Merit Pay and Music Education: A Motivation Perspective

REFERENCES

• Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Volume 2, ed. L. Berkowitz, 267–99. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ariely, D., U. Gneezy, G. Loewenstein, and N. Mazar. 2005. Large stakes and big mistakes. Working paper no. 05-11. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Accessed May 23, 2014, at http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2005/wp0511.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bergee, M. J., D. Coffman, S. Demorest, J. Humphreys, and L. Thornton. 2001. Influences on collegiate students’ decisions to become a music educator. Reston, VA: MENC—The National Association for Music Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bergee, M. J., and S. M. Demorest. 2003. Developing tomorrow's music teachers today. Music Educators Journal 89 (4): 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E., and R. Flaste. 1996. Why we do what we do: Understanding motivation. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Elpus, K. 2011. Merit pay and the music teacher. Arts Education Policy Review 112 (4): 180–90.
   Google Scholar
• Fernie, S., and D. Metcalf. 1996, June 2. “It's not what you pay, it's the way that you pay it”: Jockeys’ pay and performance. CentrePiece Magazine 1 (2): 385–411.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, C., and M. Springer. 2010. Teacher pay for performance: Context, status, and direction. Kappan 91 (8): 8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, R., and D. L. Hamann. 1999. Career choice among string music education students in American colleges and universities. Journal of Research in Music Education 47:266–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., J. F. Kain, and S. G. Rivkin. 1999. Do higher salaries buy better teachers? NBER Working Paper 7082. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, D. 2008. Do music education majors intend to teach music? An exploratory survey. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education 27 (1): 65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Heery, E. J. 1996. Performance-related pay in local government: A case study of the new industrial relations. Unpublished Ph.D. diss., University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. 2011. Obama ties economy to education and bashes Congress. The Oval (blog), September 23. USA Today. Accessed May 23, 2014, at http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/09/obama-ties-economy-to-education-and-bashes-congress/1.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. R., and G. J. Johnson. 1991. The effects of equity perceptions on union and company commitment. Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector 20 (1): 235–44.
   Google Scholar
• King, W. C., and E. W. Miles. 1993. A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior 14:133–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kluemper, D. H., K. S. Sauley, and S. G. Taylor. 2009. Equity sensitivity revisited: Contrasting unidimensional and multidimensional approaches. Journal of Business Psychology 24:299–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvet, E. J., and R. C. Watkins. 1992. Success attributes in teaching music as perceived by elementary education majors. Journal of Research in Music Education 41:70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazear, E. 1999. Performance pay and productivity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, C. K., and S. N. Kelly. 2002. First remembrances of wanting to become a music teacher. Journal of Research in Music Education 50:323–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, D., and R. Richardson. 1994. Performing for pay? The effect of “merit pay” on motivation in a public service. British Journal of Industrial Relations 32 (2): 243–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, S. H. 2010. Why do they teach? A comparison of elementary, high school, and college teachers. Education 131 (2): 437–54.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence and Education. 1983. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Accessed May 23, 2014, at http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html.
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, K., and B. Jones. 2012. Motivational constructs influencing undergraduate students’ choices to become classroom music teachers or music performers. Journal of Research in Music Education 60 (1): 101–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podgursky, M., and M. G. Springer. 2007. Teacher performance pay: A review. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 26 (4): 9–50.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. R. 2012. Preservice music teachers’ employment preferences. Journal of Research in Music Education 60 (3): 294–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, E. 2013. Districts lag in creating merit-pay tests for teachers. Orlando Sentinel, March 3. Accessed May 23, 2014, at http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2013-03-03/features/os-merit-pay-testing-20130302_1_merit-pay-standardized-tests-school-districts.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, C. 2008. Initial and changing student teacher motivation and commitment to teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 36 (2): 79–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G. 2009. Rethinking teacher compensation policies: Why now, why again? In Performance incentives: Their growing impact on American K–12 education, ed. M. G. Springer, 1–22. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, L., and M. Bergee. 2008. Career choice influences among music education students at major schools of music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 177:7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Vagi, R. 2011. Equity sensitivity among music teachers: A preliminary investigation. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar