Constructivism in the Art Classroom: Praxis and Policy

REFERENCES

• Anderson, T., and M. Milbrandt. 2004. Art for life: Authentic instruction in art. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton-Warner, S. 1986. Teacher. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Barakett, J., and E. Sacca. 2002. In Contemporary issues in art education, ed. Y. Gaudelius and P. Speiers, 61–69. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Beittel, K. R. 1973. Alternatives for art education research: Inquiry into the making of art. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2005. Against learning: Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisck Pedagogik 25:54–66.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, B. 2013. What we talk about when we talk about learning. Educare Now [blog], September 3. Accessed February 22, 2014, at http://educarenow.wordpress.com/tag/gert-biesta/.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, F. G. 1996. Celebrating pluralism: Art, education, and cultural diversity. Los Angeles: Getty.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, P. R. 2006. The project approach: An appreciation for the constructivist theory. Forum on Public Policy 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• D'Angelo, C. M., S. Touchman, and D. B. Clark. 2009. Constructivism: Overview. Education.com. Accessed January 14, 2014, at http://www.education.com/reference/article/constructivism.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., and D. Sumara. 2002. Constructivist discourses and the field of education: Problems and possibilities. Educational Theory 52 (4): 409–27.
   Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. 2006. Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. 2nd ed. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, C. P. 2011. Teacher and learner, partner and guide: The role of the teacher. In The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation, 3rd ed., ed. C. Edwards, L. Gandini, and G. Forman, 147–172. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Efland, A. 1976. The school art style: A functional analysis. Studies in Art Education 17 (2): 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2002. Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. 1972. Educating artistic vision. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. 2005. Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K. 2003. Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics, and the social life of art. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friere, P., and M. B. Ramos. 1993. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gaitskell, C. D., and A. Hurwitz. 1970. Children and their art: Methods for the elementary school. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudelius, Y. M., and P. Speiers. 2002. Contemporary issues in art education. New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. 2013. Applying constructivism to the art classroom. Hours of Idleness [blog], March 29. Accessed March 2, 2014, at https://hoursofidleness.wordpress.com/page/3/.
   Google Scholar
• Gude, O. 2013. New school art styles: The project of art education. Art Education January: 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G., K. Inagaki, and Y. Oura. 1993. Changing conceptions of development and their implications for art education. The Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Chiba University 41 (1): 137–153.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, G. 1991. Constructivist learning: The museum and the needs of the people. Paper presented at the International Committee of Museum Educators conference, Jerusalem, October 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzog, N. 2001. Reflections and impressions from Reggio Emilia: “It's not about art!” Early Childhood Research and Practice 3 (1). http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v3n1/hertzog.html
   Google Scholar
• Hesser, J. F. 2009. Personal perspectives on constructivism in a high school art class. Art Education 62 (4): 41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hetland, L., E. Winner, S. Veenema, and K. N. Sheridan. 2007. Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., L. W. Kieling, and S. L. Cooper. 2013. East Coast/West Coast art project: A constructivist and technological approach to middle level and higher education collaboration. Art Education 66 (4): 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. 2012. The emergence of the emergent curriculum. Young Children, March, 66–68.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E., and J. Nimmo. 1994. Emergent curriculum. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
   Google Scholar
• Lankford, E. L. 2002. Aesthetic experience in constructivist museums. Journal of Aesthetic Education 36 (2): 140–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenfeld, V. 1957. Creative and mental growth, 3rd. ed. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenfeld, V., and W. L. Brittain. 1964. Creative and mental growth. 4th ed. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Malaguzzi, L. 1994. Your image of the child: Where teaching begins. Child care exchange 3. Accessed May 14, 2015, at https://www.reggioalliance.org/downloads/malaguzzi:ccie:1994.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1998. History, ideas, and basic philosophy. In The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach—Advanced reflections, 2nd ed., ed. C. Edwards, L. Gandini, and G. Forman, 49–97. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. 2005. Connecting art, learning, and creativity: A case for curriculum integration. Studies in Art Education 46 (3): 227–41.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle, F. M., and B. Piscitelli. 2002. Early childhood art education: A palimpsest. Australian Art Education 25 (1): 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Milbrandt, M. K., J. Felts, B. Richards, and N. Abghari. 2004. Teaching-to-learn: A constructivist approach as shared responsibility. Art Education 57 (5): 19–24, 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. 1999. Papert on Piaget. The century's greatest minds. Time Magazine Special Issue, March 29.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. 1995. The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Education Researcher 24 (7): 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2000. Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. 1950. The psychology of intelligence. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Read, H. 1974 (1943). Education through art. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. 2003. Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record 105 (9): 1623–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, C. 1993. The emergent curriculum and social constructivism. In The hundred languages of children, ed. C. Edwards, L. Gandini, and G. Forman, 101–112. Westport, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2006. In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching, and learning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saraniero, P. n.d. Constructivism: Actively building arts education (a brief introduction to constructivism and how arts educators can use it effectively). ArtsEdge [blog], Kennedy Center. Accessed January 4, 2014, at http://artsedge.kennedy-center.org/educators/how-to/from-theory-to-practice/constructivism.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G. 2005. Arts practice as research: Inquiry in the visual arts. New York: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. J. 2002. Constructing an artistic self: A cultural perspective. In The arts in children's lives: Context, culture, and curriculum, ed. L. Bresler and C. M. Thompson, 101–11. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. 1974. The superheroes of J. C. Holz: Plus an outline of a theory of child art. Art Education 27 (8): 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zurmuehlen, M. 1990. Studio art: Praxis, symbol, presence. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar