Surface morphological influence on the in vitro bioactivity and response of mesenchymal stem cells

References

• Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, et al. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater. 2007;23:844–854.10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You C, Yeo I-S, Kim M-D, et al. Characterization and in vivo evaluation of calcium phosphate coated cp-titanium by dip-spin method. Curr Appl Phys. 2005;5:501–506.10.1016/j.cap.2005.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Lee S, Bajpai I, et al. Hydrothermal treatment of Ti surface to enhance the formation of low crystalline hydroxyl carbonate apatite. Biomater Res. 2015;19:4. doi:10.1186/s40824-014-0022-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanzillotta PS, Sader MS, Bastos IN. Improvement of in vitro titanium bioactivity by three different surface treatments. Dent Mater. 2006;22:275–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajpai Indu, Hidayat Ikhwan, Song Inhwan, et al. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and alumina grits blasted Ti surface for in-vitro cell adhesion and proliferation. J Biomater Tissue Eng. 2015;5:403–410.10.1166/jbt.2015.1322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper LF, Masuda T, Whitson SW, et al. Formation of mineralizing osteoblast cultures on machined, titanium oxide grit-blasted, and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:37–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao L, Song J, Liu X, et al. Preparation of superoleophobic and superhydrophobic titanium surfaces via an environmentally friendly electrochemical etching method. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2013;1:102–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L-H, Kong Y-M, Kim H-W, et al. Improved biological performance of Ti implants due to surface modification by micro-arc oxidation. Biomaterials. 2004;25:2867–2875.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinl P, Müller L, Körner C, et al. Cellular Ti–6Al–4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:1536–1544.10.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K-H, Kwon T-Y, Kim S-Y, et al. Preparation and characterization of anodized titanium surfaces and their effect on osteoblast responses. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32:8–13.10.1563/741.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandrini E, Giordano C, Busini V, et al. Apatite formation and cellular response of a novel bioactive titanium. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18:1225–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittens RA, McLachlan T, Olivares-Navarrete R, et al. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials. 2011;32:3395–3403.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyan BD, Batzer R, Kieswetter K, et al. Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1a,25-(OH)2D3. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;39:77–85.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivares-Navarrete R, Hyzy SL, Hutton DL, et al. Direct and indirect effects of microstructured titanium substrates on the induction of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation towards the osteoblast lineage. Biomaterials. 2010;31:2728–2735.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balloni S, Maria E, Damiani F, et al. effect of Titanium surface roughness on mesenchymal stem cells on commitment and differentiation signaling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:627–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyane A, Onuma K, Ito A, et al. Formation and growth of clusters in conventional and new kinds of simulated body fluids. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;64:339–348.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song IH, Dennis JE. Simple evaluation method for osteoinductive capacity of cells or scaffolds using ceramic cubes. Tissue Cells. 2014;46:372–378.10.1016/j.tice.2014.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajpai I, Kim DY, Kyong-Jin J, et al. Effect of water-glass coating on HA and HA-TCP samples for MSCs adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. BioMed Res Int. forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Pankov R, Yamada KM. Fibronectin at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:3861–3863.10.1242/jcs.00059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano S, Nose A, Hatta K, et al. Calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion molecules (cadherins): subclass specificities and possible involvement of actin bundles. J Cell Biol. 1987;105:2501–2510.10.1083/jcb.105.6.2501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neve A, Corrado A, Cantatore FP. Osteocalcin: skeletal and extra-skeletal effects. J Cell Physiol. 2013;228:1149–1153.10.1002/jcp.v228.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jono S, Peinado C, Giachelli CM. Phosphorylation of osteopontin is required for inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell calcification. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:20197–20203.10.1074/jbc.M909174199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar