Use of the dilatometer test to estimate the maximum shear modulus of normally consolidated Busan clay

References

• Andrus, R. D., P. Piratheepan, B. S. Ellis, J. F. Zhang, and C. H. Juang. 2004. Comparing liquefaction evaluation methods using penetration-V-S relationships. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 24 (9–10):713–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM-D2435/D2435 M. 2011. Standard test method for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils using incremental loading. West Conshohocken, PA: Annual Book of ASTM Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Baldi, G., R. Bellotti, V. Ghionna, M. Jamiolkowski, S. Marchetti, and E. Pasqualini. 1986. Flat dilatometer tests in calibration chambers. Proceedings, Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States: ASCE, 431–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bellotti, R., V. Ghionna, M. Jamiolkowski, R. Lancellotta, and G. Manfredini. 1986. Deformation characteristics of cohesionless soils from in situ tests. Proceedings, Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States: ASCE, 47–73.
   Google Scholar
• Berzins, W. E. 1983. Determination of drained and undrained soil parameters using the screw plate test. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Casagrande, A. 1936. The determination of the pre-consolidation load and its practical significance. Proceedings of, the International Conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, 60–64.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallaro, A., S. Grasso, and M. Maugeri. 2006. Clay soil characterisation by the new seismic dilatometer marchetti test (SDMT). Proceedings of, the second International Conference on the flat dilatometer, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Choo, H. and S. E. Burns. 2014. Effect of overconsolidation ratio on dynamic properties of binary mixtures of silica particles. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 60:44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, H. and S. E. Burns. 2015. Shear wave velocity of granular mixtures of silica particles as a function of finer fraction, size ratios and void ratios. Granular Matter doi:10.1007/s10035-015-0580-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, H., B. Bate, and S. E. Burns. 2015. Effects of organic matter on stiffness of overconsolidated state and anisotropy of engineered organoclays at small strain. Engineering Geology 184:19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, H., W. Lee, C. Lee, Y.-S. Kim, and M.-J. Lee. 2015. Perception of overconsolidated states of coarse-grained soils using DMT results. Proceedings of, 3rd International Conference on the flat dilatometer, Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Choo, H., W. Lee, S.-J. Hong, and C. Lee. 2016. Application of the dilatometer test for estimating undrained shear strength of Busan New Port clay. Ocean Engineering 115:39–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. G., C. K. Ryu, K. Y. Jo, and D. Y. Huh. 2005. Geological and geotechnical characteristics of marine clays at the Busan new port. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology 23 (3):235–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. G., G. J. Kim, M. S. Kim, and C. K. Ryu. 2007. Undrained shear strength from field vane test on Busan clay. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology 25 (3–4):167–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. G., P. H. Giao, G. J. Kim, and S. Leroueil. 2002. Geotechnical properties of Pusan clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 39 (5):1050–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusan, B., B. Zoran, V. Cebasek, and N. Susic. 2014. Characterisation of collapsing loess by seismic dilatometer. Engineering Geology 181:180–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbrocino, S., G. Lanzano, G. Forte, F. S. de Magistris, and G. Fabbrocino. 2015. SPT blow count vs. shear wave velocity relationship in the structurally complex formations of the Molise Region (Italy). Engineering Geology 187:84–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finno, R. J. 1993. Analytical interpretation of dilatometer penetration through saturated cohesive soils. Geotechnique 43 (2):241–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlsby, G. T. and C. P. Wroth. 1991. The variation of shear modulus of clay with pressure and overconsolidation ratio. Soils Fdns 31 (3):138–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hryciw, R. D. 1990. Small-strain-shear modulus of soil by dilatometer. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering-Asce 116 (11):1700–16.
   Google Scholar
• Iwasaki, K., H. Tsuchiya, Y. Sakai, and Y. Yamamoto. 1991. Applicability of the marchetti dilatometer test to soft ground in Japan. Proceedings of, GEOCOAST, Yokohama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Jamiolkowski, M., C. C. Ladd, J. T. Germaine, and R. Lancellotta. 1985. New developments in filed and laboratory testing of soils. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, San Francisco, 57–153.
   Google Scholar
• Jamiolkowski, M., V. N. Ghionna, and R. Lancellotta. 1988. New correlations of penetration tests for design practice. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Penetration Testing, Orlando: ISOPT, 263–96.
   Google Scholar
• Jovicic, V. and M. R. Coop. 1997. Stiffness of coarse-grained soils at small strains. Geotechnique 47 (3):545–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamei, T. and K. Iwasaki. 1995. Evaluation of undrained shear strength of cohesive soils using a flat dilatometer. Soils and Foundations 35 (2):111–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. K. 1999. Large consolidation settlement occurred during reclamation works in the Nakdong river mouth. Proceedings of, ‘99 dredging and geoenvironmental Conference, Seoul, Korea, 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, J. M. 1988. Interpretation of flat-plate dilatometer tests in sands in terms of the state parameter. Geotechnique 38 (2):263–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, T., P. W. Mayne, and B. J. Gutierrez. 2011. Hierarchy of Vs modes and stress-dependency in granular materials. The 5th International Symposium on deformation characteristics of geomaterials, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Lacasse, S. 1986. In situ site investigation techniques and interpretation for offshore practice. Report 40019, Oslo: Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Lacasse, S. and T. Lunne. 1989. Calibration of dilatometer correlations. Publikasjon-Norges Geotekniske Institutt 177:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., J. S. Lee, W. Lee, and T. H. Cho. 2008. Experiment setup for shear wave and electrical resistance measurements in an oedometer. Geotechnical Testing Journal 31 (2):8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., S. J. Hong, D. Kim, and W. Lee. 2015. Assessment of compression index of Busan and Incheon Clays with sedimentation state. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology 33 (1):23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locat, J. and H. Tanaka. 1999. Microstructure, mineralogy and physical properties; techniques and application to the Pusan clays. Proceedings of, ‘99 dredging and geoenvironmental Conference, Seoul, Korea, 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti, S. 1980. Insitu tests by flat dilatometer. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division-Asce 106 (3):299–321.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti, S. 2015. Some 2015 updates to the TC16 DMT report 2001. Proceedings of, the 3rd International Conference on the flat dilatometer, Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti, S., P. Monaco, G. Totani, and D. Marchetti. 2008. In situ tests by seismic dilatometer (SDMT). From Research to Practice in Geotechnical Engineering 180:292–311.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti, S., P. Monaco, G. Totani, and M. Calabrese. 2001. The flat dilatometer test (DMT) in soil investigations–A report by the ISSMGE committee TC16. Proceedings of. In Situ, Bali, Indonesia, 41.
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, P. W. 2001. Stress-strain-strength-flow parameters from enhanced in-situ tests. Proceedings of, International Conference on in situ measurement of soil properties and case histories, Bali, 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, P. W. 2007. NCHRP Synthesis 368: Cone penetration testing. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, P. W. and G. J. Rix. 1995. Correlations between shear wave velocity and cone tip resistance in natural clays. Soils and Foundations 35 (2):107–10.
   Google Scholar
• McGann, C. R., B. A. Bradley, M. L. Taylor, L. M. Wotherspoon, and M. Cubrinovski. 2015. Applicability of existing empirical shear wave velocity correlations to seismic cone penetration test data in Christchurch New Zealand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 75:76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. K. and K. Soga. 2005. Fundamentals of soil behavior. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Monaco, P., S. Marchetti, G. Totani, and D. Marchetti. 2009. Interrelationship between small strain modulus G0 and operative modulus. Proceedings of, the International Conference on performance-based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering (IS-Tokyo 2009), Tsukuba, Japan, 1315–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ohtsubo, M., K. Egashira, H. Tanaka, and O. Mishima. 2002. Clay minerals and geotechnical index properties of marine clays in East Asia. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology 20 (4):223–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, J. and I. Uglow. 1989. The interpretation of the Marchetti dilatometer test in UK clays. Proceedings of, penetration testing in the UK, geotechnology Conference, 1988, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. K. 2009. Interpretation of cone penetration tests - A unified approach. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 46 (11):1337–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. K., R. G. Campanella, D. Gillespie, and A. Rice. 1986. Seismic Cpt to measure insitu shear-wave velocity. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering-Asce 112 (8):791–803.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H. B. and I. M. Idriss. 1981. Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes. Proceedings of, ASCE National Convention, Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Skempton, A. W. 1953. The colloidal activity of clays. Proceedings, the Third International Conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, 57–61.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, K., S. Wright, J. Bay, and J. Roesset. 1994. Characterization of geotechnical sites by SASW method. In Geophysical characterization of sites (ISSMFE TC# 10), ed. R. D. Woods, 15–25. Oxford: IBH Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, H. and M. Tanaka. 1998. Characterization of sandy soils using CPT and DMT. Soils and Foundations 38 (3):55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, F. and S. Shibuya. 1991. Deformation characteristics of soils and rocks from field and laboratory tests. Proceedings of, the 9th Asian Regional Conference on SMFE, Bangkok, 101–70.
   Google Scholar
• Viggiani, G. and J. H. Atkinson. 1995. Stiffness of fine-grained soil at very small strains. Geotechnique 45 (2):249–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, H.-K., C. Lee, H.-K. Kim, and J.-S. Lee. 2011. Evaluation of preconsolidation stress by shear wave velocity. Smart Structures and Systems 7 (4):275–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H.-S. 2006. The first James K. Mitchell lecture in situ soil testing: From mechanics to interpretation. Geomechanics and Geoengineering: An International Journal 1 (3):165–95.
   Google Scholar