Revisiting Beurling's theorem for Fourier–Dunkl transform

References

• Hörmander L. A uniqueness theorem of Beurling for Fourier transform pairs. Ark Mat. 1991;29(2):237–240. doi: 10.1007/BF02384339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonami A, Demange B, Jaming P. Hermite functions and uncertainty principles for the Fourier and the windowed Fourier transforms. Rev Mat Iberoamericana. 2003;19:23–55. doi: 10.4171/RMI/337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demange B. Uncertainty principles associated to non-degenerate quadratic forms. Mm Soc Math Fr (NS). 2009; No. 119. Available from: http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=23531933.
   Google Scholar
• Folland GB, Sitaram A. The uncertainty principle: a mathematical survey. J Fourier Anal Appl. 1997;3(3):207–238. doi: 10.1007/BF02649110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havin V, Jöricke B, The uncertainty principle in harmonic analysis, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)], Vol. 28. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Thangavelu S, An introduction to the uncertainty principle, Prog. in Math., Vol. 159. Boston: Birkhauser; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar RP, Sengupta J. Beurling's theorem for SL(2,R). Manuscripta Math. 2007;123(1):25–36. doi: 10.1007/s00229-007-0081-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar RP, Sengupta J. Beurling's theorem for Riemannian symmetric spaces. II. Proc Amer Math Soc. 2008;136(5):1841–1853. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-07-08990-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parui S, Sarkar RP. Beurling's theorem and Lp-Lq Morgan's theorem for step two nilpotent Lie groups. Publ Res Inst Math Sci. 2008;44(4):1027–1056. doi: 10.2977/prims/1231263778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daher R, Hamad SL, Kawazoe T, Shimeno N. Uncertainty principles for the Cherednik transform. Proc Indian Acad Sci Math Sci. 2012;122:429–436. doi: 10.1007/s12044-012-0079-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo L, Trimèche K. An Lp version of Hardy's theorem for the Dunkl transform. J Aust Math Soc. 2004;77(3):371–385. doi: 10.1017/S1446788700014518
   Google Scholar
• Kawazoe T, Mejjaoli H. Uncertainty principles for the Dunkl transform. Hiroshima Math J. 2010;40(2):241–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakubovich S. Beurling's theorems and inversion formulas for certain index transforms. Opuscula Math. 2009;29(1):93–110.
   Google Scholar
• Yakubovich S. Uncertainty principles for the Kontorovich–Lebedev transform. Math Model Anal. 2008;13(2):289–302. doi: 10.3846/1392-6292.2008.13.289-302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakubovich S, Daher R. An analog of Morgan's theorem for the Kontorovich Lebedev transform. Adv Pure Appl Math. 2010;1(2):159–162. doi: 10.1515/apam.2010.010
   Google Scholar
• Thangavelu S, Xu Y. Convolution operator and maximal function for the Dunkl transform. J Anal Math. 2005;97:25–55. doi: 10.1007/BF02807401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkl CF. Differential-difference operators associated to reflection groups. Trans Amer Math Soc. 1989;311:167–183. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1989-0951883-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkl CF. Operators commuting with Coxeter group actions on polynomials. In: Stanton D, editor. Invariant theory and tableaux. Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer; 1990. p. 107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Dunkl CF. Integral kernels with reflection group invariance. Canad J Math. 1991;43(6):1213–1227. doi: 10.4153/CJM-1991-069-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkl CF. Hankel transforms associated to finite reflection groups. In: Donald St P Richards, editor. Hypergeometric functions on domains of positivity, Jack polynomials, and applications. Contemp. Math., Vol. 138. Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc.; 1992. p. 123–138.
   Google Scholar
• Rösler M. Generalized Hermite polynomials and the heat equation for Dunkl operators. Comm Math Phys. 1998;192(3):519–542. doi: 10.1007/s002200050307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösler M, de Jeu M. Asymptotic analysis for the Dunkl kernel. J Approx Theory. 2002;119(1):110–126. doi: 10.1006/jath.2002.3722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar