Toward operational methods for the assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability: A review

References

• Aguilera, P. A, Frenich, A. G, and Torres, J. A (2001). Application of the Kohonen neural network in coastal water management: Methodological development for the assessment and prediction of water quality. Water Research, 35, 4053–4062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albinet, M., and Margat, J. (1970). Cartographie de la vulnérabilité à la pollution des nappes d'eau souterraine Orleans, France. Bull BRGM 2ème série, 4, 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Aldwell, B. (1994). Examples of groundwater vulnerability definitions. The GSI Groundwater Newsletter, 25, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J. H, Petty, R. J, and Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. NWWA/EPA Series, EPA-600/2-87-035.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Zabet, T. A (2002). Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability to contamination potential using the DRASTIC method. Environ. Geol., 43, 203–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, L. J, and Gosk, E. (1987). Applicability of vulnerability maps. In van Duijvenbooden, W., and van Waegeningh, H. G (Eds.), Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants, ( Chapter 38, pp. 321–332.). The Hague: TNO Committee on Hydrological Research. Proceedings and Information.
   Google Scholar
• Andreo, B., Goldscheider, N., Vadillo, I., Vías, J. M, Neukum, C., Sinreich, M., Jimenez, P., Brechenmacher, J., Carrasco, F., Hotzl, H., Perles, M. J, and Zwahlen, F. (2006) Karst groundwater protection: First application of a pan-European Approach to vulnerability, hazard and risk mapping in the Sierra de Libar (Southern Spain). Science of the Total Environment, 357(1–3), 54–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreo, B., Ravbar, N., and Vías, J. M (2009). Source vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karst) aquifers by extension of the COP method: application to pilot sites. Hydrogeology Journal, 17, 749–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquilina, L., Vergnaud-Ayraud, V., Labasque, T., Bour, O., Molénat, J., Ruiz, L., de Montety, V., De Ridder, J., Roques, C., and Longuevergne, L. (2012). Nitrate dynamics in agricultural catchments deduced from groundwater dating and long-term nitrate monitoring in surface‐ and groundwaters. Science of the Total Environment, 435–436, 167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, J. D, Wood, H. AR., Baker, A. E, Cichon, J. R, and Raines, G. L (2007). Development and implementation of a Bayesian-based aquifer vulnerability assessment in Florida. Nat. Resour. Res., 16, 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan, A., and Autin, W. J (1996). Depositional and pedogenic influences on the environmental geology of Holocene Mississippi River floodplain deposits near Ferriday, Louisiana. Engineering Geology, 45, 417–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmat, Y., and Collin, M. (1987). Mapping to assess groundwater vulnerability to pollution. In Duijvenbooden van, W., and Waegeningh van, H. G (Eds.), Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants, ( Chapter 38, pp. 297–307). The Hague: TNO Committee on Hydrological Research. Proceedings and Information.
   Google Scholar
• Barrocu, G., and Biallo, G. (1993). Application of GIS for aquifer vulnerability application. HydroGIS 93: Proceedings of the Vienna Conference, IAHS Publ. 211, 571–580.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, N. B, Jindal, P., Schilling, K. E, Wolter, C. F, and Takle, E.S. (2012). Evaluation of analytical and numerical approaches for the estimation of groundwater residence time distribution. J. Hydrol., 475, 65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaujean, J., Lemieux, J.-M., Dassargues, A., Therrien, R., and Brouyère, S. (2014). Physically based groundwater vulnerability assessment using sensitivity analysis methods. Groundwater, 52, 864–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedessem, M. E, Casey, B., Frederic, K., and Nibbelink, N. (2005). Aquifer priorization for ambient ground water monitoring. Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation, 25(1), 150–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belitz, K., and Bredehoeft, J. D (1990). Role of confining layers in controlling large-scale regional ground-water flow. In P. S Neuman, and I. Neretnieks (Eds.), Hydrogeology of low permeability environments, (pp. 7–17.) Hannover, Federal Republic of Germany: Verlag Heinz Heise.
   Google Scholar
• Belnap, N. (1993). On rigorous definitions. Philos. Stud.: An Int. J. Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 72, 115–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhoff, K. (2008). Spatially explicit groundwater vulnerability assessment to support the implementation of the Water Framework Directive – A practical approach with stakeholders. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierkens, M. FP. (1996). Modeling hydraulic conductivity of a complex confining layer at various spatial scales. Water Resour. Res., 32, 2369–2382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkel, C., Soulsby, C., Tetzlaff, D., Dunn, S., and Spezia, L. (2012). High-frequency storm event isotope sampling reveals time-variant residence time distributions and influence of diurnal cycles. Hydrol. Processes, 26(2), 308–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohlke, J. K (2002). Groundwater recharge and agricultural contamination. Hydrogeol. J., 10, 153–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolin, B., and Rodhe, H. (1973). A note on the concepts of age distribution and residence time in natural reservoirs. Tellus, 25, 58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Botter, G., Bertuzzo, E., and Rinaldo, A. (2011). Catchment residence and residence time distributions: The master equation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottero, M. (2011). Indicators Assessment Systems. In C. Cassatella, and A. Peano (Eds.), Landscape Indicators. Accessing and Monitoring Landscape Quality, (pp. 15–29.), Springer Science & Business Media, Springer: Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Boy-Roura, M., Nolan, B. T, Menció, A., and Mas-Pla, J. (2013). Regression model for aquifer vulnerability assessment of nitrate pollution in the Osona region (NE Spain). J. Hydrol., 505, 150–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster, M. L, Annan, A. P, Greenhouse, J. P, Kueper, B. H, Olhoeft, G. R, Redman, J. D, and Sander, K. A (1995). Observed migration of a controlled DNAPL release by geophysical methods. Ground Water, 33(6), 977–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRGM (1979). Maps of ground water vulnerability to contamination 1:50 000, 31 sheets, BRGM, Orlèans, France (in French).
   Google Scholar
• Brockman, C. S, and Szabo J. P (2000). Fractures and their distribution in the tills of Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science, 100, 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broers, H. P, and van der Grift, B. (2004). Regional monitoring of temporal changes in groundwater quality. J. Hydrol., 296, 192–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. H, and Corey, A. T (1966). Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow. J. Irrig. Drainage Div, ASCE Proc., 72(IR2), 61–88.
   Google Scholar
• Brosig, K., Geyer, T., Subah, A., and Sauter, M. (2008). Residence time based approach for the assessment of vulnerability of karst groundwater: The Residence Time Method. Environ. Geol., 54, 905–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouyère, S., Jeannin, P.-J., Dassargues, A., Goldscheider, N., Popescu, I. C, Sauter, M., Vadillo, I., and Zwahlen, F. (2001). Evaluation and validation of vulnerability concepts using a physical based approach. 7th Conference on Limestone Hydrology and Fissured Media, Besançon, Sci. Tech. Envir. Mèm. H. S., 13, 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Butscher, C., and Huggenberger, P. (2008). Intrinsic vulnerability assessment in karst areas: A numerical modeling approach. Water Resour. Res., 44, W03408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butscher, C., and Huggenberger, P. (2009). Enhanced vulnerability assessment in karst areas by combining mapping with modeling approaches. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 1153–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEC (1982). Groundwater resources of the European community. Synthetical report. Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-general for the environment, consumer protection and nuclear safety. Th. Schäfer GmbH Hannover.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, S., and Parker, B L. (2005). Plume persistence due to aquitard back diffusion following dense nonaqueous phase liquid source removal or isolation. Water Resour. Res., 41(W12411), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, S.W., Parker, B. L, Sale, T. C, and Doner, L. A (2012). Testing high resolution numerical models for analysis of contaminant storage and release from low permeability zones. J. Contam. Hydrol., 136–137, 106–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves, P., and Kojiri, T. (2007). Conceptual fuzzy neural network model for water quality simulation. Hydrol. Processes, 21, 634–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, J. A, Beswick, B. T, Clister, W. E, and Lutchman, M. (1971). Flow pattern and hydrochemistry of two shallow groundwater regimes in the Lake Agassiz basin, southern Manitoba. In A. C Turnock (Ed.), Geological Association of Canada Special Paper ( Chapter 9, pp. 321–332), The Geological Association of Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, J. A, Grisak, G. E, and Clister, W. E (1973). Hydrogeologic studies at a sub-surface radioactive-waste management site in west-central Canada. In J. Braunstein (Ed.), Underground waste management and artificial recharge. (pp. 436–467). New Orleans: Second International Symposium, AAPG-USGS.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, J. A, Parker, B. L, Bradbury, K. R, Eaton, T. T, Gotkowitz, M. G, Hart, D. J, and Borchardt, M. A (2004). Role of aquitards in the protection of aquifers from contamination: A “state of the science” USA: AWWA Research Foundation, Denver, CO, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chown, J. C, Kueper, B. H, and McWhorter, D. B (1997). The use of upward hydraulic gradients to arrest downward DNAPL migration in rock fractures. Ground Water, 35, 483–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civita, M., and De Regibus, C. (1995). Sperimentazione di alcune metodologie per la valutazione della vulnerabilita degli aquiferi. Q. Geol. Appl. Pitagora. Bologna., 3, 63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Civita, M. (1994). Le carte della vulnerabilita degli acquiferiall’ inquinamento. Teoria and practica. (Aquifer vulnerability maps to pollution). Bologna: Pitagora.
   Google Scholar
• Civita, M., and De Maio M., (2004). Assessing and mapping groundwater vulnerability to contamination: The Italian “combined” approach. Geofísica Internacional, 43(4), 513–532.
   Google Scholar
• Civita, M. (1987). La previsione e la prevenzione del rischio d'inquinamento delle acque sotterranee a livello regionale mediante le Carte di Vulnerabilità. Atti. Conv. “Inquinamento delle Acque Sotterranee: Previsione e Prevenzione”, Mantova, 9–18. In Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Civita, M. (2010). The combined approach when assessing and mapping groundwater vulnerability to contamination. J. Water Res. Prot., 2, 14–28.
   Google Scholar
• Civita, M., and De Maio, M. (1997). SINTACS Un sistema parametrico per la valutazione e la cartografia per la valutazione della vulnerabilità degli acquiferi all'inquinamento, Metodologia e automazione, Bologna, In Italian: Pitagora Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Civita, M., and De Maio, M. (2000). Valutazione e cartografia automatica della vulnerabilità degli acquiferi all'inquinamento con il sistema parametrico. SINTACS R5 a new parametric system for the assessment and automatic mapping of groundwater vulnerability to contamination.Bologna Pubbl. n°2200 del GNDCI-CNR. 240 pp. In Italian: Pitagora Edit.
   Google Scholar
• Civita, M. (1990a). La valutazione della vulnerabilità degli acquiferi. Atti 1°Conv. Naz. “Protezione e gestione delle Acque Sotterranee: Metodologie, Tecnologie e Obiettivi”, 3, Marano sul Panaro, pp. 39–86. In Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Civita, M. (1990b). Legenda unificata per le Carte della vulnerabilità dei corpi idrici sotterranei. Unified legend for the aquifer pollution vulnerability Maps. Studi sulla Vulnerabilità degli Acquiferi, 1 (Append.), Pitagora Edit. Bologna. 13 pp. In Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, L. D, and van den Daele, G. (2003). A quantitative approach to aquifer vulnerability mapping. J. Hydrol., 276(1–4), 71–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, P.G., Solomon, D.K., Plummer, L.N., Busenberg, E., and Schiff, S.L. (1995). Chlorofluorocarbons as tracers of groundwater transport processes in a shallow, silty sand aquifer. Water Resour. Res., 31, 425–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornaton, F. (2004). Deterministic models of groundwater age, life expectancy and transit time distributions in advective-dispersive systems. Ph.D Thesis, Switzerland: Faculty of Sciences, University of Neuchatel.
   Google Scholar
• Cornaton, F., and Perrochet, P. (2006). Groundwater age, life expectancy and transit time distributions in advective-dispersive systems: 1. Generalized reservoir theory. Adv. Water Resour., 29, 1267–1291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daliakopoulos, I. N, Coulibaly, B., and Tsanis, I. K (2005). Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural network. J. Hydrol., 309, 29–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, D., Dassargues, A., Drew, D., Dunne, S., Goldscheider, N., Neale, S., Popescu, I. C, and Zwahlen, F. (2002). Main concepts of the “European approach” to karst – groundwater – vulnerability assessment and mapping. Hydrogeol. J., 10, 340–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassargues, A., Popescu, I. C, Beaujean, J., Lemieux, J. M, and Brouyère, S. (2009). Reframing groundwater vulnerability assessment for a better understanding between decision makers and hydrogeologists, In H. J, Liebscher, R., Clarke, J., Rodda, G., Schultz, A., Schumann, L., Ubertini, and G., Young, The Role of Hydrology in Water Resources Management (Proc. of IAHS - IHP2008) ( Chapter 327, pp. 278–284, Capri, 13–16 October 2008, IAHS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. D, Long, A. J, and Wireman, M. (2002). KARSTIC: A sensitivity method for carbonate aquifers in karst terrain. Environmental Geology, 42, 65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca, D.A, and Verga, G. (1991). Una metodologia per la valutazione della vulnerabilitá degli acquiferi. Acque Sotter., 29, 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, J. J, and Simmers, I. (2002). Groundwater recharge: an overview of processes and challenges. Hydrogeol. J., 10, 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debernardi, L., De Luca, D. A and Lasagna, M. (2008). Correlation between nitrate concentration in groundwater and parameters affecting aquifer intrinsic vulnerability. Environ Geol, 55, 539–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denny, S. C, Allen, D. M, and Journeay, J. M (2007). DRASTIC–Fm: a modified vulnerability mapping method for structurally controlled aquifers in the southern Gulf Islands, British Columbia, Canada. Hydrogeol. J., 15, 483–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriou, E., and Zacharias, I. (2006). Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping in a geologically complex area by using stable isotopes, remote sensing and GIS techniques. Environ Geol, 51, 309–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, B. (2005). Applicability of neuro-fuzzy techniques in predicting ground-water vulnerability: a GIS-based sensitivity analysis. J. Hydrol., 309, 17–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochartaigh, B. EÓ., Ball, D. F, MacDonald, A. M, Lilly, A., Fitzsimons, V., del Rio, M., and Auton, C. A. (2005). Mapping groundwater vulnerability in Scotland: A new approach for the Water Framework Directive. Scott. J. Geol., 41, 21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerfliger, N. (1996). Advances in karst groundwater protection strategy using artificial tracer tests analysis and multi-attribute vulnerability mapping (EPIK method). (PhD thesis), Faculty of Sciences, Neuchâtel University.
   Google Scholar
• Doerfliger, N., and Zwahlen, F. (1995). EPIK: A new method for outlining of protection areas in karst environment. In Günay, G. and Johnson, I., Proceedings 5th International symposium and field seminar on karst waters and environmental impacts. Antalya, Sep 1995, Rotterdam: Balkema, pp.117–123.
   Google Scholar
• Doerfliger, N., and Zwahlen, F. (1997). Practical guide: Groundwater vulnerability mapping in karstic regions (EPIK). Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), Bern, p. 56.
   Google Scholar
• Doerfliger, N., Jeannin, P. Y. and Zwahlen, F. (1999). Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: A new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method). Environ. Geo., 39(2), 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerfliger, N., Plagnes, V., and Kavouri, K. (2010). PaPRIKa a multicriteria vulnerability method as a tool for sustainable management of karst aquifers—Example of application on a test site in SW France. Proceedings of International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference “Sustainability of the Karst Environment: Dinaric Karst and other karst regions”, Plitvice Lakes, Croatia, 23–26 September 2009, UNESCO Paris, 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Durner, W. (1994). Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure, Water Resour. Res., 30(2), 211–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin, H., and Luers, A. L. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annual review of environment and resources, Book Series: Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 365–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, T. T (2002). Fracture heterogeneity and hydrogeology of the Maquoketa aquitard, southeastern Wisconsin. Ph.D diss. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, T. T, and Bradbury K. R (2003). Hydraulic transience and the role of bedding fractures in a bedrock aquitard, southeastern Wisconsin, USA. Geophysical Research Letters, 30(10), art no.-1961.
   Google Scholar
• Eberts, S. M., Boehlke, J. K., Kauffman, L. J., and Jurgens, B. C. (2012). Comparison of particle-tracking and lumped-parameter age-distribution models for evaluating vulnerability of production wells to contamination, Hydrogeol. J., 20(2), 263–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy, OJ L 327, 22 December 2000, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2003). Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). The role of wetlands in the Water Framework Directive, Guidance document (Chapter 12), Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2006). Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration, OJ L 372, 27 December 2006, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2010). Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive. Guidance on risk assessment and the use of conceptual models for groundwater, Guidance document No. 26, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Eckardt, D. A, and Stackelberg, P. E (1995). Relation of groundwater quality to land use on Long Island, New York. Groundwater, 33, 1019–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EddyDilek, C. A, Looney, B. B, Hoekstra, P., Harthill, N., Blohm, M., and Phillips, D. R (1997). Definition of a critical confining zone using surface geophysical methods. Ground Water, 35, 451–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edet, A. (2014). An aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Benin Formation aquifer, Calabar, southeastern Nigeria, using DRASTIC and GIS approach. Environ. Earth. Sci., 71, 1747–1765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA. (2003). Environmental indicators: Typology and use in reporting. European Environmental Agency (EEA), Internal. Working Paper, 20p.
   Google Scholar
• Ehteshami, M., Peralta, R. C, Eisele, H., Deer, H. M, and Tindall, T. (1991). Assessing pesticide contamination to ground water: A rapid approach. Ground Water, 29(6), 862–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfeki, A. MM., Uffink, G., and Lebreton, S. (2012). Influence of temporal fluctuations and spatial heterogeneity on pollution transport in porous media. Hydrogeol. J., 20, 283–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, B. A, Navulur, K. CS., Cooper, B. S, and Hahn, L. (1996). Estimating groundwater vulnerability to non-point source pollution from nitrates and pesticides on a regional scale, IAHS Publication, 235, 521–526.
   Google Scholar
• Etcheverry, D., and Perrochet, P. (2000). Direct simulation of groundwater transit-time distributions using the reservoir theory. Hydrogeol. J., 8(2), 200–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, B. M, and Myers, W. L (1990). A GIS-based approach to evaluating regional groundwater pollution potential with DRASTIC. J. Soil Water Conserv., 45, 242–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faybishenko, B., Nicholson, T., Shestopalov, V., Bohuslavksy, A., and Bublias, V. (2015). Groundwater vulnerability: Chernobyl nuclear disaster. Special Publications 69. American Geophysical Union and John Wiley & Sons, 136 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, O., Schulte, R. PO., Jordan, P., Lalor, S. TJ., and Richards, K. G (2011). Time lag: A methodology for the estimation of vertical and horizontal residence and flushing timescales to nitrate threshold concentrations in Irish aquifers. Environ. Sci. Policy, 14, 419–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetter, C. W (1999). Contaminant hydrogeology. 2nd edition. Prentice Hall: New York, 500pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fijani, E., Nadiri, A. A, Moghaddam, A. A, Tsai, F. TC., and Dixon, B. (2013). Optimization of DRASTIC method by supervised committee machine artificial intelligence to assess groundwater vulnerability for Maragheh–Bonab plain aquifer, Iran. J. Hydrol., 503, 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flerchinger, G. N, Seyfried, M. S, and Hardegree, S. P (2006). Using soil freezing characteristics to model multi-season soil water dynamics. Vadose Zone Journal, 5, 1143–1153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Focazio, M. J, Reilly, T. E, Rupert, M. G, and Helsel, D. R (2002). Assessing ground-water vulnerability to contamination: Providing scientifically defensible information for decision makers. U. S Geological Survey Circular 1224.
   Google Scholar
• Footprint (2006–2009). FOOTPRINT: Creating tools for pesticide risk assessment and management in Europe EU FP6 Project. http://www.eu-footprint.org Access 2013 04 01.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, D. C, and Williams, P. W (2007). Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology, Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S., and Hirata, R. (1988) Groundwater pollution risk assessment: A methodology using available data. WHO-PAHO/HPE-CEPIS. Technical Manual. Lima, Peru.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S., Hirata, R., Gomes, D., D'elia, M., and Paris, M. (2002) Groundwater quality protection. A guide for water utilities, municipal authorities and environment agencies. The World Bank Washington D. C p. 103.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S. SD. (1987). Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. [W:] van Duijvenboden W., van Waegeningh H. G [Red.] Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater to Pollutants. TNO Comm. on Hydro. Research. Hague, Proc. and Inform., 38, 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S. SD., and Skinner A. C (1995). Groundwater protection: The science and practice of land surface zoning. IAHS Publn, 225, 471–482.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S. S, andChilton, P. J (2003). Groundwater: The processes and global significance of aquifer degradation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci, 358, 1957–1972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried, J.(1987). Groundwater resources in the European Community, 2nd phase, Vulnerability-Quality (Synthetical Report) (unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Frind, E. O, Molson, J. W, and Rudolph, D. L (2006). Well vulnerability: A quantitative approach for source water protection. Ground Water, 44, 732–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, P., Williams, J. S, Rossoll, C. F, and Tolman, A. L (1989). Are ground water vulnerability classification systems workable? In: National Ground Water Association Columbus, Proceedings of the FOCUS Conference on Eastern Regional Ground-Water Issues, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, 329–343.
   Google Scholar
• Gemitzi, A., Petalas, C., Pisinaras, V., and Tsihrintzis, V. A (2009). Spatial prediction of nitrate pollution in groundwaters using neural networks and GIS: An application to South Rhodope aquifer (Thrace, Greece). Hydrol. Processes, 23(3), 372–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemitzi A., Petalas C., Tsihrintzis V. A, and Pisinaras V. (2006). Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: A combination of GIS, fuzzy logic and decision making techniques. Environ. Geol., 49, 653–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerke, H. H (2006). Preferential flow descriptions for structured soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 169(3), 382–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerke, H. H, Koszinski, S., Kalettka, T., and Sommer, M. (2010). Structures and hydrologic function of soil landscapes with kettle holes using an integrated hydropedological approach. J. Hydrol., 393, 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginn, T. R (1999). On the distribution of multicomponent mixtures over generalized exposure time in subsurface flow and reactive transport: Foundations, and formulations for groundwater age, chemical heterogeneity, and biodegradation. Water Resour. Res., 35, 1395–1407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göpper, N., and Goldscheider, N. (2008). Solute and colloid transport in karst conduits under low- and high-flow conditions. Groundwater, 46, 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gogu, R. C, and Dassargues, A. (2000a). Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods. Environ. Geol., 39(6), 549–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogu, R. C, and Dassargues, A., (2000b). Sensitivity analysis for the EPIK method of vulnerability assessment in a small karstic aquifer, southern Belgium. Hydrogeology Jour., 8, 337–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogu, R. C, Hallet, V., and Dassargues, A. (2003). Comparison of aquifer vulnerability assessment techniques. Application to the Néblon river basin (Belgium). Environ. Geol., 44, 881–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, N. (2005). Karst groundwater vulnerability mapping: application of a new method in the Swabian Alb, Germany. Hydrogeology Jour., 13(4), 555–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, N., Klute, M., Sturm, S., and Hötzl, H. (2000). The PI method: a GIS based approach to mapping groundwater vulnerability with special consideration of karst aquifers. Z. Angew. Geol., 463, 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, N., and Drew, D. (2007). Methods in karst hydrogeology. Taylor & Francis. International Contributions to Hydrogeology, 265p.
   Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, N., Klute, M., Sturm, S., and Hötzl, H. (2000). The PI method—A GIS-based approach to mapping groundwater vulnerability with special consideration of karst aquifers. Zeitschrift für angewandte Geologie, 46(3), 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Gorelick, S. M, and Zheng, C. (2015). Global change and the groundwater management challenge, Water Resour. Res., 51(5), 3031–3051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. P, and Polizzotto, M. L (2013). Pit latrines and their impacts on groundwater quality: A systematic review. Environ. Health Perspect., 121, 521–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisak, G. E, Cherry, J. A, Vonhof, J. A, and Blumele, J. P (1976). Hydrogeologic and hydrochemical properties of fractured till in the interior plains region. In Glacial Till. Proceedings of Symposium, R. F Legget (Ed.), (pp. 304–335) Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Haitjema, H. M (1995). On the residence time distribution in idealized groundwatersheds. J. Hydrol., 172 (1–4), 127–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S. K (2012). Biogeochemical time lags may delay responses of streams to ecological restoration. Freshwater Biology, 57, 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanor, J. S (1993). Effective hydraulic conductivity of fractured clay beds at a hazardous waste landfill, Louisiana Gulf-Coast. Water Resour. Res., 29, 3691–3698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M., van der Kamp, G., and Schmidt, R. (2003). Focused infiltration of snowmelt water in partially frozen soil under small depressions. J. Hydrol., 270 (3–4), 214–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, R., and Cook, P. (2002). Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeol. J., 10(1), 91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, R. W, and Scanlon, B. R (2010). Estimating groundwater recharge, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidbüchel, I., Troch, P. A, Lyon, S. W, and Weiler, M. (2012). The master transit time distribution of variable flow systems. Water Resour. Res., 48, W06520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, M. J (1988). Ground water movement in clayey till in the Prairie region. Ground Water, 26(5), 607–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, M. J, Wassenaar, L. I and Kotzer. T. (2000). Chloride and chlorine isotopes (Cl-36 and delta Cl-37) as tracers of solute migration in a thick, clay-rich aquitard system. Water Resour. Res., 36(1), 285–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, F., Berthold, G., Fritsche, J. G, Kunkel, R., Voigt, H. J, and Wendland, F. (2012) Development of a conceptual hydrogeological model for the evaluation of residence times of water in soil and groundwater: the state of Hesse case study, Germany. Environ. Earth Sci., 67, 2239–2250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuvelmans, G., and D'hont, D. (2012). A potential vulnerability index for wells based on groundwater age distribution. In: Groundwater vulnerability emerging issues and new approaches. IMVUL Conference hosted by UPMC Sisyphe, Paris, France 12 July, 2012 Les Cordeliers, Rue de l'École de Médecine, Paris: France Abstract book, pp. 61.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkel, J. (2011). Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: Towards a clarification of the science-policy interface, Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 21(1), 198–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsby, K., McKay, L. D Jorgensen, P., Lenczewski, M., and Gerba, C. P (1996). Fracture aperture measurements and migration of solutes, viruses, and immiscible creosote in a column of clay-rich till. Ground Water, 34, 1065–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölting, B., Haertle, T., Hohberger, K. H, Nachtigal, K. H, Villinger, E., Weinzierll, W., and Wrobel, J. P (1995). Konzept zur Ermittlung der Schutzfunktion der Grundwasseruberdeckung. Geol. Jahrbuch, Reihe C, Heft 63, Hannover.
   Google Scholar
• Hrachowitz, M., Soulsby, C., Tetzlaff, D., and Malcolm, I. A. (2011). Sensitivity of mean transit time estimates to model conditioning and data availability. Hydrol. Processes., 25(6), 980–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huneau, F., Jaunat, J., Kavouri, K., Plagnes, V., Rey, F., and Dörfliger, N. (2013). Intrinsic vulnerability mapping for small mountainous karst aquifers, implementation of the new PaPRIKa method to Western Pyrenees (France). Engineering Geology, 161, 81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMVUL. (2008-2012), IMVUL: Marie Curie initial training network “Towards improved groundwater vulnerability assessment” EU FP7 Project. http://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/imvul/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, N. (2002). The MACRO model (version 4.3) technical description. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Department of Soil Sciences, p 37.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannin, P.-Y., Cornaton, F., Zwahlen, F., and Perrochet, P. (2001). VULK: A tool for intrinsic vulnerability assessment and validation. 7th Conference on Limestone Hydrology and Fissured Media, Besançon, Sci. Tech. Envir. Mèm. H. S., 13, 185–190.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Madrid, A., Carrasco, F., Martinez, C., and Gogu, R. C (2013). DRISTPI, a new groundwater vulnerability mapping method for use in karstic and non-karstic aquifers. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 46, 245–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, P. O, Scharp, C., Alveteg, T., and Choza, A. (1999). Framework for ground-water protection—The Managua Ground Water System as an example. Ground Water, 37 (2), 204–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. H (1988). Factors affecting ground-water quality. [In:] National Water Summary 1986: Hydrologic events and ground-water quality. Water-Supply Paper, 2325, 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, P. R, Broholm, K., Sonnenborg, T. O, and Arvin, E. (1998). DNAPL transport through macroporous, clayey till columns. Ground Water, 36, 651–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jureta, I. (2011). Analyis and design of advice. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, p. 301.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinski, R. J, Kelly, W. E, Bogardi, I., Ehrman, R. L, and Yamamoto, P. D (1994). Correlation between DRASTIC vulnerabilities and incidents of VOC contamination of municipal well in Nebraska. Ground Water, 32 (1), 31–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kania, J., Różański, K., Witczak, S., and Zuber, A. (2006). On conceptual and numerical modeling of flow and transport in groundwater with the aid of tracers : A case study In: Viable methods of soil and water pollution monitoring, protection and remediation: proceedings of the NATO advanced research. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer; in cooperation with NATO Public Diplomacy Division, 2006. — NATO Science Series. IV, Earth and Environmental Sciences, 69, 199–208.
   Google Scholar
• Kavouri, K., Plagnes, V., Tremoulet, J., Dörfliger, N., Reijiba, F., Marchet, P. (2011). PaPRIKA: a method for estimating karst resource and source vulnerability—Application to the Ouysse karst system (southwest France). Hydrogeol. J., 19, 339–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazakis, N., and Voudouris, K. (2011). Comparison of three applied methods of groundwater vulnerability mapping: A case study from the Florina basin, Northern Greece. In N. Lambrakis et al. (Eds.), (pp. 359–367) Advances in the Research of Aquatic Environment, 2. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, G. A, Lehr, J. H, and Perrochet, P. (2006). Groundwater age. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. J, and Hamm, S-Y. (1999). Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC/EGIS technique, Cheongju area, South Korea. Hydrogeol. J., 7, 227–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleczkowski, A. S, and Witczak, S. (1990). Critical Protection Areas (CPA) of the Major Groundwater Basins (MGWB) in Poland. (Map 1:500000). Proc. International Symp. on Methodological Suggestions for Drawing up Natural, Environmental, Potential Maps. ENVIGEO - Brno. p.92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Kleczkowski, A. S (1991). The map of the Critical Protection Areas (CPA) of the Major Groundwater Basins (MGWB) in Poland, 1:500,000. (Explanations). 44p., Inst. of Hydrogeology and Eng. Geology AGH Krakow.
   Google Scholar
• Kløve B., Ala-Aho P., Bertrand G., Gurdak J. J, Kupfersberger H., Kværner J., Muotka T., Mykrä H., Preda E., and Rossi P. (2014). Climate change impacts on groundwater and dependent ecosystems, J. Hydrol., 518, 250–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr, B., Maloszewski, P., Krämer, F., and Stumpp, C. (in press). Diffusive mass exchange of non-reactive substances in dual-porosity porous systems—A column experiment under saturated conditions. Hydrol. Processes., doi: 10.1002/hyp.10620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konikow, L. F (2011). The secret to successful solute-transport modelling. Ground Water, 49, 144–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosugi, K. (1996). Lognormal distribution model for unsaturated soil hydraulic properties, Water Resour. Res., 32(9), 2697–2703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsi, R., and Stournaras, G. (2011). Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Loussi polje area, N Peloponessus: The PRESK method. Advances in the Research of Aquatic Environment Environmental Earth Sciences, 335–342.
   Google Scholar
• Kralik, M., and Keimel, T. (2003) Time-input, an innovative groundwater-vulnerability assessment scheme: Application to an alpine test site. Environ. Geol., 44, 679–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kralisch, S., Fink, M., Flügel, W.-A., and Beckstein, C. (2003). A neural network approach for the optimization of watershed management. Environ. Model. Softw., 18(8–9), 815–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, P. (2004). The DPSIR framework. workshop on a comprehensive/detailed assessment of the vulnerability of water resources to environmental change in Africa using river basin approach, 27–29 September, Nairobi, Kenya, UNEP Headquarters. 10p.
   Google Scholar
• Krogulec, E. (2013). Intrinsic and specific vulnerability of groundwater in a river valley—Assessment, verification and analysis of uncertainty. J. Earth Sci. Climat. Change., 4(159), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kübeck, C., Maloszewski, P., and Benischke, R. (2013). Determination of the conduit structure in a karst aquifer based on tracer data—Lurbach system, Austria. Hydrol. Processes., 27, 225–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kueper, B. H, and McWhorter, D. B (1991). The behavior of dense, nonaqueous phase liquids in fractured clay and rock. Ground Water, 29, 716–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel, R., and Wendland, F. (1997). WEKU—A GIS-supported stochastic model of groundwater residence times in upper aquifers for the supraregional groundwater management. Environ. Geol., 30(1–2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Laimer, H. J (2005). Die Erfassung der Karstgrundwasser-Vulnerabilität mit der Methode „VURAAS“. Grundwasser, 10(3), 167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Leibundgut, C., Maloszewski, P. and Külls, C. (2009). Tracers in hydrology. West Sussex, UK: Wiley & Sons Ltd., 415 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Liggett, J. E, and Talwar, S. (2009). Groundwater vulnerability assessments and integrated water resource management. Streamline, 13(1), 18–29.
   Google Scholar
• Lissey, A. (1962). Groundwater resources of the Regina area. Regina, Sask: Regina Engineering Department.
   Google Scholar
• Lobo-Ferreira, J. P, and Oliveira, M. M (1997). DRASTIC groundwater vulnerability mapping of Portugal. [w:] Groundwater: An endangered resource. Proc. of the 27th Congr. of the Int. Ass. for Hydraulic Research, San Francisco, USA, pp. 132–137.
   Google Scholar
• Lobo-Ferreira, J. P (1998). GIS and mathematical modelling for the assessment of vulnerability and geographical zoning for groundwater management and protection. In B. Paukštys, F. Fonnum, B. A Zeeb, K. J Reimer (Eds.), Environmental contamination and remediation practices at former and present military bases NATO Science Series 48, (pp. 143–170). Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, S. D, Reynders, A. G, and Schulze, R. E (1997). A DRASTIC approach to ground water vulnerability in South Africa. S African J. Sci., 93(2), 59–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majandang, J., and Sarapirome, S. (2013). Groundwater vulnerability assessment and sensitivity analysis in Nong Rua, Khon Kaen, Thailand, using a GIS-based SINTACS model. Environ. Earth Sci., 68, 2025–2039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, P., and Svasta, J. (1999). REKS—An alternative method of karst groundwater vulnerability estimation. Hydrogeology and land use management, Proceedings of the XXIX Congress of the International Association of Hydrogeologists, Bratislava, September 1999, 79–85.
   Google Scholar
• Maloszewski, P. and Zuber, A. (1982). Determining the turnover time of groundwater systems with the aid of environmental tracers: 1. Models and their applicability. J. Hydrol., 57(3-4), 207–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloszewski, P., and Zuber, A. (1996). Lumped parameter models for the interpretation of environmental tracer data. Manual on mathematical models in isotope hydrogeology. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Maloszewski, P., Maciejewski, S., Stumpp, C., Stichler, W., Trimborn, P., and Klotz, D. (2006). Modelling of water flow through typical Bavarian soils based on lysimeter experiments: 2. Environmental deuterium transport. Hydrol. Sci. J., 51(2), 298–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcais, J., de Dreuzy, J. R, Ginn, T. R, Rousseau-Gueutin, P., and Leray, S. (2015). Inferring transit time distributions from atmospheric tracer data: Assessment of the predictive capacities of Lumped Parameter Models on a 3D crystalline aquifer model. J. Hydrol., 525, 619–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcolongo, B., and Pretto, L. (1987). Aquifer vulnerability of the plain northwards of Vicenza, 1:25000 (in Italian). Pubbl. G. ND. CI. – C. NR. n. 28, 13 p.
   Google Scholar
• Margane, A. (2003). Guideline for groundwater vulnerability mapping and risk assessment for the susceptibility of groundwater resources to contamination. Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Arab Center for the Studies of Arid Zones and Dry Lands (ACSAD) Management, Protection and Sustainable Use of Groundwater and Soil Resources in the Arab Region Project Vol. 4. 177pp.
   Google Scholar
• Margat, J. (1968). Vulnérabilité des nappes d'eau souterraine à la pollution. BRGM-Publication 68 SGL 198 HYD; Orléans, France.
   Google Scholar
• Marín, A. I, Dörfliger, N., and Andreo, B. (2012). Comparative application of two methods (COP and PaPRIKa) for groundwater vulnerability mapping in Mediterranean karst aquifers (France and Spain). Environ. Earth Sci., 65, 2407–2421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, A. I, Andreo, B., and Mudarra, M. (2015), Vulnerability mapping and protection zoning of karst springs. Validation by multitracer tests. Sci. Total Environ., 532, 435–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marín. A. I and Andreo, B. (2015). Vulnerability to contamination of karst aquifers. In Stevanović, Z., (Ed.), Karst aquifers – characterization and engineering, professional practice in earth sciences, (pp. 251–266.) Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Marsico, A., Giuliano, G., Pennetta, L., and Vurro, M. (2004). Intrinsic vulnerability assessment of the south-eastern Murge (Apulia, southern Italy). Nat. Hazards Earth Syst Sci., 4, 769–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Bastida, J. J, Arauzo, M., and Valladolid, M. (2010). Intrinsic and specific vulnerability of groundwater in central Spain: The risk of nitrate pollution. Hydrogeol. J., 18, 681–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masetti, M., Poli, S., Sterlacchini, S. (2007). The use of the weights-of-evidence modeling technique to estimate the vulnerability of groundwater to nitrate contamination. Nat. Resour. Res., 16, 109–119.
   Google Scholar
• Masetti, M., Poli, S., Sterlacchini, S., Beretta, G. P, and Facchi, A. (2008). Spatial and statistical assessment of factors influencing nitrate contamination in groundwater. J. Environ. Manag., 86, 272–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masetti, M., Sterlacchini, S., Ballabio, C., Sorichetta, A., and Poli, S., (2009). Influence of threshold value in the use of statistical methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment. Sci. Total Environ., 407, 3836–3846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massoudieh, A., Visser, A., Sharifi, S., and Broers, H. P (2014). A Bayesian modeling approach for estimation of a shape-free groundwater age distribution using multiple tracers. Appl. Geochem., 50, 252–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxe L., and Johansson, P-O. (1998) Assessing groundwater vulnerability using residence time and specific surface area as indicators. Hydrogeol. J., 6, 441–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, K. J, and McDonnell, J. J (2006). A review and evaluation of catchment transit time modeling. J. Hydrol., 330(3–4), 543–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIelwain, T. A, Jackman, D. W, and Beukman, P. (1989). Characterization and remedial assessment of DNAPL PCB oil in fractured bedrock: a case study of the Smithville, Ontario site. In Proc. of FOCUS Conference on Eastern Regional Groundwater Issues. Kitchener, ON: National Well Water Association: 303–315
   Google Scholar
• McKay, L. D, and Fredericia, J. (1995). Distribution, origin, and hydraulic influence of fractures in a clay-rich glacial deposit. Can. Geotech. J., 32, 957–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWhorter, D. B, and Kueper, B. H (1996). Mechanics and mathematics of the movement of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) in porous media. In J. F Pankow and J. A Cherry (Eds.), Dense chlorinated solvents and other DNAPLs in groundwater; history, behavior, and remediation. (pp. 89–128). Rockwood, ON: Waterloo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meinardi, C. R, Beusen, A. HW., Bollen, M. JS., Klepper, O., and Willems W. J (1982). Vulnerability to diffuse pollution and average nitrate contamination of European soils and groundwater. Water Sci. Technol., 31(8), 159–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melloul, A., and Collin, M. (1998). Proposal index for aquifer water quality assessment: the case of the Israel's Sharon Region. J. Environ. Manage., 54, 131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyboom, P. (1966). Unsteady groundwater flow near a willow ring in hummocky moraine. J. Hydrol., 4, 38–62.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad, N. A, and Jagath, J. K (2005). Modular neural network to predict the nitrate distribution in ground water using the on-ground nitrogen loading and recharge data. Environ. Modell. Software, 20, 851–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molson, J. W, and Frind, E. O (2012). On the use of mean groundwater age, life expectancy and capture probability for defining aquifer vulnerability and time-of-travel zones for source water protection. J. Contam. Hydrol., 127, 76–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S, and John, S. (1990) SEEPAGE: A system for early evaluation of the pollution potential of agricultural groundwater environments, USDA. SCS, Northeast Technical Center, Geology Technical Note 5.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, B. L, Lawrence, A. RL., Chilton, P. JC., Adams, B., Calow, R. C, and Klinck, B. A (2003). Groundwater and its susceptibility to degradation: A global assessment of the problem and options for management. Early Warning and Assessment Report Series, RS. 03-3. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme 126p.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, W. EM., Parker, B. L, and Cherry, J. A (1998). Hydrogeological controls in flow and fate of PCE DNAPL in a fractured and layered clayey aquitard; a Borden experiment. In: Proc. of Geological Society of America 1998 annual meeting. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America: United States. 174.
   Google Scholar
• Mualem, Y. (1976). A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media, Water Resour. Res., 12, 513–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napolitano, P., and Fabbri, A. G (1996). Single-parameter sensitivity analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS. HydroGIS 96: Application of Geographic Information Systems in Hydrology and Water Resources, (pp. 559–566).
   Google Scholar
• Nativ, R., and Nissim, I. (1992). Characterization of a Desert Aquitard—Hydrologic and hydrochemical considerations. Ground Water, 30,598–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nativ, R., Dahan, O., Nissim, I., Adar, E., and Geyh, M. A (1995). Questions pertaining to isotopic and hydrochemical evidence of fracture-controlled water flow and solute transport in a chalk aquitard. International-Association-of-Hydrological-Sciences Publication ( chapter 232, pp. 317–327). Wallingford, England: IAHS.
   Google Scholar
• Navulur, K. CS., and Engel, B. A (1996). Predicting spatial distributions of vulnerability of Indiana state aquifer systems to nitrate leaching using a GIS. Third International Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling. NCGIA, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. 12p. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/SANTA_FE_CD-ROM/sfinfo.html
   Google Scholar
• Neukum, C. (2013), Overview on methods and applications for the validation of vulnerability assessments. Grundwasser, 18(1), 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neukum, C., and Hötzl, H. (2007). Standardization of vulnerability maps. Environ. Geol., 51, 689–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neukum, C., Hötzl, H., and Himmelsbach, T. (2008). Validation of vulnerability mapping methods by field investigations and numerical modeling. Hydrogeology Jour. 16(4), 641–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neukum, C., and Azzam, R. (2009). Quantitative assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability to contamination using numerical simulations. Sci. Total Environ., 408(2), 245–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. P, and Neretnieks, I. (1990). Hydrogeology of low permeability environments. Hannover Germany: Verlag Heinz Heise.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, B. D, Osenbruck, K., Aeschbach-Hertig, W., Solomon, D. K, Cook P., Rozanski, K., and Kipfer, R. (2010). Dating of “young” groundwaters using environmental tracers: advantages, applications, and research needs. Isot. Environ. Health Stud., 46, 259–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyet, V. TM., and Goldscheider, N. (2006). A simplified methodology for mapping groundwater vulnerability and contamination risk, and its first application in a tropical karst area, Vietnam. Hydrogeol. J., 14, 1666–1675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijenhuis, I., Schmidt, M., Pellegatti, E., Paramatti, E., Richnow, H. H, and Gargini, A. (2013). A stable isotope approach for source apportionment of chlorinated ethene plumes at a complex multi-contamination events urban site. J. Contam. Hydrol., 153, 92–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimmo, J. R (2012). Preferential flow occurs in unsaturated conditions. Hydrol. Processes, 26, 786–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, B. T, Hitt, K. J, and Ruddy, B. C (2002). Probability of nitrate contamination of recently recharged groundwaters in the conterminous United States. Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 2138–2145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. E (1959). Vertical leakage through till as a source of recharge to a buried-valley aquifer at Dayton, Ohio.Columbus, Ohio: Department of Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1993) Groundwater vulnerability assessment, contamination potential under condition of uncertainty. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ouedraogo, I., Defourny, P. and Vanclooster, M. (2016). Mapping the groundwater vulnerability for pollution at the pan African scale. Sci. Total Environ., 544, 939–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, G. P, Antonakos, A. K, and Lambrakis, N. J (2006). Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Hydrogeol. J., 14, 894–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pankow, J. F, and Cherry, J. A (1996). Dense chlorinated solvents and other DNAPLs in groundwater: History, behavior, and remediation. Rockwood, ON: Waterloo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, B. L (1996). Effects of molecular diffusion on the persistence of dense immiscible organic liquids in fractured porous media. Ph. D diss. Waterloo, Ontario: University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, B. L, Cherry, J. A, and Chapman, S. W (2004). Field study of TCE diffusion profiles below DNAPL to access aquitard integrity. J. Contam. Hydrol., 74, 197–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, B. L, Gillham, R. W, and Cherry, J. A (1994). Diffusive disappearance of immiscible-phase organic liquids in fractured geologic media. Ground Water, 32, 805–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlis, M., Cummins, E., and McDonnell, K. (2010). Groundwater vulnerability assessment of plant protection products: A review. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 16, 621–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, J., Pochon, A., Jeannin P.-Y., and Zwahlen F. (2004). Vulnerability assessment in karstic areas: Validation by field experiment. Environ. Geol., 46 (2), 237–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petelet-Giraud, E., Doerfliger, N., and Crochet, P. (2000). RISKE: méthode d’évaluation multicritère de la cartographie de la vulnérabilité des aquifères karstiques. Application aux systèmes des Fontanilles et Cent-Fonts (Herault, Sud de la France) Hydrogéol. 4, 71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Plagnes, V., Théry, S., Fontaine, L., Bakalowicz, M., and Dörfliger, N. (2005). Karst vulnerability mapping: improvement of the RISKE method. KARST 2005, Water Resources and Environmental Problems in Karst, 14–19 September 2005 Belgrade-Kotor, Serbia.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, R., de Loë, R, and Armitage, D. (2012). A systematic review of water vulnerability assessment tools. Water Resour. Manage., 26, 4327–4346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polemio, M., Casarano, D., and Limoni, P. P (2009). Karstic aquifer vulnerability assessment methods and results at a test site (Apulia, southern Italy). Nat. Hazard Hearth Syst. Sci., 9, 1461–1470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, I. C, Gardin, N., Brouyère, S., and Dassargues, A. (2008). Groundwater vulnerability assessment using physically based modelling: From challenges to pragmatic solutions. In J. C Refsgaard, K. Kovar, E. Haarder, and E. Nygaard (Eds.), ModelCARE 2007 Proceedings, Calibration and Reliability in Groundwater Modelling, Denmark: IAHS Publication No. 320, 83–88.
   Google Scholar
• PPG Industries. (1995). Phase 2, Draft Site Wide RCRA Facility Investigation Report submitted to U. S EPA, January 1995. (prepared by IT Corp.).
   Google Scholar
• Priesack, E., and Durner, W. (2006). Closed-form expression for the multi-modal unsaturated conductivity function. Vadose Zone J. 5(1), 121–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucci, A. A (1998). Hydrogeochemical processes and facies in confining units of the Atlantic Coastal Plain in New Jersey. Ground Water, 36, 635–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucci, A. A (1999). Sulfate transport in a coastal plain confining unit, New Jersey, USA. Hydrogeology Journal, 7, 251–263.
   Google Scholar
• Qamhieh, N. SA. R (2006). Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to contamination in the West Bank, Palestine (Unpublished master's thesis). An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. 115p.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, A. (2008). A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl. Geogr., 28, 32–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos Leal, J. A, Noyola Medrano, C., and Tapia Silva, F. O (2010). Aquifer vulnerability and groundwater quality in mega cities: Case of the Mexico Basin. Environ. Earth Sci., 61, 1309–1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravbar, N., and Goldscheider, N. (2007). Proposed methodology of vulnerability and contamination risk mapping for the protection of karst aquifers in Slovenia. Acta Carsol, 36(3), 461–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravbar, N., and Goldscheider, N. (2009). Comparative application of four methods of groundwater vulnerability mapping in a Slovene karst catchment. Hydrogeol. J., 17, 725–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravbar, N. (2007). The protection of karst waters: A comprehensive Slovene approach to vulnerability and contamination risk mapping. Ljubljana: Zalożba ZRC 254 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, J. A, and O'dell, P. W (1993). DIVERSITY. A new method for evaluating sensitivity of groundwater to contamination. Environ. Geol., 22, 345–352.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, J. A, Webb, J. S, and O'dell, P. W (1994). Groundwater sensitivity regions of Kentucky. Map 1:500000. Kentucky Dep. for Environ. Prot., Frankfort, Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Refsgaard, J.Ch., Christensen, S., Sonnenborg, T. O, Seifert, D., Højberg, A. L, and Troldborg, L. (2012). Review of strategies for handling geological uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport modeling. Adv. Water Resour., 36, 36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remenda, V. H, van der Kamp, G., and Cherry, J. A (1996). Use of vertical profiles of delta O-18 to constrain estimates of hydraulic conductivity in a thick, unfractured aquitard. Water Resour. Res., 32, 2979–2987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richert, S. E, Young, S. E, and Johnson, C. (1992). SEEPAGE: A GIS model for Groundwater Pollution Potential, Paper No. 922592ASAE 1992, International Winter Meeting, Nashville, Tennessee, 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. R, Cherry, J. A, and Schwartz, F. W (1982). A case-study of a chemical spill—Polychlorinated-biphenyls (PCBs) 1. History, distribution, and surface translocation. Water Resour. Res., 18, 525–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, N., Chilton, P. and Cobbing, J. (2007). Adapting existing experience with aquifer vulnerability and groundwater protection for Africa. J. Afr. Earth Sci., 47, 30–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rophe, B., Berkowitz, B., Magaritz, M., and Ronen, D. (1992). Analysis of subsurface flow and formation anisotropy in a fractured aquitard using transient water level data. Water Resour. Res., 28, 199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, L. (1994). A Study of the DRASTIC Methodology with emphasis on Swedish conditions. Ground Water, 32(2), 279–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozkowski, A. (1967). The origin of hydrochemical patterns in hummocky moraine. Can. J. Earth Sci., 4,1065–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Rupert, M. G (2001). Calibration of the DRASTIC ground water vulnerability mapping method. Ground Water, 39, 625–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sappa, G., and Lega, S. (1998). Comparison between different vulnerability analysis methods applied to a volcanic groundwater system. In D. Moore and O. Hungr (Eds.), Proceedings, Eighth International Congress, International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment in Vancouver, Canada: Balkema, Rotterdam, 2291–2298.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, B., Healy, R., and Cook, P. (2002). Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeol. J., 10(1), 18–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, K. E., Hubbard, T., Luzier, J., and Spooner, J. (2006). Walnut Creek watershed restoration and water quality monitoring. Project: Final Report. Iowa Department of Natural Resources. Iowa City, IA: Geological Survey Bureau Technical Information Series 49 124 p.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. O (2006). Numerical modeling of groundwater vulnerability; the example Namibia. Environmental Geol. 50, 237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, F. W, Cherry, J. A, and Roberts, J. R (1982). A case-study of a chemical spill—Polychlorinated-biphenyls (PCBs): 2. Hydrogeological conditions and contaminant migration. Water Resour. Res., 18, 535–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, V., Negi, S. C, Rudra, R. P, and Yang, S. (2003). Neural networks for predicting nitrate-nitrogen in drainage water. Agri. Water Manage., 63, 169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. J, and Hendry, M. J (1998). Hydrogeology of a thick clay till and Cretaceous clay sequence, Saskatchewan, Canada. Can. Geotech. J., 35,1041–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, S. M, Imran, H. M, and Akib, S. (2012). GIS-based DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment: A review, J. Risk Res., 15, 991–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sililo, O. T. N. and Tellam, J. H. (2000). Fingering in Unsaturated Zone Flow: A Qualitative Review with Laboratory Experiments on Heterogeneous Systems, Groundwater, 38(6), 864–871.
   Google Scholar
• Simpkins, W. W, Eidem, J. M, Seo, H. H, Johnson, B. L, Helmke, M. F, Weis, M. R, Parkin, T. B, Burkart, M. R, and Moorman, T. B (1996). Confining units are not created equal; Quaternary history and its control on physical and biogeochemical processes. In: Proc. of Geological Society of America 28th annual meeting. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Šimůnek, J., and Bradford, S. (2008). Vadose zone modeling: Introduction and importance. Vadose Zone J. 7, 581–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šimůnek, J., and van Genuchten, M. T (2008). Modelling nonequilibrium flow and transport processes using HYDRUS. Vadose Zone J. 7(2), 782–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šimůnek, J., van Genuchten, M. T, and Senja, M. (2005). The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media. Version 3, Riverside, USA: Department of Environmental Sciences University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Sinreich, M., and Pochon, A. (2015). Standardized approach for conducting tracing tests in order to validate and refine vulnerability mapping criteria. In B. Andreo et al. (Eds.), Hydrogeological and Environmental Investigations in Karst Systems, Springer Environmental Earth Sciences 1, 131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Sinreich, M., Flynn, R., and Zopfi, J. (2009). Use of particulate surrogates for assessing microbial mobility in subsurface ecosystems. Hydrogeol. J., 17, 49–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinreich, M., Cornaton, F., and Zwahlen, F. (2007). Evaluation of reactive transport parameters to assess specific vulnerability in karst systems. In A. J Witkowski, A. Kowalczyk, and J. Vrba Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping, Selected Papers on Hydrogeology, 11, 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sophocleous, M. (2012). On understanding and predicting groundwater response time. Ground Water, 50,528–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, M. R, Jones, J. P, Frind, E. O, and Rudolph, D. L (2013). A simple method to assess unsaturated zone time lag in the travel time from ground surface to receptor, J. Contam. Hydrol., 144(1), 138–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stähli, M., Jansson, P., and Lundin, L. C (1999). Soil moisture redistribution and infiltration in frozen sandy soils. Water Resour. Res., 35, 95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer, F., Stoll, S., Kipfer, R., and Kinzelbach, W. (2011). Analytical model for environmental tracer transport in well catchments. Water Resour. Res., 47, W03525, doi: 10.1029/2010WR009940.
   Google Scholar
• Stigter, T. Y, Ribeiro, L., and Carvalho Dill, A. MM. (2005). Evaluation of an intrinsic and a specific vulnerability assessment method in comparison with groundwater salinisation and nitrate contamination levels in two agricultural regions in the south of Portugal. Hydrogeol. J., 14, 79–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimson, J., Frape, S., Drimmie, R., and Rudolph, D. (2001). Isotopic and geochemical evidence of regional-scale anisotropy and interconnectivity of an alluvial fan system, Cochabamba Valley, Bolivia. Appl. Geoch., 16, 1097–1114.
   Google Scholar
• Stumpp, C., and Hendry, M. J (2012). Spatial and temporal dynamics of water flow and solute transport in a heterogeneous glacial till: The application of high resolution profiles of δ18O and δ2H in pore waters. J. Hydrol., 438–439, 203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpp, C., and Maloszewski, P. (2010). Quantification of preferential flow and flow heterogeneities in an unsaturated soil planted with different crops using the environmental isotope δ18O. J. Hydrol., 394, 407–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpp, C., Engelhardt, S., Hofmann, M., and Huwe, B. (2009a). Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for estimating soil hydraulic properties of prevalent soils in a catchment of the Bavarian Alps. European J. Forest Res., 128, 609–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpp, C., Maloszewski, P., Stichler, W., and Fank, J. (2009b). Environmental isotope (δ18O) and hydrological data to assess water flow in unsaturated soils planted with different crops: Case study lysimeter station “Wagna” (Austria). J. Hydrol., 369(1–2), 198–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpp, C., Maloszewski, P., Stichler, W., and Maciejewski, S. (2007). Quantification of heterogeneity of the unsaturated zone based on environmental deuterium observed in lysimeter experiments. Hydrol. Sci. J., 52, 748–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpp, C., Stichler, W. and Maloszewski, P. (2009c). Application of the environmental isotope δ18O to study water flow in unsaturated soils planted with different crops: Case study of a weighable lysimeter from the research field in Neuherberg, Germany. J. Hydrol., 368(1–4), 68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpp, C., Stichler, W., Kandolf, M., and Šimůnek, J. (2012). Effects of land cover and fertilization method on water flow and solute transport in five lysimeters: A long-term study using stable water isotopes Vadose Zone J., 11, doi:10.2136/vzj2011.0075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudicky, E. A (1986). A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process. Water Resour. Res., 22, 2069–2082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesoriero, A. J, and Voss, F. D (1997). Predicting the probability of elevated nitrate concentrations in the Puget Sound Basin: implications for aquifer susceptibility and vulnerability. Ground Water, 35, 1029–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A., and Tellam, J. (2006). Modelling of recharge and pollutant fluxes to urban groundwaters. Sci. Total Environ., 360(1–3), 158–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilahun, K., and Merkel, B. J (2010). Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution in Dire Dawa, Ethiopia using DRASTIC. Environ. Earth Sci., 59, 1485–1496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulipano, L., Sappa, G., and Vitale, S. (2002). Karstic aspects in the assessment of groundwater vulnerability of Maiella, Italy. In J. L. van Rooy, and C. A. Jermy (Eds.), Engineering Geology for Developing Countries - Proceedings of 9th Congress of the International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment. Durban, South Africa, 1623–1632.
   Google Scholar
• U. S Environmental Protection Agency. (1991). Wellhead Protection Strategies for Confined-Aquifer Settings. Washington, D. C: U. S Environmental Protection Agency Office of Groundwater and Drinking Water.
   Google Scholar
• U. S Environmental Protection Agency. (1993). A review of methods for assessing aquifer sensitivity and ground water vulnerability to pesticide contamination. U. S EPA/813/R-93/002, Washington, DC:Environmental Protection Agency 196p.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kamp, G. (2001). Methods for determining the in situ hydraulic conductivity of shallow aquitards—An overview. Hydrogeol. J., 9, 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Velde, Y., Torfs, P., van der Zee, S., and Uijlenhoet, R. (2012). Quantifying catchment-scale mixing and its effect on time-varying travel time distributions. Water Resour. Res., 48, W06536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Duijvenbooden, W., and van Waegeningh, H. G (Eds.) (1987). Vulnerability of soil and ground water pollutants, The Hague, The Netherlands: TNO Committee on Hydrological Research Proceedings and Information No. 38.
   Google Scholar
• van Genuchten, M. T (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Society Am. J., 44, 892–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Stempvoort, D., Ewert, L., and Wassenaar, L. (1993). Aquifer vulnerability index: A GIS-compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Can. Water Resour. J., 18, 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Van Stempvoort, D., Ewert, L., and Wassenaar, L. (1992). AVI: A method for ground water protection mapping in the Prairie Provinces of Canada. Regina, Saskatchewan: Prairie Provinces Water Board.
   Google Scholar
• Van Stempvoort, D. R, and Martin, P. (2003). Advancement of the use of the aquifer vulnerability index (AVI) in urban and rural areas. In: Proceedings, First International Workshop on Aquifer Vulnerability and Risk, May 2003, Salamanca, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Vereecken, H., Kasteel, R., Vanderborght, J., and Harter, T. (2007). Upscaling hydraulic properties and soil water flow processes in heterogeneous soils: A review. Vadose Zone J. 6(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vereecken, H., Weynants, M., Javaux, M., Pachepsky, Y., Schaap, M. G, and van Genuchten, M. T (2010). Using Pedotransfer Functions to Estimate the van Genuchten-Mualem Soil Hydraulic Properties: A Review. Vadose Zone J. 9(4), 795–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vías, J. M, Andreo B., Perles M. J, and Carrasco F. (2005). A comparative study of four schemes for groundwater vulnerability mapping in a diffuse flow carbonate aquifer under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Environ. Geol., 47, 586–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vías, J. M, Andreo, B., Perles, M. J, Carrasco, F., Vadillo, I., and Jiménez, P. (2006). Proposed method for groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karstic) aquifers: the COP method. Application in two pilot sites in Southern Spain, Hydrogeol. J., 14, 912–925.
   Google Scholar
• Vierhuff, F. (1981). Classification of groundwater resources for regional planning with regard to their vulnerability to pollution. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Studies in Env. Sci., 17, 1101–1105.
   Google Scholar
• Villumsen, A., Jacobsen, O. S, and Sonderskov, C. (1982). Mapping the vulnerability of groundwater reservoirs with regard to surface pollution. Copenhagen: Geological Survey of Denmark, Yearbook 1982 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, A., Broers, H. P, Purtschert, R., Sultenfuss, J., and de Jonge, M. (2013). Groundwater age distributions at a public drinking water supply well field derived from multiple age tracers (Kr-85, H-3/He-3, and Ar-39). Water Resour. Res., 49, 7778–7796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigt, H.-J., Heinkele, T., Jahnke, C., and Wolter, R. (2004). Characterization of groundwater vulnerability to fulfil requirements of the water framework directive of the European Union, Geofísica Internacional, 43, 567–574.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hoyer, M., and Sofner, B. (1998). Groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karst) areas of Germany, Federal institute for geosciences and natural resources, Archive no 117854, Hannover, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, C. I (2011a). Editor's message: Groundwater modeling fantasies—Part 1, adrift in the details. Hydrogeol. J., 19, 1281–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, C. I (2011b). Editor's message: Groundwater modeling fantasies—Part 1, down to earth. Hydrogeol. J., 19, 1455–1458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, C. I (2005). The future of hydrogeology. Hydrogeol. J., 13, 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrba, J., and Zaporozec, A. (Eds.) (1994). Guidebook on Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability. IAH, Intern. Contrib. to Hydrogeol. 16, Heise Verlag, Hannover.
   Google Scholar
• Weissmann, G. S, and Fogg, G. E (1999). Multi-scale alluvial fan heterogeneity modeled with transition probability geostatistics in a sequence stratigraphic framework. J. Hydrol., 226, 48–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. E, and Farvolden, R. N (1967). The influence of joints on the movement of groundwater through glacial till. J. Hydrol., 5, 163–170.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, J., Howell, L., McKay, L. D, Parker, B. L, and Walter, A. (1992). Smithville C. WM. L Site: characterizations of overburden fractures and implications for DNAPL transport. In Modern trends in hydrogeology: Proceedings of the 1992 Conference of the Canadian Chapter, Hamilton: International Association of Hydrogeologists Ont IAH 501–515.
   Google Scholar
• Witczak S., Duda R., and Zurek A. (2007). The Polish concept of groundwater vulnerability mapping. In A. J Witkowski, A. Kowalczyk, J. Vrba, (Eds.), Groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping, Selected Papers on Hydrogeol., 11, 45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Witczak, S. (Ed.) (2011). Groundwater vulnerability map of Poland. Ministerstwo Środowiska. Warszawa.
   Google Scholar
• Witkowski, A. J, Rubin, K., Kowalczyk, A., Rozkowski, A., and Wróbel, J. (2003). Groundwater vulnerability map of the Chrzanów karst-fissured Triassic aquifer (Poland). Environ. Geology, 44, 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Worral, F., and Besien, T. (2005). The vulnerability of groundwater to pesticide contamination estimated directly from observations of presence or absence in wells. J. Hydrol., 303, 92–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, M., and Topkaya, B. (2007). Groundwater protection: A comparative study of four vulnerability mapping methods. Clean, 35(6), 594–600.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C., Yao, Y., Hayes, G., Zhang, B., and Zheng, C. (2010). Quantitative assessment of groundwater vulnerability using index system and transport simulation, Huangshuihe catchment, China. Sci. Total Environ., 408, 6108–6116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampetti, M. (1983). Informazioni e dati relativi alla quantitá ed alla qualitá delle acque sotterranee nella Comunitá Europea. In: Proceedings of the international conference inquinamento delle Acque sotterranee da Composti organo-clorurati di Origine industriale. Milano, 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Ziezel, A. J, Walton, W. C, Sasman, R. T, and Prickett, T. A (1962). Ground-water resources of DuPage County, Illinois. Illinois State Water Survey and Illinois State Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Zuber, A., Różański, K., Kania, J., and Purtschert, R. (2011). On some methodological problems in the use of environmental tracers to estimate hydrogeologic parameters and to calibrate flow and transport models. Hydrogeol. J., 19, 53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuber, A., Witczak, S., Różański, K., Śliwka, I., Opoka, M., Mochalski, P., Kuc, T., Karlikowska, J., Kania, J., Korczyński-Jackowicz, M., and Duliński, M. (2005). Groundwater dating with 3H and SF6 in relation to mixing patterns, transport modelling and hydrochemistry. Hydrol. Processes, 19, 2247–2275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwahlen, F. (Ed.) (2004). Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers, final report. COST action 620, Brussels.
   Google Scholar