Manual therapy for non-radicular cervical spine related impairments: establishing a ‘Trustworthy’ living systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Borrella-Andres S, Marques-Garcia I, Lucha-Lopez MO, et al. Manual Therapy as a Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: a Systematic Review. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:9936981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyles R, Toy P, Mellon J Jr., et al. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Aug;19(3):135–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bukhari SRI, Shakil-Ur-Rehamn S, Ahmad S, et al. Comparison between effectiveness of mechanical and manual traction combined with mobilization and exercise therapy in patients with Cervical Radiculopathy. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(1):31–34. DOI:10.12669/pjms.321.8923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaibi A, Stavem K, Russell MB. Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Acute Neck Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 28;10(21):5011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu J, Allen DD, Pawlowsky S, et al. Peripheral response to cervical or thoracic spinal manual therapy: an evidence-based review with meta analysis. J Man Manip Ther. 2014 Nov;22(4):220–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coulter ID, Crawford C, Vernon H, et al. Manipulation and Mobilization for Treating Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for an Appropriateness Panel. Pain Physician. 2019 Mar;22(2):E55–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Sylva J, Miller J, Gross A, et al. Manual therapy with or without physical medicine modalities for neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010 Oct;15(5):415–433.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fredin K, Loras H. Manual therapy, exercise therapy or combined treatment in the management of adult neck pain - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Oct;31:62–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacalone A, Febbi M, Magnifica F, et al. The Effect of High Velocity Low Amplitude Cervical Manipulations on the Musculoskeletal System: literature Review. Cureus. 2020 Apr 15;12(4):e7682. DOI:10.7759/cureus.7682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross A, Langevin P, Burnie SJ, et al. Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep;23(9):CD004249.
   Google Scholar
• Gross A, Miller J, D’Sylva J, et al. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan;20(1):CD004249.
   Google Scholar
• Gross A, Miller J, D’Sylva J, et al. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain: a Cochrane Review. Man Ther. 2010 Aug;15(4):315–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo B, Hall T, Bossert J, et al. The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for treating non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Nov 6;30(6):1149–1169. DOI:10.3233/BMR-169615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman PA, Speksnijder CM, de Wijer A. The effect of thoracic spine manipulation on pain and disability in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Sep;35(20):1677–1685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaver AM, Refshauge KM, Maher CG, et al. Conservative interventions provide short-term relief for non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2010;56(2):73–85. DOI:10.1016/S1836-9553(10)70037-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masaracchio M, Kirker K, States R, et al. Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of mechanical neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):e0211877. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0211877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J, Gross A, D’Sylva J, et al. Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010 Jun 1;15(4):334–354. DOI:10.1016/j.math.2010.02.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholten-Peeters GG, Thoomes E, Konings S, et al. Is manipulative therapy more effective than sham manipulation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chiropr Man Therap. 2013 Oct 2;21(1):34. DOI:10.1186/2045-709X-21-34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schroeder J, Kaplan L, Fischer DJ, et al. The outcomes of manipulation or mobilization therapy compared with physical therapy or exercise for neck pain: a systematic review. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2013 Apr;4(1):30–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shamsi S, Alshehri A, Torairi NA, et al. Efficacy of Manual Therapy in Neck Pain. A Review International Journal of Recent Innovations in Medicine and Clinical Research. 2020;2(2):24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Thoomes EJ. Effectiveness of manual therapy for cervical radiculopathy, a review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(1):45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vincent K, Maigne JY, Fischhoff C, et al. Systematic review of manual therapies for nonspecific neck pain. Joint Bone Spine. 2013 Oct;80(5):508–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao M, Sun YL, Dun RL, et al. Is manipulative therapy clinically necessary for relief of neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chin J Integr Med. 2017 Jul;23(7):543–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Wei X, Wang S. Does cervical spine manipulation reduce pain in people with degenerative cervical radiculopathy? A systematic review of the evidence, and a meta-analysis. Clin Rehabilitat. 2016;30(2):145–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuligowski T, Skrzek A, Cieslik B. Manual Therapy in Cervical and Lumbar Radiculopathy: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 7;18(11):6176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley S, Swanson BT, Sawyer SF, et al. Should low-quality evidence dominate high-level evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of musculoskeletal physical therapy interventions. J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Aug;29(4):203–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley SP, Swanson BT, Shaffer SM, et al. Is the quality of systematic reviews influenced by prospective registration: a methods review of systematic musculoskeletal physical therapy reviews. J Man Manip Ther. 2022 Aug;8:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Riley SP, Swanson BT, Shaffer SM, et al. The Unknown Prevalence of Postrandomization Bias in 15 Physical Therapy Journals: a Methods Review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Nov;51(11):542–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924–926. DOI:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews JC, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;66(7):726–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley SP, Swanson BT, Shaffer SM, et al. Protocol for the development of a ‘trustworthy’ living systematic review and meta analyses of manual therapy interventions to treat neuromusculoskeletal impairments. J Man Manip Ther. 2022 Sep;9:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Research NIo H. Reviews of methodology University of York, York, UK, YO10 5DD: university of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2020 [11/22/2020]. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#sub_methodology
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. DOI:10.1136/bmj.n160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartmann KE, Matchar DB, Chang SM, et al. Assessing Applicability of Medical Test Studies in Systematic Reviews. In: Chang S, Matchar D, and Smetana G, editors. Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews. Rockville (MD): AHRQ Methods for Effective Health Care; 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK98234/
   Google Scholar
• Organization WH. International Classification of Functioning disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mangus BC, Hoffman LA, Hoffman MA, et al. Basic Principles of Extremity Joint Mobilization Using a Kaltenborn Approach. J Sport Rehabil. 2002;11(4):235–250. DOI:10.1123/jsr.11.4.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitland GD. Treatment of the glenohumeral joint by passive movement. Physiotherapy. 1983 Jan;69(1):3–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King PM. The manipulation education manual: support for evidence-based education. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005 Jul;35(7):407–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, et al. Neck Pain: revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, et al. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clinical Epidemiol. 2016;75(Supplement C):40–46. 2016 July 1. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MM FA, Chou MD, Chou R, et al. Updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group. Spine. 2015;40(21):1660–1673. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Searching for Studies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2008;95–150. https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_6/6_searching_for_studies.htm
   Google Scholar
• Babu AS, Veluswamy SK, Rao PT, et al. Clinical trial registration in physical therapy journals: a cross-sectional study. Phys Ther. 2014 Jan;94(1):83–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Oxford, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein M. Research Note: in a meta-analysis, the I(2) index does not tell us how much the effect size varies across studies. J Physiother. 2020 Apr;66(2):135–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pustejovsky JE, Rodgers MA. Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences. Res Synth Methods. 2019 Mar;10(1):57–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011 Jul 22;343:d4002. DOI:10.1136/bmj.d4002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee DK. Alternatives to P value: confidence interval and effect size. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016 Dec;69(6):555–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagliaferri SD, Mitchell UH, Saueressig T, et al. Classification Approaches for Treating Low Back Pain Have Small Effects That are Not Clinically Meaningful: a Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Feb;52(2):67–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwind J, Learman K, O’Halloran B, et al. Different minimally important clinical difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index for the same sample of patients. J Man Manip Ther. 2013 May;21(2):71–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodriguez-Sanz J, Malo-Urries M, Corral-de-Toro J, et al. Does the Addition of Manual Therapy Approach to a Cervical Exercise Program Improve Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Neck Pain in Short- and Mid-Term? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 10;17(18):6601. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17186601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Sanz J, Malo-Urries M, Lucha-Lopez MO, et al. Effects of the Manual Therapy Approach of Segments C0-1 and C2-3 in the Flexion-Rotation Test in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 17;18(2):753. DOI:10.3390/ijerph18020753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valera-Calero A, Lluch Girbes E, Gallego-Izquierdo T, et al. Endocrine response after cervical manipulation and mobilization in people with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Dec;55(6):792–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook CE, Wright A, Wittstein J, et al. Five Recommendations to Address the Limitations of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Dec;51(12):562–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer CW, Lee IE, Tenan MS. All MCIDs are Wrong, but Some May be Useful. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Jun;52(6):401–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade C. Harking, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 18;82(1). DOI:10.4088/JCP.20f13804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClenahan BJ, Lojacono M, Young JL, et al. Trials and tribulations of transparency related to inconsistencies between plan and conduct in peer-reviewed physiotherapy publications: a methodology review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Jan 29. doi: 10.1111/jep.13810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health NIo. Research Misconduct - Definitions 2018[February 17 2023]. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/policy/research_integrity/definitions.htm
   Google Scholar
• Health USDo, Human S. Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2005 May 17;70(94):28369–28400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Editors ICoMJ. Scientific Misconduct, Expressions of Concern, and Retraction 2023 [February 17 2023]. Available from: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/scientific-misconduct-expressions-of-concern-and-retraction.html
   Google Scholar
• Editors ICoMJ. Corrections, Retractions, Republications and Version Control 2023 [February 17 2023]. Available from: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/corrections-and-version-control.html
   Google Scholar
• Goldacre B, Drysdale H, Dale A, et al. Compare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time. Trials. 2019 Feb 14;20(1):118. DOI:10.1186/s13063-019-3173-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldacre B, Drysdale H, Powell-Smith A, et al. The COMPare Trials Project 2016 [February 16 2023]. Available from: www.COMPare-trials.org
   Google Scholar
• Zadro JR, Ferreira G. Has physical therapists’ management of musculoskeletal conditions improved over time? Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Sep - Oct;24(5):458–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003 Aug;83(8):713–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley NC, Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, et al. Estimates of quality and reliability with the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale to assess the methodology of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;86(6):817–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo LG, Elkins MR, Maher CG, et al. There was evidence of convergent and construct validity of Physiotherapy Evidence Database quality scale for physiotherapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):920–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Maher CG, et al. Pedro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2000 Nov;5(4):223–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. DOI:10.1136/bmj.l4898.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Current version of RoB 2 2019 [4 March 2022]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/riskofbiastool/welcome/rob-2-0-tool/current-version-of-rob-2
   Google Scholar
• Minozzi S, Cinquini M, Gianola S, et al. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar