Composted Amendment Affects Soil Quality and Hedges Performance in the Mediterranean Urban Landscape

REFERENCES

• Bernal, M.P., M.A. Sanchez-Monedero, C. Paredes, and A. Roig. 1998. “Carbon Mineralization from Organic Wastes at Different Composting Stages during their Incubation with Soil.” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 69(3): 175–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, N.C., and R.R. Weil. 2002. The Nature and Properties of Soils, p. 415. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bremner, J.M., and C.S. Mulvaney. 1982. “Total Nitrogen.” In Methods of Soil Analysis, edited by A.L. Page, R.H. Miller, and D.R. Keeney, pp. 1119–1123. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Casado-Vela, J., S. Sellés, J. Navarro, M.A. Bustamante, J. Mataix, C. Guerrero, and I. Gomez. 2006. “Evaluation of Composted Sewage Sludge as Nutritional Source for Horticultural Soils.” Waste Management 26(9): 946–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, I. 2005. “Land-Use Effects on Organic Matter and Physical Properties of Soil in a Southern Mediterranean Highland of Turkey.” Soil Tillage Research 83: 270–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogger, C.G. 2005. “Potential Compost Benefits for Restoration of Soils Disturbed by Urban Development.” Compost Science and Utilization 13: 243–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortellini, L., G. Toderi, G. Baldoni, and A. Nassisi. 1996. “Effects on the Content of Organic Matter, Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Heavy Metals in Soil and Plants after Application of Compost and Sewage Sludge.” Edited by M. De Bertoldi, P. Sequi, B. Lemmes, and T. Papi. In: The Science of Composting, 457–468. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crecchio, C., M. Curci, M.D.R. Pizzigallo, P. Ricciuti, P. Ruggiero. 2004. “Effects of Municipal Solid Waste Compost Amendments on Soil Enzyme Activities and Bacterial Genetic Diversity.” Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36: 1595–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, S., N.L. Bassuk, and H. van Es. 1995. Effects of four compaction remediation methods for landscape trees on soil aeration, mechanical impedance and tree establishment. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 13(2): 64–71.
   Google Scholar
• di Castri, F., D.W. Goodall, and R. Specht (Eds.). 1981. Mediterranean-Type Shrublands, Ecosystems of the World 11, p. 643. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York: Elsevier Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• De Lucia, B., C. Cervelli, M.A. Cocozza Talia, and G. Zizzo. 2009. “Native Mediterranean Potted Species for Ornamental Use.” Italian Journal of Agronomy 4: 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• De Lucia, B., G. Cristiano, L. Vecchietti, E. Rea, and G. Russo. 2013a. “Nursery Growing Media: Agronomic and Environmental Quality Assessment of Sewage Sludge-Based Compost.” Applied and Environmental Soil Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/565139, Article ID 565139.
   Google Scholar
• De Lucia, B., L. Vecchietti, and A. Leone. 2011. “Italian Buckthorn Response to Compost Based Substrates.” Acta Horticulturae 891: 231–236.
   Google Scholar
• De Lucia, B., L. Vecchietti, S. Rinaldi, C.M. Rivera, A. Trinchera, and E. Rea. 2013b. “Effect of Peat-Reduced and Peat-Free Substrates on Rosmarinus officinalis L. Growth.” Journal of Plant Nutrition 36(6): 863–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrini, F., and A. Fini. 2011. “Sustainable Management Techniques for Trees in the Urban Areas.” Journal of Biodiversity and Ecological Sciences 1(1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrini, F., and F.P. Nicese. 2005. “Effect of Compost-Based Substrates on Growth and Leaf Physiology of Acer campestre and Cornus alba Potted Plants.” Advances in Horticultural Science 19(2): 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Gallardo-Lara, F., and R. Nogales. 1987. “Effect of the Application of Town Refuse Compost on the Soil–Plant System: A Review.” Biological Wastes 19: 35–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigatti, M., C. Ciavatta, and C. Gessa. 2004. “Evolution of Organic Matter from Sewage Sludge and Garden Trimming during Composting.” Bioresource Technology 91: 163–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haby, V.A. 1993. “Soil pH and Plant Nutrient Availability.” FertiGram X(2): 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Himelick, E.B., and G.W. Watson. 1990. “Reduction of Oak Chlorosis with Wood Chip Mulch Treatments.” Journal of Arboriculture 16: 275–278.
   Google Scholar
• Harada, Y., and A. Inoko. 1980. “The Measurement of the Cation-Exchange Capacity of Composts for the Estimation of the Degree of Maturity.” Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 26: 127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias-Jimenez, E., and C.E. Alvarez. 1993. “Apparent Availability of Nitrogen in Composted Municipal Refuse.” Biology and Fertility of Soils 16: 313–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias-Jimenez, E., and V. Pérez. 1992. “Determination of Maturity Indices for City Refuse Compost.” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 38: 331–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• InfoStat. 2002. “InfoStat version 1.1”. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Ingelmo, F., R. Canet, M.A. Ibanez, F. Pomares, and J. Garcia. 1998. “Use of MSW Compost, Dried Sewage Sludge, and Other Wastes as Partial Substitutes for Peat and Soil.” Bioresource Technology 63: 123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, J.P., P.M. Groffman, N.B. Grimm, L.A. Baker, and R.V. Pouyat. 2006. “A Distinct Urban Biogeochemistry?” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 192–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelting, M., J.R. Harris, J. Fanelli, and B. Appleton. 1999. “Bio-Stimulants and Soil Amendments Affect Two-Year Post Transplant Growth of Red Maple and Washington Hawthorn.” HortTechnology 9: 129.
   Google Scholar
• Larchevêque, M., C. Ballini, N. Korboulewsky, and N. Montes. 2006. “The Use of Compost in Afforestation of Mediterranean Areas: Effects on Soil Properties and Young Tree Seedlings.” Science of the Total Environment 369: 220–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon-Gonzalez, F., M.M. Hernandez-Serrano, J.D. Etchevers, and F. Payan-Zelaya. 2000. “Short-Term Effect on Macroaggregation in a Sandy Soil.” Soil Tillage Research 56: 213–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, J., S. Seibert, and I. Koegel-Knabner. 2002. “Changes in the Chemical Composition of Soil Organic Matter after Application of Compost.” European Journal of Soil Science 53, 299–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisto, G., A. De Marco, F. De Nicola, and C. Arena. 2010. “Suitability of Two Types of Organic Wastes for Growth of Sclerophyllous Shrubs on Limestone Debris: A Mesocosm Trial.” Science of the Total Environment 408(7): 1508–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, L., and B. De Lucia. 2011. “Organic and Mineral Soil Fertilization in Gladiolus.” Compost Science and Utilization 19(3): 178–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, D.A., and W.T. Frankenberger. 1992. “Modification of Infiltration Rates in an Organic-Amended Irrigated Soil.” Agronomy Journal 84: 707–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostos, J.C., R. López-Garrido, J.M. Murillo, and R. López. 2008. “Substitution of Peat for Municipal Solid Waste- and Sewage Sludge-Based Composts in Nursery Growing Media: Effects on Growth and Nutrition of the Native Shrub Pistacia lentiscus L.” Bioresource Technology 99: 1793–1800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Murcia, M.D., R. Moral, J. Moreno-Caselles, A. Perez-Espinosa, and C. Paredes. 2006. “Use of Composted Sewage Sludge in Growth Media for Broccoli.” Bioresource Technology 97: 123–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea, E., F. Pierandrei, S. Rinaldi, B. De Lucia, L. Vecchietti, and A. Ventrelli. 2009. “Effect of Compost-Based Alternative Substrata in Potted Aloe vera (L.) Burm. F.” Acta Horticulturae 807: 541–546.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S., K. Arunachalam, B.K. Dutta, and A. Arunachalam. 2010. “Effect of Organic Amendments of Soil on Growth and Productivity of Three Common Crops viz. Zea mays, Phaseolus vulgaris and Abelmoschus esculentus.” Applied Soil Ecology 45: 78–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutigliano, F.A., R.D. Ascoli, and A.V. De Santo. 2004. “Soil Microbial Metabolism and Nutrient Status in a Mediterranean Area as Affected by Plant Cover.” Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36: 1719–1729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharenbroch, B.C. 2009. “A Meta-analysis of Studies Published in Arboriculture & Urban Forestry Relating to Organic Materials and Impacts on Soil, Tree, and Environmental Properties.” Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 35: 221–231.
   Google Scholar
• Stellacci, A.M., G. Cristiano, P. Rubino, B. De Lucia, and E. Cazzato. 2013. “Nitrogen Uptake, Nitrogen Partitioning and N-Use Efficiency of Container-Grown Holm Oak (Quercus ilex L.) under Different Nitrogen Levels and Fertilizer Sources. International Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 11(3–4): 990–994.
   Google Scholar
• Tognetti, C., M.J. Mazzarino, and F. Laos. 2007. “Improving the Quality of Municipal Organic Waste Compost.” Bioresource Technology 98: 1067–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, I., F. Martinez, and G. Cuevas. 2006. “Plant and Soil Responses to the Application of Composted MSW in a Degraded, Semiarid Shrubland in Central Spain.” Compost Science and Utilization 14(2): 147–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, J., M. Licznar, and J. Drozd. 2003. “Changes in Physical and Physicochemical Properties of Sandy Soil Amended with Composted Municipal Solid Wastes.” In Innovative Soil–Plant Systems for Sustainable Agricultural Practices, edited by J.M. Lynch, J.S. Schepers, and I. Unver, pp. 227–242. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A.L., T.L. Provin, F.M. Hons, D.A. Zuberer, and R.H. White. 2007. “Compost Source and Rate Effects on Soil Macronutrient Availability under Saint Augustine Grass and Bermuda Grass Turf.” Compost Science and Utilization 15: 22–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. 1994. “Organic Matter Incorporation Affects Mechanical Properties of Soil Aggregates.” Soil Tillage Research 31: 263–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar