin, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
   Google Scholar
• A. Ellaway, S. Macintyre, R. Hiscock, and A. Kearns, “In the Driving Seat: Psychosocial Benefits from Private Motor Vehicle Transport Compared to Public Transport,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior 6: 3 (2003) 217–231.
   Google Scholar
• V. Eubanks, Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (New York: St Martin’s Press, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• D. J. Fagnant and K. Kockelman, “Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 77 (2015) 167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. J. Fagnant and K. M. Kockelman, “Dynamic Ride-Sharing and Fleet Sizing for a System of Shared Autonomous Vehicles in Austin, Texas,” Transportation 45: 1 (2018) 143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Fleetwood, “Public Health, Ethics, and Autonomous Vehicles,” American Journal of Public Health 107: 4 (2017) 532–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Fraedrich, D. Heinrichs, F.J. Bahamonde-Birke, and R. Cyganski, “Autonomous Driving, the Built Environment and Policy Implications,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 122 (2019) 162–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.G. Frankfurt, The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
   Google Scholar
• P. E. S. Freund and G.T. Martin, The Ecology of the Automobile (Montréal: Black Rose Books, 1993).
   Google Scholar
• M. Friedman, “Autonomy and Social Relationships: Rethinking the Feminist Critique,” in Autonomy, Gender, Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
   Google Scholar
• B. Gardner and C. Abraham, “What Drives Car Use? A Grounded Theory Analysis of Commuters’ Reasons for Driving,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior 10: 3 (2007) 187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).
   Google Scholar
• R. Golledge and T. Gärling, “Spatial Behavior in Transportation Modeling and Planning,” in K. Goulias, ed., Transportation Systems Planning (Baton Rouge, La. CRC Press, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• K. M. Gurumurthy and K. M. Kockelman, “Modeling Americans’ Autonomous Vehicle Preferences: A Focus on Dynamic Ride-Sharing, Privacy and Long-Distance Mode Choices,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 150 (2020) 119792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Haddington, “Movement in Action: Initiating Social Navigation in Cars,” Semiotica 2012: 191 (2012) 137–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. J. Haraway, “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century,” in Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York: Routledge, 1991).
   Google Scholar
• M. Hatakka, E. Keskinen, N. P. Gregersen, A. Glad, and K. Hernetkoski, “From Control of the Vehicle to Personal Self-Control; Broadening the Perspectives to Driver Education,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior 5: 3 (2002) 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• R. Hiscock, S. Macintyre, A. Kearns, and A. Ellaway, “Means of Transport and Ontological Security: Do Cars Provide Psycho-Social Benefits to Their Users?,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 7 (2002) 119–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. L. Hoagland, Lesbian Ethics: Toward New Value (Palo Alto, CA: Institute of Lesbian Studies, 1988).
   Google Scholar
• L. D. Introna, “The Enframing of Code: Agency, Originality and the Plagiarist,” Theory, Culture & Society 28: 6 (2011) 113–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Jensen, “Passion and Heart in Transport: A Sociological Analysis on Transport Behavior,” Transport Policy 6: 1 (1999) 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• O. Juhlin, “Traffic Behavior as Social Interaction: Implications for the Design of Artificial Drivers,” in The Social Production of Technology: On the Everyday Life of Things (Goteborg: BAS, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• I. Kant, Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone (New York: Harper & Row, 1960).
   Google Scholar
• I. Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• J. Katz, How Emotions Work (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• A. Kellerman, Automated and Autonomous Spatial Mobilities, Transport, Mobilities and Spatial Change (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• E. Keskinen, “Why do Young Drivers Have More Accidents?” paper presented at the Conference of Bundesanstalt für Strassenwesen, Mensh und Sicherheit (Köln, December, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• R. Krueger, T. H. Rashidi, and J. M. Rose, “Preferences for Shared Autonomous Vehicles,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 69 (2016) 343–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Laapotti, E. Keskinen, M. Hatakka, and A. Katila, “Novice Drivers’ Accidents and Violations: A Failure on Higher or Lower Hierarchical Levels of Driving Behavior,” Accident Analysis & Prevention 33: 6 (2001) 759–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Latham and M. Nattrass, “Autonomous Vehicles, Car-Dominated Environments, and Cycling: Using an Ethnography of Infrastructure to Reflect on the Prospects of a New Transportation Technology,” Journal of Transport Geography 81 (2019) 102539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Latour, “Technology is Society Made Durable,” The Sociological Review 38: 1 suppl (1990) 103–131.
   Google Scholar
• E. Laurier, B. Brown, and H. Lorimer, “What It Means to Change Lanes: Actions, Emotions and Wayfinding in the Family Car,” Semiotica 191: 1–4 (2012) 117–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Laurier, H. Lorimer, B. Brown, O. Jones, O. Juhlin, A. Noble, M. Perry, D. Pica, P. Sormani, I. Strebel, L. Swan, A. S. Taylor, L. Watts, and A. Weilenmann, “Driving and ‘Passengering’: Notes on the Ordinary Organization of Car Travel,” Mobilities 3: 1 (2008) 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. S. Lavieri, V. M. Garikapati, C. R. Bhat, R. M. Pendyala, S. Astroza, and F. F. Dias, “Modeling Individual Preferences for Ownership and Sharing of Autonomous Vehicle Technologies,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2665: 1 (2017) 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• R. Leenes and F. Lucivero, “Laws on Robots, Laws by Robots, Laws in Robots: Regulating Robot Behavior by Design,” Law, Innovation and Technology 6: 2 (2014) 193–220.
   Google Scholar
• H. Lefebvre, Everyday Life in the Modern World (New Brunswick, NJ) (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1984).
   Google Scholar
• H. Lefebvre, Writings on Cities, trans. E. Kofman and E. Lebas (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• A. Leszczynski, “Glitchy Vignettes of Platform Urbanism,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space (2019) 189–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. W. Levin, K. M. Kockelman, S. D. Boyles, and T. Li, “A General Framework for Modeling Shared Autonomous Vehicles with Dynamic Network-Loading and Dynamic Ride-Sharing Application,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 64 (2017) 373–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Litman, Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions: Implications for Transport Planning (Victoria Transportation Policy Institute, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• H.-Y. Liu, “Irresponsibilities, Inequalities and Injustice for Autonomous Vehicles,” Ethics and Information Technology 19: 3 (2017) 193–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Luetge, “The German Ethics Code for Automated and Connected Driving,” Philosophy and Technology 30: 4 (2017) 547–558.
   Google Scholar
• C. Mackenzie, “Three Dimensions of Autonomy: A Relational Analysis,” in A. Veltman and M. Piper, eds., Autonomy, Oppression, and Gender (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• E. Mann and C. Abraham, “The Role of Affect in UK Commuters’ Travel Mode Choices: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis,” British Journal of Psychology 97: 2 (2006) 155–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Mecacci and F. Santoni de Sio, “Meaningful Human Control as Reason-Responsiveness: The Case of Dual-Mode Vehicles,” Ethics and Information Technology 22: 2 (2020) 103–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. A. Michon, “A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do?” in L. Evans and R.C. Schwing, eds., Human Behavior and Traffic Safety (Boston, MA: Springer US, 1985).
   Google Scholar
• D. Milakis, B. van Arem, and B. van Wee, “Policy and Society Related Implications of Automated Driving: A Review of Literature and Directions for Future Research,” Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 21: 4 (2017) 324–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. L. Mokhtarian and I. Salomon, “How Derived is the Demand for Travel? Some Conceptual and Measurement Considerations,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 35: 8 (2001) 695–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Nedelsky, “Reconceiving Autonomy: Sources, Thoughts and Possibilities,” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1: 1 (1989) 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• M. Oshana, Personal Autonomy in Society (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• M. Oshana, “Autonomy and the Question of Authenticity,” Social Theory and Practice 33: 3 (2007) 411–429.
