122
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on vital functions after cesarean section: a single center experience

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 198-203 | Received 14 Mar 2022, Accepted 07 Sep 2022, Published online: 16 Sep 2022

References

  • Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, et al. WHO 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group. caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in latin America. Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1819–1829.
  • Francome C, Savage W, Churchill H. Caesarean birth in Britain: a book for health professionals and parents. London, UK: Middlesex University Press; 2006.
  • MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Menacker F, et al. Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to women with “no indicated risk,” United States, 1998-2001 birth cohorts. Birth. 2006;33(3):175–182.
  • Zhang X, Xu T, Jia L, et al. Continuous cardiovascular hemodynamics monitoring with pressure recording analytical method in patients under spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section: a pilot study. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(7):7184–7193.
  • Afolabi BB, Lesi FE. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17; 10. CD004350.10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3
  • Ram M, Lavie A, Lev S, et al. Cardiac hemodynamics before, during and after elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia in low-risk women. J Perinatol. 2017;37(7):793–799.
  • Saygı Aİ, Özdamar Ö, Gün İ, et al. Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among patients undergoing cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J. 2015;133(3):227–234.
  • Reynolds F. General anesthesia is unacceptable for elective cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010;19(2):212–217.
  • Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, et al. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(3):645–653.
  • Tsen LC. Anesthesia for cesarean section. In: Chestnut DH, Polley LS, Wong CA, et al., editors. Chestnut’s obstetric anesthesia: principles and practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2009. p. 521–551.
  • Sung TY, Jee YS, You HJ, et al. Comparison of the effect of general and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section on maternal and fetal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021;16(1):49–55
  • Thorp JM. Clinical aspects of normal and abnormal labor. In: Creasy RK, Resnik R, Iams JD, et al., editors. Creasy and Resnik’s maternal-fetal medicine: principles and practice. Philadelphia Saunders: Publisher: Elsevier; 2009. p. 691–724.
  • Andrews WW, Ramin SM, Maberry MC, et al. Effect of type of anesthesia on blood loss at elective repeat cesarean section. Am J Perinatol. 1992;9(3):197–200.
  • Kestin IG. Spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics. Bja. 1991;66(5):596–607.
  • Juri T, Suehiro K, Kimura A, et al. Impact of non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring on maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery: a randomized-controlled study. J Anesth. 2018 Dec;32(6):822–830.
  • Jelting Y, Klein C, Harlander T, et al. Preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anesthesia for cesarean section: challenges and solutions. Local Reg Anesth. 2017;10:83–90.
  • Schewe JC, Komusin A, Zinserling J, et al. Effects of spinal anaesthesia versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section on postoperative analgesic consumption and postoperative pain. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26(1):52–59.
  • Petropoulus G, Siristatidis C, Salamalekis E, et al. Spinal and epidural versus general anesthesia for elective cesarean section at term: eCect on the acid-base status of the mother and newborn. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;13:260–266.
  • Gori F, Pasqualucci A, Corradetti F, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcome after cesarean section: the impact of anesthesia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20(1):53–57.
  • Gandhi KA, Jain K. Management of anaesthesia for elective, low-risk (Category 4) caesarean section. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(9):667–674.
  • Shibli KU, Russell IF. A survey of anaesthetic techniques used for caesarean section in the UK in 1997. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2000;9(3):160–167.
  • Tsen LC, Pitner R, Camann WR. General anesthesia for cesarean section at a tertiary care hospital 1990–1995: indications and implications. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998;7(3):147–152.
  • Stamer UM, Messerschmidt A, Wulf H. Anaesthesia for caesarean section–a German survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42(6):678–684.
  • Gao Y, Tang Y, Tong M, et al. Does attendance of a prenatal education course reduce rates of caesarean section on maternal request? A questionnaire study in a tertiary women hospital in Shanghai, China. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e029437.
  • Ngan Kee WD, Hung VY, Roach VJ, et al. A survey of factors influencing patients’ choice of anaesthesia for caesarean section. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;37(3):300–303.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.