Visit Motivation as Part of Visitors’ Personal Context in a Science Museum

References

• Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88(S1), S17–S33. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D., Storksdieck, M., & Spock, M. (2007). Understanding the long-term impacts of museum experiences. In J. H. Falk, L. D. Dierking, & S. Foutz (Eds.), In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions (pp. 197–215). Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Black, G. (2005). The engaging museum. Developing museums for visitor involvement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Black, G. (2018). Meeting the audience challenge in the “Age of Participation”. Museum Management and Curatorship, 33(4), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1469097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bless, H., Wänke, M., Bohner, G., Fellhauer, R. F., & Schwarz, N. (1994). Need for cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben [Need for cognition: A scale measuring engagement and happiness in cognitive tasks]. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihályi, M., & Hermanson, K. (1995). What makes visitors want to learn? Intrinsic motivation in museums. Museum News, 74(3), 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H. (2006). An identity-centered approach to understanding museum learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00209.x
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H. (2007). Toward an improved understanding of learning from museums: Filmmaking as metaphor. In J. H. Falk, L.D. Dierking, & S. Foutz (Eds.), In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions (pp. 3–16). Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H. (2009). Identity and the museum visitor experience. Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H. (2011). Contextualizing Falk’s identity-related visitor motivation model. Visitor Studies, 14(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2011.608002
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Adelman, L. M. (2003). Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium visitor learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Whalesback Books.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1998). Free-choice learning: An alternative term to informal learning? In J. H. Falk, & L. D. Dierking (Eds.), Informal learning environments research newsletter (p. 2). American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). The museum experience revisited. Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2018). Learning from museums (2nd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Heimlich, J., & Bronnenkant, K. (2008). Using identity-related visit motivations as a tool for understanding adult zoo and aquarium visitors’ meaning-making. Curator: The Museum Journal, 51(1), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2008.tb00294.x
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitor’s agendas on museum learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 41(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1998.tb00822.x
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Storksdieck, M. (2005). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 89(5), 744–778. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Storksdieck, M. (2009). Science learning in a leisure setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, A., Taskinen, P., Schütte, K., & PISA-Konsortium Deutschland. (2009). PISA 2006 Skalenhandbuch - Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente [PISA 2006 scale handbook – documentation of survey tools]. Waxmann-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gutwill, J. P. (2018). Science self-efficacy and lifelong learning: Emerging adults in science museums. Visitor Studies, 21(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2018.1503875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, M. G. (1983). Staying away: Why people choose not to visit museums. Museum News, 61(4), 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. (Ed.). (1999). The educational role of the museum (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K., & Knutson, K. (2002). Learning conversations in museums. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lewalter, D., Geyer, C., & Neubauer, K. (2014). Comparing the effectiveness of two communication formats on visitors’ understanding of nanotechnology. Visitor Studies, 17(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2014.945345
   Google Scholar
• Lewalter, D., Phelan, S., Geyer, C., Specht, I., Grüninger, R., & Schnotz, W. (2015). Investigating visitor profiles as a valuable addition to museum research. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 5(4), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1035688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S. (1995). Consuming science: Public knowledge and the dispersed politics of reception among museum visitors. Media, Culture & Society, 17(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344395017001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R., Robinson, A., & Coffield, E. (Eds.). (2018). Museum and gallery studies. The basics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moussouri, T., & Roussos, G. (2013). Examining the effect of visitor motivation on observed visit strategies using mobile computer technologies. Visitor Studies, 16(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2013.767732
   Google Scholar
• Moussouri, T. (1997). Family agendas and family learning in hands-on museums [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Leicester. http://hdl.handle.net/2381/31158
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihályi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norouzian, R., & Plonsky, L. (2018). Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316684904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer, J. (2006). Learning for fun: The unique contribution of educational leisure experiences. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00227.x
   Google Scholar
• Packer, J., & Ballantyne, R. (2002). Motivational factors and the visitor experience: A comparison of three sites. Curator: The Museum Journal, 45(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2002.tb00055.x
   Google Scholar
• Packer, J., & Ballantyne, R. (2005). Solitary vs. shared: Exploring the social dimension of museum learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 48(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2005.tb00165.x
   Google Scholar
• Packer, J. (2004). Motivational factors and the experience of learning in educational leisure settings [Doctoral dissertation]. Queensland University of Technology. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/15911/
   Google Scholar
• Pekarik, A. J., Doering, Z. D., & Karns, D. A. (1999). Exploring satisfying experiences in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 42(2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1999.tb01137.x
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, S., Bauer, J., & Lewalter, D. (2018). Visit motivations: Development of a short scale for comparison across sites. Museum Management and Curatorship, 33(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2017.1389617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.587723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Research Data Center - Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories. (2019). NEPS glossary (Version February 2019). https://www.neps-data.de/en-us/datacenter/dataanddocumentation/startingcohortadults/documentation.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Rounds, J. (2004). Strategies for the curiosity-driven museum visitor. Curator: The Museum Journal, 47(4), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00135.x
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1990). Thematisches Interesse, Variablen des Leseprozesses und Textverstehen [Thematic interest, reading process and text comprehension variables]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte psychologie, 37(2), 304–332.
   Google Scholar
• Schwan, S., Grajal, A., & Lewalter, D. (2014). Understanding and engagement in places of science experience: Science museums, science centers, zoos, and aquariums. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.917588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Specht, I., & Lewalter, D. (2011). Abschlussbericht der Besucherbefragung der Ausstellung zur Nano- und Biotechnologie im Deutschen Museum München [End report of the visitor survey at the nano- and biotechnology exhibition in the Deutsches Museum in Munich]. http://www.deutsches-museum.de/fileadmin/Content/010_DM/050_Forschung/030_Forschung_Projekte/Bericht_ZNT_Besucherstruktur_Februar_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Waltner, C. (2007). Physik lernen im Deutschen Museum [Learning physics in the Deutsches Museum]. Logos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Yalowitz, S. S. (2002). Personality and motivation in visitor satisfaction. Visitor Studies Today, 5(1), 14–17.
   Google Scholar