Current advancements in the development of bionic organs using regenerative medicine and 3D tissue engineering

References

• Gojo S, Toyoda M, Umezawa A. Tissue engineering and cell-based therapy toward integrated strategy with artificial organs. J Artif Organs. 2011;14(3):171–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu G, Hou Y, Xu J, et al. Reprintable polymers for digital light processing 3D printing. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31:2007173. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202007173
   Google Scholar
• Chung JJ, Im H, Kim SH, et al. Toward biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering: 3D printing techniques in regenerative medicine. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.586406
   Google Scholar
• Chen F-M, Liu X. Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci. 2016;53:86–168. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley WP, Peters SB, Larsen M. Extracellular matrix dynamics in development and regenerative medicine. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:255–264. doi: 10.1242/jcs.006064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajaj P, Schweller RM, Khademhosseini A, et al. 3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;16:247–276. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-105155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes J, Özçelik H, Hindié M, et al. Cell microenvironment engineering and monitoring for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: the recent advances. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:921905. doi: 10.1155/2014/921905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzobo K, Thomford NE, Senthebane DA, et al. Advances in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering: innovation and transformation of medicine. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klak M, Bryniarski T, Kowalska P, et al. Novel strategies in artificial organ development: what is the future of medicine? Micromachines. 2020;11(7):646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altomare L, Bonetti L, Campiglio CE, et al. Biopolymer-based strategies in the design of smart medical devices and artificial organs. Int J Artif Organs. 2018;41(6):337–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yambe T, Yoshizawa M, Tanaka A, et al. Recent progress in artificial organ research at Tohoku University. Artif Organs. 2003;27(1):2–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma P, Kumar P, Sharma R, et al. Tissue engineering; current status & futuristic scope. J Med Life. 2019;12(3):225–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lanza RP, Cibelli JB, Blackwell C, et al. Extension of cell life-span and telomere length in animals cloned from senescent somatic cells. Science. 2000;288(5466):665–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Design of artificial extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci. n.d.;36(2):238–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobelle WH. Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex. ASAIO J. 2000;46(1):3–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilbey A. Membrane processing: dairy and beverage applications (2013), edited by A.Y. Tamime, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The atrium, southern gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, UK. Price £130.00. Int J Dairy Technol. 2013;66(3):452–453.
   Google Scholar
• Nosé Y, Malchesky PS. Future of artificial organs; therapeutic artificial organs. Mrs Proc. 1987;110. doi: 10.1557/proc-110-723
   Google Scholar
• Boesel L, Reis R. Injectable biodegradable systems. In: Biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. CRC Press; 2004. doi: 10.1201/9780203491232.ch2
   Google Scholar
• Artificial blood vessel: the Holy Grail of peripheral vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. n.d.;41(2):349–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin’oka: Transplantation of a tissue-engineered … n.d. Google Scholar. http://refhub.elsevier.com/B978-0-12-812258-7.00013-7/rf0010
   Google Scholar
• Szycher M. Prosthetic and biomedical devices. In: Kirk-othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2000. doi: 10.1002/0471238961.1618151919262503.a01
   Google Scholar
• Sonstegard DA, Matthews LS, Kaufer H. The surgical replacement of the human knee joint. Sci Am. 1978;238(1):44–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukas JS. Prospects for the state of an art: future goals of engineering in biology and medicine. Proceedings of an international conference, Washington, D.C., Sept. 1967. James, F. Dickson III, and J. H. U. Brown, Eds. Academic Press, New York, 1969. xvi + 360 pp., illus. $16. Science. 1969;166(3913):1614.
   Google Scholar
• Hill DW. Advances in biomedical engineering and medical physics. Med Biol Eng. 1968;6(6):687.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Huh D, Hamilton G, et al. Human gut-on-a-chip inhabited by microbial flora that experiences intestinal peristalsis-like motions and flow. Lab Chip. 2012;12(12):2165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner I, Materne E-M, Brincker S, et al. A dynamic multi-organ-chip for long-term cultivation and substance testing proven by 3D human liver and skin tissue co-culture. Lab Chip. 2013;13(18):3538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz BM, Herland A, Henry OYF, et al. Organs-on-Chips with combined multi-electrode array and transepithelial electrical resistance measurement capabilities. Lab Chip. 2017;17(13):2294–2302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhulsel M, Vignes M, Descroix S, et al. A review of microfabrication and hydrogel engineering for micro-organs on chips. Biomaterials. 2014;35(6):1816–1832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luni C, Serena E, Elvassore N. Human-on-chip for therapy development and fundamental science. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;25:45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meli L, Barbosa HSC, Hickey AM, et al. Three dimensional cellular microarray platform for human neural stem cell differentiation and toxicology. Stem Cell Res. 2014;13(1):36–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey PK, Sharma AK, Gupta U. Blood brain barrier: an overview on strategies in drug delivery, realisticin vitromodeling andin vivolive tracking. Tissue Barriers. 2015;4(1):e1129476.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doryab A, Amoabediny G, Salehi-Najafabadi A. Advances in pulmonary therapy and drug development: lung tissue engineering to lung-on-a-chip. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34(5):588–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh D, Matthews BD, Mammoto A, et al. Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science. 2010;328(5986):1662–1668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubin H, Nichol JW, Hutson CB, et al. Directed 3D cell alignment and elongation in microengineered hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2010;31(27):6941–6951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YS, Yue K, Aleman J, et al. 3D bioprinting for tissue and organ fabrication. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;45(1):148–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhise NS, Manoharan V, Massa S, et al. A liver-on-a-chip platform with bioprinted hepatic spheroids. Biofabrication. 2016;8(1):014101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biomaterials in regenerative medicine: Engineering to recapitulate the natural. Curr Opin Biotechnol. n.d.;23(4):579–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biomimetic nanofibrous gelatin/apatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. n.d.;30(12):2252–2258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhariants AA, Burmistrova OA, Shkurnikov MY, et al. Development of a specific substrate—inhibitor panel (liver-on-a-chip) for evaluation of cytochrome P450 activity. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2016;162(1):170–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsano A, Conficconi C, Lemme M, et al. Beating heart on a chip: a novel microfluidic platform to generate functional 3D cardiac microtissues. Lab Chip. 2016;16(3):599–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LI W-X, Liang G-T, Yan W, et al. Artificial uterus on a microfluidic chip. Chin J Anal Chem. 2013;41(4):467–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman A, Hoffmann H. Faculty opinions recommendation of A microfluidic culture model of the human reproductive tract and 28-day menstrual cycle. Faculty Opin – Post-Pub Peer Rev Biomed Literat. 2017. doi: 10.3410/f.727450954.793533987
   Google Scholar
• Rice JJ, Martino MM, Laporte LD, et al. Engineering the regenerative microenvironment with biomaterials. Adv Healthc Mater. n.d.;2(1):57–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(8):773–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed EM. Hydrogel: preparation, characterization, and applications: a review. J Adv Res. 2015;6(2):105–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger R, Giraud M-N. 3D printing applied to tissue engineered vascular grafts. Appl Sci. 2018;8(12):2631.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Yan Y, Zhang R. Recent trends and challenges in complex organ manufacturing. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16(2):189–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saroia J, Yanen W, Wei Q, et al. A review on biocompatibility nature of hydrogels with 3D printing techniques, tissue engineering application and its future prospective. Bio-Des Manuf. 2018;1(4):265–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deliormanlı AM. Direct write assembly of graphene/poly(ε-caprolactone) composite scaffolds and evaluation of their biological performance using mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2019;188(4):1117–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vienken J. Polymers in nephrology characteristics and needs. Int J Artif Organs. 2002;25(5):470–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YS, Arneri A, Bersini S, et al. Bioprinting 3D microfibrous scaffolds for engineering endothelialized myocardium and heart-on-a-chip. Biomaterials. 2016;110:45–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers LJ, Bouwer EJ. RP4 plasmid transfer among species of pseudomonas in a biofilm reactor. Water Sci Technol. 1999;39(7):163–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and function. Acta Biomater. n.d.;5(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore WE, Holdeman LV, Cato EP, et al. Bacteriology of moderate (chronic) periodontitis in mature adult humans. Infect Immun. 1983;42(2):510–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarwood JM, Paquette KM, Tikh IB, et al. Generation of virulence factor variants in staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(22):7961–7967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachid S, Cho S, Ohlsen K, et al. Induction of staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation by environmental factors: the possible involvement of the alternative transcription factor sigb. In: Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Kluwer Academic Publishers; n.d. p. 159–166. doi: 10.1007/0-306-46840-9_22
   Google Scholar
• von Eiff C, Jansen B, Kohnen W, et al. Infections associated with medical devices. Drugs. 2005;65(2):179–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausner M, Wuertz S. High rates of conjugation in bacterial biofilms as determined by quantitative in situ analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(8):3710–3713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15(2):167–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell BT, Ives CJ, Mohiuddin OA, et al. Beyond the present constraints that prevent a wide spread of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B-S, Mooney DJ, Atala A. Genitourinary system. In: Principles of tissue engineering. Elsevier; 2000. p. 655–667. doi: 10.1016/b978-012436630-5/50050-7
   Google Scholar
• Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260(5110):920–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson JL, Atala A, Yoo JJ. Tissue engineering: current strategies and future directions. Chonnam Med J. 2011;47(1):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pampaloni F, Reynaud EG, Stelzer EHK. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(10):839–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Place ES, Evans ND, Stevens MM. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat Mater. n.d.;8(6):457–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polymeric biomaterials for tissue and organ regeneration. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. n.d.;34(4–5):147–230. doi: 10.1016/S0927-796X(01)00035-3
   Google Scholar
• Williams DF. The biomaterials conundrum in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20(7–8):1129–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Silva EA, Mooney DJ. Growth factor delivery-based tissue engineering: general approaches and a review of recent developments. J Royal Soc Interface. 2010;8(55):153–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollister SJ. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater. n.d.;4(7):518–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitragotri S, Lahann J. Physical approaches to biomaterial design. Nat Mater. n.d.;8(1):15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F-M, Wu L-A, Zhang M, et al. Homing of endogenous stem/progenitor cells for in situ tissue regeneration: promises, strategies, and translational perspectives. Biomaterials. 2011;32(12):3189–3209.
   Google Scholar
• Stoppel G, McNamara III, McNamara, et al. Clinical applications of naturally derived biopolymer-based scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014a;43(3):657–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renth AN, Detamore MS. Leveraging “raw materials” as building blocks and bioactive signals in regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012 May 14;18(5):341–362. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0079-6700(15)00038-6/sbref1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peptide-based biopolymers in biomedicine and biotechnology. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. n.d.;62(4):125–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Self-assembly of mineralized collagen composites. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. n.d.;57(1–6):1–27. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2007.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Barnes CP. Cross-Linking electrospun type II collagen tissue engineering scaffolds with carbodiimide in ethanol. Tissue Eng. 2007 July 15. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0079-6700(15)00038-6/sbref1325
   Google Scholar
• Atala: engineering complex tissues. n.d. Google Scholar. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0079-6700(15)00038-6/sbref1170
   Google Scholar
• Lutolf MP, Hubbell JA. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(1):47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn JM, Gibson M, Monagle S, et al. Bioinspired nanofibers support chondrogenesis for articular cartilage repair. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2012;109(25):10012–10017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Synthetic biopolymer nanocomposites for tissue engineering scaffolds. Prog Polym Sci. n.d.;38(10–11):1487–1503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacanti NM. Localized delivery of dexamethasone from electrospun fibers reduces the foreign body response. ACS Publications; 2012 Sep 11. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0079-6700(15)00038-6/sbref1400
   Google Scholar
• Halper J, Kjaer M. Basic components of connective tissues and extracellular matrix: elastin, fibrillin, fibulins, fibrinogen, fibronectin, laminin, tenascins and thrombospondins. Springer Netherlands; 2014 Jan 1. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0079-6700(15)00038-6/sbref2350
   Google Scholar
• Scopus preview - Scopus. n.d. Welcome to Scopus.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama KH, Hou L, Huang NF. Role of extracellular matrix signaling cues in modulating cell fate commitment for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. n.d.;3(5):628–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials. n.d.;35(24):6143–6156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New insights into and novel applications of release technology for periodontal reconstructive therapies. J Control Release. n.d.;149(2):92–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnans C, Chou, Werb J, et al. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(12):786–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X. Coating electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) fibers with gelatin and calcium phosphate and their use as biomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. ACS Publications; 2008 Nov 16. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0079-6700(15)00038-6/sbref1410
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan S, Farach-Carson MC. Mining the extracellular matrix for tissue engineering applications. Regen Med. 2010 Nov 17;5(6):961–970. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0079-6700(15)00038-6/sbref2420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtner GC, Callaghan MJ, Longaker MT. Progress and potential for regenerative medicine. Ann Rev. 2007 Jan 11;58(1):299–312. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0079-6700(15)00038-6/sbref1000
   Google Scholar
• Rossi F, van Griensven M. Polymer functionalization as a powerful tool to improve scaffold performances. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20(15–16):2043–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur A, Midha S, Giri S, et al. Functional skin grafts: where biomaterials meet stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Caldwell J, Doty SB, et al. Integrating soft and hard tissues via interface tissue engineering. J Orthop Res. 2018;36(4):1069–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daar AS. The future of replacement and restorative therapies: from organ transplantation to regenerative medicine. Transplant Proc. 2013;45(10):3450–3452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee LN, Quatela O, Bhattacharyya N. The epidemiology of autologous tissue grafting in primary and revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2018;129(7):1549–1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naegeli KM, Kural MH, Li Y, et al. Bioengineering human tissues and the future of vascular replacement. Circ Res. 2022;131(1):109–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitropoulos A, Scotti C, Bourgine P, et al. Engineered decellularized matrices to instruct bone regeneration processes. Bone. 2015;70:66–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitsuka T, Hama R, Ulziibayar A, et al. Clinical application for tissue engineering focused on materials. Biomedicines. 2022;10(6):1439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannobile WV, Jung RE, Schwarz F. Evidence-based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri-implant soft tissues: osteology foundation consensus report part 1-effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue health. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:7–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colazo JM, Evans BC, Farinas AF, et al. Applied bioengineering in tissue reconstruction, replacement, and regeneration. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2019;25(4):259–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuhr O, Bäumer D, Hürzeler M. The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(Suppl 15):S123–S142. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12185
   Google Scholar
• Lin JC-Y, Nevins M, Kim DM. Laser de-epithelialization of autogenous gingival graft for root coverage and soft tissue augmentation procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018;38:405–411. doi: 10.11607/prd.3587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meza-Mauricio J, Cortez-Gianezzi J, Duarte PM, et al. Comparison between a xenogeneic dermal matrix and connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:6919–6929. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03982-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabers JM. Free gingival grafts. Periodontics. 1966;4:243–245.
   Google Scholar
• Parvini P, Obreja K, Becker K, et al. The prevalence of peri-implant disease following immediate implant placement and loading: a cross-sectional analysis after 2 to 10 years. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6:63. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00259-x
   Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Chen Y, Shao L, et al. Airflow-assisted 3D bioprinting of human heterogeneous microspheroidal organoids with microfluidic nozzle. Small. 2018;14(39):1802630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batalov I, Stevens KR, DeForest CA. Photopatterned biomolecule immobilization to guide three-dimensional cell fate in natural protein-based hydrogels. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2021;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014194118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakab K, Norotte C, Marga F, et al. Tissue engineering by self-assembly and bio-printing of living cells. Biofabrication. 2010;2(2):022001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visconti RP, Kasyanov V, Gentile C, et al. Towards organ printing: engineering an intra-organ branched vascular tree. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10(3):409–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishiyama Y, Nakamura M, Henmi C, et al. Development of a three-dimensional bioprinter: construction of cell supporting structures using hydrogel and state-of-the-art inkjet technology. J Biomech Eng. 2008;131(3). doi: 10.1115/1.3002759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee K, Radhakrishnan J, Ayyadurai N, et al. Advances in neoteric modular tissue engineering strategies for regenerative dentistry. J Sci. 2022;7(4):100491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, Gardiner MD, et al. 3D bioprinting for reconstructive surgery: principles, applications and challenges. J Plast Reconstruct Aesthetic Surg. 2017;70(9):1155–1170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu W, Ma X, Gou M, et al. 3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;40:103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Vijayavenkataraman S, Yan W-C, Lu WF, et al. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:296–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colla G, Porto LM. Development of artificial blood vessels through tissue engineering. BMC Proc. 2014;8(S4). doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-8-s4-p45
   Google Scholar
• Jang J, Yi H-G, Cho D-W. 3D printed tissue models: present and future. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(10):1722–1731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JY, Jang J, Kang H-W. 3D bioprinting and its application to organ-on-a-chip. Microelectron Eng. 2018;200:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack A, Highley CB, Leslie NR, et al. 3D printing in suspension baths: keeping the promises of bioprinting afloat. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38(6):584–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh Alghamdi S, John S, Roy Choudhury N, et al. Additive manufacturing of polymer materials: progress, promise and challenges. Polymers. 2021;13(5):753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Wu K, Zhang R, et al. Fabrication of multicore milli- and microcapsules for controlling hydrophobic drugs release using a facile approach. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2019;58(36):17017–17026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Park SA, Kim WD, et al. Current advances in 3D bioprinting technology and its applications for tissue engineering. Polymers. 2020;12(12):2958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadpoor AA, Malda J. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials, tissues, and organs. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;45(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljohani W, Ullah MW, Zhang X, et al. Bioprinting and its applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;107:261–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garreta E, Oria R, Tarantino C, et al. Tissue engineering by decellularization and 3D bioprinting. Mater Today. 2017;20(4):166–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly AC, Critchley SE, Rencsok EM, et al. A comparison of different bioinks for 3D bioprinting of fibrocartilage and hyaline cartilage. Biofabrication. 2016;8(4):045002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai G, Lee V. Three-dimensional bioprinting and tissue fabrication: prospects for drug discovery and regenerative medicine. Adv Health Care Techno. 2015;23. doi: 10.2147/ahct.s69191
   Google Scholar
• Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP, et al. 25th anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater. 2013;25(36):5011–5028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinos R, Sbrana FV, Scielzo C. Bioprinting functional tissues: cell types and a focus on cancer modeling. In: Bioprinting. Elsevier; 2022. p. 247–269. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-323-85430-6.00005-4
   Google Scholar
• Knowlton S, Onal S, Yu CH, et al. Bioprinting for cancer research. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33(9):504–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, et al. 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: a review of recent trends and advances. Bioact Mater. 2018;3(2):144–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch L, Deiwick A, Schlie S, et al. Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(7):1855–1863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine S, Venkatraman S. Bioprinting and differentiation of stem cells. Molecules. 2016;21(9):1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp B. Femtosecond laser printing of living cells using absorbing film-assisted laser-induced forward transfer. Opt Eng. 2012;51(1):014302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozbolat IT, Yin Y. Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: challenges and future trends. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60(3):691–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daar AS, Greenwood HL. A proposed definition of regenerative medicine. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2007;1(3):179–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King NMP. Ethics in regenerative medicine and transplantation. In: Regenerative medicine applications in organ transplantation. Elsevier; 2014. p. 977–986. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-398523-1.00071-9
   Google Scholar
• Tam PKH, Wong KKY, Atala A, et al. Regenerative medicine: postnatal approaches. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6(9):654–666.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material. Biomaterials. n.d.;28(25):3587–3593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towards the development of polycaprolactone based amphiphilic block copolymers: Molecular design, self-assembly and biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C. n.d.;45:620–634. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar L, Pu T, Porter B, et al. Regenerative medicine, organ bioengineering and transplantation. Br J Surg. 2020;107(7):793–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilic D, Polak JM. Stem cells in regenerative medicine: introduction. Br Med Bull. 2011;98:117–126. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldr012
   Google Scholar
• Kolios G, Moodley Y. Introduction to stem cells and regenerative medicine. Respir Int Rev Thorac Dis. 2013;85:3–10. doi: 10.1159/000345615
   Google Scholar
• Roh JD, Sawh-Martinez R, Brennan MP, et al. Tissue-engineered vascular grafts transform into mature blood vessels via an inflammation-mediated process of vascular remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:4669–4674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911465107
   Google Scholar
• Rose M, Gao K, Cortez-Toledo E, et al. Endothelial cells derived from patients’ induced pluripotent stem cells for sustained factor VIII delivery and the treatment of hemophilia A. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020;9(6):686–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirci S, Uchida N, Tisdale JF. Gene therapy for sickle cell disease: an update. Cytotherapy. 2018;20(7):899–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddard-Bennett T, Pera R. Stem cell therapy for Parkinson’s disease: safety and modeling. Neural Regen Res. 2020;15(1):36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin MJ, Muotri A, Gage F, et al. Human embryonic stem cells express an immunogenic nonhuman sialic acid. Nat Med. 2005;11(2):228–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji H, Miyoshi S, Ikegami Y, et al. Xenografted human amniotic membrane–derived mesenchymal stem cells are immunologically tolerated and transdifferentiated into cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2010;106(10):1613–1623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar