Coworking Spaces and Well-Being: An Empirical Investigation of Coworkers in Italy

References

• M. Akhavan, M. Ilaria and F. Rossi, “The Rise of Coworking Spaces in Peripheral and Rural Areas in Italy,” Territorio - Sezione Open Access, (97-Supplemento) (2021) 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• M. Akhavan, “Third Places for Work: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature on Coworking Spaces and Makerspaces,” in I. Mariotti, S. Di Vita, and M. Akhavan, eds., New Workplaces: Location Patterns, Urban Effects and Development Trajectories (Cham: Springer International, 2021) 13–32.
   Google Scholar
• M. Akhavan and I. Mariotti, “The Effects of Coworking Spaces on Local Communities in the Italian Context,” Territorio 87: 8 (2018) 85–92.
   Google Scholar
• V. Avdikos and A. Kalogeresis, “Socio-Economic Profile and Working Conditions of Freelancers in Co-Working Spaces and Work Collectives: Evidence from the Design Sector in Greece,” Area 49: 1 (2017) 35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Avdikos and J. Merkel, “Supporting Open, Shared and Collaborative Workspaces and Hubs: Recent Transformations and Policy Implications,” Urban Research and Practice 13: 3 (2020) 348–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.-A. Balland, R. Boschma, and K. Frenken, “Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics,” Regional Studies 49: 6 (2015) 907–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. A. Bentley, S. T. T. Teo, L. McLeod, F. Tan, R. Bosua, and M. Gloet, “The Role of Organizational Support in Teleworker Well-being: A Socio-Technical Systems Approach,” Applied Ergonomics 52 (2016) 207–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Bilandzic, “Connected Learning in the Library as a Product of Hacking, Making, Social Diversity and Messiness,” Interactive Learning Environments 24: 1 (2016) 158–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Boschma, “Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment,” Regional Studies 39: 1 (2005) 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. B. Bouncken and A. J. Reuschl, “Coworking-Spaces: How a Phenomenon of the Sharing Economy Builds a Novel Trend for the Workplace and for Entrepreneurship,” Review of Managerial Science 12 (2018) 317–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. A. Bowling, K. J. Eschleman, and Q. Wang, “A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Subjective Well-Being,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 83: 4 (2010) 915–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Brown, “Curating the ‘Third Place’ Coworking and the Mediation of Creativity,” Geoforum 82 (March 2017) 112–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Capdevila, “Knowledge Dynamics in Localized Communities: Coworking Spaces as Microclusters,” SSRN Electronic Journal (December 9, 2013) <https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2414121> Accessed July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• I. Capdevila, “Coworkers, Makers, and Fabbers Global, Local and Internal Dynamics of Innovation in Localized Communities in Barcelona” (PhD thesis, HEC Montréal École affiliée à l‘Université de Montréal, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• I. Capdevila, “A Typology of Localized Spaces of Collaborative Innovation,” in M. van Ham, D. Reuschke, R. Kleinhans, S. Syrett, and C. Mason, eds, Entrepreneurial Neighbourhoods: Towards an Understanding of the Economies of Neighbourhoods and Communities (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017) 80–97.
   Google Scholar
• I. Capdevila, “Joining a Collaborative Space: Is It Really A Better Place to Work?” Journal of Business Strategy 40: 2 (2019) 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• A. E. Clark, “Job Satisfaction in Britain,” British Journal of Industrial Relations 4 (1996) 341–372.
   Google Scholar
• N. Clifton, A. Füzi, and G. Loudon, “Coworking in the Digital Economy: Context, Motivations, and Outcomes,” Futures 135 (2019) 102439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Croce, E. Di Porto, E. Ghignoni, and A. Ricci, “Agglomeration and Workplace Training: Knowledge Spillovers Versus Poaching,” Regional Studies 51: 11 (2016) 1635–1651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Diener, “Subjective Well-being,” Psychological Bulletin 95 (1984) 542–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Diener, S. Oishi and R. E. Lucas, “Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and Life Satisfaction,” in C. R. Snyder and S. J. Lopez, eds, Handbook of Positive Psychology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) 463–473.
   Google Scholar
• M. Di Marino and K. Lapintie, “Libraries as Transitory Workspaces and Spatial Incubators,” Library and Information Science Research 37: 2 (2015) 118–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Di Marino and K. Lapintie, “Emerging Workplaces in Post-Functionalist Cities,” Journal of Urban Technology 24: 3 (2017) 5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. A. Easterlin, “Will Raising the Incomes of all Increase the Happiness of All?” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27: 1 (1995) 35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Florida, Cities and the Creative Class (New York: Routledge, 2005)
   Google Scholar
• B. S. Frey and A. Stutzer, “Happiness, Economy and Institutions,” The Economic Journal 110 (October 2000) 918–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Fuzi, “Co-Working Spaces for Promoting Entrepreneurship in Sparse Regions: The Case of South Wales,” Regional Studies, Regional Science 2: 1 (2015) 462–469.
   Google Scholar
• A. Gandini, “The Rise of Coworking Spaces: A Literature Review,” Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organizations 15: 1 (2015) 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• L. E. Garrett, G. M. Spreitzer, and P. A. Bacevice, “Co-Constructing a Sense of Community at Work: The Emergence of Community in Coworking Spaces,” Organization Studies 38: 6 (2017) 821–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. H. Gavin and R. O. Mason, “The Virtuous Organization: The Value of Happiness in the Workplace,” Organizational Dynamics 33 (2004) 379–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Gerdenitsch, T. E. Scheel, J. Andorfer, and C. Korunka, “Coworking Spaces: A Source of Social Support for Independent Professionals,” Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016) 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hamari, M. Sjöklint, and A. Ukkonen, “The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67: 9 (2016) 2047–2059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Hodson, Dignity at Work (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• A. C. Jamal, “Coworking Spaces in Mid-Sized Cities: A Partner in Downtown Economic Development,” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50: 4 (2018) 773–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Johns and G. Lynda, “The Third Wave of Virtual Work,” Harvard Business Review (January–February 2013) <http://hbr.org/2013/01/the-third-wave-of-virtual-work/ar/1> Accessed September 2017.
   Google Scholar
• T. A. Judge, C. J. Thoresen, J. E. Bono, and G. K. Patton, “The Job Satisfaction-Job Performance Relationship: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review,” Psychological Bulletin 127: 3 (2001) 376–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. L. Joroff, “Workplace Mind Shifts,” Journal of Corporate Real Estate 4: 3 (2002) 266–274.
   Google Scholar
• D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz, Well Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (New York: Russell Sage, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• D. Kahneman and A. Krueger, “Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2006) 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Kelliher and D. Anderson,: “Doing More with Less? Flexible Working Practices and the Intensification of Work” Human Relations 63: 1 (2010) 83–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Kenny, “Does Growth Cause Happiness, or Does Happiness Cause Growth?” Kyklos 52 (1999) 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. B. Krueger and D. Schkade, “The Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Measures,” Journal of Public Economics 92: 8/9 (2008) 1833–1845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kwiatkowski and B. Buczynski, Coworking: How Freelancers Escape the Coffee Shop Office (Fort Collins, Colorado, US: Cohere Coworking, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• I. Manzini-Ceinar and I. Mariotti, “Teleworking in Post-Pandemic Times: May Local Coworking Spaces Be the Future Trend?” Romanian Journal of Regional Science 15: 1 (2021) 52–76.
   Google Scholar
• I. Mariotti, C. Pacchi, and S. Di Vita, “Coworking Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects,” Journal of Urban Technology 24: 3 (2017) 47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Mariotti and D. Di Matteo “Coworking in Emergenza Covid-19: Quali Effetti Per Le Aree Periferiche?” EyesReg 10: 2 (2020) <http://www.eyesreg.it/2020/coworking-in-emergenza-covid-19-quali-effetti-per-le-aree-periferiche/> Accessed January 2021.
   Google Scholar
• I. Mariotti, M. Akhavan, and D. Di Matteo, “The Geography of Coworking Spaces and the Effects on the Urban Context: Are Pole Areas Gaining?” in I. Mariotti, S. Di Vita, and M. Akhavan, eds, New Workplaces: Location Patterns, Urban Effects, and Development Trajectories. (Cham: Springer International, 2021a) 169–194.
   Google Scholar
• I. Mariotti, S. Di Vita, and M. Akhavan, eds, New Workplaces: Location Patterns, Urban Effects, and Development Trajectories (Cham: Springer International, 2021b).
   Google Scholar
• I. Mariotti, M. Akhavan, and F. Rossi, “The Preferred Location of Coworking Spaces in Italy: An Empirical Investigation in Urban and Peripheral Areas,” European Planning Studies (2021c). DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1895080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. M. Mason and M. A. Griffin, “Group Task Satisfaction: The Group’s Shared Attitude to its Task and Work Environment,” Group and Organization Management 30: 6 (2005) 625–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Merkel, “Coworking in the City,” Ephemera | Theory and Politics in Organisation 15 (2015) 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• J. Merkel,: “‘Freelance isn’t Free:’ Co-working As a Critical Urban Practice to Cope with Informality in Creative Labour Markets,” Urban Studies 56: 3 (2019) 526–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Moriset, “Building New Places of the Creative Economy. The Rise of Coworking Spaces,” in 2nd Geography of Innovation International Conference 2014 Utrecht University, Utrecht, 23-25 January 2014: 24.
   Google Scholar
• R. L. Morrison and K. A. Macky, “The Demands and Resources Arising from Shared Office Spaces,” Applied Ergonomics 60 (2017) 103–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Nenonen, “Analysing the Intangible Benefits of Work Space,” Facilities 22: 9/10 (2004) 233–239.
   Google Scholar
• J. M. Nilles, “Telecommunications and Organizational Decentralization,” IEEE Transactions on Communications 23: 10 (1975) 1142–1147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Oldenburg, D. Brissett, “The Third Place,” Qual Sociol 5 (1982) 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986754
   Google Scholar
• A. J. Oswald, “Happiness and Economic Performance,” Economic Journal 107 (1997) 1815–1831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Pacchi, “Coworking e Innovazione Urbana a Milano,” Imprese e Città 8 (2015) 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• L. Parrino, “Coworking: Assessing the Role of Proximity in Knowledge Exchange,” Knowledge Management Research and Practice 13: 3 (2015) 261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Raffaele and J. Connell, “Telecommuting and Co-working Communities: What Are the Implications for Individual and Organizational Flexibility?” in J. Sushil, J. Connell, and J. Burgess, eds, Flexible Work Organizations (New Delhi: Springer India, 2016) 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• S. Robelski, H. Keller, V. Harth, and S. Mache, “Coworking Spaces: The Better Home Office? A Psychosocial and Health-Related Perspective on an Emerging Work Environment,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16: 13 (2019) 2379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Rodríguez-Pose, “The Revenge of the Places That Don't Matter (and What to Do About It),” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11: 1 (2018) 189–209, https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
   Google Scholar
• R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being,” Annual Review of Psychology 52: 1 (2001) 141–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Spinuzzi, “Working Alone, Together: Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity,” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 26: 4 (2012) 399–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Spinuzzi, Z. Bodrožić, G. Scaratti, and S. Ivaldi, “‘Coworking Is About Community’: But What Is ‘Community’ in Coworking?” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 33: 2 (2019) 112–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Veenhoven, “Greater Happiness for a Greater Number: Is that Possible and Desirable?” Journal of Happiness Studies 11: 5 (2010) 605–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Warr, “Well-Being and the Workplace,” in D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz, eds, Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999) 394–412.
   Google Scholar
• P. Warr, “Self-Employment, Personal Values, and Varieties of Happiness-Unhappiness,” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 23: 3 (2017) 388–401.
   Google Scholar
• H. M. Weiss and R. Cropanzano, “Affective Events Theory: A Theoretical Discussion of the Structure, Causes and Consequences of Affective Experiences at Work,” in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, eds, Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews (US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press, 1996) 1–74.
   Google Scholar
• R. Yu, M. Burke, and N. Raad, “Exploring Impact of Future Flexible Working Model Evolution on Urban Environment, Economy and Planning,” Journal of Urban Management 8: 3 (2019) 447–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar