Social Meaning Mapping as a Means of Exploring Visitors’ Practices in the Museum

References

• Adams, M., Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2003). Things change. In M. Xanthoudaki, L. Tickle, & V. Sekules (Eds.), Researching visual arts education in museums and galleries. Landscapes: The arts, aesthetics, and education (vol. 2, pp. 15–32). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chiozzi, G., & Andreotti, L. (2001). Behavior vs. time: Understanding how visitors utilize the Milan natural history museum. Curator: The Museum Journal, 44(2), 153–165. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2001.tb00038.x
   Google Scholar
• Christidou, D. (2019). Social Meaning Mapping: A digital tool for visitors to map their museum experience. In K. Lund, G. P. Niccolai, E. Lavoué, C. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon, & M. Baker (Eds.), A wide lens: Combining embodied, enactive, extended, and embedded learning in collaborative settings, 13th international conference on computer supported collaborative learning (vol. 2, pp. 763–765.
   Google Scholar
• Christidou, D., & Reitstätter, L. (2020). From map using to map making: The museum experience through social meaning mapping. In: Gresalfi, M. and Horn, I. S. (Eds.). (2020). The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, Volume 2, pp. 1087–1094. Nashville, Tennessee: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Coffee, K. (2007). Audience research and the museum experience as social practice. Museum Management and Curatorship, 22(4), 377–389. doi: 10.1080/09647770701757732
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S. (2005). Intention and meaning in young children’s drawing. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 24(2), 115–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2005.00432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deans, C., Martin, J., Neon, K., Nuesea, B., & O’Reilly, J. (1987). A zoo for who? A pilot study in zoo design for children: The Reid park zoo. Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). They don’t show nothing I didn’t know: Emergent tensions between culturally relevant pedagogy and mathematics pedagogy. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 139–174. doi: 10.1080/10508400701193671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Reinhard, E. M., Vernon, C. L., Bronnenkant, K., Deans, N. L., & Heimlich, J. E. (2007). Why zoos & aquariums matter: Assessing the impact of a visit. Association of Zoos & Aquariums.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E., Elwood, S., & Mitchell, K. (2016). Critical spatial learning: Participatory mapping, spatial histories, and youth civic engagement. Children's Geographies, 14(5), 558–572. doi: 10.1080/14733285.2015.1136736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2006). Studying visitors. In S. MacDonald (Ed.), A companion to museum studies (pp. 362–376). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and the interpretation of visual culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Korn, R., & Jones, J. (2000). Visitor behavior and experiences in the four permanent galleries at the tech museum of innovation. Curator: The Museum Journal, 43(3), 261–281. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2000.tb01718.x
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K., & Knutson, K. (Eds.). (2002). Learning conversations in museums. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Melton, A. W. (1935). Problems of installation in museums of art. New Series Number 14. American Association of Museums.
   Google Scholar
• Melton, A. W. (1936). Distribution of attention in galleries of science and industry. Museum News, 14(3), 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Nurse Rainbolt, G., Benfield, J. A., & Loomis, R. J. (2012). Visitor self-report behavior mapping as a tool for recording exhibition circulation. Visitor Studies, 15(2), 203–216. doi: 10.1080/10645578.2012.715035
   Google Scholar
• Pattison, S., & Shagott, T. (2015). Participant reactivity in museum research: The effect of cueing visitors at an interactive exhibit. Visitor Studies, 18(2), 214–232. doi: 10.1080/10645578.2015.1079103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierroux, P., & Steier, R. (2016). Making it real: Transforming a university and museum research collaboration into a design product. In V. Svihla, & R. Reeve (Eds.), Design as scholarship. Case studies from the learning sciences (pp. 115–129). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, E. S. (1928). The behavior of the museum visitor. New Series No. 5. American Association of Museums.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., & Lindley, S. (2004). Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: Which way is best?. Interacting with Computers, 16(6), 1133–1152. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2004.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, N. (2010). The participatory museum. Museum 2.0.
   Google Scholar
• Tröndle, M., Wintzerith, S., Wäspe, R., & Tschacher, W. (2012). A museum for the twenty-first century: The influence of ‘sociality’ on art reception in museum space. Museum Management and Curatorship, 27(5), 461–486. doi: 10.1080/09647775.2012.737615
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2007). Graphic-narrative play: Young children’s authoring through drawing and telling. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 8(8), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Yalowitz, S., & Bronnenkant, K. (2009). Timing and tracking: Unlocking visitor behavior. Visitor Studies, 12(1), 47–64. doi: 10.1080/10645570902769134
   Google Scholar