Looking Back to Think Ahead: Reflections on Science Festival Evaluation and Research

References

• Adhikari, B., Hlaing, P. H., Robinson, M. T., Ruecker, A., Tan, N. H., Jatupornpimol, N., Chanviriyavuth, R., & Cheah, P. Y. (2019). Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand. PLoS One, 14(7), e0219983. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, S. (2008). Tools, topics, and common issues in evaluation experimental design choices. In A. J. Friedmean (Ed.), Framework for evaluating impacts of informal science education projects (pp. 31–33). National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, S., & Peterman, K. (2019). Evaluating informal STEM education: Issues and challenges in xontext. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(161), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20354
   Google Scholar
• Asher, T. (2019). Unlocking the neuroscience of visitor experience. https://www.aam-us.org/2019/08/05/unlocking-the-neuroscience-of-visitor-experience/
   Google Scholar
• Becker-Klein, R., Peterman, K., & Stylinski, C. (2016). Embedded assessment as an essential method for understanding public engagement in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1).
   Google Scholar
• Bevc, C., Young, D., & Peterman, K. (2016). Using social network analysis to document science festival partnerships. Journal of Science Communication, 15(5), A04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15050204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyette, T., & Ramsey, J. (2019). Does the messenger matter? Studying the impacts of scientists and engineers interacting with public audiences at science festival events. Journal of Science Communication, 18(2), A02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18020202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bultitude, K., McDonald, D., & Custead, S. (2011). The rise and rise of science festivals: An international review of organised events to celebrate science. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.588851
   Google Scholar
• CAISE. (2019). What are the important gaps in informal STEM education research? https://www.informalscience.org/research/what-important-gaps-informal-stem-education-research
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, C. (2019). “Going to these events truly opens your eyes” Perceptions of science and science careers following a family visit to a science festival. Journal of Science Communication, 18(2), A06. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18020201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. (2019). Science communication as emotion work: Negotiating curiosity and wonder at a science festival. Science as Culture, 28(4), 538–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1597035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. (2014). Equity in informal science education: Developing an access and equity framework for science museums and science centres. Studies in Science Education, 50(2), 209–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.957558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. (2019). Equity, exclusion and everyday science learning: The experiences of minoritised groups. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dippel, E. A., Mechels, K. B., Griese, E. R., Laufmann, R. N., & Weimer, J. M. (2016). Midwest science festival: Exploring students’ and parents’ participation in and attitudes toward science. South Dakota Medicine, 69(8), 343–349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., Swanger, L. P., Staus, N., Back, M., Barriault, C., Catalao, C., Chambers, C., Chew, L.-L., Dahl, S. A., Falla, S., Gorecki, B., Lau, T.-C., Lloyd, A., Martin, J., Santer, J., Singer, S., Solli, A., Trepanier, G., Tyystjärvi, K., & Verheyden, P. (2016). Correlating science center use with adult science literacy: An international, cross‐institutional study. Science Education, 100(5), 849–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Needham, M. (2011). Measuring the impact of a science center on its community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. W. (2017). Equity and the meaning of science learning: A defining challenge for science museums. Science Education, 101(4), 533–538. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogg-Rogers, L., Bay, J. L., Burgess, H., & Purdy, H. C. (2015). “Knowledge is power”: A mixed-methods study exploring adult audience preferences for engagement and learning formats over 3 years of a health science festival. Science Communication, 37(4), 419–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015585006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fooshee, J. (2019). Science Festival Alliance 2018 annual report. https://sciencefestivals.org/blog/2018-sfa-member-annual-report/
   Google Scholar
• Fu, A. C., Kannan, A., & Shavelson, R. J. (2019). Direct and unobtrusive measures of informal STEM education outcomes. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(161), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20348
   Google Scholar
• Fu, A. C., Kannan, A., Shavelson, R. J., Peterson, L., & Kurpius, A. (2016). Room for rigor: Designs and methods in informal science education evaluation. Visitor Studies, 19(1), 12–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2016.1144025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibay, C., & Teasdale, R. M. (2019). Equity and evaluation in informal STEM education. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(161), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20352
   Google Scholar
• Grack Nelson, A., Goeke, M., Auster, R., Peterman, K., & Lussenhop, A. (2019). Shared measures for evaluating common outcomes of informal STEM education experiences. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(161), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20353
   Google Scholar
• Iachini, T., Maffei, L., Masullo, M., Senese, V. P., Rapuano, M., Pascale, A., Sorrentino, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2019). The experience of virtual reality: Are individual differences in mental imagery associated with sense of presence? Cognitive Processing, 20(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0897-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idema, J., & Patrick, P. G. (2019). Experiential learning theory: Identifying the impact of an Ocean Science Festival on family members and defining characteristics of successful activities. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1-19, 9(3), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1614238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illingworth, S. M., Lewis, E., & Percival, C. (2015). Does attending a large science event enthuse young people about science careers? Journal of Science Communication, 14(2), A06. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.14020206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. (2015). Evaluating impact and quality of experience in the 21st century: Using technology to narrow the gap between science communication research and practice. Journal of Science Communication, 14(3), C05. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.14030305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, E., & Buckley, N. (2014). Why people attend science festivals: Interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 23(5), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512458624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato-Nitta, N., Maeda, T., Iwahashi, K., & Tachikawa, M. (2018). Understanding the public, the visitors, and the participants in science communication activities. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 27(7), 857–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517723258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, E. B., Jensen, E. A., & Verbeke, M. (2018). Preaching to the scientifically converted: Evaluating inclusivity in science festival audiences. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1371356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, V. Y. (2017). Citizen science as a means for increasing public engagement in science: Presumption or possibility? Science Communication, 39(2), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017696165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, M., Griswold, J., Starks, H., Fullerton, S. M., Viernes, C., Sipe, T. A., Brown, M., Dwight, C., Knuth, R., & Levias, S. (2018). Celebrating STEM in rural communities: A model for an inclusive science and engineering festival. Journal of STEAM Outreach, 1(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2015). Identifying and supporting productive STEM programs in out-of-school settings. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K., Gathings, M. J., & Peterman, K. (2019). New, not different: Data-driven perspectives on science festival audiences. Science Communication, 41(2), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019832312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, A. R., Yanowitz, K. L., & Grippo, A. A. (2015). How we engaged audiences in informal science education through the Inaugural Arkansas Science Festival. Alan J. Friedman, 7(2), 63.
   Google Scholar
• Peterman, K., & Young, D. (2015). Mystery shopping: An innovative method for observing interactions with scientists during public science events. Visitor Studies, 18(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2015.1016369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson Evia, J., & Peterman, K. (2020). Understanding engagement with science festivals: Who are the engaged? Visitor Studies, 23(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2020.1750276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, K. M., Korzekwa, K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Heisler, L. (2017). Engaging the public at a science festival: Findings from a panel on human gene editing. Science Communication, 39(2), 250–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017697981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. (2018). Q&A: For Chicago playwright Stuart Flack, mixing art and data is a snap. https://madison.com/ct/news/local/q-a-for-chicago-playwright-stuart-flack-mixing-art-and/article_16c08d32-711c-5c0d-8afd-51f61.html
   Google Scholar
• van Beynen, K., & Burress, T. (2018). Debris, diatoms, and dolphins: Tracking child engagement at a public science festival. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(4), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2018.1506189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beynen, K., Neville, T., & Burress, T. (in revision). The role of peer youth exhibitors on child engagement at a public science festival. International Journal of Science Education - Part B.
   Google Scholar
• Wellcome Trust. (2008). Millennium science centres impact assessment report. Wellcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Wiehe, B. (2014). When science makes us who we are: Known and speculative impacts of science festivals. Journal of Science Communication, 13(4), C02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13040302
   Google Scholar
• Yoshimura, Y., Amini, A., Sobolevsky, S., Blat, J., & Ratti, C. (2017). Analysis of pedestrian behaviors through non-invasive Bluetooth monitoring. Applied Geography, 81, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimura, Y., Sobolevsky, S., Ratti, C., Girardin, F., Carrascal, J. P., Blat, J., & Sinatra, R. (2014). An analysis of visitors’ behavior in the Louvre Museum: A study using Bluetooth data. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(6), 1113–1131. https://doi.org/10.1068/b130047p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar