Optimum Surface Roughness for Titanium-Coated PEEK Produced by Electron Beam PVD for Orthopedic Applications

References

• Pan YS, Shen QQ, Chen Y, et al. Mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite reinforced polyetheretherketone biocomposites. Mater Technol. 2015;30(5)257-263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathi MH, Salehi M, Saatchi A, et al. Novel double layer Hydroxyapatite (HA)/Ti coating for biocompatibility improvement of metallic implants. Surf Eng. 2001;17(6):459–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia D, Mayfield CK, Leong J, et al. Early adherence and biofilm formation of cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes) on spinal implant materials. Spine J. 2020;20(6):981-987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi G, Choudhury P, Basu B. Development of polymer based biocomposites: a review. Mater Technol. 2010;25:158–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Jiaheng Mao J, Ding J. Fatigue performance of hydroxyapatite filled polyetheretherketone functional gradient biocomposites. Mater Technol. 2018;33:761–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845–4869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panayotov IV, Orti V, Cuisinier F, et al. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27:118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampaio M, Buciumeanu M, Henriques B, et al. Tribocorrosion behavior of veneering biomedical PEEK to Ti6Al4V structures. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;54:123–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivard C, Rhalmi S, Coillard C. in vivo biocompatibility testing of peek polymer for a spinal implant system: A study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater. 2002;62:488–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter RD, Klosterho BS, Torstrick FB, et al. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A fi nite element analysis comparing Titanium and PEEK. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;80:68–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao PJ, Pelletier MH, Walsh WR, et al. Spine interbody implants: material selection and modification, functionalization and bioactivation of surfaces to improve osseointegration. Orthop Surg. 2014;6:81–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizuki T, Matsushita T. Apatite-forming PEEK with TiO2 surface layer coating. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015;26:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han C, Lee E, Kim H, et al. Biomaterials the electron beam deposition of titanium on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and the resulting enhanced biological properties. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3465–3470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma R, Tang T. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:5426–5445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra S, Chowdhary R. PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21:208–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Luo CJ, Huang J, et al. PEEK surface modification by fast ambient-temperature sulfonation for bone implant applications. J R Soc Interface. 2019;16:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Huang FJ, Wu ZZ, et al. Cytocompatibility of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composite materials with Sprague Dawley rat osteoblasts. Mater Technol. 2016;31:28–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio C, Padrós A, Gil F. In vivo evaluation of micro-rough and bioactive titanium dental implants using histometry and pull-out tests. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4:1672–1682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niinomi M. Recent research and development in titanium alloys for biomedical applications and healthcare goods. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2003;4:445–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revathi A, Magesh S, Balla VK, et al. Current advances in enhancement of wear and corrosion resistance of titanium alloys –a review. Mater Technol. 2016;31(12),696-704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao S, Li SJ, Hou WT, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of open cellular Ti–6Al–4V prototypes fabricated by electron beam melting for biomedical applications. Mater Technol. 2016;31:98–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kienle A, Graf N, Ing D, et al. Does impaction of titanium-coated interbody fusion cages into the disc space cause wear debris or delamination? Spine J. 2016;16:235–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torstrick FB, Klosterhoff BS, Westerlund LE, et al. Impaction durability of porous polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and titanium-coated PEEK interbody fusion devices. Spine J. 2018;18:857–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banghard M, Freudigmann C, Silmy K, et al. Plasma treatment on novel carbon fiber reinforced PEEK cages to enhance bioactivity. Curr Dirr Biomed Eng. 2016;2:569–572.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel D, Dempwolf H, Baumann A, et al. Characterization of thick titanium plasma spray coatings on PEEK materials used for medical properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;77:600-608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-eskandrany MS, Al-azmi A. Potential applications of cold sprayed Cu 50 Ti 20 Ni 30 metallic glassy alloy powders for antibacterial protective coating in medical and food sectors. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;56:183–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafieerad AR, Bushroa AR, Kaboli SHA, et al. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;61:182-196.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz MA, Assoian RK. Integrins and cell proliferation: regulation of cyclin- dependent kinases via cytoplasmic signaling pathways. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:2553–2560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braem A, Van Mellaert L, Mattheys T, et al. Staphylococcal biofilm growth on smooth and porous titanium coatings for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res. 2013;102:215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Hays MP, Hardwidge R, et al. Surface characteristics influencing bacterial adhesion to polymeric substrates. RSC Adv. 2017;7:14254–14261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon BJV, Xavier F, Walker BR, et al. Optimizing surface characteristics for cell adhesion and proliferation on titanium plasma spray coatings on polyetheretherketone. Spine J. 2016;16:1238–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermansson M. The DLVO theory in microbial adhesion, colloids and surfaces. B: Biointerfaces. 1999;14:105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiu HT, Goss B, Lutton C, et al. Formation of blood clot on biomaterial implants influences bone healing. Tissue Eng. 2014;20:697–712.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Kwok DTK, Xu M, et al. Tailoring of mesenchymal stem cells behavior on plasma-modified polytetrafluoroethylene. Adv Mater. 2012;24:3315–3324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu A. Effect of surface roughness on osteogenesis in vitro and osseointegration in vivo of carbon nanohydroxyapatite composite. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:1425–1447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans NT, Irvin CW, David L, et al. Local deformation behavior of surface porous polyether-ether-ketone. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016, 65:522-532.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado-naranjo AL, Healy AT, Kalfas IH. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) intervertebral cage as a cause of chronic systemic allergy: a case report. Spine J. 2015;15:e1–e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan B. Tribology and mechanics of magnetic storage devices. 2nd ed. 2012. Springer-Verlag New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ludema KC, Friction LA. Wear, lubrication: a textbook in tribology. 2nd ed. 2018. CRC-Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Robotti F, Bottan S, Fraschetti F, et al. A micron-scale surface topography design reducing cell adhesion to implanted materials. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsonnet L, Reybier K, Jaffrezic N, et al. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour. Mater Sci Eng C. 2003;23:551–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Chen M, Zheng T, et al. Effect of surface roughness on the initial response of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on polished titanium alloy. Biomed Mater Eng. 2015;26:S155–S64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar