Shifting Gears for the Automated Vehicle: Findings from Focus Groups in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area

References

• I. Ajzen, “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991) 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Bansal, K. Kockelman, and A. Singh, “Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective,” paper presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (Washington, DC, January 2016).
   Google Scholar
• N. Barbour, N. Menon, Y. Zhang, and F. Mannering, “Shared Automated Vehicles: A Statistical Analysis of Consumer Use Likelihoods and Concerns,” Transport Policy 80 (2019) 86–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. A. Bauer, “Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking,” in M. J. Baker, ed., Marketing: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management (Taylor and Francis: 2001) 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ben-Akiva and S. R. Lerman, Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (Cambridge: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985).
   Google Scholar
• J. Bentham, An Introduction to the Principle of Morals and Legislations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1948 [1789]).
   Google Scholar
• R. Berliner, R. M., Hardman, S., and G. Tal, “Uncovering Early Adopter’s Perceptions and Purchase Intentions of Automated Vehicles: Insights from Early Adopters of Electric Vehicles in California.” Transportation Research Part F 60 (2019) 712–722.
   Google Scholar
• B. Botello, R. Buehler, S. Hankey, A. Mondschein, and Z. Jian, “Planning for Walking and Cycling in an Autonomous Vehicle Future,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 1 (2019) 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 2 (2006) 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• L. Buckley, S. A. Kaye, and A. K. Pradhan, “Psychosocial Factors Associated with Intended Use of Automated Vehicles: A Simulated Driving Study,” Accident Analysis and Prevention 115 (2018) 202–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. K. Chen and D. W. Yan, “Interrelationships Between Influential Factors and Behavioral Intention with Regard to Autonomous Vehicles,” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 13: 7 (2019) 511–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” Management Information Systems Quarterly 13: 3 (1989) 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 35: 8 (1989) 982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Fagnant and K. Kockelman, “The Travel and Environmental Implications of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Using Agent-Based Model Scenarios,” Transportation Research Part C 40 (2014) 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Faisal, T. Yigitcanlar, M. Kamaruzzamand, and C. Graham, “Understanding Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Literature Rereview on Capability, Impact, Planning and Policy,” The Journal of Transport and Land Use 12: 1 (2019) 45–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975).
   Google Scholar
• T. Golob, M. J. Beckmann, and Y. Zahavi, “A Utility-Theory Travel Demand Model Incorporating Travel Budgets” Transportation Research Part B 15B: 6 (1981) 375–389.
   Google Scholar
• E. González-González, S. Nogués, and D. Stead, “Automated Vehicles and the City of Tomorrow: A Backcasting Approach,” Cities 94 (2019) 153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google. (2012). Self-Driving Car Test: Steve Mahan <www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdgQpa1pUUE> Accessed July 27, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• M. Hengstler, E. Enkel, and S. Duelli, “Applied Artificial Intelligence and Trust: The Case of Autonomous Vehicles and Medical Assistance Devices,” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 105 (2016) 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Howard, and D. Dai, “Public Perceptions of Self-Driving Cars: The Case of Berkeley, California,” presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (Washington, DC, January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• I. B. Huang, J. Keisler, and I. Linkov, “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Sciences: Ten Years of Applications and Trends,” Science of the Total Environment 409 (2011) 3578–3594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Huth, E. Fuessl, and R. Risser, “Motorcycle Riders’ Perceptions, Attitudes and Strategies: Findings from a Focus Group Study,” Transportation Research Part F 25 (2014) 74–85.
   Google Scholar
• P. Jing, H. Huang, B. Ran, F. Zhan, and Y. Shi, “Exploring the Factors Affecting Mode Choice Intention of Autonomous Vehicle Based on an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior: A Case Study in China,” Sustainability 11 (2019) 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kester, G. Zarazua de Rubens, B. K. Sovacool, and L. Noel, “Public Perceptions of Electric Vehicles and Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G): Insights from a Nordic Focus Group Study,” Transportation Research Part D 74 (2019) 277–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Krueger, T. H. Rashidi, and J. M. Rose, “Preferences for Shared Autonomous Vehicles,” Transportation Research Part C 69 (2016) 343–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kyriakidis, R. Happee, and J. C. De Winter, “Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire among 5000 Respondents,” Transportation Research Part F 32 (2015) 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• J. LaMondia, D. Fagnant, H. Qu, J. Barrett, and K. Kockelman, “Long-Distance Travel Mode Shifts Due to Automated Vehicles: A Statewide Mode-Shift Simulation Experiment and Travel Survey Analysis,” presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (Washington, DC, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. Lee, and K. D. See, “Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance,” Human Factors 46: 1 (2004) 50–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Lee, D. Lee, Y. Park, S. Lee, and T. Ha, “Autonomous Vehicles Can Be Shared, but a Feeling of Ownership is Important: Examination of the Influential Factors for Intention to Use Autonomous Vehicles,” Transportation Research Part C 107 (2019) 411–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Leicht, A. Chtourou, and K. Ben Youssef, “Consumer Innovativeness and Intentioned Autonomous Car Adoption,” Journal of High Technology Management Research 29 (2018) 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• S. Li, P. Blythe, W. Guo, and A. Namdeo, “Investigation of Older Drivers’ Requirements of the Human–Machine Interaction in Highly Automated Vehicles,” Transportation Research Part F 62 (2019) 546–563.
   Google Scholar
• T. Liljamo, H. Liimatainen, and M. Pöllänen, “Attitudes and Concerns on Automated Vehicles,” Transportation Research Part F 59 (2018) 24–44.
   Google Scholar
• M. Mahmudur Rahman, D. Shuchisnigdha, L. Strawderman, R. Burch, and B. Smith, “How the Older Population Perceives Self-Driving Vehicles,” Transportation Research Part F 65 (2019) 242–257.
   Google Scholar
• M. Meyer and E. J. Miller, Urban Transportation Planning (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000).
   Google Scholar
• H. J. Miller, “Theories and Models in Transportation Planning,” in G. Giuliano and S. Hanson, The Geography of Urban Transportation (New York: The Guilford Press, 2017) 113–138.
   Google Scholar
• S. Murtagh, D. A. Rowe, M. A. Elliott, D. McMinn, and N. M. Nelson, “Predicting Active School Travel: The Role of Planned Behavior and Habit Strength,” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 9: 65 (2012) 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S. Nordhoff, B. van Arem, and R. Happee, “A Conceptual Model to Explain, Predict, and Improve User Acceptance of Driverless Vehicles,” presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (Washington, DC, January 2016).
   Google Scholar
• NSTC (National Science and Technology Council) and USDOT (United States Department of Transportation), “Ensuring American Leadership in Automated Vehicle Technologies” (Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President of the United States, 2020) <www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2020-02/EnsuringAmericanLeadershipAVTech4.pdf> Accessed July 15, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• J. P. Nuñez Velasco, H. Farah, V. Arem, and M. P. Hagenzieker, “Studying Pedestrians’ Crossing Behavior When Interacting with Automated Vehicles Using Virtual Reality,” Transportation Research Part F 66 (2019) 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• L. E. Olsson, J. Huck, and M. Friman, “Intention for Car Use Reduction: Applying a Stage-Based Model,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15: 216 (2018) 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• P. A. Pavlou, “Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7: 3 (2003) 101–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. D. Pendleton, H. Andersen, X. Du, X. Shen, M. Meghjani, Y. H. Eng, and M. H. Ang, “Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles,” Machines 5: 6 (2017) 1–54. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/5/1/6
   Google Scholar
• O. Petrik, F. Moura, and J. de Abreu e Silva, “Measuring Uncertainty in Discrete Choice Travel Demand Forecasting Models,” Transportation Planning and Technology 39: 2 (2016) 218–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. K. Pradhan, E. Pulver, J. Zakrajsek, S. Bao, and L. Molnar, “Perceived Safety Benefits, Concerns, and Utility of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems among Owners of ADAS-Equipped Vehicles,” Traffic Injury Prevention 19: S2 (2018) 135–137.
   Google Scholar
• B. Pudane, M. Rataj, E. J. Molin, N. Mouter, S. van Cranenburgh, and C. G. Chorus, “How Will Automated Vehicles Shape Users’ Daily Activities? Insights from Focus Groups with Commuters in the Netherlands,” Transportation Research Part D 71 (2019) 222–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. D. Robertson, S. R. Meister, and W. G. Vanlaar, Automated Vehicles: Driver Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices, Report of The Traffic Injury Research Foundation (Ottawa, Canada, 2017a) <http://tirf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Automated-Vehicles-Driver-Knowledge-Attitudes-and-Practices-ExecutiveSummary-3.pdf> Accessed July 12, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• R. Robertson, S. R. Meister, W. G. Vanlaar, and M. M. Hing, “Automated Vehicles and Behavioral Adaptation in Canada,” Transportation Research Part A 104 (2017b) 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• P. M. Sandman, “Risk Communication: Facing Public Outrage,” EPA Journal 13: 90 (1987) 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• S. E. Shladover, “Connected and Automated Vehicle Systems,” Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 22 (2018) 190–200.
   Google Scholar
• Society of Automotive Engineers International, “Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles” (2018) <www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201806/> Accessed June 6, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• T. Stoiber, I. Schubert, R. Hoerler, and P. Burger, “Will Consumers Prefer Shared and Pooled-Use Autonomous Vehicles? A Stated Choice Experiment with Swiss Households,” Transportation Research Part D 71 (2019) 265–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sweet and K. Laidlaw, “No Longer in the Driver’s Seat: How Do Affective Motivations Impact Consumer Interest in Automated Vehicles?” Transportation 47 (2020) 2601–2634. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11116-019-10035-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Train, Discrete Choice Models with Simulation, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science 46: 2 (2000) 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” Management Information Systems Quarterly 27: 3 (2003) 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wall, V. Cuenca, K. Creef, and B. Barnes, “Attitudes and Opinions towards Intelligent Speed Adaptation,” paper presented at IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (Gold Coast, Australia, June 23-26, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• A. Wang, C. Stogios, Y. Gai, J. Vaughan, G. Ozonder, S. Lee, and M. Hatzopoulo, “Automated, Electric, or Both? Investigating the Effects of Transportation and Technology Scenarios on Metropolitan Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” Sustainable Cities and Society 40 (2018) 524–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Woldeamanuel and D. Nguyen, “Perceived Benefits and Concerns of Autonomous Vehicles: An Exploratory Study of Millennials’ Sentiments of an Emerging Market,” Transportation Economics 71 (2018) 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Xu, K. Zhang, H. Min, Z. Wang, X. Zhao, and P. Liu, “What Drives People to Accept Automated Vehicles? Findings from a Field Experiment,” Transportation Research Part C 95 (2018) 320–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Yim, “A Focus Group Study of Automated Highway Systems and Related Technologies,” California PATH Working Paper, 1997 (Berkeley: University of California).
   Google Scholar
• F. El Zarwi, A. Vij, and J. L. Walker, “A Discrete Choice Framework for Modeling and Forecasting Adoption and Diffusion of New Transportation Services,” Transportation Research C: Emerging Technologies 79 (2017) 207–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Zhang, D. Tao, X. Qu, X. Zhang, R. Lin, and W. Zhang, “The Roles of Initial Trust and Perceived Risk in Public’s Acceptance of Automated Vehicles,” Transportation Research Part C 98 (2019) 207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zmud, I. N. Sener, and J. Wagner, “Consumer Acceptance and Travel Behavior Impacts of Autonomous Vehicles,” Texas Transportation Institute Report (College Station: Texas Transportation Institute, 2016).
   Google Scholar