Designing 3-D Prints for Blind and Partially Sighted Audiences in Museums: Exploring the Needs of Those Living with Sight Loss

References

• Access Economics. (2009). Future sight loss UK (1): The economic impact of partial sight and blindness in the UK adult population. Full Report. RNIB.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostakis, G., Antoniao, M., Kardamitsi, E., Sachinidis, T., Koutsabasis, P., Stavrakis, M., Vosinakis, S., & Zissis, D. (2016). Accessible museum collections for the visually impaired: Combining tactile exploration, audio descriptions and mobile gestures [Paper presentation]. MobileHCI'16 Adjunct, Florence, Italy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2957265.2963118
   Google Scholar
• Alary, F., Duquette, M., Goldstein, R., Chapman, C. E., Voss, P., La Buissonnière-Ariza, V., & Lepore, F. (2009). Tactile acuity in the blind: A closer look reveals superiority over the sighted in some but not all cutaneous tasks. Neuropsychologia, 47(10), 2037–2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballarin, M., Balletti, C., & Vernier, P. (2018). Replicas in cultural heritage: 3D printing and the museum experience. In F. Remondino, I. Toschi, & T. Fuse (Eds.), The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensory and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLII-2, 2018 ISPRS TC II Mid-term Symposium “Towards Photogrammetry 2020 (pp. 55–62). ISPRS. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-55-2018
   Google Scholar
• Balletti, C., & Ballarin, M. (2019). An application of integrated 3D technologies for replicas in cultural heritage. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Informatics, 8, 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8060285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, E., Wiebel, C. B., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2015). A comparison of haptic material perception in blind and sighted individuals. Vision Research, 115(Pt B), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourne, R. R. A., Stevens, G. A., White, R. A., Smith, J. L., Flaxman, S. R., Price, H., Jonas, J. B., Keeffe, J., Leasher, J., Naidoo, K., Pesudovs, K., Resnikoff, S., & Taylor, H. R. (2013). Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis. The Lancet. Global Health, 1(6), e339–e349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70113-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callieri, M., Pingi, P., Potenziani, M., Dellepiane, M., Pavoni, G., Lureau, A., & Scopigno, R. (2015). Alchemy in 3D: A digitization for a journey through matter [Paper presentation]. Paper presented at 2015 Digital Heritage, Granada, Spain. https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2015.7413875
   Google Scholar
• Candlin, F. (2003). Blindness, art and exclusion in museums and galleries. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 22(1), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candlin, F. (2008). Don’t touch. Hands off! Art, blindness and the conservation of expertise. In E. Pye (Ed.), The power of touch: Handling objects in museum and heritage contexts (pp. 89–106). Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Candlin, F. (2010). Art, museums and touch. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Chen, C., Yu, Z., Yin, H., He, L., & Yuan, J. (2016). Color 3D printing: Theory, method and application. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/63944
   Google Scholar
• Chick, A. (2017). Co-creating an accessible, multisensory exhibition with the national centre for craft & design and blind and partially sighted participants. Paper presented at REDO: 2017 Cumulus International Conference, Kolding, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, C. K., & Leong, K. F. (2015). 3D printing and additive manufacturing: Principles and applications. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/10200
   Google Scholar
• Disability Discrimination Act. 1995. Disability Discrimination Act: 1995. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/50/pdfs/ukpga_19950050_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eardley, A. F., Fryer, L., Hutchinson, R., Cock, M., Ride, P., & Neves, J. (2017). Enriched audio description: Working towards and inclusive museum experience. In S. Halder & L. C. Assaf (Eds.), Inclusion, disability and culture, inclusive learning and educational equity (pp. 195–207). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55224-8_13
   Google Scholar
• Eardley, A. F., Mineiro, C., Neves, J., & Ride, P. (2016). Redefining access: Embracing multimodality, memorability and shared experience in Museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 59(3), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EBU. (2020). About blindness and partial sight: Facts and figures. http://www.euroblind.org/about-blindness-and-partial-sight/facts-and-figures
   Google Scholar
• Equality Act. (2010). Equality Act: 2010. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/pdfs/ukpga_20100015_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, G. C. (2015). Mistakes and how to avoid mistakes in using intercoder reliability indices. Methodology, 11(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2014). Touch with the future: The sense of touch from cognitive neuroscience to virtual reality. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644469.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, I., Rosen, D., & Stucker, B. (2015). Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. C., Thiagarajah, M. C., & Sathian, K. (2000). Tactile perception in blind braille readers: A psychophysical study of acuity and hyperacuity using gratings and dot patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(2), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03205550
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guarini, B. F. (2015). Beyond braille on toilet doors: Museum curators and audiences with vision impairment. M/C Journal, 18, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, R., Balakrishnan, M., & Rao, P. V. M. (2017). Tactile diagrams for the visually impaired. IEEE Potentials, 36(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPOT.2016.2614754
   Google Scholar
• Hayhoe, S. (2013). The philosophical, political and religious roots of touch exhibitions in 20th century British museums. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(3), 48980. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v33i3.3760
   Google Scholar
• Hegna, T. A., & Johnson, R. E. (2016). Preparation of fossil and osteological 3D-printable models from freely available CT-scan movies. Journal of Paleontological Techniques, 16, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, M. A., & Ballesteros, S. (2006). Introduction: Approaches to touch and blindness. In M. A. Heller & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Touch and blindness: Psychology and neuroscience (pp. 1–24). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615671
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, K. (2000). Museums and the visually impaired: The spatial politics of access. The Sociological Review, 48(3), 444–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, K. (2003). Accountability and disposal: Visual impairment and the museum. Museum and Society, 1(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v1i2.18
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, L., Marriott, K., Butler, M., & Borning, A. (2019). Making sense of art [Paper presentation]. The 2019 CHI Conference, Access for Gallery Visitors with Vision Impairments. Paper presented at CHI’19 Proceedings of on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, Scotland. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300250
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2007). Museums and education: Purpose, pedagogy, performance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937525
   Google Scholar
• Jafri, R., & Ali, A. A. (2015). Utilizing 3D printing to assist the blind. Paper presented at HIMS’15 International Conference on Informatics and Medical Systems, Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Karnapke, M., & Baker, B. (2018). Digital heritage and 3D printing: Trans-media analysis and the display of prehistoric rock art from Valcamonica. In M. Ioannides (Ed.), Digital cultural heritage (pp. 227–238). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75826-8_19
   Google Scholar
• Koch, V., Lückert, A., Schwarz, T., Both, P., & Diziol, P. (2013). Using rapid prototyping technologies to grant visually impaired persons access to paintings, sculptures, graphics and architecture. In H. Achten, J. Pavliček, J. Hulín, & D. Matějovská(Eds.), 508 30th eCAADe Conference Prague 2012 Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic. Vol. 2. Physical Digitality (pp. 501–508). eCAADe.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2009). Testing the reliability of content analysis data: What is involved and why? In K. Krippendorff & M. A. Bock (Eds.), The content analysis reader (pp. 350–357). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, S., & Sathian, K. (2014). Please do touch the exhibits! Interactions between visual imagery and haptic perception. In N. Levent & A. Pascual-Leone (Eds.), The multisensory museum: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on touch, sound, smell, memory and space (pp. 3–15). Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (2004). Multisensory texture perception. In G. A. Calvert, C. Spence, & B. E. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 107–122). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, C., & Rosenberg, F. (2014). Art making as multisensory engagement. In N. Levent and A. Pascual-Leone (Eds.), The multisensory museum: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on touch, sound, smell, memory and space (pp. 29–44). Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mesquita, S., & Carneiro, M. J. (2016). Accessibility of European museums to visitors with visual impairments. Disability & Society, 31(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1167671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018). Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B Engineering, 143, 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nili, A., Tate, M., & Barros, A. (2017). A critical analysis of inter-coder reliability methods in information systems research. Paper presented at Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Hobart, Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Null, R. (2014). Universal design: Principles and models. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15580
   Google Scholar
• Partington-Sollinger, Z., & Morgan, A. (2011). Shifting perspectives: Opening up museums and galleries to blind and partially sighted people. RNIB.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A., & Beesley, L. (2011). Braille profiling project. RNIB.
   Google Scholar
• Rener, R. (2017). The 3D printing of tactile maps for persons with visual impairment. In M. Antona and C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal access in human-computer interaction. Designing novel interactions. 11th International Conference UAHCI 2017. Proceedings Part II (pp. 335–350). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58703-5_25
   Google Scholar
• RNIB. (2018). Eye health and sight loss stats and facts. RNIB.
   Google Scholar
• Sathian, K. (2005). Visual cortical activity during tactile perception in the sighted and the visually deprived. Developmental Psychobiology, 46(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, J., Darcy, S., & Packer, T. (2012). The embodied tourist experiences of people with vision impairment: Management implications beyond the visual gaze. Tourism Management, 33(4), 941–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, C. (2018). Multisensory Perception. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.) Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 625–680). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn214
   Google Scholar
• Spence, C., & Gallace, A. (2008). Making sense of touch. In H. J. Chatterjee (Ed.), Touch in museums: Policy and practice in object handling (pp. 21–40). Berg. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn214
   Google Scholar
• Stanco, F., Tanasi, D., Allegra, D., Milotta, F. L. M., Lamagna, G., & Monterosso, G. (2017). Virtual anastylosis of greek sculpture as museum policy for public outreach and cognitive accessibility. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 26(1), 011025. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JEI.26.1.011025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story, M. F. (1998). Maximizing usability: The principles of universal design. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of Resna, 10(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1998.10131955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbas, R., Pivar, M., & Elesini, U. S. (2016). Development of tactile floor plan for the blind and the visually impaired by 3D printing technique. Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design, 7(1), 19–26., https://doi.org/10.24867/JGED-2016-1-019
   Google Scholar
• Vanderploeg, A., Lee, S. E., & Mamp, M. (2017). The application of 3D printing technology in the fashion industry. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 10(2), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2016.1223355
   Google Scholar
• VisionUK (2017). How common is sight loss? VisionUK.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, P. (2011). Superior tactile abilities in the blind: Is blindness required? The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 31(33), 11745–11747. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2624-11.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, P., Alary, F., Lazzouni, L., Chapman, C. E., Goldstein, R., Bourgoin, P., & Lepore, F. (2016). Crossmodal processing of haptic inputs in sighted and blind individuals. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 10, 62. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J. (2014). Multisensory memories: How richer experiences facilitate remembering. In N. Levent & A. Pascual-Leone (Eds.), The multisensory museum: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on touch, sound, smell, memory and space (pp. 273–284). Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2018). ICD-11 for mortality and morbidity statistics. https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. F., Stott, J., Warnett, J. M., Attridge, A., Smith, M. P., & Williams, M. A. (2017). Evaluation of touchable 3D-printed replicas in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 60(4), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. F., Stott, J., Warnett, J. M., Attridge, A., Smith, M. P., & Williams, M. A. (2018). Museum visitor preference for the physical properties of 3D-printed replicas. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 32, 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XYZPrinting. (2018). Da Vinci color. https://www.xyzprinting.com/en-GB/product/da-vinci-color
   Google Scholar