Investigation on dimensional accuracy, compressive strength and measured porosity of additively manufactured calcium sulphate porous bone scaffolds

References

• Florencio-Silva R, Sasso GR, Sasso-Cerri E, et al. Biology of bone tissue: structure, function, and factors that influence bone cells. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–17. Article ID 421746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter JR. Ruckh TT and Popat KC. Bone tissue engineering: a review in bone biomimetics and drug delivery strategies. Biotechnol Prog. 2009;25(6):1539–1560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Mandal S, Barui S, et al. Low temperature additive manufacturing of three dimensional scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering applications: processing related challenges and property assessment. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2016;103:1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrizio M, Lorenzo N. Diana C and Massimo I. New biomaterials for bone regeneration. Clin Cases Mineral Bone Metab. 2011;8:21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Klokkevold PR, Jovanovic SA. Advanced implant surgery and bone grafting techniques. Newman, Takei, Carranza. Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002. p. 907–908.
   Google Scholar
• Chadayammuri V. Hake M and Mauffrey C. Innovative strategies for the management of long bone infection: a review of the Masquelet technique. Patient Saf Surg. 2015;9(1):32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu J, Wang JH, Wang R, et al. Analysis of biomechanical behavior of 3D printed mandibular graft with porous scaffold structure designed by topological optimization. 3D Print Med. 2019;5(1):5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eshraghi S, Das S. Mechanical and microstructural properties of polycaprolactone scaffolds with one-dimensional, two-dimensional, and three-dimensional orthogonally oriented porous architectures produced by selective laser sintering. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(7):2467–2476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syahrom A, Kadir MRA. Abdullah J and Öchsner A. Permeability studies of artificial and natural cancellous bone structures. Med Eng Phys. 2013;35(6):792–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voronov R, VanGordon S. Sikavitsas VI and Papavassiliou DV. Computational modeling of flow-induced shear stresses within 3D salt-leached porous scaffolds imaged via micro-CT. J Biomech. 2010;43(7):1279–1286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260(5110):920–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S. Vahabzadeh S and Bandyopadhyay A. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today. 2013;16(12):496–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollister SJ. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater. 2005;4(7):518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yu W, Ba Z, et al. Wei J and Li H. 3D printed scaffolds of mesoporous bioglass/gliadin/polycaprolactone ternary composite for enhancement of compressive strength, degradability, cell responses and new bone tissue ingrowth. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:5433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S. Roy M and Bandyopadhyay A. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30(10):546–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Nune KC. Murr LE and Misra RDK. Biocompatibility and mechanical behaviour of three-dimensional scaffolds for biomedical devices: process–structure–property paradigm. Int Mater Rev. 2016;61(1):20–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Leong KF. Du Z and Chua CK. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I: traditional factors. Tissue Eng. 2001;7(6):679–689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shirazi SFS, Gharehkhani S, Mehrali M, et al. Kadri NA and Osman NAA. A review on powder-based additive manufacturing for tissue engineering: selective laser sintering and inkjet 3D printing. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2015;16(3):033502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadpoor AA, Malda J. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials, tissues, and organs. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen HJ, Tseng CS. Hsu SH and Tsai CL. Evaluation of chondrocyte growth in the highly porous scaffolds made by fused deposition manufacturing (FDM) filled with type II collagen. Biomed Microdevices. 2009;11(3):615–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghieh S, Ravari MK, Badrossamay M. Foroozmehr E and Kadkhodaei M. Numerical investigation of the mechanical properties of the additive manufactured bone scaffolds fabricated by FDM: the effect of layer penetration and post-heating. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;59:241–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elomaa L, Teixeira S, Hakala R, et al. Grijpma DW and Seppälä JV. Preparation of poly (ε-caprolactone)-based tissue engineering scaffolds by stereolithography. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(11):3850–3856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao S, Li SJ, Hou WT, et al. Yang R and Misra RDK. The influence of cell morphology on the compressive fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V meshes fabricated by electron beam melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;59:251–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Li X, Hou W, et al. Yang R and Murr LE. Fabrication of open-cellular (porous) titanium alloy implants: osseointegration, vascularization and preliminary human trials. Sci China Mater. 2018;61(4):525–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Ayoubi R, Eliopoulos N, Diraddo R. Galipeau J and Yousefi AM. Design and fabrication of 3D porous scaffolds to facilitate cell-based gene therapy. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14(6):1037–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi G, Basu B. A porous hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone tissue engineering: physico-mechanical and biological evaluations. Ceram Int. 2012;38(1):341–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An J, Teoh JE, Suntornnond R, et al. Design and 3D printing of scaffolds and tissues. Engineering. 2015;1(2):261–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuai C, Mao Z, Lu H, et al. Hu H and Peng S. Fabrication of porous polyvinyl alcohol scaffold for bone tissue engineering via selective laser sintering. Biofabrication. 2013;5(1):015014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YF. Dong XT and Zhu FD. Overview of rapid prototyping for fabrication of bone tissue engineering scaffold. Adv Mater Res. 2010;102:550–554.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Nune KC, Misra RDK. Biological functionality and mechanistic contribution of extracellular matrix‐ornamented three dimensional Ti‐6Al‐4V mesh scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104(11):2751–2763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Yeatts A, Dean D, et al. Stereolithographic bone scaffold design parameters: osteogenic differentiation and signal expression. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16(5):523–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Buschle-Diller G, Misra RDK. Chitosan-based injectable hydrogels for biomedical applications. Mater Technol. 2015;30(sup8):B198–B205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayindir Bilgic M, Lacin NT, Berber H, et al. In vitro evaluation of alpha-tocopherol loaded carboxymethylcellulose chitosan copolymers as wound dressing materials. Mater Technol. 2019;34(7):386–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keikhaei S, Mohammadalizadeh Z. Karbasi S and Salimi A. Evaluation of the effects of β-tricalcium phosphate on physical, mechanical and biological properties of Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)/chitosan electrospun scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Mater Technol. 2019;34(10):615–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu X, Cao R, Li Y, et al. Li F and Lyu S. Three-component antibacterial membrane of poly (butylene carbonate), poly (lactic acid) and chitosan prepared by electrospinning. Mater Technol. 2019;34(8):463–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pišlová M, Šubrt M, Polívková M. Kolářová K and Švorčík V. Deposition of thin metal layers on chitosan films. Mater Technol. 2018;33(14):845–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depan D, Surya PV. Girase B and Misra RDK. Organic/inorganic hybrid network structure nanocomposite scaffolds based on grafted chitosan for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(5):2163–2175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maganti N, Venkat Surya PK, Thein‐Han WW. Pesacreta TC and Misra RDK. Structure–process–property relationship of biomimetic chitosan‐based nanocomposite scaffolds for tissue engineering: biological, physico‐chemical, and mechanical functions. Adv Eng Mater. 2011;13(3):B108–B122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thein-Han WW, Misra RDK. Three-dimensional chitosan-nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. JOM. 2009;61(9):41–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thein-Han WW, Misra RDK. Biomimetic chitosan–nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(4):1182–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mali SA. Nune KC and Misra RDK. Biomimetic nanostructured hydroxyapatite coatings on metallic implant materials. Mater Technol. 2016;31(13):782–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nune KC, Kumar A, Misra RDK, et al. Hao YL and Yang R. Functional response of osteoblasts in functionally gradient titanium alloy mesh arrays processed by 3D additive manufacturing. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017;150:78–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nune KC, Misra RDK. Gaytan SM and Murr LE. Biological response of next-generation of 3D Ti-6Al-4V biomedical devices using additive manufacturing of cellular and functional mesh structures. J Biomater Tissue Eng. 2014;4(10):755–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreesmann H. Knochenplombierung bei Hohlenforigen defekten des Knochens. Burn Beitr Klin Chir. 1892;9:804–810.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee AS. Regeneration of bone in the presence of calcium sulfate. Arch Otolaryngol. 1980;106(7):405–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al Ruhaimi KA. Effect of calcium sulphate on the rate of osteogenesis in distracted bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30(3):228–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modi YK. Calcium sulphate based 3D printed tooling for vacuum forming of medical devices: an experimental evaluation. Mater Technol. 2018;33(10):642–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarino V. Causa F and Ambrosio L. Bioactive scaffolds for bone and ligament tissue. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007;4(3):405–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner M. Calcium orthophosphates in medicine: from ceramics to calcium phosphate cements. Injury. 2000;31:D37–D47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döbelin N. Luginbühl R and Bohner M. Synthetic calcium phosphate ceramics for treatment of bone fractures. CHIMIA Int J Chem. 2010;64(10):723–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A. Nune KC and Misra RDK. Biological functionality of extracellular matrix‐ornamented three‐dimensional printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104(6):1343–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson AJ, Herschler BA. A review of the mechanical behavior of CaP and CaP/polymer composites for applications in bone replacement and repair. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(1):16–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legeros RZ. Biodegradation and bioresorption of calcium phosphate ceramics. Clin Mater. 1993;14(1):65–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sidqui M, Collin P. Vitte C and Forest N. Osteoblast adherence and resorption activity of isolated osteoclasts on calcium sulphate hemihydrate. Biomaterials. 1995;16(17):1327–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucholz RW. Nonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitutes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;395:44–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castilho M, Moseke C, Ewald A, et al. Direct 3D powder printing of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds for substitution of complex bone defects. Biofabrication. 2014;6(1):015006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Mitchell CA. Buchanan FJ and Dunne NJ. Effects of heat treatment on the mechanical and degradation properties of 3D-printed calcium-sulphate-based scaffolds. ISRN Biomaterials. 2012;2013:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lowmunkong R, Sohmura T, Suzuki Y. Matsuya S and Ishikawa K. Fabrication of freeform bone‐filling calcium phosphate ceramics by gypsum 3D printing method. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 2009;90(2):531–539.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarafder S, Bose S. Polycaprolactone-coated 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: in vitro alendronate release behavior and local delivery effect on in vivo osteogenesis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(13):9955–9965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CM, Yang SW. Jung SC and Kim BH. Oxygen plasma treatment on 3D-printed chitosan/gelatin/hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2017;17(4):2747–2750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Q, Wang Y, Chai W. Zhang Y and Chen X. Molecular dynamics simulation and experimental study of the bonding properties of polymer binders in 3D powder printed hydroxyapatite bioceramic bone scaffolds. Ceram Int. 2017;43(16):13702–13709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nune KC, Misra RDK, Li SJ. Hao YL and Yang R. Osteoblast cellular activity on low elastic modulus Ti–24Nb–4Zr–8Sn alloy. Dent Mater. 2017;33(2):152–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nune KC, Misra RDK, Li SJ. Hao YL and Yang R. Cellular response of osteoblasts to low modulus Ti‐24Nb‐4Zr‐8Sn alloy mesh structure. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105(3):859–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nune KC, Misra RDK, Li SJ. Hao YL and Zhang W. The functional response of bioactive titania‐modified three‐dimensional Ti‐6Al‐4V mesh structure toward providing a favorable pathway for intercellular communication and osteoincorporation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104(10):2488–2501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A. Nune KC and Misra RDK. Biological functionality and mechanistic contribution of extracellular matrix‐ornamented three dimensional Ti‐6Al‐4V mesh scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104(11):2751–2763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nune KC, Kumar A, Misra RDK, et al. Hao YL and Yang R. Osteoblast functions in functionally graded Ti-6Al-4 V mesh structures. J Biomater Appl. 2016;30(8):1182–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nune KC, Kumar A. Murr LE and Misra RDK. Interplay between self‐assembled structure of bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (BMP‐2) and osteoblast functions in three‐dimensional titanium alloy scaffolds: S timulation of osteogenic activity. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104(2):517–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Zhao S, Hou W, et al. Yang R and Misra RDK. Functionally graded Ti‐6Al‐4V meshes with high strength and energy absorption. Adv Eng Mater. 2016;18(1):34–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nune KC, Misra RDK. Gaytan SM and Murr LE. Interplay between cellular activity and three‐dimensional scaffold‐cell constructs with different foam structure processed by electron beam melting. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015;103(5):1677–1692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi-Eydivand M, Solati-Hashjin M. Farzad A and Osman NA. Effect of technical parameters on porous structure and strength of 3D printed calcium sulfate prototypes. Rob Comput Integr Manuf. 2016;37:57–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C. Xia Z and Czernuszka JT. Design and development of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering. Chem Eng Res Des. 2007;85(7):1051–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castilho M, Pires I. Gouveia B and Rodrigues J. Structural evaluation of scaffolds prototypes produced by three-dimensional printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2011;56(5–8):561–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Buchanan F. Mitchell C and Dunne N. Printability of calcium phosphate: calcium sulfate powders for the application of tissue engineered bone scaffolds using the 3D printing technique. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;38:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castilho M, Dias M, Gbureck U, et al. Rodrigues J and Vorndran E. Fabrication of computationally designed scaffolds by low temperature 3D printing. Biofabrication. 2013;5(3):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butscher A, Bohner M, Doebelin N. Hofmann S and Müller R. New depowdering-friendly designs for three-dimensional printing of calcium phosphate bone substitutes. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(11):9149–9158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modi YK. Agrawal S and de Beer DJ. Direct generation of STL files from USGS DEM data for additive manufacturing of terrain models. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2015;10(3):137–148.
   Google Scholar
• Butscher A, Bohner M, Hofmann S. Gauckler L and Müller R. Structural and material approaches to bone tissue engineering in powder-based three-dimensional printing. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(3):907–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chumnanklang R, Panyathanmaporn T. Sitthiseripratip K and Suwanprateeb J. 3D printing of hydroxyapatite: effect of binder concentration in pre-coated particle on part strength. Mater Sci Eng C. 2007;27(4):914–921.
   Google Scholar
• Buj-Corral I, Bagheri A, Petit-Rojo O. 3D printing of porous scaffolds with controlled porosity and pore size values. Materials. 2018;11(9):1532:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson S, Shu Y, Zhong D. Könke C and Tandia A. Permeability of porous ceramics by X-ray CT image analysis. Acta Materialia. 2019;172:121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will J. Detsch R and Boccaccini AR. Structural and biological characterization of scaffolds. “Characterization of Biomaterials”, edited by Amit Bandopadhyay and Susmita Bose. Doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-415800-9.01001-9.
   Google Scholar
• Allard J, Atalla N. Propagation of sound in porous media: modelling sound absorbing materials 2e. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK. 2009.
   Google Scholar