Arsenic, lead, and cadmium bioaccessibility in contaminated soils: Measurements and validations

References

• Basta, N. T., Foster, J. N., Dayton, E. A., Rodriguez, R. R., & Casteel, S. W. (2007). The effect of dosing vehicle on arsenic bioaccessibility in smelter-contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 42(9), 1275–1281. doi:10.1080/10934520701434927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basta, N. T., & Juhasz, A. (2014). Using in vivo bioavailability and/or in vitro gastrointestinal bioaccessibility testing to adjust human exposure to arsenic from soil ingestion. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 79(1), 451–472.
   Google Scholar
• Bradham, K., Diamond, G., Juhasz, A. L., Nelson, C., & Thomas, D. (2017). Comparison of mouse and swine bioassays for determination of soil arsenic relative bioavailability. Applied Geochemistry, 88, 221–225. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradham, K. D., Diamond, G. L., Burgess, M., Juhasz, A., Klotzbach, J. M., Maddaloni, M., … Thomas, D. J. (2018a). In vivo and in vitro methods for evaluating soil arsenic bioavailability: Relevant to human health risk assessment. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 21(2), 83–114. doi:10.1080/10937404.2018.1440902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradham, K. D., Diamond, G. L., Nelson, C. M., Noerpel, M., Scheckel, K. G., Elek, B., … Thomas, D. J. (2018b). Long-term in situ reduction in soil lead bioavailability measured in a mouse model. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(23), 13908–13913. doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b04684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradham, K. D., Diamond, G. L., Scheckel, K. G., Hughes, M. F., Casteel, S. W., Miller, B. W., … Thomas, D. J. (2013). Mouse assay for determination of arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 76(13), 815–826. doi:10.1080/15287394.2013.821395
   Google Scholar
• Bradham, K. D., Nelson, C., Juhasz, A. L., Smith, E., Scheckel, K., Obenour, D. R., … Thomas, D. J. (2015). Independent data validation of an in vitro method for the prediction of the relative bioavailability of arsenic in contaminated soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(10), 6312–6318. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradham, K. D., Scheckel, K. G., Nelson, C. M., Seales, P. E., Lee, G. E., Hughes, M. F., … Thoms, D. J. (2011). Relative bioavailability and bioaccessibility and speciation of arsenic in contaminated soils. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119(11), 1629–1634. doi:10.1289/ehp.1003352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brattin, W., & Casteel, S. (2013). Measurement of arsenic relative bioavailability in swine. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 76(7), 449–457. doi:10.1080/15287394.2013.771562
   Google Scholar
• Brattin, W., Drexler, J., Lowney, Y., Griffin, S., Diamond, G., & Woodbury, L. (2013). An in vitro method for estimation of arsenic relative bioavailability. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 76(7), 458–478. doi:10.1080/15287394.2013.771765
   Google Scholar
• Casteel, S. W., Weis, C. P., Henningsen, G. M., & Brattin, W. J. (2006). Estimation of relative bioavailability of lead in soil and soil–like materials using young swine. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(8), 1162–1171. doi:10.1289/ehp.8852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denys, S., Caboche, J., Tack, K., Rychen, G., Wragg, J., Cave, M., … Feidt, C. (2012). In vivo validation of the unified BARGE method to assess the bioaccessibility of arsenic, antimony, cadmium, and lead in soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(11), 6252–6260. doi:10.1021/es3006942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, G. K., Bradham, K. D., Brattin, W. J., Burgess, M., Griffin, S., Hawkins, C. A., … Thomas, D. J. (2016). Predicting oral relative bioavailability of arsenic in soil from in vitro bioaccessibility. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 79(4), 165–173. doi:10.1080/15287394.2015.1134038
   Google Scholar
• Deutsches Institut fur Normung e.V. (DIN). (2000). Soil Quality − Absorption availability of organic and inorganic pollutants from contaminated soil material. DIN E, 19738.
   Google Scholar
• Drexler, J. W., & Brattin, W. J. (2007). An in vitro procedure for estimation of lead relative bioavailability: With validation. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 13(2), 383–401. doi:10.1080/10807030701226350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. L., Weber, J., & Smith, E. (2011). Influence of saliva, gastric and intestinal phases on the prediction of As relative bioavailability using the Unified Bioaccessibility Research Group of Europe Method (UBM). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 197, 161–168. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. L., Basta, N. T., & Smith, E. (2013). What is required for the validation of in vitro assays for predicting contaminant relative bioavailability? Considerations and criteria. Environmental Pollution, 180, 372–375. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. L., Gancarz, D., Herde, C., McClure, S., Scheckel, K. G., & Smith, E. (2014). In situ formation of pyromorphite is not required for the reduction of in vivo Pb relative bioavailability in contaminated soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(12), 7002–7009. doi:10.1021/es500994u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. L., Herde, P., Herde, C., Boland, J., & Smith, E. (2014). Validation of the predictive capabilities of the Sbrc-G in vitro assay for estimating arsenic relative bioavailability in contaminated soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(21), 12962–12969. doi:10.1021/es503695g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. L., Herde, P., Herde, C., Boland, J., & Smith, E. (2015). Predicting arsenic relative bioavailability using multiple in vitro assays: Validation of in vivo-in vitro correlations. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(18), 11167–11175. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b02508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. L., Scheckel, K. G., Betts, A. R., & Smith, E. (2016). Predictive capabilities of in vitro assays for estimating Pb relative bioavailability in phosphate amended soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(23), 13086–13094. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b04059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. L., Smith, E., Nelson, C., Thomas, D. J., & Bradham, K. D. (2014). Variability associated with As in vivo–in vitro correlations when using different bioaccessibility methodologies. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(19), 11646–11653. doi:10.1021/es502751z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. L., Smith, E., Weber, J., Rees, M., Rofe, A., Kuchel, T., … Naidu, R. (2007). Comparison of in vivo and in vitro methodologies for the assessment of arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils. Chemosphere, 69(6), 961–966. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.05.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. L., Weber, J., Naidu, R., Gancarz, D., Rofe, A., Todor, D., & Smith, E. (2010). Determination of cadmium relative bioavailability in contaminated soils and its prediction using in vitro methodologies. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(13), 5240–5247. doi:10.1021/es1006516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. L., Weber, J., Smith, E., Naidu, R., Marschner, B., Rees, M., … Sansom, L. (2009). Evaluation of SBRC–gastric and SBRC–intestinal methods for the prediction of in vivo relative lead bioavailability in contaminated soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(12), 4503–4509. doi:10.1021/es803238u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. L., Weber, J., Smith, E., Naidu, R., Rees, M., Rofe, A., … Sansom, L. (2009). Assessment of four commonly employed in vitro arsenic bioaccessibility assays for predicting in vivo relative arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(24), 9487–9494. doi:10.1021/es902427y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, M. E., Brauning, S. E., Schoof, R. A., & Ruby, M. V. (2002). Assessing oral bioavailability of metals in soil. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H. B., Cui, X. Y., Li, K., Li, J., Juhasz, A. L., & Ma, L. Q. (2014). Assessment of in vitro lead bioaccessibility in house dust and its relationship to in vivo lead relative bioavailability. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(15), 8548–8455. doi:10.1021/es501899j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. B., Li, J., Zhu, Y. G., Juhasz, A. L., & Ma, L. Q. (2015). Comparison of arsenic bioaccessibility in housedust and contaminated soils based on four in vitro assays. Science of the Total Environment, 532, 803–811. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. B., Zhao, D., Li, J., Li, S. W., Wang, N., Juhasz, A. L., … Ma, L. Q. (2016). Using the SBRC assay to predict lead relative bioavailability in urban soils: Contaminant source and correlation model. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(10), 4989–4996. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Li, C., Sun, H. J., Juhasz, A. L., Luo, J., Li, H. B., & Ma, L. Q. (2016). Arsenic relative bioavailability in contaminated soils: Comparison of animal models, dosing schemes, and biological end points. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(1), 453–461. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b04552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Li, K., Cave, M., Li, H. B., & Ma, L. Q. (2015). Lead bioaccessibility in 12 contaminated soils from China: Correlation to lead relative bioavailability and lead in different fractions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 295, 55–62. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.03.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Li, K., Cui, X. Y., Basta, N., Li, L. P., Li, H. B., & Ma, L. Q. (2015). In vitro bioaccessibility and in vivo relative bioavailability in 12 contaminated soils: Method comparison and method development. Science of the Total Environment, 532, 812–820. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. W., Liu, X., Sun, H. J., Li, M. Y., Zhao, D., Luo, J., … Ma, L. Q. (2017). Effect of phosphate amendment on relative bioavailability and bioaccessibility of lead and arsenic in contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 339, 256–263. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.06.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. W., Sun, H. J., Li, H. B., Luo, J., & Ma, L. Q. (2016). Assessment of cadmium bioaccessibility to predict its bioavailability in contaminated soils. Environment International, 94, 600–606. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. W., Sun, H. J., Wang, G., Cui, X. Y., Juhasz, A. L., Li, H. B., & Ma, L. Q. (2017). Lead relative bioavailability in soils based on different endpoints of a mouse model. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 326, 94–100. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.12.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. Y., Wang, B. B., Cui, X. Y., Xu, D. Q., Cheng, H. G., Wang, Q., … Liu, Y. Z. (2017). Estimates of soil ingestion in a population of Chinese children. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(7), 077002. doi:10.1289/EHP930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschner, B., Welge, P., Hack, A., Wittsiepe, J., & Wilhelm, M. (2006). Comparison of soil Pb in vitro bioaccessibility and in vivo bioavailability with Pb pools from a sequential soil extraction. Environmental Science & Technology., 40(8), 2812–2818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollson, C. J., Smith, E., Scheckel, K. G., Betts, A. R., & Juhasz, A. L. (2016). Assessment of arsenic speciation and bioaccessibility in mine-impacted materials. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 313, 130–137. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.03.090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oomen, A. G., Hack, A., Minekus, M., Zeijdner, E., Cornelis, C., Schoeters, G., … Van Wijnen, J. H. (2002). Comparison of five in vitro digestion models to study the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(15), 3326–3334. doi:10.1021/es010204v
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oomen, A. G., Tolls, J., Sips, A. J. A. M., & Groten, J. P. (2003). In vitro intestinal lead uptake and transport in relation to speciation. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 44(1), 116–124. doi:10.1007/s00244-002-1226-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, R. R., Basta, N. T., Casteel, S. W., & Pace, L. W. (1999). An in vitro gastrointestinal method to estimate bioavailable arsenic in contaminated soils and solid media. Environmental Science & Technology, 33(4), 642–649. doi:10.1021/es980631h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, M. V., Davis, A., Schoof, R., Eberle, S., & Sellstone, C. M. (1996). Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test. Environmental Science & Technology, 30(2), 422–430. doi:10.1021/es950057z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, M. V., & Lowney, Y. W. (2012). Selective soil particle adherence to hands: Implications for understanding oral exposure to soil contaminants. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(23), 12759–12771. doi:10.1021/es302473q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, M. V., Schoof, R., Brattin, W., Goldade, M., Post, G., Harnois, M., … Chappell, W. (1999). Advances in evaluating the oral bioavailability of inorganics in soil for use in human health risk assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 33(21), 3697–3705. doi:10.1021/es990479z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroder, J. L., Basta, N. T., Casteel, S. W., Evans, T. J., Payton, M. E., & Si, J. (2004). Validation of the in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) method to estimate relative bioavailable lead in contaminated soils. Journal of Environment Quality, 33(2), 513–521. doi:10.2134/jeq2004.0513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroder, J. L., Basta, N. T., Si, J., Casteel, S. W., Evans, T., & Payton, M. (2003). In vitro gastrointestinal method to estimate relative bioavailable cadmium in contaminated soil. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(7), 1365–1370. doi:10.1021/es026105e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. A., Kirk, J. L., & Stephenson, G. L. (2010). The influence of liquid to soil ratios on arsenic and lead bioaccessibility in reference and field soil. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 16(1), 149–162. doi:10.1080/10807030903459163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., Kempson, I. M., Juhasz, A. L., Weber, J., Rofe, A., Gancarz, D., … Gräfe, M. (2011). In vivo–in vitro and XANES spectroscopy assessments of lead bioavailability in contaminated periurban soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(14), 6145–6152. doi:10.1021/es200653k
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., Scheckel, K., Miller, B. W., Weber, J., & Juhasz, A. L. (2014). Influence of in vitro assay pH and extractant composition on As bioaccessibility in contaminated soils. Science of the Total Environment, 473–474, 171–177. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA. (1994). Guidance manual for the integrated exposure uptake biokinetic model for lead in children. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. (2008). Child specific exposure factors handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Retrieved from http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=199243
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. (2009). Validation assessment of in vitro lead bioaccessibility assay for predicting relative bioavailability of lead in soils and soil-like materials at superfund sites (pp. 3–51). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. OSWER 9200.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. (2012). Compilation and review of data on relative bioavailability of arsenic in soil (pp. 1–113). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. OSWER 9200. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/superfund/health/contaminants/bioavailability/guidance.htm
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. (2013). In vitro bioaccessibility assay for lead in soil. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 1340.
   Google Scholar
• von Lindern, I., Spalinger, S., Stifelman, M. L., Stanek, L. W., & Bartrem, C. (2016). Estimating children’s soil/dust ingestion rates through retrospective analyses of blood lead biomonitoring from the Bunker Hill Superfund Site in Idaho. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(9), 1462–1470. doi:10.1289/ehp.1510144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitacre, S., Basta, N., Stevens, B., Hanley, V., Anderson, R., & Scheckel, K. (2017). Modification of an existing in vitro method to predict relative bioavailable arsenic in soils. Chemosphere, 180, 545–552. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wragg, J., Cave, M., Taylor, H., Basta, N., Brandon, E., Casteel, S., … Wiele, T. (2009). Interlaboratory trial of a unified bioaccessibility procedure. British Geological Survey, OR/07/027.
   Google Scholar
• Wragg, J., Cave, M., Basta, N., Brandon, E., Casteel, S., Denys, S. E. B., … Van de Wiele, T. (2011). An inter–laboratory trial of the unified BARGE bioaccessibility method for arsenic, cadmium and lead in soil. Science of the Total Environment, 409(19), 4016–4030.
   Google Scholar
• Zahran, S., Laidlaw, M. A., McElmurry, S. P., Filippelli, G. M., & Taylor, M. (2013). Linking source and effect: Resuspended soil lead, air lead, and children's blood lead levels in Detroit, Michigan. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(6), 2839–2845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar