Using Action Research to Innov8: Facilitating Culture Shifts in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

References

• Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, N. R., Thomas, C., Usinger, P., Marquez, N., Neuman, N., & Jernigan, K. (2015). Facilitating innovation in college environments: The Innov8 Academy. In H. Shepard (Ed.), Selected papers from the 27th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning. Jacksonville, FL: Florida State College at Jacksonville.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training time, incentives, and …Tensions with professional identity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11, 339–346. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3–7. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED282491.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chizmar, J. F., & Williams, D. B. (2001). What do faculty want? Educause Quarterly, 24(1), 18–24. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ632847
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Donnell, K. (2006). Practitioner inquiry: Blurring the boundaries of research and practice. In J. L. Grenn, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 503–518). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• du Toit, P. H. (2012). Using action research as process for sustaining knowledge production: A case study of higher education qualification for academics. South African Journal of Higher Education, 26(6), 1216–1233.
   Google Scholar
• Elton, L. (2009). Continuing professional development in higher education: The role of the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1). doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030128
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, S. M., & Bernstein, J. L. (2011). Growing the scholarship of teaching and learning through institutional culture change. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hensen, K. T. (1996). Teachers as researchers. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (4th ed., pp. 53–66). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, G. S. C. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 151–163.
   Google Scholar
• Jaipal, K., & Figg, C. (2011). Collaborative action research approaches promoting professional development for elementary school teachers. Educational Action Research, 19(1), 59–72. doi:10.1080/09650792.2011.547688
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T., Wisniewski, M. A., Kuhlemeyer, G., Isaacs, G., & Krzykowski, J. (2012). Technology adoption in higher education: Overcoming anxiety through faculty bootcamp. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D., & McKay, J. (1996). Action research into the quality of student learning. Journal of Higher Education, 67(5), 528–554. doi:10.2307/2943867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Missing: Evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 327–337. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.773419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, B. B., & Merritt, S. P. (2006). Guest editors’ introduction. Action research for teacher empowerment and transformation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, M. G., & Guglielimino, L. (2006). The influence of subcultures on planned change in a community college. Community College Review, 34(2), 108–127. doi:10.1177/0091552106292518
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. (2008). The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An overview. In R. Murray (Ed.), Helping students to learn: The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 6–15). New York, NY: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metler, C. A. (2006). Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Murray (Ed.), Helping students to learn: The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 1–5). New York, NY: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papastephanou, M. (2006). Philosophical research and educational action research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 187–203. doi:10.1111/jope.2006.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponton, M. K., Derrick, M. G., Confessore, G. J., & Rhea, N. (2005). The role of self-efficacy in autonomous learning. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 2(2), 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Price, L., & Kirkwood, A. (2014). Using technology and learning in higher education: A critical review of the role of evidence in informing practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 549–564. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.841643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragupathi, K., & Hubball, H. (2015). Scholarly approaches to learning technology integration in a research-intensive university context: Impact of a new faculty initiative. Learning Technology Integration, 8(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, D. B. (2010). Transforming professional development into student results. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (2004). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1995). The reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations rational, natural, and open systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stigmar, M. (2010). Scholarship of teaching and learning when bridging theory and practice in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(2), Article 23. doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2010.040223
   Google Scholar
• Teclehaimanot, B., & Lamb, A. (2005). Workshops that work!: Building an effective, technology-rich faculty development program. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 109–115. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ882475
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M., Parsons, S. A., Kologi, S., & Saul, M. (2014). Action research as a reflective tool: A multiple case study of eight rural educators’ understandings of instructional practice. Reflective Practice, 15(5), 634–650. doi:10.1080/14623943.2014.900030
   Google Scholar
• West, C. (2011). Action research as a professional development activity. Arts Education Policy Review, 112(2), 89–94. doi:10.1080/10632913.2011.546697
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Professional development in higher education. London, England: Kogan Page Limited.
   Google Scholar