Investigation the in vitro biological performance of graphene/bioactive glass scaffolds using MC3T3-E1 and ATDC5 cells

References

• Rismanchian M, Khodaeian N, Bahramian L, et al. In-vitro comparison of cytotoxicity of two bioactive glasses in micropowder and nanopowder forms. Iran J Pharm Res. 2013;12:437–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler DL, Montfort MJ, McLoughlin SW. Differential healing response of bone adjacent to porous implants coated with hydroxyapatite and 45S5 bioactive glass. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;55:603–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hench LL. Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc. 1991;74:1487–1510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhardt LC, Boccaccini AR. Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials. 2010;3(7):3867–3910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur G, Pandey OP, Singh K, et al. A review of bioactive glasses: their structure, properties, fabrication and apatite formation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014 ;102(1):254–274.
   Google Scholar
• Xynos ID, Edgar AJ, Buttery LD, et al. Ionic products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression and protein synthesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;276:461–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahaman MN, Day DE, Bal BS, et al. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(6):2355–2373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, et al. Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1971;5(6):117–141.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhardt L-C, Boccaccini AR. Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials. 2010;3:3867–3910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink M, Turunen T, Happonen RP, et al. Compositional dependence of bioactivity of glasses in the system Na2O-K2O-MgO-CaO-B2O3-P2O5-SiO2. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;37(1):114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahini A, Yazdimamaghani M, Walker KJ, et al. 3D conductive nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed. 2013;9(1):167—181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar A, Nune KC, Basu B, et al. Mechanistic contribution of electroconductive hydroxyapatite-titanium disilicide composite on the alignment and proliferation of cells. J Biomater Appl. 2016;30:1505–1516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tigunta S, Pisitpipathsin N, Kantha P, et al. Electrical properties of calcium phosphate/BZT bioglass-ceramics prepared by incorporation method. Ferroelectrics. 2014;459:188–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veetil JV, Ye K. Tailored carbon nanotubes for tissue engineering applications. Biotechnol Prog. 2009;25(3):709–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonelli FMP, Santos AK, Gomes KN, et al. Carbon nanotube interaction with extracellular matrix proteins producing scaffolds for tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:4511–4529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung C, Kim YK, Shin D, et al. Biomedical applications of graphene and graphene oxide. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46:2211–2224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitounis D, Ali-Boucetta H, Hong BH, et al. Prospects and challenges of graphene in biomedical applications. Adv Mater. 2013;25:2258–2268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng C, Li S, Thomas A, et al. Functional graphene nanomaterials based architectures: biointeractions, fabrications, and emerging biological applications. Chem Rev. 2017;117:1826–1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez VC, Jachak A, Hurt RH, et al. Biological interactions of graphene-family nanomaterials: an interdisciplinary review. Chem Res Toxicol. 2012;25:15–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey N, Bentini R, Islam I, et al. Graphene: a versatile carbon-based material for bone tissue engineering. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:12. Article ID 804213.
   Google Scholar
• Gao C, Liu T, Shuai C, et al. Enhancement mechanisms of graphene in nano-58S bioactive glass scaffold: mechanical and biological performance. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen H, Zhang L, Liu M, et al. Biomedical applications of graphene. Theranostics. 2012;2(3):283–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Denno ME, Pyakurel P, et al. Recent trends in carbon nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors for biomolecules: A review. Anal Chim Acta. 2015;5(887):17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbri P, Valentini L, Hum J, et al. 45S5 bioglass-derived scaffolds coated with organic-inorganic hybrids containing graphene. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33(7):3592–3600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk M, Deliormanlı AM. Electrically conductive borate-based bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. J Biomater Appl. 2017;32(1):28–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türk M, Deliormanlı AM. Graphene-containing PCL-coated porous 13-93B3 bioactive glass scaffolds for bone regeneration. Mater Res Express. 2018;5(4):045406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RF, Rahaman MN, Dwilewicz AB, et al. Effect of borate glass composition on its conversion to hydroxyapatite and on the proliferation of MC3T3‐E1 cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;88(2):392–400.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Gao C, Feng P, et al. A bioactive glass nanocomposite scaffold toughed by multi-wall carbon nanotubes for tissue engineering. J Ceramic Soc Japan. 2015;123(6):485–491.
   Google Scholar
• Deliormanlı AM. Fabrication and characterization of poly(ε-caprolactone) coated silicate and borate-based bioactive glass composite scaffolds. J Compos Mater. 2015;50(7):917–928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Qi Y, Yan X, et al. Green fabrication of porous chitosan/graphene oxide composite xerogels for drug delivery. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014;131(3):40006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Saka S, et al. Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24:721–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vajrabhaya LO, Korsuwannawong S, Surarit R. Cytotoxic and the proliferative effect of cuttlefish bone on MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cell line. Eur J Dent. 2017;11:503–507.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar A, Dhara S, Biswas K, et al. In vitro bioactivity and cytocompatibility properties of spark plasma sintered HA‐Ti composites. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater. 2013;101:223–236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanz-Herrera JA, Boccaccini AR. Modelling bioactivity and degradation of bioactive glass based tissue engineering scaffolds. Int J Solids Struct. 2011;48(2):257–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner B, Hoffman A, Schoen F, et al. 2004. Biomaterials Science: An introduction to materials in medicine. Second edition. Academic Press, California, United States of America; 864.
   Google Scholar
• Meejoo S, Maneeprakorn W, Winotai P. Phase and thermal stability of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite prepared via microwave heating. Thermochim Acta, 2006;447:115–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynaud S, Champion E, Bernache-Assollant D. Calcium phosphate apatite with variable Ca/P atomic ratio I. synthesis, characterisation and thermal stability of powders. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1065–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Akhavan A. Size-dependent genotoxicity of graphene nanoplatelets in human stem cells. Biomaterials. 2012;33:8017–8025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrali M, Moghaddam E, Shirazi SFS, et al. Mechanical and in vitro biological performance of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced calcium silicate composite. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li M, Wang YB, et al. Cell response of nanographene platelets to human osteoblast-like MG63 cells. J Biomed Mater ResA. 2014 ;102(3):732–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Dang Z, Wang Y, et al. Hydroxyapatite/graphene-nanosheet composite coatings deposited by vacuum cold spraying for biomedical applications: inherited nanostructures and enhanced properties. Carbon. 2014;67:250–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Z, Wang J, Liu F, et al. A new composite scaffold of bioactive glass nanoparticles/graphene: synchronous improvements of cytocompatibility and mechanical property.  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;145:438–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler DL, Montfort MJ, McLoughlin SW. Differential healing response of bone adjacent to porous implants coated with hydroxyapatite and 45S5 bioactive glass. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;55:603–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golub EE, Boesze-Battaglia K. The role of alkaline phosphatase in mineralization. Curr Opin Orthop. 2007;18:444–448.
   Google Scholar
• López-Álvarez M, Serra J, De Carlos A, et al. Marine-based carbon and silicon carbide scaffolds with patterned surface for tissue engineering applications, Advances in Ceramics- Electric and Magnetic Ceramics, Bioceramics, Ceramics and Environment, edited by Sikalidis C. book. ISBN 978-953-307-350-7. Published. 2011 Sep 6. under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 license.
   Google Scholar
• Fritzsche M, Mandenius CF. Fluorescent cell-based sensing approaches for toxicity testing. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010 ;398(1):181–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrobel K, Claudio E, Segade F. Measurement of cytotoxicity by propidium iodide staining of target cell DNA. application to the quantification of murine TNF-alpha. J Immunol Methods. 1996;189(2):243-249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutolf MP, Hubbell JA. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extra-cellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(1):47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar