Does manual therapy meaningfully change quantitative sensory testing and patient reported outcome measures in patients with musculoskeletal impairments related to the spine?: A ‘trustworthy’ systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• USBoD C, Mokdad AH, Ballestros K, et al. The state of US Health, 1990-2016: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors among US States. JAMA. 2018 Apr 10;319(14):1444–1472. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin DW, Shin JI, Koyanagi A, et al. Global, regional, and national neck pain burden in the general population, 1990-2019: an analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019. Front Neurol. 2022;13:955367. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.955367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu A, March L, Zheng X, et al. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global burden of disease study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):299. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Ostelo R, et al. Surgery versus conservative care for neck pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2013 Jan;22(1):87–95. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2553-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gugliotta M, da Costa BR, Dabis E, et al. Surgical versus conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 21;6(12):e012938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, et al. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American college of physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514–530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George SZ, Fritz JM, Silfies SP, et al. Interventions for the management of acute and chronic low back pain: revision 2021. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Nov;51(11):CPG1–CPG60. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.0304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Va/dod clinical practice guidelines: diagnosis and treatment of low back pain (LBP) (2022). In Affairs USDoV. editor: U.S Department of Veterans Affairs; 2022. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/pain/lbp/
   Google Scholar
• Corp N, Mansell G, Stynes S, et al. Evidence-based treatment recommendations for neck and low back pain across Europe: asystematic review of guidelines. Eur J Pain. 2021 Feb;25(2):275–295. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2791–2803. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health NIo. Neural mechanisms of force-based manipulations: high priority research networks (U24 Clinical Trial Optional). RFA-AT-21–006. [7/23/2022]. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-AT-21-006.html
   Google Scholar
• Maitland GD. Treatment of the glenohumeral joint by passive movement. Physiotherapy. 1983 Jan;69(1):3–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mangus BC, Hoffman LA, Hoffman MA, et al. Basic principles of extremity joint mobilization using a kaltenborn approach. J Sport Rehabil. 2002;11(4):235–250. doi: 10.1123/jsr.11.4.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Doorn PF, de Schepper EIT, Rozendaal RM, et al. The incidence and management of shoulder complaints in general practice: a retrospective cohort study. Fam Pract. 2021 Sep 25;38(5):582–588. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampazo EP, Telles JD, Schiavon MAG, et al. Hypoalgesic effects of specific vs non-specific cervical manipulation in healthy subjects: a randomized crossover trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Oct;28:311–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacalone A, Febbi M, Magnifica F, et al. The effect of high velocity low amplitude cervical manipulations on the musculoskeletal system: literature review. Cureus. 2020 Apr 15;12(4):e7682. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinall SL, Leboeuf-Yde C, Etherington SJ, et al. Manipulation-induced hypoalgesia in musculoskeletal pain populations: a systematic critical review and meta-analysis. Chiropr Man Therap. 2019;27(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0226-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaegter HB, Jones MD. Exercise-induced hypoalgesia after acute and regular exercise: experimental and clinical manifestations and possible mechanisms in individuals with and without pain. Pain Rep. 2020 Sep-Oct;5(5):e823. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000823
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmid A, Brunner F, Wright A, et al. Paradigm shift in manual therapy? Evidence for a central nervous system component in the response to passive cervical joint mobilisation. Man Ther. 2008 Oct;13(5):387–396. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2007.12.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lascurain-Aguirrebena I, Newham D, Critchley DJ. Mechanism of action of spinal mobilizations: a systematic review. spine (phila pa 1976). Spine. 2016 Jan;41(2):159–172. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honore M, Leboeuf-Yde C, Gagey O. The regional effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in asymptomatic subjects: a systematic literature review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2018;26(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0181-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Millan M, Leboeuf-Yde C, Budgell B, et al. The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on experimentally induced pain: a systematic literature review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012 Aug 10;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coronado RA, Gay CW, Bialosky JE, et al. Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):752–767. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.12.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung A, Adamczyk WM, Ahmed A, et al. No Sufficient evidence for an Immediate hypoalgesic effect of spinal manual therapy on pressure pain thresholds in asymptomatic and chronic pain populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Rehabil J. 2023;103(3): doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad003
   Google Scholar
• Fix GM, VanDeusen Lukas C, Bolton RE, et al. Patient-centred care is a way of doing things: how healthcare employees conceptualize patient-centred care. Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):300–307. doi: 10.1111/hex.12615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafi JN, Parchman M. Low-value care: an intractable global problem with no quick fix. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 May;27(5):333–336. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelz M. Translating nociceptive processing into human pain models. Exp Brain Res. 2009;196(1):173–178. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1809-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modir J, Wallace M. Human experimental pain models 2: the cold pressor model analgesia. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;617:165–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graven-Nielsen T, McArdle A, Phoenix J, et al. In vivo model of muscle pain: quantification of intramuscular chemical, electrical, and pressure changes associated with saline-induced muscle pain in humans. Pain. 1997;69(1–2):137–143. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03270-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graven-Nielsen T, Fenger-Gron LS, Svensson P, et al. Quantification of deep and superficial sensibility in saline-induced muscle pain-a psychophysical study [article]. Somatosens Mot Res. 1998;15(1):46–53. doi: 10.1080/08990229870943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modir J, Wallace M. Human experimental pain models 3: heat/capsaicin sensitization and intradermal capsaicin models. Analg Methods Mol Biol. 2010;617:169–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chimenti RL, Frey-Law LA, Sluka KA. A mechanism-based approach to physical therapist management of pain. Phys Ther. 2018 May 1;98(5):302–314. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Bandt HL, Paulis WD, Beckwee D, et al. Pain mechanisms in low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis of mechanical quantitative sensory testing outcomes in people with nonspecific low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Oct;49(10):698–715. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley SP, Swanson BT, Shaffer SM, et al. Protocol for the development of a ‘trustworthy’ living systematic review and meta analyses of manual therapy interventions to treat neuromusculoskeletal impairments. J Man Manip Ther. 2022;Sep 9:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Research NIo H. Reviews of methodology University of york, York, UK, YO10 5DD: University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2020 [11/22/2020]. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#sub_methodology
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartmann KE, Matchar DB, Chang SM, et al. Assessing applicability of medical test studies in systematic reviews. In: editors, Chang S, Matchar D, and Smetana G. Methods guide for medical test reviews AHRQ methods for effective health care. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK98234/
   Google Scholar
• Organization WH. International classification of functioning disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine. 1997 Sep 15;22(18):2128–2156. Phila Pa 1976. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199709150-00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15(2):S192–300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyng KD, Thorsen JBB, Larsen DB, et al. The modulatory effect of quantitative sensory testing in shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Med. 2022 Apr 8;23(4):733–744. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407–415. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams GN, Gangel TJ, Arciero RA, et al. Comparison of the Single assessment Numeric evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales. Outcomes measures after shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):214–221. doi: 10.1177/03635465990270021701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, et al. Neck pain: revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1–A83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, et al. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clinical Epidemiol. 2016;75:40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlan AD, Malmivaara A, Chou R, et al. Updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane back and neck group. Spine. 2015;40(21):1660–1673. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Searching for studies Cochrane Handbook For Systematic Reviews Of Interventions. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Riley SP, Swanson BT, Shaffer SM, et al. The unknown prevalence of postrandomization bias in 15 physical therapy journals: a methods review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Nov;51(11):542–550. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.10491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews JC, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;66(7):726–735. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagliaferri SD, Mitchell UH, Saueressig T, et al. Classification approaches for treating low back pain have small effects that are not clinically meaningful: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Feb;52(2):67–84. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2022.10761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwind J, Learman K, O’Halloran B, et al. Different minimally important clinical difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index for the same sample of patients. J Man Manip Ther. 2013 May;21(2):71–78. doi: 10.1179/2042618613Y.0000000028
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balaguier R, Madeleine P, Vuillerme N. Intra-session absolute and relative reliability of pressure pain thresholds in the low back region of vine-workers: effect of the number of trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 18;17(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1212-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrasco-Martinez F, Ibanez-Vera AJ, Martinez-Amat A, et al. Short-term effectiveness of the flexion-distraction technique in comparison with high-velocity vertebral manipulation in patients suffering from low-back pain. Complement Ther Med. 2019 Jun;44:61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira RF, Costa LOP, Nascimento LP, et al. Directed vertebral manipulation is not better than generic vertebral manipulation in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2020 Jul;66(3):174–179. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Sanz J, Malo-Urries M, Corral-de-Toro J, et al. Does the addition of manual therapy approach to a cervical exercise Program improve clinical outcomes for patients with chronic neck pain in Short- and Mid-term? A randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 10;17(18):6601. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valera-Calero A, Lluch Girbes E, Gallego-Izquierdo T, et al. Endocrine response after cervical manipulation and mobilization in people with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Dec;55(6):792–805. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05475-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshami AM, Bamhair DA. Effect of manual therapy with exercise in patients with chronic cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2021 Oct 18;22(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05690-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bautista-Aguirre F, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca A, Heredia-Rizo AM, et al. Effect of cervical vs. thoracic spinal manipulation on peripheral neural features and grip strength in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;53(3):333–341. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04431-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrangrad S, Kamali F. Comparison of ischemic compression and lumbopelvic manipulation as trigger point therapy for patellofemoral pain syndrome in young adults: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Jul;21(3):554–564. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.08.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casanova-Mendez A, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca A, Rodriguez-Blanco C, et al. Comparative short-term effects of two thoracic spinal manipulation techniques in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Man Ther. 2014 Aug;19(4):331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira RF, Liebano RE, Costa Lda C, et al. Immediate effects of region-specific and non-region-specific spinal manipulative therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2013 Jun;93(6):748–756. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagundes Loss J, de Souza da Silva L, Ferreira Miranda I, et al. Immediate effects of a lumbar spine manipulation on pain sensitivity and postural control in individuals with nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Jun 3;28(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-00316-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galindez-Ibarbengoetxea X, Setuain I, Ramirez-Velez R, et al. Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018 Feb 6;31(1):133–145. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galindez-Ibarbengoetxea X, Setuain I, Ramirez-Velez R, et al. Immediate effects of osteopathic treatment versus therapeutic exercise on patients with chronic cervical pain. Altern Ther Health Med. 2018 May;24(3):24–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Perez-Juana D, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Arias-Buria JL, et al. Changes in cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility, widespread pressure pain sensitivity, and neck pain after cervical thrust manipulation in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Sep;41(7):551–560. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardouni JR, Shaffer SW, Pidcoe PE, et al. Immediate changes in pressure pain sensitivity after thoracic spinal manipulative therapy in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled study. Man Ther. 2015 Aug;20(4):540–546. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.12.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• La Touche R, Paris-Alemany A, Mannheimer JS, et al. Does mobilization of the upper cervical spine affect pain sensitivity and autonomic nervous system function in patients with cervico-craniofacial pain?: A randomized-controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2013 Mar;29(3):205–215. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318250f3cd
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Lopez A, Alonso Perez JL, Gonzalez Gutierez JL, et al. Mobilization versus manipulations versus sustain apophyseal natural glide techniques and interaction with psychological factors for patients with chronic neck pain: randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Apr;51(2):121–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Segura R, De-la-Llave-Rincon AI, Ortega-Santiago R, et al. Immediate changes in widespread pressure pain sensitivity, neck pain, and cervical range of motion after cervical or thoracic thrust manipulation in patients with bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;42(9):806–814. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer AC, Pires PF, Dibai-Filho AV, et al. Effects of upper thoracic manipulation on pressure pain sensitivity in women with temporomandibular disorder: a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;93(2):160–168. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arjona Retamal JJ, Fernandez Seijo A, Torres Cintas JD, et al. Effects of instrumental, manipulative and soft tissue approaches for the suboccipital region in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain. A randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 16;18(16):8636. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salom-Moreno J, Ortega-Santiago R, Cleland JA, et al. Immediate changes in neck pain intensity and widespread pressure pain sensitivity in patients with bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial of thoracic thrust manipulation vs non-thrust mobilization. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jun;37(5):312–319. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker KK, Sethi J, Mohanty U. Effect of spinal manipulation on pain sensitivity, postural sway, and health-related quality of life among patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomised control trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2019;13(2). doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2019/38074.12578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Sterling M, et al. Dose optimization for spinal treatment effectiveness: a randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of high and low mobilization forces in patients with neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Mar;44(3):141–152. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schliessbach J, Siegenthaler A, Streitberger K, et al. The prevalence of widespread central hypersensitivity in chronic pain patients. Eur J Pain. 2013 Nov;17(10):1502–1510. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00332.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monticone M, Baiardi P, Vanti C, et al. Responsiveness of the Oswestry disability index and the Roland Morris disability questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan;21(1):122–129. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1959-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook CE, Wright A, Wittstein J, et al. Five recommendations to address the limitations of patient-reported outcome measures. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Dec;51(12):562–565. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.10836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer CW, Lee IE, Tenan MS. All MCIDs are wrong, but Some may be useful. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Jun;52(6):401–407. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2022.11193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bise CG, Piva SR, Erhard R. Manual therapy. In: Placzek J Boyce D, editors. Orthopaedic physical therapy secrets. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 85–94. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-28683-1.00012-6
   Google Scholar
• Shraim MA, Sluka KA, Sterling M, et al. Features and methods to discriminate between mechanism-based categories of pain experienced in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi expert consensus study. Pain. 2022 Sep 1;163(9):1812–1828. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgopoulos V, Akin-Akinyosoye K, Zhang W, et al. Quantitative sensory testing and predicting outcomes for musculoskeletal pain, disability, and negative affect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2019 Sep;160(9):1920–1932. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialosky JE, George SZ, Horn ME, et al. Spinal manipulative therapy-specific changes in pain sensitivity in individuals with low back pain (NCT01168999). J Pain. 2014 Feb;15(2):136–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialosky JE, Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, et al. Unraveling the mechanisms of manual therapy: modeling an approach. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jan;48(1):8–18. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook CE. JOSPT. 2022. Available from: https://www.jospt.org/do/10.2519/jospt.blog.20220524/full/.
   Google Scholar
• Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003 Aug;83(8):713–721. doi: 10.1093/ptj/83.8.713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley NC, Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, et al. Estimates of quality and reliability with the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale to assess the methodology of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;86(6):817–824. doi: 10.1093/ptj/86.6.817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo LG, Elkins MR, Maher CG, et al. There was evidence of convergent and construct validity of physiotherapy evidence database quality scale for physiotherapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):920–925. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Maher CG, et al. Pedro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2000 Nov;5(4):223–226. doi: 10.1054/math.2000.0372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Current version of RoB 2 2019 [2022 Apr 3]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/riskofbiastool/welcome/rob-2-0-tool/current-version-of-rob-2
   Google Scholar
• Minozzi S, Cinquini M, Gianola S, et al. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoomes EJ. Effectiveness of manual therapy for cervical radiculopathy, a review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0126-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924–926. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence–publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1277–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar