Spinal manipulation and adverse event reporting in the pregnant patient limits estimation of relative risk: a narrative review

References

• Curtin SC, Abma JC, Kost K. Pregnancy Rates Among U.S. Women. NCHS Health E-Stat; 2015. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wang S-M, Dezinno P, Maranets I, et al. Low back pain during pregnancy: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):65–70. DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000129403.54061.0e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis CA, Barrett J, Tavares P, et al. Prevalence of low back pain, pelvic girdle pain, and combination pain in a pregnant ontario population. J Obstet Gynaecology Canada. 2018;40(8):1038–1043. DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2017.10.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn G, Egger MJ, Shaw JM, et al. Trajectories of lower back, upper back, and pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy and early postpartum in primiparous women. Womens Health (Lond). 2019;15:1745506519842757.
   Google Scholar
• Kesikburun S, Güzelküçük Ü, Fidan U, et al. Musculoskeletal pain and symptoms in pregnancy: a descriptive study. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2018;10(12):229–234. DOI:10.1177/1759720X18812449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negro A, Delaruelle Z, Ivanova TA, et al.Headache and pregnancy: a systematic review. J Headache Pain. 2017 Oct 19;18(1):106. PMID: 29052046; PMCID: PMC5648730. DOI:10.1186/s10194-017-0816-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khorsan R, Hawk C, Lisi AJ, et al. Manipulative therapy for pregnancy and related conditions: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009;64(6):416–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton A, Carlesso LC, Flynn T, et al. International framework for the examination of the cervical region for potential of vascular pathologies of the neck prior to Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (OMT) intervention: international IFOMPT cervical framework. Auckland, New Zealand: IFOMPT; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Paige NM, Miake-Lye IM, Booth MS, et al. Association of spinal manipulative therapy with clinical benefit and harm for acute low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis [published correction appears in JAMA. date-in-citation year 2017 year month Jun month day 6 day date-in-citation;volume 317 volume(issue 21 issue):page-range 2239] page-range misc [published correction appears in JAMA misc. date-in-citation year 2017 year month Nov month day 28 day date-in-citation;volume 318 volume(issue 20 issue):2048]. Jama. 2017;317(14):1451–1460. DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.3086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein SM, de Zoete A, van Middelkoop M, et al. Benefits and harms of spinal manipulative therapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Bmj. 2019;364:l689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith MS, Olivas J, Smith K. Manipulative therapies: what works. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(4):248–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George SZ, Fritz JM, Silfies SP, et al. Interventions for the management of acute and chronic low back pain: revision 2021. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021;51(11):CPG1–CPG60. DOI:10.2519/jospt.2021.0304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, et al. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(7):514–530. DOI:10.7326/M16-2367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo B, Hall T, Bossert J, et al. The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for treating non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(6):1149–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racicki S, Gerwin S, Diclaudio S, et al. Conservative physical therapy management for the treatment of cervicogenic headache: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2013;21(2):113–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, et al. Neck Pain: revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(7):A1–A83. DOI:10.2519/jospt.2017.0302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert JJ, Stomski NJ, French SD, et al. Serious adverse events and spinal manipulative therapy of the low back region: a systematic review of cases. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015;38(9):677–691. DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.05.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen SM, Tarp S, Christensen R, et al. The risk associated with spinal manipulation: an overview of reviews. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):64. DOI:10.1186/s13643-017-0458-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kranenburg HA, Schmitt MA, Puentedura EJ, et al. Adverse events associated with the use of cervical spine manipulation or mobilization and patient characteristics: a systematic review [published correction appears in Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 May 18;:]. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;28:32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton M. Chapter 10 manual techniques. In: Dutton M, editor. Dutton’s orthopaedic examination, evaluation, and intervention. Pittsburgh, PA: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2012. pp. 382–383.
   Google Scholar
• Puentedura EJ, O’Grady WH. Safety of thrust joint manipulation in the thoracic spine: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2015;23(3):154–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas L, Shirley D, Rivett D Clinical guide to safe manual therapy practice in the cervical spine (Part 2). Australian Physiotherapy Association; 2017 [cited 2021 Sep 7].https://australian.physio/sites/default/files/tools/NAT023_APA_VBI_FACTSHEET.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Owoeye IO. Manipulative therapy in the management of back pain: indications and contra-indications. J Nig Soc Physiother. 1995;13(1):12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Pettman E Manipulative thrust techniques: an evidence-based approach. Abbotsford, Canada: Aphema Publishing, 2006. Paperback, 230 pp., ISBN 1-59971-873-1
   Google Scholar
• Stuber KJ, Wynd S, Weis CA. Adverse events from spinal manipulation in the pregnant and postpartum periods: a critical review of the literature.Chiropr Man Therap. 2012 [Published 2012 Mar 28];20(1):8. DOI:10.1186/2045-709X-20-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marnach ML, Ramin KD, Ramsey PS, et al. Characterization of the relationship between joint laxity and maternal hormones in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(2):331–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Committee Opinion No646: ethical considerations for including women as research participants. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(5):e100–e107. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federal Register. Evaluating inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical trials. Public Meeting (Docket number: FDA-2018-N-0129). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/01/30/2018-01643/evaluating-inclusion-and-exclusion-criteria-in-clinical-trials-public-meeting
   Google Scholar
• Shields KE, Lyerly AD. Exclusion of pregnant women from industry-sponsored clinical trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1077–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Graaf R, van der Zande ISE, den Ruijter HM, et al. Fair inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials: an integrated scientific and ethical approach. Trials. 2018 [Published 2018 Jan 29];19(1):78. DOI:10.1186/s13063-017-2402-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dugas C, Slane VH. Miscarriage.[updated 2022 May 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Jan–. PMID: 30422585.
   Google Scholar
• Carnes D, Mullinger B, Underwood M. Defining adverse events in manual therapies: a modified Delphi consensus study. Man Ther. 2010;15(1):2–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcantara J, Cossette M. Intractable migraine headaches during pregnancy under chiropractic care. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2009;15(4):192–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fallon J. Chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of costovertebral joint dysfunction with resultant intercostal neuralgia during pregnancy. J Neuromusculoskeletal Syst. 1996;4:73–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffelner T, Maurer-Ertl W, Kienbacher G, et al. Internal jugular vein thrombosis following cervical manipulation. Man Ther. 2009;14(6):706–708.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monari F, Busani S, Imbrogno MG, et al. Vertebral artery dissection in term pregnancy after cervical spine manipulation: a case report and review the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2021 [Published 2021 Oct 20];15(1):530. DOI:10.1186/s13256-021-03090-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morton A. Internal carotid artery dissection following chiropractic treatment in a pregnant woman with systemic lupus erythematosus.Chiropr Man Therap. 2012 [Published 2012 Dec 19];20(1):38. DOI:10.1186/2045-709X-20-38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernard M, Tuchin P. Chiropractic management of pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: a case study. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):129–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heiner JD. Cervical epidural hematoma after chiropractic spinal manipulation. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27(8):1023. e10232-1023el. DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2008.12.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz A, Lutterbey G, von Engelhardt L, et al. Pathological cervical fracture after spinal manipulation in a pregnant patient. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28(8):633–636. DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly JM, Frame PS, Rapoza PA. Sacroiliac subluxation: a common, treatable cause of low-back pain in pregnancy. Fam Pract Res J. 1991;11(2):149–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lisi AJ. Chiropractic spinal manipulation for low back pain of pregnancy: a retrospective case series. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006;51(1):e7–e10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diakow PR, Gadsby TA, Gadsby JB, et al. Back pain during pregnancy and labor. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(2):116–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy DR, Hurwitz EL, McGovern EE. Outcome of pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain treated according to a diagnosis-based decision rule: a prospective observational cohort study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32(8):616–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson CK, Mühlemann D, Humphreys BK. Outcomes of pregnant patients with low back pain undergoing chiropractic treatment: a prospective cohort study with short term, medium term and 1 year follow-up. Chiropr Man Therap. 2014;22(1):15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skarica B. Effectiveness of manual treatment on pregnancy symptoms: usefulness of manual treatment in treating pregnancy symptoms. Med Arch. 2018;72(2):131–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gausel AM, Kjærmann I, Malmqvist S, et al. Chiropractic management of dominating one-sided pelvic girdle pain in pregnant women; a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson CD, Haas M, Gregory WT. A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of exercise, spinal manipulation, and neuro emotional technique for the treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012;20(1):18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haavik H, Murphy BA, Kruger J. Effect of spinal manipulation on pelvic floor functional changes in pregnant and nonpregnant women: a preliminary study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016;39(5):339–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King HH, Tettambel MA, Lockwood MD, et al. Osteopathic manipulative treatment in prenatal care: a retrospective case control design study. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2003;103(12):577–582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ea HK, Weber AJ, Yon F, et al. Osteoporotic fracture of the dens revealed by cervical manipulation. Joint Bone Spine. 2004;71(3):246–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Feng JF, Tang X, et al. Cervical epidural hematoma after spinal manipulation therapy: a case report. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner RC, Lucke-Wold BP, Boo S, et al. The potential dangers of neck manipulation & risk for dissection and devastating stroke: an illustrative case & review of the literature. Biomed Res Rev. 2018;2(1):10.15761/BRR.1000110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weis CA, Stuber K, Murnaghan K, et al. Adverse events from spinal manipulations in the pregnant and postpartum periods: a systematic review and update. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2021;65(1):32–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puentedura EJ, March J, Anders J, et al. Safety of cervical spine manipulations: are adverse events preventable and are manipulations being performed appropriately? A review of 134 case reports. J Man Manip Ther. 2012;20(2):66–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masaracchio M, Kirker K, States R, et al. Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of mechanical neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0211877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross KM, Kuenze C, Grindstaff T, et al. Thoracic spine thrust manipulation improves pain, range of motion, and self-reported function in patients with mechanical neck pain: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;14(9):633–642.
   Google Scholar
• Huisman PA, Speksnijder CM, de Wijer A. The effect of thoracic spine manipulation on pain and disability in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(20):1677–1685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young JL, Walker D, Snyder S, et al. Thoracic manipulation versus mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2014;22(2):141–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heneghan NR, Pup C, Koulidis K, et al. Thoracic adverse events following spinal manipulative therapy: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Man Manip Ther. 2020;28(5):275–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert JJ, Stomski NJ, French SD, et al. Serious adverse events and spinal manipulative therapy of the low back region: a systematic review of cases. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015;38(9):677–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry F, Quatresooz P, Valverde-Lopez JC, et al. Blood vessel changes during pregnancy: a review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2006;7(1):65–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heneghan NR, Puentedura EJ, Arranz I, et al. Thoracic thrust joint manipulation: an international survey of current practice and knowledge in IFOMPT member countries. Musculoskelet Sci Pract Dec Dec Dec. 50:102251. DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102251.
   Google Scholar