   Google Scholar
• C. Pakusch, G. Stevens, A. Boden, and P. Bossauer, “Unintended Effects of Autonomous Driving: A Study on Mobility Preferences in the Future,” Sustainability 10: 7 (2018) 2404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Prakken, “On the Problem of Making Autonomous Vehicles Conform to Traffic Law,” Artificial Intelligence and Law 25: 3 (2017) 341–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Raz, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, 1986).
   Google Scholar
• G. Rose, “Posthuman Agency in the Digitally Mediated City: Exteriorization, Individuation, Reinvention,” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107: 4 (2017) 779–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAE International, “Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems,” Report of SAE International (2014) <https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201401/> Accessed July 7, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• T. Sager, “Freedom as Mobility: Implications of the Distinction between Actual and Potential Travelling,” Mobilities 1: 3 (2006) 465–488.
   Google Scholar
• B. Schoettle and M. Sivak, Motorists’ Preferences for Different Levels of Vehicle Automation (University of Michigan Sustainable Worldwide Transportation, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• M. Sheller, “Automotive Emotions: Feeling the Car,” Theory, Culture & Society 21: 4–5 (2004) 221–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sheller and J. Urry, “The City and the Car,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24: 4 (2000) 737–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Smith and M. Anderson, Americans’ Views on Driverless Vehicles (Pew Research Center, 2017) <https://www.pewinternet.org/2017/10/04/americans-attitudes-toward-driverless-vehicles/> Accessed August 14, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• E. Stayton, M. Cefkin, and J. Zhang, “Autonomous Individuals in Autonomous Vehicles: The Multiple Autonomies of Self-Driving Cars,” Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings 2017: 1 (2017) 92–110.
   Google Scholar
• L. Steg, “Car Use: Lust and Must. Instrumental, Symbolic and Affective Motives for Car Use,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39: 2–3 (2005) 147–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Steg, C. Vlek, and G. Slotegraaf, “Instrumental-Reasoned and Symbolic-Affective Motives for Using a Motor Car,” Transportation Research Part F 4 (2001) 151–169.
   Google Scholar
• T. Stoiber, I. Schubert, R. Hoerler, and P. Burger, “Will Consumers Prefer Shared and Pooled-Use Autonomous Vehicles? A Stated Choice Experiment with Swiss Households,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 71 (2019) 265–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Stoljar, “Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy,” in E. N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018) (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• S. G. Stradling, M. L. Meadows, and S. Beatty, “Identity and Independence: Two Dimensions of Driver Autonomy,” in Behavioral Research in Road Safety: Proceedings of the Q11 10th Seminar on Behavioral Research in Road Safety, April 3–5, 2000 (Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Board, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• L. A. Suchman, Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• H. Surden and M.-A. Williams, “Technological Opacity, Predictability, and Self-Driving Cars,” Cardozo Law Review 38: 1 (2016) 121–181.
   Google Scholar
• C. Taylor, The Ethics of Authenticity, Massey Lectures Series (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).
   Google Scholar
• N. Thrift, “Driving in the City,” Theory, Culture & Society 21: 4–5 (2004) 41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Thrift and S. French, “The Automatic Production of Space,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27: 3 (2002) 309–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Tingley, “How to Make Cars Cooperate,” The New York Times Magazine, November 9, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• K. Toiskallio, “The Impersonal Flâneur: Navigation Styles of Social Agents in Urban Traffic,” Space and Culture 5: 2 (2002) 169–184.
   Google Scholar
• A. Veltman and M. Piper, “Introduction,”: in A. Veltman and M. Piper, eds., Autonomy, Oppression, and Gender (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• D. Vrščaj, S. Nyholm, and G. P. J. Verbong, “Is Tomorrow’s Car Appealing Today? Ethical Issues and User Attitudes Beyond Automation,” AI and Society (2020). DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-00941-z
   Google Scholar
• D. Watzenig and M. Horn, Automated Driving: Safer and More Efficient Future Driving (Cham: Springer International, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• I. M. Young, Justice and the Politics of Difference (with a new foreword by Danielle Allen) (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011).
   Google Scholar