1,027
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

U.S. Arts Education Requirements

REFERENCES

  • Abril, C., and B. Gault. 2008. The state of music in secondary schools: The principal's perspective. Journal of Research in Music Education 56 (1): 68–81.
  • Balduf, M. 2009. Underachievement among college students. Journal of Advanced Academics 20 (2): 274–94.
  • Benedict, C. 2007. Naming our reality: Negotiating and creating meaning in the margin. Philosophy of Music Education Review 15 (1): 23–35.
  • Beveridge, T. 2010. No Child Left Behind and fine arts classes. Arts Education Policy Review 111 (1): 4–7.
  • Bourke, B., N. Bray, and C. Horton. 2009. Approaches to the core curriculum. Journal of General Education 58 (4): 219–40.
  • Carlson, D., and M. Planty. 2011. The ineffectiveness of high school graduation credit requirement reforms: A story of implementation and enforcement? Educational Policy, August 25.
  • Chapman, L. 2004. No Child Left Behind in art? Arts Education Policy Review 106 (2): 3–17.
  • Cohen, J. 1992. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1): 155–59.
  • Conley, D. 2010. College and career ready: Helping all students succeed beyond high school. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
  • Costes, T. 2005. New music: How music educators can save an endangered species. Music Educators Journal 92 (2): 50–54.
  • Council for Basic Education. 2004. Academic atrophy: The condition of the liberal arts in America's public schools. Accessed March 22, 2011, at http://downloads.ncss.org/legislative/AcademicAtrophy.pdf.
  • Detels, C. 1999. Hard boundaries and the marginalization of the arts in American education. Philosophy of Music Education Review 7 (1): 19–30.
  • ———. 2001. Towards a redefinition of the role of the arts in education: Extrapolations from Ernest Gellner's “Plough, Sword, and Book.” Philosophy of Music Education Review 9 (2): 11–18.
  • Frierson-Campbell, C. 2007. Connections with the schooling enterprise: Implications for music education policy. Arts Education Policy Review 108 (6): 33–38.
  • Heilig, J., H. Cole, and A. Aguilar. 2010. From Dewey to No Child Left Behind: The evolution of and devolution of public arts education. Arts Education Policy Review 111 (4): 136–45.
  • Heimonen, M. 2006. Justifying the right to music education. Philosophy of Music Education Review 14 (2): 119–41.
  • Hourigan, R. 2011. Race to the Top: Implications for professional development in arts education. Arts Education Policy Review 112 (2): 60–64.
  • Kratus, J. 2007. Music education at the tipping point. Music Educators Journal 94 (2): 42–48.
  • National Association of Schools of Music (NASM). 2008. Handbook. Reston, VA: NASM.
  • National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE). 2011. Public education positions for 2012. Accessed March 22, 2011, at http://nasbe.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012_NASBE_Public_Education_Positions.pdf.
  • Palmer, A. 2004. Music education for the twenty-first century: A philosophical view of the general education core. Philosophy of Music Education Review 12 (2): 126–38.
  • Pederson, P. 2007. What is measured is treasured: The impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on nonassessed subjects. Clearing House 80 (6): 287–91.
  • Reid, M., and J. Moore. 2008. College readiness and academic preparation for postsecondary education: Oral histories of first-generation urban college students. Urban Education 43 (2): 240–61.
  • Schmidt, C. 1996. Who benefits? Music education and the national standards. Philosophy of Music Education Review 4 (2): 71–82.
  • Schneider, C. 2005. Measuring student achievement in the future based on lessons from the past: The NAEP arts assessment. Music Educators Journal 92 (2): 56–61.
  • Schuler, S. 2011. Music education for life: Building inclusive, effective twenty-first-century music programs. Music Educators Journal 98 (1): 8–13.
  • U.S. Department of Education. 2009. Race to the Top program executive summary. Accessed May 23, 2014, at http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf.
  • West, C. 2012. Teaching music in an era of high-stakes testing and budget reductions. Arts Education Policy Review 113 (2): 75–79.
  • Williams, D. 2001. The elephant in the room. Music Educators Journal 98 (1): 51–57.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.