Creatives in the Office: Personality and the Environmental Effects of Workspace

References

• Allen, Kim, Jocey Quinn, Sumi Hollingworth, and Anthea Rose. 2013. “Becoming Employable Students and ‘Ideal’ Creative Workers: Exclusion and Inequality in Higher Education Work Placements.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 34 (3):431–452. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2012.714249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, Jonas. 2018. “A Sane Workplace Involves Neither Cubicles nor an Open Office.” Quartz at Work. February 12, 2018. https://qz.com/work/1202518/a-sane-workplace-involves-neither-a-cubicle-nor-an-open-office/.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, Teresa M. 1998. “How to Kill Creativity.” Harvard Business Review 76 (5):76–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, Teresa M. 2012. “Componential Theory of Creativity.” Harvard Business School 12:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, Teresa M., Regina Conti, Heather Coon, Jeffrey Lazenby, and Michael Herron. 1996. “Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity.” Academy of Management Journal 39 (5):1154–1184. doi: 10.2307/256995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belojevic, Goran, Branislav Jakovljevic, and Vesna Slepcevic. 2003. “Noise and Mental Performance: Personality Attributes and Noise Sensitivity.” Noise and Health 6 (21):77–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brill, Michael, Sue Weidemann, and BOSTI Associates. 2001. Disproving Widespread Myths about Workplace Design. Jasper, IN: Kimball International.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Steven R., and Clyde Hendrick. 1971. “Introversion, Extraversion and Social Perception.” The British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 10 (4):313–319. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1971.tb00755.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cain, Susan. 2013. Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking. New York, NY: Broadway Books.
   Google Scholar
• CAPT. 2003. “Estimated Frequencies of Types.” Center for Application of Psychological Type. https://www.capt.org/mbti-assessment/estimated-frequencies.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, Gianna, and Raymond A. R. MacDonald. 2007. “The Effect of Background Music and Background Noise on the Task Performance of Introverts and Extraverts.” Psychology of Music 35 (3):517–537. doi: 10.1177/0305735607076444.
   Google Scholar
• Caves, Richard E. 2000. Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charness, Neil, Michael Tuffiash, Ralf Krampe, Eyal Reingold, and Ekaterina Vasyukova. 2005. “The Role of Deliberate Practice in Chess Expertise.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 19 (2):151–165. doi: 10.1002/acp.1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Xingwen, Jun Liu, Haina Zhang, and Ho Kwong Kwan. 2019. “Cognitive Diversity and Innovative Work Behaviour: The Mediating Roles of Task Reflexivity and Relationship Conflict and the Moderating Role of Perceived Support.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 92 (3):671–694. doi: 10.1111/joop.12259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “ChiatDay and the Invention of the ‘Open Office.’” n.d. 4A’s. Accessed October 2, 2018. https://www.aaaa.org/timeline-event/chiatday-invention-open-office/.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, Irene Hau-Siu. 2018. “Cognitive Diversity and Creativity in Teams: The Mediating Roles of Team Learning and Inclusion.” Chinese Management Studies 12 (2):369–383. doi: 10.1108/CMS-09-2017-0262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, Bo T., Lizette Kirstine Drewsen, and Johannes Maaløe. 2014. “Implicit Theories of the Personality of the Ideal Creative Employee.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 8 (2):189–197. doi: 10.1037/a0036197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1988a. “The Flow Experience and Its Significance for Human Psychology.” In Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness, edited by M. Csikszentmihalyi and I. Csikszentmihalyi, 15–35. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1988b. “Motivation and Creativity: Toward a Synthesis of Structural and Energistic Approaches to Cognition.” New Ideas in Psychology 6 (2):159–176. doi: 10.1016/0732-118X(88)90001-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1996a. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1996b. Creativity: The Work and Lives of 91 Eminent People. HarperCollins. https://www.alibris.com/Creativity-The-Work-and-Lives-of-91-Eminent-People-Dr-Mihaly-Csikszentmihalyi-PhD/book/1387054.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, and Keith Sawyer. 2014. “Shifting the Focus from Individual to Organizational Creativity.” In The Systems Model of Creativity: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, edited by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, 67–71. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Rosamund, and Gauti Sigthorsson. 2013. Introducing the Creative Industries: From Theory to Practice. 1st ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Matthew, Desmond J. Leach, and Chris W. Clegg. 2012. “The Physical Environment of the Office: Contemporary and Emerging Issues.” International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 26:193–235.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS. 2016. “Creative Industries Economic Estimates - January 2016.” https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/creative-industries-economic-estimates-january-2016.
   Google Scholar
• De Beauvoir, Simone. 1961. The Second Sex. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• DeGraff, Jeff. 2015. “The Good, the Bad, and the Future of Creative Collaboration.” Huffington Post (Blog). May 11, 2015. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-degraff/the-good-the-bad-and-the-future-of-creative-collaboration_b_7257924.html.
   Google Scholar
• DeYoung, Colin G., Lena C. Quilty, and Jordan B. Peterson. 2007. “Between Facets and Domains: 10 Aspects of the Big Five.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (5):880–896. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dua, Tanya. 2016. “Ad Agencies’ New Office Hack: Sit Wherever You Want.” Digiday (Blog). November 28, 2016. https://digiday.com/careers/ad-agency-hot-desking/.
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, Angela L., Christopher Peterson, Michael D. Matthews, and Dennis R. Kelly. 2007. “Grit: Perseverance and Passion for Long-Term Goals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (6):1087–1101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunnette, Marvin D., John Campbell, and Kay Jaastad. 1963. “The Effect of Group Participation on Brainstorming Effectiveness for 2 Industrial Samples.” Journal of Applied Psychology 47 (1):30–37. doi: 10.1037/h0049218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist, Gregory J. 1998. “A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 2 (4):290–309. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forrest, Connor. 2017. “74% of Employees Are Willing to Quit Their Job over Work from Home Policy.” TechRepublic. September 11, 2017. https://www.techrepublic.com/article/74-of-employees-are-willing-to-quit-their-job-over-work-from-home-policy/.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, Adrian. 2000. “The Brainstorming Myth.” Business Strategy Review 11 (4):21–28. doi: 10.1111/1467-8616.00154.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, Adrian, and Velicia Bachtiar. 2008. “Personality and Intelligence as Predictors of Creativity.” Personality and Individual Differences 45 (7):613–617. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, Adrian, Barrie Gunter, and Emma Peterson. 1994. “Television Distraction and the Performance of Introverts and Extroverts.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 8 (7):705–711. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350080708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, Adrian, and Lisa Strbac. 2002. “Music Is as Distracting as Noise: The Differential Distraction of Background Music and Noise on the Cognitive Test Performance of Introverts and Extraverts.” Ergonomics 45 (3):203–217. doi: 10.1080/00140130210121932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürst, Guillaume. 2016. “Creativity, Learning, Intelligence and Personality.” Revue française de pédagogie 197 (4):23–34. doi: 10.4000/rfp.5143.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, Lawrence L., Eva M. Hyatt, and Ünal Ö. Boya. 2009. “The Collaborative Roles of the Designer, the Marketer, and the Consumer in Determining What Is Good Design.” Advertising & Society Review 10 (1):1–16. doi: 10.1353/asr.0.0021.
   Google Scholar
• Geen, Russell G. 1984. “Preferred Stimulation Levels in Introverts and Extroverts: Effects on Arousal and Performance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (6):1303–1312. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Chris, Susan Luckman, and Julie Willoughby-Smith. 2010. “Creativity without Borders? Rethinking Remoteness and Proximity.” Australian Geographer 41 (1):25–38. doi: 10.1080/00049180903535543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girotra, Karan, Christian Terwiesch, and Karl T. Ulrich. 2010. “Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea.” Management Science 56 (4):591–605. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, David. 2011. “New Book Lays Failure to Learn on Colleges’ Doorsteps.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 18, 2011. https://www.chronicle.com/article/New-Book-Lays-Failure-to-Learn/125983.
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, Jennifer, Jonathan Cheek, and JulieK. Norem. 2011. “Four Meanings of Introversion: Social, Thinking, Anxious, and Inhibited Introversion.” Paper presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, USA, January 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, Joy P. 1959. “Traits of Creativity.” In Creativity and Its Cultivation, edited by H. H. Anderson, 142–161. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, Joy P. 1970. “Creativity: Retrospect and Prospect.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 4 (3):149–168. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1970.tb00856.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harma, Mikko. 1993. “Individual Differences in Tolerance to Shiftwork: A Review.” Ergonomics 36 (1–3):101–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, Thomas W., and Bernard Alpert. 1989. “Attributes of Successful MBAs: A 20-Year Longitudinal Study.” Human Performance 2 (4):301–322. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup0204_4.
   Google Scholar
• Hartocollis, Anemona. 2018. “Is an Extroverted Applicant Better Suited for Harvard Than an Introvert?” The New York Times, October 25, 2018, sec. U.S. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/us/harvard-admissions-trial-asian-americans.html.
   Google Scholar
• Heerwagen, Judith. 2016. “The Changing Nature of Organizations, Work, and Workplace|WBDG Whole Building Design Guide.” WBDG. October 5, 2016. https://www.wbdg.org/resources/changing-nature-organizations-work-and-workplace.
   Google Scholar
• Helson, Ravenna, Brent Roberts, and Gail Agronick. 1995. “Enduringness and Change in Creative Personality and the Prediction of Occupational Creativity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (6):1173–1183. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessey, Beth. 2015. “If I Were Secretary of Education: A Focus on Intrinsic Motivation and Creativity in the Classroom.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 9 (2):187–192. (May). doi: 10.1037/aca0000012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hongisto, Valtteri, Annu Haapakangas, Johanna Varjo, Riikka Helenius, and Hannu Koskela. 2016. “Refurbishment of an Open-Plan Office – Environmental and Job Satisfaction.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 45:176–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, Tomi J., Annika Johanna Blomberg, and Kirsi-Mari Kallio. 2015. “Physical Space, Culture and Organisational Creativity – A Longitudinal Study.” Facilities 33 (5/6):389–411. doi: 10.1108/F-09-2013-0074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (5):965–990. doi: 10.1086/226425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, James C., and Robert J. Sternberg. 2007. “Creativity.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 39 (4):55–60. doi: 10.3200/CHNG.39.4.55-C4.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, Lindsay. 2014. “Google Got It Wrong. The Open-Office Trend Is Destroying the Workplace.” Washington Post, December 30, 2014. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/12/30/google-got-it-wrong-the-open-office-trend-is-destroying-the-workplace/.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, Scott Barry. 2014. “Will the Real Introverts Please Stand Up?” Scientific American Blog Network. June 9, 2014. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/will-the-real-introverts-please-stand-up/.
   Google Scholar
• Khazan, Olga. 2014. “Why Are There So Many Women in Public Relations?” The Atlantic. August 8, 2014. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/08/why-are-there-so-many-women-in-pr/375693/.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Jungsoo, and Richard de Dear. 2013. “Workspace Satisfaction: The Privacy-Communication Trade-off in Open-Plan Offices.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 36:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma, Boris, and Wouter D. van Marken Lichtenbelt. 2015. “Energy Consumption in Buildings and Female Thermal Demand.” Nature Climate Change 5 (12):1054–1056. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konnikova, Maria. 2014. “The Open-Office Trap.” The New Yorker, January 7, 2014. https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/the-open-office-trap.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Young, and Jay L. Brand. 2005. “Effects of Control over Office Workspace on Perceptions of the Work Environment and Work Outcomes.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 25 (3):323–333. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallia, Karen L. 2019. Leadership in the Creative Industries: Principles and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mallia, Karen L., and Kasey Windels. 2011. “Will Changing Media Change the World? An Exploratory Investigation of the Impact of Digital Advertising on Opportunities for Creative Women.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 11 (2):30–44. doi: 10.1080/15252019.2011.10722183.
   Google Scholar
• Mallia, Karen L, Kasey Windels, Jenny Mumah, and Sheri J. Broyles. 2013. “Lost in Space: Advertising Agency Employees’ Perceptions of Work Space.” Paper presented at the 2012 Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Conference, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, Colin. 1989. “Personality, Situation, and Creativity.” In Handbook of Creativity: Perspectives on Individual Differences, edited by John A. Glover, Royce R. Ronning, and Cecil R. Reynolds, 211–232. Boston, MA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, Robert R. 1987. “Creativity, Divergent Thinking, and Openness to Experience.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (6):1258–1265. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, Laird D. 2005. “Organizational Culture’s Influence on Creativity and Innovation: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Human Resource Development.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 7 (2):226–246. doi: 10.1177/1523422305274528.
   Google Scholar
• Meinel, Martin, Lukas Maier, Timm Wagner, and Kai-Ingo Voigt. 2017. “Designing Creativity-Enhancing Workspaces: A Critical Look at Empirical Evidence.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3051058. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3051058.
   Google Scholar
• Mongeau, Paul, and Mary Claire Morr. 1999. “Reconsidering Brainstorming.” Group Facilitation 1 (1):14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Moses, Timothy P., and Anthony J. Stahelski. 1999. “A Productivity Evaluation of Teamwork at an Aluminum Manufacturing Plant.” Group & Organization Management 24 (3):391–412. doi: 10.1177/1059601199243007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, Michael D., Devin C. Lonergan, and Ginamarie Scott. 2002. “Evaluating Creative Ideas: Processes, Standards, and Context.” Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 22 (1):21–30.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, Justin. 2010. The Cultural and Creative Industries: A Literature Review. 2nd ed. London: Creativity, Culture and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Oldham, Greg R., and Daniel J. Brass. 1979. “Employee Reactions to an Open-Plan Office: A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment.” Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (2):267–284. doi: 10.2307/2392497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, Alex F. 1953. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. New York, NY: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Oseland, Nigel. 2009. “The Impact of Psychological Needs on Office Design.” Journal of Corporate Real Estate 11 (4):244–254. doi: 10.1108/14630010911006738.
