Perceptions of Intellectual Diversity Among Religious/Conservative Undergraduate Seniors at Highly Selective US Universities: Is the University a Liberal Hegemony?

References

• American Council of Trustees & Alumni [ACTA]. (2008a). Shining the light: A report card on Georgia’s system of public higher education. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Council of Trustees & Alumni [ACTA]. (2008b). Show me: A report card on public higher education in Missouri. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Council of Trustees & Alumni [ACTA]. (2011a). Made in Maine: A state report card on public higher education. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Council of Trustees & Alumni [ACTA]. (2011b). Here we have Idaho: A state report card on public higher education. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Council of Trustees and Alumni. (2005). Intellectual diversity: Time for action. Retrieved from https://www.goacta.org/publications/PDFs/IntellectualDiversityFinal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• American Council on Education. (2005). Statement on academic rights and responsibilities. Retrieved from http://www.acenet.edu/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Search&template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=10672.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573. doi:10.1007/bf02293814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich, D. (2009). Education measurement: Rasch models. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peters (Eds.), Third Edition of the International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 1–15). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich, D., Lyne, A., Sheridan, B., & Luo G. (2009). RUMM2030 [Computer Software]. Perth: RUMM Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Colleges and Universities (2006). Academic freedom and educational responsibility: A statement from the board of directors. From American Council of Trustees and Alumni with Illinois Policy Institute (2009). For the people: a report card on public higher education in Illinois. Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A., Astin, H., & Lindholm, J. (2011). Cultivating the Spirit: How college can enhance students’ inner lives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, C. D., Dougherty, K. D., Froese, P., Johnson, B., Mencken, F. C., Park, J. Z., & Stark, R. (2006). American piety in the 21st century: New insights to the depth and complexity of religion in the US: Selected findings from The Baylor Religion Survey. Waco, TX: Baylor Institute for Studies of Religion.
   Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408–446. doi:10.1086/590649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardiff, C., & Klein, D. (2005). Faculty partisan affiliation in all disciplines: A voter- registration study. Critical Review, 17(3–4), 237–255. doi:10.1080/08913810508443639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1984). In R. Maranto, R. Redding, & F. Hess (Eds.), The politically correct university: Problems, scope, and reforms (p. 65). Washington, DC: The AEI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1997). Is the academy a liberal hegemony? The political orientations and educational values of professors. In J. Zipp & R. Fenwick (2006). Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(3), 304–326.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Conover, P., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25(4), 617. doi:10.2307/2110756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, P. (1964/2006). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Critical Review, 18, 1–74. doi:10.1080/08913810608443650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, G. (2014). Toward improved intellectual diversity in law schools. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 37(1): 165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, J., Crawford, J., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. (2015). Political diversity will improve social psychology science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, e130–e143. doi:10.1017/s0140525x14000430
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different set of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, N. (2013). Why are professors liberal and why do conservatives care? Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, N., & Simmons, S. (2007). The social and political views of American professors. Working paper presented at a Harvard University Symposium on Professors and Their Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Research Institute [HERI]. (2004). Spirituality in higher education: A national study of college students’ search for meaning and purpose. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D., & Lehrer, E. (2002). Political bias in the administrations and faculties of 32 elite colleges and universities. Retrieved from Center for the Study of Popular Culture website: http://studentsforacademicfreedom.org/news/1898/lackdiversity.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 20(10), 1–8. doi:10.1177/1745691612448792
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.7.651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelloway, E. (2015). Using Mplus for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, R. (2006). God’s new whiz kid: Korean American evangelicals on campus. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D., & Stern, C. (2004/2005). Political diversity in six disciplines. Academic Questions, 18, 40–52. doi:10.1007/s12129-004-1031-4
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D., & Stern, C. (2009). By the numbers: The ideological profile of professors. In R. Maranto, R. Redding, & F. Hess (Eds.), The politically correct university: Problems, scope, and reforms (pp. 15–37). Washington, DC: The AEI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D., & Western, A. (2005). Voter registration of Berkeley and Stanford faculty. Academic Questions, 18(1), 53–65. doi:10.1007/s12129-004-1032-3
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D., Stern, C., & Western, A. (2005). Political diversity in six disciplines. Academic Questions, 18(1), 40–52. doi:10.1007/s12129-004-1031-4
   Google Scholar
• La Falce, D., & Gomez, S. (2007). Political attitudes in the classroom: Is academia the last bastion of liberalism? Journal of Political Science Education, 3, 1–20. doi:10.1080/15512160601115513
   Google Scholar
• Layman, G., & Green, J. (2006). Wars and rumors of wars: The contexts of cultural conflict in American political behavior. British Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 61–89. doi:10.1017/s0007123406000044
   Google Scholar
• Light, P. (2001). Government’s greatest priorities of the next half century. Reform Watch (No. 4). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Retrieved from http://www.brook.edu/comm/reformwatch/rw04.htm
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2009). Winsteps (Version 3.68.2) [Computer Software]. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, J. (2005). Conceptualizing diversity in empirical terms. Yale Law & Policy Review, 23(1), 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, D. (2007). Faith in the halls of power: How evangelicals joined the American elite. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahutga, M., & Stephan-Norris, J. (2007). Ideological hegemony. Blackwell Encyclopedia Online. Retrieved from http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405124331_chunk_g978140512433115_ss1–9#citation
   Google Scholar
• Malka, A., & Lelkes, Y. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative-liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23, 156–188. doi:10.1007/s11211-010-0114-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malka, A., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). The association of religiosity and political conservatism: The role of political engagement. Political Psychology, 33(2), 275–299. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00875.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menand, L. (2004). The unpolitical animal: How political science understands voters. The New Yorker.
   Google Scholar
• Messer-Davidow, E. (1993). Manufacturing the attack on liberalized higher education. Social Text, 36, 40–80. doi:10.2307/466388
   Google Scholar
• MPLUS (Version 6.1). (2010). [Computer Software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Redding, R. (2001). Sociopolitical diversity in psychology: The case for pluralism. American Psychologist, 56(3), 205–215. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, S., & Lichter, S. (2009). The vanishing conservative: Is there a glass ceiling? In R. Maranto, R. Redding, & F. Hess (Eds.), The politically correct university: Problems, scope, and reforms (pp. 60–76). Washington, DC: AEI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, S., Kelly-Woessner, A., & Woessner, M. (2011). The still divided academy: How competing visions of power, politics, and diversity complicate the mission of higher education. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, S., Lichter, S., & Nevitte, N. (2005). Politics and professional advancement among college faculty. The Forum, 3, 1–16. doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1067
   Google Scholar
• SAS 9.4. (2013). [Computer Software]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. (2002). Understanding Rasch measurement: Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimenstionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 205–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, R. (2003). Rasch measurement models: Interpreting WINSTEPS and FACETS Output. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care & Research, 57, 1358–1362. doi:10.1002/art.23108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of California Academic Senate. (2008). Letter to Robert dynes regarding student freedom of scholarly inquiry principles [UC Senate Reports]. Retrieved from http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/senate/assembly/feb2008/assembly.scholarlyassembly.scholarly.inquiry.prncpls.03.08.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, H. (1980). A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification. Political Behavior, 2(1), 33–60. doi:10.1007/bf00989755
   Google Scholar
• Woessner, M., & Kelly-Woessner, A. (2014). Reflections on academic liberalism and conservative criticism. Society, 52, 35–41. doi:10.1007/s12115-014-9864-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., & Adams, R. (2013). Properties of Rasch residual fit statistics. Journal of Applied Measurement, 14, 339–355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zipp, J., & Fenwick, R. (2006). Is the academy a liberal hegemony? The political orientations and educational values of professors. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 304–326. doi:10.1093/poq/nfj009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zschirnt, S. (2011). The origins & meaning of liberal/conservative self-identification revisited. Political Behavior, 33, 685–701. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9145-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar