Changes in biochemical markers following a spinal manipulation – a systematic review update

References

• Coronado RA, Gay CW, Bialosky JE, et al. Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;22(5):752–767. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.12.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonic EE, Stockwell CA, Kettner NW. Brain stem compression and atlantoaxial instability secondary to chronic rheumatoid arthritis in a 67-year-old female. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010;33(4):315–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosseau L, Wells GA, Poitras S, et al. Ottawa panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on therapeutic massage for low back pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012;16(4):424–455. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.04.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross A, Miller J, D’Sylva J, et al. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain: a Cochrane review. Manual Ther. 2010;15(4):315–333. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin SL, Kerr KL, Bartley EJ, et al. Respiration-induced hypoalgesia: exploration of potential mechanisms. J Pain. 2012;13(8):755–763. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppieters MW, Butler DS. Do ‘sliders’ slide and ‘tensioners’ tension? An analysis of neurodynamic techniques and considerations regarding their application. Manual Ther. 2008;13(3):213–221. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Price DD, et al. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Manual Ther. 2009;14(5):531–538. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellens F. The traditional mechanistic paradigm in the teaching and practice of manual therapy: time for a reality check. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtadze MA, Vernon H, Karalkin AV, et al. Cerebral perfusion in patients with chronic neck and upper back pain: preliminary observations. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35(2):76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu J, Allen DD, Pawlowsky S, et al. Peripheral response to cervical or thoracic spinal manual therapy: an evidence-based review with meta analysis. J Manual Manipulative Ther. 2014;22(4):220–229. doi: 10.1179/2042618613y.0000000062
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisold S, Mehrabi A, Konstantinidis L, et al. Experimental study of cardiorespiratory and stress factors in esophageal surgery using robot-assisted thoracoscopic or open thoracic approach. Arch Surg. 2008;143(2):156–163. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kingston L, Claydon L, Tumilty S. The effects of spinal mobilizations on the sympathetic nervous system: a systematic review. Manual Ther. 2014;19(4):281–287. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matus S, Valenzuela V, Medinas DB, et al. ER dysfunction and protein folding stress in ALS. Int J Cell Biol. 2013;2013:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2013/674751
   Google Scholar
• Moutzouri M, Joanna P, Eudokia B. Investigation of the effects of a centrally applied lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glide mobilization on lower limb sympathetic nervous system activity in asymptomatic subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35(4):286–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puhl AA, Injeyan HS. Short-term effects of manipulation to the upper thoracic spine of asymptomatic subjects on plasma concentrations of epinephrine and norepinephrine—A Randomized and controlled Observational study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35(3):209–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid A, Brunner F, Wright A, et al. Paradigm shift in manual therapy? Evidence for a central nervous system component in the response to passive cervical joint mobilisation. Manual Ther. 2008;13(5):387–396. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2007.12.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wingenfeld K, Heim C, Schmidt I, et al. HPA axis reactivity and lymphocyte glucocorticoid sensitivity in fibromyalgia syndrome and chronic pelvic pain. Psychosom Med. 2008;70(1):65–72. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815ff3ce
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman EB, Pacheco GR, Gharibvand L, et al. The immediate effects of cervical spine manipulation on pain and biochemical markers in females with acute non-specific mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Manual Manipulative Ther. 2019;27(4):186–196. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1553696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampath KK, Botnmark E, Mani R, et al. Neuroendocrine response following a thoracic spinal manipulation in healthy men. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(9):617–627. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampath KK, Mani R, Katare R, et al. Thoracic spinal manipulation effect on neuroendocrine response in people with Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized crossover trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021;44(5):420–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodorczyk-Injeyan JA, McGregor M, Ruegg R, et al. Interleukin 2-regulated in vitro antibody production following a single spinal manipulative treatment in normal subjects. Chiropr Man Therap. 2010;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-26
   Google Scholar
• Gevers-Montoro C, Provencher B, Descarreaux M, et al. Neurophysiological mechanisms of chiropractic spinal manipulation for spine pain. Eur J Pain. 2021;25(7):1429–1448. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haavik H, Kumari N, Holt K, et al. The contemporary model of vertebral column joint dysfunction and impact of high-velocity, low-amplitude controlled vertebral thrusts on neuromuscular function. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121(10):2675–2720. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04727-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutke Schipholt IJ, Coppieters MW, Meijer OG, et al. Effects of joint and nerve mobilisation on neuroimmune responses in animals and humans with neuromusculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Rep. 2021;6(2):e927. doi: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000927
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wirth B, Gassner A, de Bruin ED, et al. Neurophysiological effects of high velocity and low amplitude spinal manipulation in symptomatic and asymptomatic humans: a systematic literature review. Spine. 2019;44(15):E914–E926. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takuwa H, Matsuura T, Bakalova R, et al. Contribution of nitric oxide to cerebral blood flow regulation under hypoxia in rats. J Physiol Sci. 2010;60(6):399–406. doi: 10.1007/s12576-010-0108-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobner PR. Neurotensin and pain modulation. Peptides. 2006;27(10):2405–2414. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2006.04.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoletti M, Neri G, Maccauro G, et al. Impact and neuropeptide substance P an inflammatory compound on arachidonic acid compound generation. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2012;25(4):849–857. doi: 10.1177/039463201202500403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotz M, Vaughan JH, Carson DSA. Effect of neuropeptides on production of inflammatory cytokines by human monocytes. Science. 1988;241(4870):1218–1221. doi: 10.1126/science.2457950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suffredini AF, Fantuzzi G, Badolato R, et al. New insights into the biology of the acute phase response. J Clin Immunol. 1999;19(4):203–214. doi: 10.1023/A:1020563913045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elenkov IJ, Wilder RL, Chrousos GP, et al. The sympathetic nerve--an integrative interface between two supersystems: the brain and the immune system. Pharmacol Rev. 2000;52(4):595–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrousos GP. Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009;5(7):374–381. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2009.106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priftis KN, Papadimitriou A, Anthracopoulos MB, et al. Endocrine-immune interactions in adrenal function of asthmatic children on inhaled corticosteroids. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2009;16(5):333–339. doi: 10.1159/000216191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degenhardt BF, Darmani NA, Johnson JC, et al. Role of osteopathic manipulative treatment in altering pain biomarkers: a pilot study. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007;107(9):387–400. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34948818710&partnerID=40&md5=257097abc17ab76422809bfb21c045e3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molina-Ortega F, Lomas-Vega R, Hita-Contreras F, et al. Immediate effects of spinal manipulation on nitric oxide, substance P and pain perception. Manual Ther. 2014;19(5):411–417. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.02.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whelan TL, Dishman JD, Burke J, et al. The effect of chiropractic manipulation on salivary cortisol levels. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002;25(3):149–153. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cin20&AN=2002089945&site=ehost-live&scope=site
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampath KK, Mani R, Cotter J, et al. Reply to letter to the editor ‘changes in biochemical markers following spinal manipulation – a systematic review and meta-analysis’. Musculoskeletal Sci Pract. 2017;30:e90. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner P, Hopewell S, Chandler J, et al. When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist. BMJ. 2016;354:i3507. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3507
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith GD, Ho KHM. Systematic reviews: when should they be updated? J Clin Nurs. 2023;32(9–10):e17–e18. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann internal med. 2009;151(4):264–269. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway PJW, Herzog W, Zhang Y, et al. Forces required to cause cavitation during spinal manipulation of the thoracic spine. Clin Biomech. 1993;8(4):210–214. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(93)90016-B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(oct18 2):d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Version 1.22.0: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. revised ed. New York: Academic Press; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JP. The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Making. 2005;25(6):646–654. doi: 10.1177/0272989x05282643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein M. Research note: in a meta-analysis, the I2 index does not tell us how much the effect size varies across studies. J Physiother. 2020;66(2):135–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanna I, John PAI, Maroeska MR, et al. Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e010247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009;172(1):137–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–926. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achalandabaso A, Plaza-Manzano G, Lomas-Vega R, et al. Tissue damage markers after a spinal manipulation in healthy subjects: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial. Dis Markers. 2014;2014:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2014/815379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan PC, Kokjohn K, Kaltinger CJ, et al. Enhanced phagocytic cell respiratory burst induced by spinal manipulation: potential role of substance P. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):399–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian GF, Stanton GJ, Sissons D, et al. Immunoreactive ACTH, β-endorphin, and cortisol levels in plasma following spinal Manipulative therapy. Spine. 1988;13(12):1411–1417. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198812000-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte FCK, Funabashi M, Starmer D, et al. Effects of distinct force magnitude of spinal manipulative therapy on blood biomarkers of inflammation: a proof of principle study in healthy young adults. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2022;45(1):20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual-Vaca Á O, Punzano-Rodríguez R, Escribá-Astaburuaga P, et al. Short-term changes in algometry, inclinometry, stabilometry, and urinary pH Analysis after a thoracolumbar junction manipulation in patients with kidney stones. J Altern Complementary Med. 2017;23(8):639–647. http://ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=124584232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza-Manzano G, Molina F, Lomas-Vega R, et al. Changes in biochemical markers of pain perception and stress response after spinal manipulation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(4):231–239. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodorczyk-Injeyan JA, Injeyan HS, Ruegg R. Spinal manipulative therapy reduces inflammatory cytokines but not substance P production in normal subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29(1):14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valera-Calero A, Lluch Girbes E, Gallego-Izquierdo T, et al. Endocrine response after cervical manipulation and mobilization in people with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;55(6):792–805. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05475-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampath KK, Mani R, Cotter JD, et al. Measureable changes in the neuro-endocrinal mechanism following spinal manipulation. Med Hypotheses. 2015;85(6):819–824. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechartres A, Trinquart L, Boutron I, et al. Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2013;346:f2304. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de C Williams AC, Fisher E, Hearn L, et al. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;2020(8). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub4
   Google Scholar
• Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Vase L, Scott W, et al. Recommendations for the development, implementation, and reporting of control interventions in efficacy and mechanistic trials of physical, psychological, and self-management therapies: the CoPPS statement. BMJ. 2023;381:e072108. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348(mar07 3):g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neimann Rasmussen L, Montgomery P. The prevalence of and factors associated with inclusion of non-English language studies in campbell systematic reviews: a survey and meta-epidemiological study. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):129. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0786-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walpole SC. Including papers in languages other than English in systematic reviews: important, feasible, yet often omitted. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugley S, Wade A, Thomas J, et al. Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for campbell. Campbell Syst Rev. 2016;13(1):1–73. doi: 10.4073/cmg.2016.1
   Google Scholar
• Stalder T, Kirschbaum C, Kudielka BM, et al. Assessment of the cortisol awakening response: expert consensus guidelines. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;63:414–432. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedgood D, Boggiano MM, Turan B. Testosterone and social evaluative stress: The moderating role of basal cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;47:107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes LD, Grace FM, Baker JS, et al. Exercise-induced responses in Salivary testosterone, cortisol, and their ratios in men: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2015;45(5):713–726. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0306-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goebel MU, Mills PJ, Irwin MR, et al. Interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α production after acute psychological stress, exercise, and infused isoproterenol: differential effects and pathways. Psychosom Med. 2000;62(4):591–598. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200007000-00019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar