Shaping Learning for Young Audiences: A Comparative Case Study of Children’s Texts from Two Parisian Museums

References

• Anderson, D., Piscitelli, B., Weier, K., Everett, M., & Tayler, C. (2002). Children’s museum experiences: Identifying powerful mediators of learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 45(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2002.tb00057.x
   Google Scholar
• Andre, L., Durksen, T., & Volman, M. L. (2017). Museums as avenues of learning for children: A decade of research. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), 47–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9222-9
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, J. A. (2019). From Stephanie’s bedroom to world of warcraft via Powerpoint: Texts, semi-texts, and the methodological centrality of materiality. Keynote address. Fourth Bremen conference on multimodality – Multimodality Empirical Inroads, 25–27 September 2019. Bremen University.
   Google Scholar
• Blunden, J. (2016). THE LANGUAGE with DISPLAYED ART(EFACTS): Linguistic and sociological perspectives on meaning, accessibility and knowledge-building in museum exhibitions [PhD thesis]. University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Blunden, J. (2020). Adding ‘something more’ to looking: The interaction of artefact, verbiage and visitor in museum exhibitions. Visual Communication, 19(1), 45–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253–276). The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Coffin, C., & O'Halloran, K. (2005). Finding the global groove: Theorising and analysing dynamic reader positioning using APPRAISAL, corpus, and a concordancer. Critical Discourse Studies, 2(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500283607
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L., MacLulich, C., & Ravelli, L. (1995). Meanings and messages: Language guidelines for museum exhibitions. Australian Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., revised by Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (fourth ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofinger, A., & Ventola, E. (2004). Multimodality in operation: Language and picture in a museum. In E. Ventola, C. Charles, & M. Kaltenbacher (Eds.), Perspectives on multimodality (pp. 193–209). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lipovsky, C. (2014). The CV as a multimodal text. Visual Communication, 13(4), 429–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, M. (2004). Interacting with the multimodal text: Reflections on image and verbiage in ArtExpress. Visual Communication, 3(1), 5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142–175). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J., & Stengling, M. (2007). Materializing reconciliation: Negotiating difference in a transcolonial exhibition. In T. Royce, D. & W. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse. (pp. 215–238) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English.Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Musée d’Orsay (2006-2020). Enseignants et animateurs. https://www.musee-orsay.fr/fr/espace-professionnels/professionnels/enseignants-et-animateurs/bienvenue.html.
   Google Scholar
• Musée en Herbe (2013). Prestations de service. https://museeenherbe.com/prestations-de-service/.
   Google Scholar
• Observatoire économique du tourisme parisien (2018). Le tourisme à Paris: Chiffres-clés. (2018). Office du Tourisme et des Congrès de Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Purser, E. R. (2000). Telling stories: Text analysis in a museum. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Discourse and community: Doing functional linguistics (pp. 169–198). Gunter Narr Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ravelli, L. (1996). Making language accessible: Successful text writing for museum visitors. Linguistics and Education, 8(4), 367–387.
   Google Scholar
• Ravelli, L. (1998). The consequences of choices: Discursive positioning in an art institution. In A. Sánchez-Macarro & R. Carter (Eds.), Linguistic choice across genres: Variation in spoken and written English (pp. 137–153). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ravelli, L. (2006a). Genre and the museum exhibition. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 2(2), 289– 317.
   Google Scholar
• Ravelli, L. J. (2006b). Museum texts: Communication frameworks. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stenglin, M. K. (2004). Packaging curiosities: Towards a grammar of three-dimensionanl space [PhD thesis]. University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, K., & Kim, S. (2014). Understanding children’s engagement with interpretation at a cultural heritage museum. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 9(4), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2014.924952
   Google Scholar