The Impact of Independent Directors on Organizational Effectiveness in Monetary and In-Kind Stakeholder Dialogue Museums

REFERENCES

• Aggarwal, R.K., M. Evans, and D.J. Nanda. 2007. “Access, Board Size and Incentives in Non-Profit Firms.” Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, V. 1996. “Pictures at an Exhibition: Conflicting Pressures in Museums and the Display of Art.” The American Journal of Sociology 101 (4): 797–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayuso, S., M.A. Rodriguez, and J.E. Ricart. 2006. “Using Stakeholder Dialogue as a Source for New Ideas: A Dynamic Capability Underlying Sustainable Innovation.” Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Balser, D. and J. McClusky. 2005. “Managing Stakeholder Relationships and Nonprofit Organisation Effectiveness”. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 15 (3): 295.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. 2001. “A Stakeholder Approach to Responsiveness and Accountability in Non-Profit Organizations”. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 17: 36–52
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner, A. and T. Van Hoomissen. 1991. “Nonprofit Organizations in the Mixed Economy: A Demand and Supply Analysis.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 62: 519–550.
   Google Scholar
• Boezeman, E.J. and N. Ellemers. 2008. “Pride and Respect in Volunteers’ Organizational Commitment”. European Journal of Social Psychology 38 (1): 159–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W.A. 2005. “Exploring the Association between Board and Organizational Performance in Non-Profit Organizations”. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 15 (3): 317–339.
   Google Scholar
• Callen, J.L., A. Klein, and D. Tinkelman. 2003. “Board Composition, Committees, and Organizational Efficiency: The Case of Nonprofits”. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 32: 493–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Aunno, T.A., R.I. Suttona, and R.H. Price. 1991. “Isomorphismand External Support in Conflicting Institutional Environments: A Study of Drug Abuse Treatment Units”. Academy of Management Journal 3l4: 636–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R.D. and D.O. Renz. 1998. “Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness: Contrasts between Especially Effective and Less Effective Organizations”. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 9: 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, N. and P. McDonnell. 2009. “Governance and Charities: An Exploration of Key Themes and the Development of a Research Agenda”. Financial Accountability and Management 25 (1): 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, R.T. 2009. Ten Basic Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards, 2^nd ed. Washington, DC: BoardSource.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptein, M. and R. Van Tulder. 2003. “Toward Effective Stakeholder Dialogue”. Business and Society Review 108 (2): 203–224.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J.L. 2002. “The Board as Monitor of Organizational Activity: The Applicability of Agency Theory to Nonprofit Boards”. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 12: 429–50.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell R.K., B.R. Agle, and D.J. Wood. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts”. Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 853–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences of Sidney. 2011. “Annual Report 2010.” Available at: http://publications.nsw.gov.au/pub/eb3/caf/eb3caf4f5f15aa8f50d79aad7b235c5108676d92/document.pdf. Accessed April 20, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S., W. Diaz, and J.F. O’Sullivan. 2002. “Negotiating Accountability: Managerial Lessons from Identity-Based Nonprofit Organizations”. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 31: 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrower, F. 2002. Trustees of Culture: Power, Wealth, and Status on Elite Arts Boards. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, E.R. 2006. “Making Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Operable: How Companies Translate Shareholder Dialogue into Practice”. Business and Society Review 111 (2): 137–163.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. and G.R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource-Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Puyvelde, S.V., R. Caers, C. Bois, and M. Jegers. 2011. “The Governance of Nonprofit Organizations: Integrating Agency Theory with Stakeholder and Stewardship Theories”.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly: 431–451.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, R.R. 2000. “A Review of Models for Measuring Organizational Effectiveness Among For-profit and Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 11 (1): 97--104.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, G.A. 1966. “The People Look at Commercials: A Study of Audience Behaviour”. The Journal of Business 39 (2): 272–304.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R. 1999. “Why People Cooperate with Organizations: An Identity-Based Perspective”. Research in Organizational Behavior 21: 201–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R. and S.L. Blader. 2000. Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, R.D. 2009. “The Use of Social Media by Nonprofit Organizations: An Examination from the Diffusion of Innovations Perspective”. In Handbook of Research on Social Interaction Technologies and Collaboration Software: Concepts and Trends, edited by T. Dumova and R. Fiordo, 1420--1432. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D., B. Colbert, and R.E. Freeman. 2003. “Focusing on Value: Reconciling Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and a Stakeholder Approach in a Network World”. Journal of General Management 28 (3): 1–28.
   Google Scholar