   Google Scholar
• Pagnani, Alexander R., and Mark A. Runco. 2011. “Psychological Research on Creativity.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Creative Learning, edited by Julian Sefton-Green, Pat Thomson, Ken Jones, and Liora Bresler, 87–95. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ploesser, Melanie, and Paul Mecheril. 2012. “Neglect–Recognition–Deconstruction: Approaches to Otherness in Social Work.” International Social Work 55 (6):794–808. doi: 10.1177/0020872811416143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randel, Amy E., Benjamin M. Galvin, Lynn M. Shore, Karen Holcombe Ehrhart, Beth G. Chung, Michelle A. Dean, and Uma Kedharnath. 2018. “Inclusive Leadership: Realizing Positive Outcomes through Belongingness and Being Valued for Uniqueness.” Human Resource Management Review 28 (2):190–203. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, Anne. 1974. The Making of a Scientist. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, Mark A. 2007. “A Hierarchical Framework for the Study of Creativity.” New Horizons in Education 55 (3):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, Mark A., and Steven R. Pritzker. 1999. Encyclopedia of Creativity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samani, Sanaz, Siti Zaleha Abdul Rasid, and Saudah Sofian. 2014. “A Workplace to Support Creativity.” Industrial Engineering and Management Systems 13 (4):414–420. doi: 10.7232/iems.2014.13.4.414.
   Google Scholar
• Sasser, Sheila, and Scott Koslow. 2009. “Creativity and Ad Theory.” In Advertising Theory, edited by S. Rodgers and E. Thorsen, 191–211. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Seddigh, Aram, Erik Berntson, Christina Bodin Danielson, and Hugo Westerlund. 2014. “Concentration Requirements Modify the Effect of Office Type on Indicators of Health and Performance.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 38:167–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senion. 2017. “Time Spent Finding Things, Places and People in the Office.” Senion. https://senion.com/insights/time-spent-finding-things-places-people-office/.
   Google Scholar
• Shalley, Christina E., Lucy L. Gilson, and Terry C. Blum. 2000. “Matching Creativity Requirements and the Work Environment: Effects on Satisfaction and Intentions to Leave.” Academy of Management Journal 43 (2):215–223. doi: 10.5465/1556378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, Christina E., Greg R. Oldham, and Joseph F. Porac. 1987. “Effects of Goal Difficulty, Goal-Setting Method, and Expected External Evaluation on Intrinsic Motivation.” Academy of Management Journal 30 (3):553–563. doi: 10.5465/256014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, Yoram. 2018. “The Most Creative Types Are Introverts, and Extroverts.” Inc.Com. 2018. https://www.inc.com/cameron-albert-deitch/2018-inc5000-garrett-companies.html.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, Jesper, and Henrik Markhede. 2010. “Spatial and Social Configurations in Offices.” The Journal of Space Syntax 1 (1):121–132.
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg, Georg, Ingmar Rosén, and Jarl Risberg. 1990. “Attention and Personality in Augmenting/Reducing of Visual Evoked Potentials.” Personality and Individual Differences 11 (12):1243–1254. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(90)90151-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, Robert J. 1988. The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, Robert J. 1999. Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Maura. 2019. Attention Management: How to Create Success and Gain Productivity – Every Day. Naperville, IL: Simple Truths.
   Google Scholar
• Thoring, Katja, Pieter Desmet, and Petra Badke-Schaub. 2018. “Creative Environments for Design Education and Practice: A Typology of Creative Spaces.” Design Studies 56:54–83. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2018.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoring, Katja, Pieter Desmet, and Petra Badke-Schaub. 2019. “Creative Space: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design 1 (1):299–308. doi: 10.1017/dsi.2019.33.
   Google Scholar
• Toomey, Rob. 2018. “Why Your Company Needs Diverse Personality Types.” Forbes (Blog). July 26, 2018. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2018/07/26/why-your-company-needs-diverse-personality-types/.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch, Jennifer A., Kate E. Charles, Kelly M. J. Farley, and Guy R. Newsham. 2007. “A Model of Satisfaction with Open-Plan Office Conditions: COPE Field Findings.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 27 (3):177–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, Willem, Philip Hans Franses, Arthur le Blanc, and Nienke van Ruiten. 2008. “Finding the Keys to Creativity in Ad Agencies: Using Climate, Dispersion, and Size to Examine Award Performance.” Journal of Advertising 37 (4):121–130. doi: 10.2753/JOA0091-3367370410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vischer, Jacqueline C. 2008. “Towards an Environmental Psychology of Workspace: How People Are Affected by Environments for Work.” Architectural Science Review 51 (2):97–108. doi: 10.3763/asre.2008.5114.
   Google Scholar