Laboratory Investigations for Dewatering of Golden Horn Dredged Sludge with Geotextile Tubes

References

• ASTM. 1994. Standard guide for collection, storage, characterisation and manipulation of sediment for toxicological testing. American Society for Testing and Material, Annual Book of Standards 11(04): E1391–96.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM. 2011. Standard Test Method for Determining the Flow Rate of Water and Suspended Solids from a Geotextile Bag - D7701. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA, 7.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM. 2013. Standard Test Method for Determining Flow Rate of Water and Suspended Solids Retention from a Closed Geosynthetic Bag - D7880/D7880M. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Aydilek, A. H. and T. B. Edil. 2002. Filtration performance of woven geotextiles with wastewater treatment sludge. Geosynthetics International 9(1): 41–69. doi:10.1680/gein.9.0210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berilgen, S. A., M. M. Berilgen, and K. Özaydın. 2005. Determination of consolidation behavior of haliç dredged material using a seepage-induced consolidation test. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 16(6): 681–690. doi:10.1108/14777830510623745
   Google Scholar
• Berilgen, S. A., P. Biçer, M. M. Berilgen, and K. Özaydın. 2006. Assessment of consolidation behavior of Golden Horn marine dredged material. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology 24: 1–16. doi:10.1080/10641190600559424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantré, S. and F. Saathoff. 2011. Design method for geotextile tubes considering strain – Formulation and verification by laboratory tests using photogrammetry. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 29(3): 201–210. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, J., W. Guo, and S. W. Yan. 2011. Geosynthetic tubes and geosynthetic mats: Analyses and applications. Geotechnical Engineering 42(1): 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, J., S. W. Yan, and W. Li. 2012. Innovative methods for dike construction – An overview. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 30: 35–42. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA, Office of Water. 2001. Methods for Collection, Storage and Manipulation of Sediments for Chemical and Toxicological Analyses: Technical Manual EPA-823-F-01–023.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, J., Toups, D., F. Duarte, and P. Gilbert. 1995. Geotextile contained dredged material, red eye crossing, Baton Rouge, LA, Western Dredging Association 16th Technical Conference & 28th Annual Texas A&M Dredging Seminar, University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Dredging Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, May 23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gaffney, D. A., L. Wells, D. Wickoren, and B. A. Skelton. 2001. Environmental benefits of dredged material contained in geotextile tubes—Drakes Creek, TN. Proceedings of Conference 32, International Erosion Control Association, Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• GRI (Geosynthetic Research Institute). 2009. Standard Test Method for the Pillow Test for Field Assessment of Fabrics/Additives Used for Geotextile Bags, Containers, and Tubes. Geosynthetics Institute (GSI), Folsom, CA, USA, GRI-GT15.
   Google Scholar
• IOC–UNEP–IMO. 2000. Global Investigation of Pollution in the Marine Environment (GIPME 2000): Guidance on Assessment of Sediment Quality, Pub. No. 439/00.
   Google Scholar
• Koerner, G. R. and R. M. Koerner. 2006. Geotextile tube assessment using a hanging bag test. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 24:129–137. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutay, M. E. 2002. Hydraulic performance of geotextile containers confining waste materials. MS thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, pp. 130.
   Google Scholar
• Kutay, M. E. and A. H. Aydilek. 2005a. Filtration performance of two-layer geotextile systems. Geotechnical Testing Journal 28(1): 1–13. doi:10.1520/gtj12580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutay, M. E. and A. H. Aydilek. 2005b. Filtration performance of two-layer geotextile systems. Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM 28(1): 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, C. R. 2008. Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering. Geosynthetics International 15(6): 384–427. doi:10.1680/gein.2008.15.6.384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshchinsky, D., O. Leshchinsky, H. I. Ling, and P. A. Gilbert. 1996. Geosynthetic tubes for confining pressurized slurry: Some design aspects. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 122(8): 682–690. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733–9410(1996)122:8(682)
   Google Scholar
• Liao, K., and S. K. Bhatia. 2005 Geotextile tube: Filtration performance of woven geotextiles under pressure. Geosynthetics ‘05, IFAI Las Vegas, Nevada, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Malik, J. and S. Sysala. 2011. Analysis of geosynthetic tubes filled with several liquids with different densities. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 29(3): 249–56. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastin, B., G. E. Lebster, and J. R. Salley. 2008. Use of Geotube® dewatering containers in environmental dredging. Proceedings of GeoAmericas 2008,(CD-ROM), Cancun Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Moo-Young, H. K., A. G. Douglas, and X. Mo. 2002. Testing procedures to assess the viability of dewatering with geotextile tubes. Geotextiles and Geomemebranes 20(5): 289–303. doi:10.1016/s0266–1144(02)00028–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthukumaran, A. and K. Ilamparuthi. 2006. Laboratory studies on geotextile filters as used in geotextile tube dewatering. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 24(4): 210–219. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1997. Contaminated sediments in ports and waterways: Cleanup strategies and technologies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, E. C. and Y. I. Oh. 2007. Coastal erosion prevention by geotextile tube technology. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 25(4–5), 264–277. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TenCate. 2007. TenCate Geotube® GDT test: A demonstration of Geotube® dewatering technology. Commerce, GA: TenCate Geosynthetics North America.
   Google Scholar
• TenCate. 2015. TenCate RDT Test. TENCATE Corporation. http://www.tencate.com/amer/Images/bro_rdt_tcm29-12759.pdf (accessed April 13, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, M., P. Lafferty, and J. D. Kobler. 2001. Innovative dewatering and water treatment techniques for hydraulically dredged sediments. The First International Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediments, Venice, October, 10–11, 361–69.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, S. W. and J. Chu. 2010. Construction of an offshore dike using slurry filled geotextile mats. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 28: 422–33. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, T. W. and C. R. Lawson. 2012. Modelling the geotextile tube dewatering process. Geosynthetics International 19(6): 339–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, T. W., C. R. Lawson, Z. Y. Wang, L. Ding, and Y. Liu. 2012. Geotextile tube dewatering of contaminated sediments, Tianjin Eco-City, China. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 31: 39–50. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar