An international consensus on gaps in mechanisms of forced-based manipulation research: findings from a nominal group technique

References

• Neural Mechanisms of Force-Based Manipulations: High Priority Research Networks. National Institutes Of Health (NIH). [cited 2023 February 2]. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-AT-21-006.html#:~:text=Force-based%20manipulations%20refer%20to%20the%20passive%20application%20of,rehabilitation%20care%2C%20or%20general%20wellness%20and%20disease%20prevention
   Google Scholar
• Bond BM, Kinslow CD, Yoder AW, et al. Effect of spinal manipulative therapy on mechanical pain sensitivity in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a pilot randomized, controlled trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2020;28(1):15–27. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1572986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop MD, Torres-Cueco R, Gay CW, et al. What effect can manual therapy have on a patient’s pain experience? Pain Manag. 2015;5(6):455–464. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuczynski JJ, Schwieterman B, Columber K, et al. Effectiveness of physical therapist administered spinal manipulation for the treatment of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(6):647–662.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lascurain-Aguirrebeña I, Newham DJ, Casado-Zumeta X, et al. Immediate effects of cervical mobilisations on global perceived effect, movement associated pain and neck kinematics in patients with non-specific neck pain. A double blind placebo randomised controlled trial. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018;38:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombi A, Testa M. The effects induced by spinal Manipulative Therapy on the immune and endocrine systems. Medicina (Mex). 2019;55(8):448. doi: 10.3390/medicina55080448
   Google Scholar
• Vigotsky AD, Bruhns RP. The role of descending modulation in Manual Therapy and its analgesic implications: a narrative review. Pain Res Treat. 2015;2015:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2015/292805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney CA, Fernández de las Peñas C. Manual Therapy for chronic conditions: a mechanistic approach to modern Manual Therapy. In Simoneau G, editor. Mechanisms of manual therapy interventions. 31.3.2. Lacrosse, WI: Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy. APTA; 2021. p. 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Karas S, Olson Hunt MJ, Temes B, et al. The effect of direction specific thoracic spine manipulation on the cervical spine: a randomized controlled trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2018;26(1):3–10. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2016.1260674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaven EJ, Goode AP, Coronado RA, et al. The relative effectiveness of segment specific level and non-specific level spinal joint mobilization on pain and range of motion: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Man Manip Ther. 2013;21(1):7–17. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nim CG, Downie A, O’Neill S, et al. The importance of selecting the correct site to apply spinal manipulation when treating spinal pain: myth or reality? A systematic review. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):23415. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02882-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino RL, Caires PM, Furtado FC, et al. Applying joint mobilization at different cervical vertebral levels does not influence immediate pain reduction in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(2):95–100. doi: 10.1179/106698109790824686
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donaldson M, Petersen S, Cook C, et al. A prescriptively selected nonthrust manipulation versus a therapist-selected nonthrust manipulation for treatment of individuals with low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(4):243–250. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter M, Gordon S, Hamer P. The Nominal group technique: a useful consensus methodology in physiotherapy research. N Z J Physiother. 2004;32(3):126–130.
   Google Scholar
• Manera K, Hanson CS, Gutman T, et al. Consensus methods: nominal group technique. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore; 2019. pp. 737–750. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_100.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Gonsalves C, et al. Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal group in medical education research. Med Teach. 2017;39(1):14–19. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima CR, Martins DF, Reed WR. Physiological responses induced by Manual Therapy in animal models: a scoping review. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:430. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geri T, Viceconti A, Minacci M, et al. Manual therapy: exploiting the role of human touch. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019;44:102044. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed WR, Weber KA, Martins DF. Editorial: mechanisms and models of musculoskeletal pain and nonpharmacological treatment. Front Integr Neurosci. 2022;16:998413. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2022.998413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andias R, Neto M, Silva AG. The effects of pain neuroscience education and exercise on pain, muscle endurance, catastrophizing and anxiety in adolescents with chronic idiopathic neck pain: a school-based pilot, randomized and controlled study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;34(9):682–691. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1423590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neurocircuitry of force-based manipulations workshop: meeting report. Published online September 17, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Jünger S, Payne SA, Brine J, et al. Guidance on conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med. 2017;31(8):684–706. doi: 10.1177/0269216317690685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green RA. The delphi technique in educational research. Sage Open. 2014;4(2):215824401452977. doi: 10.1177/2158244014529773
   Google Scholar
• Gyer G, Michael J, Inklebarger J, et al. Effects of biomechanical parameters of spinal manipulation: a critical literature review. J Integr Med. 2022;20(1):4–12. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2021.10.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pasquier M, Daneau C, Marchand AA, et al. Spinal manipulation frequency and dosage effects on clinical and physiological outcomes: a scoping review. Chiropr Man Ther. 2019;27(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12998-019-0244-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Thomson OP, Rossettini G, et al. Avoiding nocebo and other undesirable effects in chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy: an invitation to reflect. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022;62:102677. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossettini G, Carlino E, Testa M. Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1943-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossettini G, Geri T, Palese A, et al. What physiotherapists specialized in Orthopedic Manual Therapy Know About nocebo-related effects and contextual factors: findings from a National survey. Frontiers In Psychology. 2020;11:582174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith D. Reflecting on new models for osteopathy – it’s time for change. Int J Osteopath Med. 2019;31:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards RR, Dworkin RH, Turk DC, et al. Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2016;157(9):1851–1871. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar