Knowledge and pre-thoracic spinal thrust manipulation examination: a survey of current practice in the UK

References

• Adams G, Sim J. A survey of UK manual therapists’ practice of and attitudes towards manipulation and its complications. Physiother Res Int. 1998;3(3):206–227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puentedura E, Slaughter R, Reilly S, et al. Thrust joint manipulation utilized by U.S. physical therapists. J Man Manip Ther. 2016;25(2):74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puentedura EJ, O’Grady WH. Safety of thrust joint manipulation in the thoracic spine: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2015;23(3):154–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puentedura E, Landers M, Cleland J, et al. Thoracic spine thrust manipulation versus cervical spine thrust manipulation inpatients with acute neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(4):208–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struewer J, Frangen T, Ziring E, et al. Massive haemothorax after thoracic spinal manipulation for acute thoracolumbar pain. Orthopedic Reviews. 2013. 5 (3): e27.
   Google Scholar
• Sueki DG, Cleland JA, Wainner RS. A regional interdependence model of musculoskeletal dysfunction: research, mechanisms, and clinical implications. J Man Manip Ther. 2013;21(2):90–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cleland JA, Childs JD, Fritz JM, et al. Development of a clinical prediction rule for guiding treatment of a subgroup of patients with neck pain: use of thoracic spine manipulation, exercise and patient education. Phys Ther. 2007;87(1):9–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganer N, Kulandaivelan S, Malik M, et al. Thoracic spinal manual therapy and regional interdependence: a review. Int J Health Sci Res. 2016;6(5):337–344.
   Google Scholar
• Heneghan NR, Rushton A. Understanding why the thoracic region is the ‘Cinderella’ region of the spine. Man Ther. 2016;21:274–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines linked to the international classification of functioning, disability and health from the orthopaedic section of the American physical therapy association. JOSPT. 2017;47(7):A1–A83.
   Google Scholar
• Cagnie B, Vinck E, Beernaert A, et al. How common are side effects of spinal manipulation and can these side effects be predicted. Man Ther. 2004;9(3):151–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlesso L, Rivett D. Manipulative practice in the cervical spine: a survey of IFOMPT member countries. J Man Manip Ther. 2011;19(2):66–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carnes D, Mars TS, Mullinger B, et al. Adverse events and manual therapy: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010a;15(4):355–363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thoomes-de Graaf M, Thoomes E, Carlesso L, et al. Adverse effects as a consequence of being the subject of orthopaedic manual therapy training, a worldwide retrospective survey. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;29:20–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldeman S, Kohlbeck FJ, McGregor M. Unpredictability of cerebrovascular ischemia associated with cervical spine manipulation- a review of sixty-four cases after cervical spine manipulation. Spine. 2002;27(1):49–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerry R, Taylor AJ, Mitchell J, et al. Manual therapy and cervical artery dysfunction, directions for the future: a clinical perspective. J Man Manipulative Ther. 2008;16(1):39–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kranenburg HA, Schmitt MA, Puentedura EJ, et al. Adverse events associated with the use of cervical spine manipulation or mobilization and patient characteristics: A systematic review. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;28:32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton A, Rivett D, Carlesso L, et al. International framework for examination of the cervical region for potential of cervical arterial dysfunction prior to orthopaedic manual therapy intervention. Man Ther. 2014;19(3):222–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross JK, Bereznick DE, McGill SM. Determining cavitation location during lumbar and thoracic spinal manipulation: is spinal manipulation accurate and specific? Spine. 2004;29(13):1452–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walser RF, Meserve BB, Boucher TR. The effectiveness of thoracic spine manipulation for the management of musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Man Manipulative Ther. 2009;17(4):237–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puentedura E, March J, Anders J, et al. Safety of cervical spine manipulation: are adverse events preventable and are manipulations being performed appropriately? A review of 134 case reports. J Man Manip Ther. 2012;20(2):66–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of Internet e-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Int Res. 2004;6(3e34):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnes D, Mullinger B, Underwood M. Defining adverse events in manual therapies: a modified Delphi consensus study. Man Ther. 2010b;15(1):2–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy C, Bialosky J, Rivett D. Section 3.1: principles of modern management. Chapter 29: spinal manipulation. In:Jull G, Moore A, Falla D, et al. editors. Grieve’s modern musculoskeletal physiotherapy. 4th ed. Elsevier, London, UK;2015.
   Google Scholar
• Skyba DA, Radhakrishnan R, Fohlwing JJ, et al. Joint manipulation reduces joint hyperalgesia by activation of monamine receptors but not opioid or GABA receptors in the spinal cord. Pain. 2003;106(1):159–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Price DD, et al. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther. 2009;14(5):531–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-de-Las Penas C, Perez-de-Heredia M, Brea-Rivero M, et al. Immediate effects on pressure pain threshold following a single cervical spine manipulation in healthy subjects. JOSPT. 2007;37(6):325–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVocht JW, Pickar G, Wilder DG. Spinal manipulation alters electromyographic activity of parsapinal muscles: a descriptive study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28(7):465–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nulty DD. The adequency of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assess Eval Higher Educ. 2008;33(3):301–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educ and Psychol Meas. 2000;60(6):821–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar