The Local and Global State of Theater Education Research and Policy

REFERENCES

• Anderson, M., J. Carroll, and D. Cameron. 2009. Drama education with digital technology. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and K. Skolberg. 2009. Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arts Education Partnership. 2012. State of the states. Accessed August 11, 2013, at http://www.aep-arts.org/research-policy/state-policy-database/state-policy-summary-2012/.
   Google Scholar
• Badham, M. 2010. The menace of measurement: A discussion about arts indicators. Regina, Saskatchewan: Saskatchewan Arts Alliance. Accessed May 21, 2014, at http://www.academia.edu/1366194/The_Menace_of_Measurement_A_discussion_about_arts_indicators.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, J. D. 2006. Multimedia arts learning in an activity system: New literacies for at risk children. International Journal of Education and the Arts 7 (7): 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Brenchly, Cameron. 2012. ED releases new report on arts education in U.S. public schools. HomeRoom, U.S. Department of Education. Accessed May 21, 2014, at http://www.ed.gov/blog/2012/04/ed-releases-new-report-on-arts-education-in-u-s-public-schools/.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, R. 2013. A time for alliances: A reflection on the emergence of the World Alliance for Arts Education. In International yearbook for research in arts education, Vol. 1, ed. E. Liebau, E. Wagner, and M. Wyman, 23–32. Münster: Waxman.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. 2000. Achieving technological literacy: A national perspective. Technology Teacher 60 (1): 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. 2004. Digital pre-text: Process drama and everyday technology. In State of our art: NSW perspectives in educational drama, ed. C. Hatton and M. Anderson, 66–76. Sydney: Currency Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J., M. Anderson, and D. Cameron. 2006. Real players?: Drama, technology, and education. Staffordshire, England: Trentham Books Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Catterall, James S. 2009. Doing well and doing good by doing art: The effects of education in the visual and performing arts on the achievements and values of young adults. Los Angeles/London: Imagination Group/I-Group Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., P. Piazza, and C. Power. 2012. The politics of accountability: Assessing teacher education in the United States. Educational Forum 77 (1): 6–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D. 2002. Randomized experiments in educational policy research: A critical examination of the reasons the educational evaluation community has offered for not doing them. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24 (3): 175–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMoss, K., and T. Morris. 2002. How arts integration supports student learning: Students shed light on the connections. Chicago: Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education (CAPE).
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, P. 2012. Problem finders in problem spaces: A review of cognitive research for drama in education. Youth Theatre Journal 26 (2): 120–32.
   Google Scholar
• Dugger, E. William. 2010. Evolution of STEM in the United States. Paper presented at the 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Australia, December 8–11. Accessed May 21, 2014, at http://www.iteea.org/Resources/PressRoom/AustraliaPaper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Enciso, P., and B. Edmiston. 1997. Drama and response to literature: Reading the text and re-reading the truth. In Reader response in elementary classroom: Quest and discovery, ed. N. Karolides, 69–94. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, G. M., and C. L. Carney. 2012. Challenging the spectacle: A case study on education policy advocacy. International Journal of Leadership and Change.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S., and A. Roach. 1999. Imaginative actuality: Learning in the arts during nonschool hours. In Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning, ed. E. Fiske, 19–34. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership and President's Committee on the Arts and Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Hetland, L., E. Winner, V. Shirley, and K. Sheridan. 2007. Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• InSEA. n.d. About. Accessed August 28, 2013, at http://www.insea.org/insea/about.
   Google Scholar
• International Reading Association. 2012. Adolescent literacy: A position statement of the International Reading Association. Accessed June 7, 2014, at http://www.reading.org/Libraries/resources/ps1079_adolescentliteracy_rev2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. P. 2008. Multimodal literacy in the theatre education classroom. Arts Education Policy Review 109 (5): 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 1992. Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structural perspectives. Theory into Practice: Qualitative Issues in Educational Research 31 (2): 87–99.
   Google Scholar
• Leong, S. 2013. Polylogue II World Summit on Arts Education 2013: An overview. In International yearbook for research in arts education, Vol. 1, ed. E. Liebau, E. Wagner, and M. Wyman, 12–17. Münster: Waxman.
   Google Scholar
• Lobo, Y. B., and A. Winsler. 2006. The effects of a creative dance and movement program on the social competence of head start preschoolers. Social Development 15:501–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locher, P. E., C. E. Martindale, and L. E. Dorfman. 2006. New directions in aesthetics, creativity and the arts. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Maltese, A. V., F. Lung, G. Potvin, and C. Hochbein. 2013. STEM education in the United States. Australian Council of Learned Academies. Accessed May 21, 2014, at http://www.acolasecretariat.org.au/ACOLA/PDF/SAF02Consultants/Consultant%20Report%20-%20US.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, C. Y., K. M. Steedly, and M. S. Thormann. 2008. Impact of arts integration on voice, choice, and access. Teacher Education and Special Education 31 (1): 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• McCammon, L., J. Saldaña, A. Hines, and M. Omasta. 2012. Lifelong impact: Adult perceptions of their high school speech and/or theatre participation. Youth Theatre Journal 26 (1): 2–25.
   Google Scholar
• Medina, C. 2006. Identity and imagination of immigrant children: Creating common place locations in literary interpretation. In Process drama and multiple literacies: Addressing social, cultural, and ethical issues, ed. J. J. Schneider and T. P. Crumple, 182–94. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Melnick, S. A., J. T. Witmer, and M. J. Strickland. 2011. Cognition and student learning through the arts. Arts Education Policy Review 112 (3): 154–62.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB). 2008. 2008 arts education assessment framework. USDOE Publication RN 92167001. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Coalition for Core Arts Standards. n.d. National core arts standards: A conceptual framework for arts learning. Accessed June 7, 2014, at http://nccas.wikispaces.com/Conceptual+Framework.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2011. New coalition will lead the revision of the National Standards for Arts Education [press release]. June 9. Accessed May 21, 2014, at http://www.arteducators.org/news/6-11_New_coalition_National_Standards_for_Arts_Education.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Noice, H., and T. Noice. 2006. What studies of actors and acting can tell us about memory and cognitive functioning. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 (1): 14–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Farrell, L. 2013. Reviewing UNESCO's road map and Seoul agenda: Guidelines and an action plan to advance arts education. In International yearbook for research in arts education, Vol. 1, ed. E. Liebau, E. Wagner, and M. Wyman, 17–22. Münster: Waxman.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, B., and D. Sexton. 2009. Threat rigidity, school reform, and how teachers view their work inside current education policy contexts. American Educational Research Journal 46 (1): 9–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omasta, M., and D. Snyder-Young. 2014. Gaps, silences and comfort zones: Dominant paradigms in educational drama and applied theatre discourse. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 19 (1): 7–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plato. 1962. The Republic. Trans. A. H. Gilbert. Literacy Criticism: Plato to Dryden. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabkin, N., and E. Hedberg. 2011. Arts education in America: What the declines mean for arts participation. Research Report #52. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Respress, T., and G. Lufti. 2006. Whole brain learning: The fine arts with students at risk. Reclaiming Children & Youth 15 (1): 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rostan, S. M. 2010. Studio learning: Motivation, competence, and the development of young art students’ talent and creativity. Creativity Research Journal 22 (3): 261–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabol, R. F. 2013. Seismic shifts in the education landscape: What do they mean for arts education and arts education policy. Arts Education Policy Review 114 (1): 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, S. 1999. Stand and unfold yourself. Report on the Shakespeare & Co. Summer Shakespeare Program. In Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning, ed. E. Fiske, 79–90. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership and President's Committee on the Arts and Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, S., S. Tishman, E. Winner, L. Hetland, and P. Palmer. 2009. The qualities of quality: Understanding excellence in arts education. Commissioned by the Wallace Foundation. Cambridge, MA: Project Zero. Accessed July 16, 2014 at http://www.ellenwinner.com/uploads/7/0/0/0/7000655/qoqreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smithrim, K., and R. Upitis. 2005. Learning through the arts: Lessons of engagement. Canadian Journal of Education 28 (1/2): 109–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa D., and T. Pilecki. 2013. From STEM to STEAM: Using brain-compatible strategies to integrate the arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Standley, J. M. 1996. A meta-analysis on the effects of music as reinforcement for education/therapy objectives. Journal of Research in Music Education 44 (2): 105–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, L. M. 2011. Creating destiny: Youth, arts and social change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Accessed July 16, 2014, at http://www.artsedsearch.org/summaries/creating-destiny-youth-arts-and-social-change#sthash.bmG0HrcX.dpuf.
   Google Scholar
• Tarnoff, John. 2010. STEM to STEAM—Recognizing the value of creative skills in the competitiveness debate. The Blog. Huffington Post, October 14. Accessed May 21, 2014, at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-tarnoff/stem-to-steam-recognizing_b_756519.html.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P. 2003. Education policy. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2001. Introducing UNESCO. Accessed August 28, 2013, at https://en.unesco.org/about-us/introducing-unesco.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2006. Road map for arts education: The World Conference on Arts Education: Building creative capacities for the 21st century. Accessed August 28, 2013 at http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/ev.php-URL_ID=30335&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2010. The Second World Conference on Arts Education: Seoul agenda: Goals for the development of arts education. Accessed August 28, 2013, at http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/CLT/pdf/Seoul_Agenda_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. n.d. National assessment of educational progress. Accessed July 16, 2014 at http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/.
   Google Scholar
• Vasavada, N., E. Carman, B. Hart, and D. Luisier. 2010. Common Core state standards alignment. Reston, VA: The College Board Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, E., C. Tabone, and G. Weltsek. 2011. When achievement data meet drama and arts integration. Language Arts 88 (5): 365–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wiessner, C. A. 2005. Storytellers: Women crafting new knowing and better worlds. Convergence 38 (4): 101–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J. L. M., G. Graham, S. Parker, S. Westfall, R. G. Fraser, and M. Tembo. 2003. Time in the arts and physical education and school achievement. Journal of Curriculum Studies 35 (6): 721–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, E., L. Hetland, S. Veenema, K. Sheridan, P. Palmer, I. Locher, et al. 2006. Studio thinking: How visual arts teaching can promote disciplined habits of mind. In New Directions in Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 189–205.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E., and S. Vincent-Lancrin. 2013. The impact of arts education: Evidence and agenda for future research. In International yearbook for research in arts education, ed. E. Liebau, E. Wagner, and M. Wyman, 1:71–78. Münster: Waxman.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S., and P. Enciso. 1994. Multiple selves in literary interpretation: Engagement and the language of drama. In Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory, and practice: Forty-third yearbook of the National Reading Conference, ed. C. Kinzer and D. Leu, 351–60. Chicago: National Reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S., B. Edmiston, and P. Enciso. 1997. Drama worlds: Places of the heart, head, voice, and hand in dramatic interpretation. In Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative visual arts, ed. J. Flood, S. B. Heath, and D. Lapp, 492–505. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R., L. John, R. Alaggia, and J. Sheel. 2006. Community-based arts program for youth in low-income communities: A multi-method evaluation. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 23:635–52.
   Google Scholar