Advanced search
Publication Cover
Hypertension in Pregnancy Volume 26, 2007 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
246
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Women's Views of Their Experiences in the CHIPS (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study) Pilot Trial

L. A. Magee Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Centre for Healthcare Innovation and Improvement, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaCorrespondence[email protected]
,
P. von Dadelszen Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Centre for Healthcare Innovation and Improvement, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
,
S. Chan Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
A. Gafni Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
A. Gruslin Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
,
M. Helewa Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
,
S. Hewson Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
E. Kavuma Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
S. K. Lee Department of Paediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
,
A. G. Logan Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
D. McKay Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
J.-M. Moutquin Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
,
A. Ohlsson Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Programme in Population Health Science, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
E. Rey Department of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
,
S. Ross Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
,
J. Singer Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
,
A. R. Willan Programme in Population Health Science, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
M. E. Hannah Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
& for the CHIPS Pilot Trial Collaborative Group* show all
Pages 371-387 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

REFERENCES

  • Dunlop L, Umstad M, McGrath G, Reidy K, Brennecke S. Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction with pregnancy day care for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 43(3)207–212
  • Leung KY, Sum TK, Tse CY, Law KW, Chan MY. Is in-patient management of diastolic blood pressure between 90 and 100 mm Hg during pregnancy necessary?. Hong Kong Med J 1998; 4(2)211–217
  • Turnbull DA, Wilkinson C, Gerard K, Shanahan M, Ryan P, Griffith EC, et al. Clinical, psychosocial, and economic effects of antenatal day care for three medical complications of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial of 395 women. Lancet 2004; 363(9415)1104–1109
  • Taylor RS, Freeman L, North RA. Evaluation of ambulatory and self-initiated blood pressure monitors by pregnant and postpartum women. Hypertens Pregnancy 2001; 20(1)25–33
  • Leeners B, Rath W, Kuse S, Neises M, Neumaier-Wagner P. Satisfaction with medical information in women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. J Psychosom Res 2006; 60(1)39–44
  • Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186(5 Suppl Nature)S160–S172
  • Seguin L, Therrien R, Champagne F, Larouche D. The components of women's satisfaction with maternity care. Birth 1989; 16(3)109–113
  • Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Chan S, Gafni A, Gruslin A, Helewa ME, et al. The CHIPS Pilot Trial (Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study). BJOG 2007; 114: 770–820
  • Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Chan S, Gafni A, Gruslin A, Helewa ME, et al. The CHIPS Pilot Trial (Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study). Hypertens Pregn 2006; 25(Supplement 1)21
  • Helewa ME, Burrows RF, Smith J, Williams K, Brain P, Rabkin SW. Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 1. Definitions, evaluation and classification of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. CMAJ 1997; 157(6)715–725
  • Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations. BMJ 1991; 302(6781)887–889
  • Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW, Joseph KS, Allen A, Abrahamowicz M, et al. A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics 2001; 108(2)E35
  • Heaman M, Robinson MA, Thompson L, Helewa M. Patient satisfaction with an antepartum home-care program. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1994; 23(8)707–713
  • Caetano M, Ornstein M, von Dadelszen P, Hannah ME, Logan AG, Gruslin A, et al. A survey of Canadian practitioners regarding the management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Hypertens Pregn 2003; 23(1)61–74
  • Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183(1)S1–S22
  • Brown MA, Hague WM, Higgins J, Lowe S, McCowan L, Oats J, et al. The detection, investigation and management of hypertension in pregnancy: executive summary. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 40(2)133–138
  • Bellomo G, Narducci PL, Rondoni F, Pastorelli G, Stangoni G, Angeli G, et al. Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure in pregnancy. JAMA 1999; 282(15)1447–1452
  • Peek M, Shennan A, Halligan A, Lambert PC, Taylor DJ, de Swiet M. Hypertension in pregnancy: which method of blood pressure measurement is most predictive of outcome?. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88(6)1030–1033
  • Penny WJ, Lewis MJ. Nifedipine is excreted in human milk. Eur J Clin Pharm 1989; 36: 427–428
  • Waugh J, Habiba MA, Bosio P, Boyce T, Shennan A, Halligan AW. Patient initiated home blood pressure recordings are accurate in hypertensive pregnant women. Hypertens Pregnancy 2003; 22(1)93–97
  • Waugh JJ, Halligan AW, Shennan AH. Ambulatory monitoring and self-monitoring of blood pressure during pregnancy. Blood Press Monit 2000; 5(1)3–10
  • Oppenheim A. Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. Heinemann, London 1966
  • Hodnett ED, Hannah ME, Hewson S, Whyte H, Amankwah K, Cheng M, et al. Mothers' views of their childbirth experiences 2 years after planned Caesarean versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term, in the international randomized Term Breech Trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2005; 27(3)224–231

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.