Uncertainty in Market-Mediated Technology Transfer and Geographical Diffusion: Evidence from Chinese Technology Flow

References

• Z. J. Acs, D. B. Audretsch and M. P. Feldman, “R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 76:2 (1994) 336–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Aghion, J. Cai, M. Dewatripont, L. Du, A. Harrison and P. Legros, “Industrial Policy and Competition,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7:4 (2015) 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Argote, Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer US, New York, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• L. Argote and P. Ingram, “Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82:1 (2000) 150–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Arora, “Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy,” Industrial and Corporate Change 10:2 (2001) 419–451.
   Google Scholar
• A. Arora and A. Fosfuri, “Licensing the Market for Technology,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 52:2 (2003) 277–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Arora, A. Fosfuri and A. Gambardella, “Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy,” Industrial and Corporate Change 10:2 (2001) 419–451.
   Google Scholar
• A. Arora, A. Fosfuri and A. Gambardella, Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• A. Arora and A. Gambardella, “Complementarity and External Linkages: The Strategies of the Large Firms in Biotechnology,” The Journal of Industrial Economics 38:4 (1990) 361–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. J. Arrow, “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention,” in ed., C. K. Rowley, Readings in Industrial Economics (Springer, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 1972) 219–236.
   Google Scholar
• A. Arundel and A. Geuna, “Proximity and the Use of Public Science by Innovative European Firms,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13:6 (2004) 559–580.
   Google Scholar
• B. T. Asheim and A. Isaksen, “Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge,” The Journal of Technology Transfer 27:1 (2002) 77–86
   Google Scholar
• D. B. Audretsch, B. Bozeman, K. L. Combs, M. Feldman, A. N. Link, D. S. Siegel, P. Stephan, G. Tassey and C. Wessner, “The Economics of Science and Technology,” The Journal of Technology Transfer 27:2 (2002) 155–203.
   Google Scholar
• D. B. Audretsch and M. P. Feldman, “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production,” The American Economic Review 86:3 (1996) 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. B. Audretsch and M. Keilbach, “Resolving the Knowledge Paradox: Knowledge-Spillover Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth,” Research Policy 37:10 (2008) 1697–1705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. B. Audretsch and P. E. Stephan, “Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology,” The American Economic Review 86:3 (1996) 641–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Autio and T. Laamanen, “Measurement and Evaluation of Technology Transfer: Review of Technology Transfer Mechanisms and Indicators,” International Journal of Technology Management 10:7–8 (1995) 643–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. M. Azagra-Caro, D. Barberá-Tomás, M. Edwards-Schachter and E. M. Tur, “Dynamic Interactions between University-Industry Knowledge Transfer Channels: A Case Study of the Most Highly Cited Academic Patent,” Research Policy 46:2 (2017) 463–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.-A. Balland, R. Boschma and K. Frenken, “Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics,” Regional Studies 49:6 (2015) 907–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bathelt and S. Henn, “The Geographies of Knowledge Transfers over Distance: Toward a Typology,” Environment and Planning A 46:6 (2014) 1403–1424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Battistella, A. F. De Toni and R. Pillon, “Inter-Organisational Technology/Knowledge Transfer: A Framework from Critical Literature Review,” The Journal of Technology Transfer 41:5 (2015) 1195–1234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Beaudry and A. Schiffauerova, “Who's Right, Marshall or Jacobs? The Localization Versus Urbanization Debate,” Research Policy 38:2 (2009) 318–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Bidault and W. A. Fischer, “Technology Transactions: Networks over Markets,” R&D Management 24:4 (1994) 373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Boschma, “Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment,” Regional Studies 39:1 (2005) 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Boschma, R. H. Eriksson and U. Lindgren, “Labour Market Externalities and Regional Growth in Sweden: The Importance of Labour Mobility between Skill-Related Industries,” Regional Studies 48:10 (2014) 1669–1690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Bozeman, “Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory,” Research Policy 29:4–5 (2000) 627–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Bozeman, H. Rimes and J. Youtie, “The Evolving State-of-the-Art in Technology Transfer Research: Revisiting the Contingent Effectiveness Model,” Research Policy 44:1 (2015) 34–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. G. Branstetter, “Are Knowledge Spillovers International or Intranational in Scope?: Microeconometric Evidence from the US and Japan,” Journal of International Economics 53:1 (2001) 53–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Breschi and F. Lissoni, “Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey,” Industrial and Corporate Change 10:4 (2001) 975–1005.
   Google Scholar
• S. Breschi, F. Lissoni and F. Malerba, “Knowledge-Relatedness in Firm Technological Diversification,” Research Policy 32:1 (2003) 69–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Burhop and N. Wolf, “The German Market for Patents During the “Second Industrialization,” 1884–1913: A Gravity Approach,” Business History Review 87:1 (2013) 69–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Cairncross, “The Death of Distance,” RSA Journal 149:5502 (2002) 40–42.
   Google Scholar
• R. Capello, A. Caragliu and P. Nijkamp, “Territorial Capital and Regional Growth: Increasing Returns in Knowledge Use,” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 102:4 (2010) 385–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Caragliu and P. Nijkamp, “Space and Knowledge Spillovers in European Regions: The Impact of Different Forms of Proximity on Spatial Knowledge Diffusion,” Journal of Economic Geography 16:3 (2016) 749–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Catherine, “Evolution of the Geography of Innovation: Evidence from Patent Data,” Growth and Change 33:4 (2002) 393–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. T. Coe and E. Helpman, “International R&D Spillovers,” European Economic Review 39:5 (1995) 859–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Drivas and C. Economidou, “Is Geographic Nearness Important for Trading Ideas? Evidence from the US,” The Journal of Technology Transfer 40:4 (2015) 629–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, “The Triple Helix—University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development,” EASST Review 14:1 (1995) 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• M. Feldmann, The Geography of Innovation (Dordrecht: Springer, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• R. D. Fitjar and M. Gjelsvik, “Why Do Firms Collaborate with Local Universities?,” Regional Studies 52:11 (2018) 1525–1536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. D. Fitjar, F. Huber and A. Rodríguez-Pose, “Not Too Close, Not Too Far: Testing the Goldilocks Principle of ‘Optimal’ Distance in Innovation Networks,” Industry and Innovation 23:6 (2016) 465–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Fosfuri, “The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing,” Strategic Management Journal 27:12 (2006) 1141–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gambardella, “‘Successes’ and ‘Failures’ in the Markets for Technology,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18:1 (2002) 52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. Gertler, “Tacit Knowledge and the Economic Geography of Context, or the Undefinable Tacitness of Being (There),” Journal of Economic Geography 3:1 (2003) 75–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Gittelman, “Does Geography Matter for Science-Based Firms? Epistemic Communities and the Geography of Research and Patenting in Biotechnology,” Organization Science 18:4 (2007) 724–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Griliches, “Returns to Research and Development Expenditures in the Private Sector,” in J. W. Kendrick and B. N. Vaccara, (ed), New Developments in Productivity Measurement (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980) 419–462.
   Google Scholar
• R. Gulati, “Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly (1995) 619–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. G. Harris, “The Knowledge-Based Economy: Intellectual Origins and New Economic Perspectives,” International Journal of Management Reviews 3:1 (2001) 21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Hong, “Decline of the Center: The Decentralizing Process of Knowledge Transfer of Chinese Universities from 1985 to 2004,” Research Policy 37:4 (2008) 580–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. G. Z. Hu and A. B. Jaffe, “Patent Citations and International Knowledge Flow: The Cases of Korea and Taiwan,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 21:6 (2003) 849–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Huggins, S. Luo and P. Thompson, “The Competitiveness of China's Leading Regions: Benchmarking Their Knowledge-Based Economies,” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 105:3 (2014) 241–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. B. Jaffe, “Real Effects of Academic Research,” The American Economic Review 79:5 (1989) 957–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg, Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• A. B. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg and R. Henderson, “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics (1993) 577–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Johnston and R. Huggins, “Drivers of University–Industry Links: The Case of Knowledge-Intensive Business Service Firms in Rural Locations,” Regional Studies 50:8 (2015) 1330–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kalapouti and N. C. Varsakelis, “Intra and Inter: Regional Knowledge Spillovers in European Union,” The Journal of Technology Transfer 40:5 (2015) 760–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Kirchberger and L. Pohl, “Technology Commercialization: A Literature Review of Success Factors and Antecedents across Different Contexts,” The Journal of Technology Transfer 41:5 (2016) 1077–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Kroll and I. Liefner, “Spin-Off Enterprises as a Means of Technology Commercialisation in a Transforming Economy—Evidence from Three Universities in China,” Technovation 28:5 (2008) 298–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. R. Krugman, Geography and Trade (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991).
   Google Scholar
• N. R. Lamoreaux and K. L. Sokoloff, “Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries,” in eds., N. Lamoreaux et al., Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999) 19–60.
   Google Scholar
• W. -H. Liu, “The Role of Proximity to Universities for Corporate Patenting: Provincial Evidence from China,” Ann Reg Sci 51:1 (2013) 273–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. J. Malecki, “Cities and Regions Competing in the Global Economy: Knowledge and Local Development Policies,” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25:5 (2007) 638–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Malerba, L. Orsenigo and P. Peretto, “Persistence of Innovative Activities, Sectoral Patterns of Innovation and International Technological Specialization,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 15:6 (1997) 801–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Maruseth and B. Verspagen, “Knowledge-Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citation Analysis,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 104:4 (2002) 531–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Maskell and A. Malmberg, “Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 23:2 (1999) 167–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. J. Mayer and R. M. Salomon, “Capabilities, Contractual Hazards, and Governance: Integrating Resource-Based and Transaction Cost Perspectives,” Academy of Management Journal 49:5 (2006) 942–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Moreno, R. Paci and S. Usai, “Innovation Clusters in the European Regions,” European Planning Studies 14:9 (2006) 1235–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. C. Mowery and A. A. Ziedonis, “Markets Versus Spillovers in Outflows of University Research,” Research Policy 44:1 (2015) 50–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. J. Nelson, “Measuring Knowledge Spillovers: What Patents, Licenses and Publications Reveal About Innovation Diffusion,” Research Policy 38:6 (2009) 994–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. R. Nelson, “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research,” Journal of Political Economy 67:3 (1959) 297–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Peri, “Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation,” Review of Economics and Statistics 87:2 (2005) 308–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Radosevich, “A Model for Entrepreneurial Spin-Offs from Public Technology Sources,” International Journal of Technology Management 10:7–8 (1995) 879–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Rivera-Batiz and P. Romer, “Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106:2 (1990) 531–555.
   Google Scholar
• P. Rond and C. Hussler, “Innovation in Regions: What Does Really Matter?,” Research Policy 34:8 (2005) 1150–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Schmidt, “Balancing the Spatial Localisation ‘Tilt’: Knowledge Spillovers in Processes of Knowledge-Intensive Services,” Geoforum 65(2015) 374–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Seo and J. W. Sonn, “Conflicting Motivations and Knowledge Spill-Overs: Dynamics of the Market across Space,” Geoforum 105 (2019a) 210–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Seo and J. W. Sonn, “The Persistence of Inter-Regional Hierarchy in Technology Transfer Networks: An Analysis of Chinese Patent Licensing Data,” Growth and Change 50:1 (2019b) 145–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Shearmur, “Innovation, Regions and Proximity: From Neo-Regionalism to Spatial Analysis,” Regional Studies 45:9 (2011) 1225–1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. W. Sonn and M. Storper, “The Increasing Importance of Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Production: An Analysis of Us Patent Citations, 1975–1997,” Environ Plan A 40:5 (2008) 1020–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. L. Ter Wal, “The Dynamics of the Inventor Network in German Biotechnology: Geographic Proximity Versus Triadic Closure,” Journal of Economic Geography 14:3 (2013) 589–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. van Hemert, E. Masurel and P. Nijkamp, “The Role of Knowledge Sources of Smes for Innovation Perception and Regional Innovation Policy,” Regional Science Policy and Practice 3:3 (2011) 163–179.
   Google Scholar
• A. Varga, D. Pontikakis and G. Chorafakis, “Metropolitan Edison and Cosmopolitan Pasteur? Agglomeration and Interregional Research Network Effects on European R&D Productivity,” Journal of Economic Geography 14:2 (2014) 229–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Verspagen, “Large Firms and Knowledge Flows in the Dutch R&D System: A Case Study of Philips Electronics,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 11:2 (1999) 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, Z. Zhou and J. Li-Ying, “The Impact of Licensed-Knowledge Attributes on the Innovation Performance of Licensee Firms: Evidence from the Chinese Electronic Industry,” The Journal of Technology Transfer 38:5 (2013) 699–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Zander and B. Kogut, “Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test,” Organization Science 6:1 (1995) 76–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar