Psychometric measurement properties of patient-reported and observer-reported outcome measures for spinal mobilisations and manipulation on paediatric subjects with diverse medical conditions: A systematic review

References

• Chiropractic Board. Chiropractic Board of Australia policy statement: interim policy on spinal manipulation for infants and young children. Melbourne; 2019. p. 1–2. Available from: https://www.chiropracticboard.gov.au/Codes-guidelines/Position-statements/Interim-policy-on-spinal-manipulation.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Milne N, Longeri L, Patel A, et al. Spinal manipulation and mobilisation in the treatment of infants, children, and adolescents: a systematic scoping review. BioMed Central Pediatr. 2022 Dec;22(1):1–24. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03781-6
   Google Scholar
• McKown S, Acquadro C, Anfray C, et al. Good practices for the translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of clinician-reported outcome, observer-reported outcome, and performance outcome measures. J Patient-Reported Outcomes. 2020 Dec;4(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00248-z
   Google Scholar
• Stratford P. Is this change real? Interpreting patient outcomes in Physical therapy. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021 Dec;10(1):1–1. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2019 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hayton T, Gross A, Basson A, et al. Psychometric properties of clinician-reported and performance-based outcomes cited in a scoping review on spinal manipulation and mobilization for pediatric populations with diverse medical conditions: a systematic review. J Man Manipulate Therapy. 2009 Jan; doi: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2269038.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, et al. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009 Oct;18(8):1115–1123. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Prinsen C, Patrick DL et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). User Manual. 2018 Feb;78(1). https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Prinsen CA, Chiarotto A et al. COSIM methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs – user manual. 2018. Available from: http://www/cosmin.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Parent EC, Hill D, Moreau M, et al. Score distribution of the Scoliosis quality of Life index questionnaire in different subgroups of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2007 Jul 15;32(16):1767–1777. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180b9f7a5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feise RJ, Donaldson S, Crowther ER, et al. Construction and validation of the scoliosis quality of life index in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1310–1315. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000163885.12834.ca
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staes F, Stappaerts K, Vertommen H, et al. Visual analogue scale for the perceived influence of exertion and movements/positions on low back problems in surveys of adolescents. Acta Paediatrica. 2000 Jun;89(6):713–716. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2000.tb00371.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, et al. Measuring quality of life in children with asthma. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(1):35–46. doi: 10.1007/BF00435967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr RG, Kramer MS, Boisjoly C, et al. Parental diary of infant cry and fuss behaviour. Arch Dischildhood. 1988 Apr 1;63(4):380–387. doi: 10.1136/adc.63.4.380
   Google Scholar
• Abaoud AA, Almalki NS, Bakhiet SF, et al. Psychometric properties of the Autism treatment evaluation checklist in Saudi Arabia. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2020 Aug 1;76:101604. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Backer NB. Correlation between Autism treatment evaluation checklist (ATEC) and Childhood Autism rating Scale (CARS) in the evaluation of autism spectrum disorder. Sudan J Paediatr. 2016;16(1):17–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freire MH, André AM, Kummer AM. Test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity of Autism treatment evaluation checklist (ATEC). Rev Bras de Psiquiatr. 2018 Jan;67:63–64. doi: 10.1590/0047-2085000000186
   Google Scholar
• Geier DA, Kern JK, Geier MR. A comparison of the Autism treatment evaluation checklist (ATEC) and the Childhood Autism rating Scale (CARS) for the quantitative evaluation of autism. J Mental Health Res Intellectual Disabilities. 2013 Oct 1;6(4):255–267. doi: 10.1080/19315864.2012.681340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magiati I, Moss J, Yates R, et al. Is the Autism treatment evaluation checklist a useful tool for monitoring progress in children with autism spectrum disorders? J Intellectual Disability Res. 2011;55(3):302–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01359.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahapatra S, Khokhlovich E, Martinez S, et al. Longitudinal epidemiological study of autism subgroups using Autism treatment evaluation checklist (ATEC) score. J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 May;50(5):1497–1508. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3699-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memari AH, Shayestehfar M, Mirfazeli FS, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the autism treatment evaluation checklist in persian. Iran J Pediatr. 2013 Jun;23(3):269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunakarach K, Kessomboon P. Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Autism treatment evaluation checklist: a two-phase diagnostic accuracy study. F1000Res. 2018 May 3;7(538):538. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14537.1
   Google Scholar
• Cheung PW, Wong CK, Cheung JP. Comparative study of the use of paediatric quality of Life Inventory 4.0 generic core scales in paediatric patients with spine and limb pathologies. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul;102(7):890–898. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1766.R2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seid M, Limbers CA, Driscoll KA, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) generic core scales and asthma symptoms scale in vulnerable children with asthma. J Asthma. 2010 Mar;47(2):170–177. doi: 10.3109/02770900903533966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantilipikorn P, Watter P, Prasertsukdee S. Feasibility, reliability and validity of the Thai version of the pediatric quality of life inventory 3.0 cerebral palsy module. Qual Life Res. 2013 Mar;22(2):415–421. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0161-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varni JW, Seid M, Knight TS, et al. The PedsQLTM 4.0 generic core scales: sensitivity, responsiveness, and impact on clinical decision-making. J Behav Med. 2002 Apr;25(2):175–193. doi: 10.1023/A:1014836921812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL™ 4.0: reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of Life Inventory™ version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med care. 2001 Aug;1:800–812. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006
   Google Scholar
• Desai AD, Zhou C, Stanford S, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 generic core scales in the pediatric inpatient setting. JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Dec 1;168(12):1114–1121. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinsen CA, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147–1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santesso N, Glenton C, Dahm P, et al. GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions. J Clinical Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 1;119:126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai MC, Lerch JP, Floris DL, et al. Imaging sex/gender and autism in the brain: etiological implications. J Neurosci Res. 2017 Jan 2;95(1–2):380–397. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruijs JE, Stengs C, Keessen W. Parameter variation in stable scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 1995 Jun;4(3):176–179. doi: 10.1007/BF00298242
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lalloo C, Mesaroli G, Makkar M, et al. Outcome measures for pediatric pain: practical guidance on clinical use in juvenile arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Oct;72(Suppl 10):358–368. doi: 10.1002/acr.24217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edelson S. ATEC: development and application. 2021. Available from: http://www.autism.org/autism-treatment-evaluation-checklist/atec-development.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn A. Improvement in Autism spectrum disorder following vertebral subluxation reduction: a case study. J Pediatr Matern Fam Health. 2011;Sep:87–89.
   Google Scholar
• Khorshid KA, Sweat RW, Zemba DA, et al. Clinical efficacy of upper cervical versus full spine chiropractic care on children with autism: a randomized clinical trial. J Vertebr Subluxat Res. 2006 Mar;9:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kronau S, Thiel B, Jakel A, et al. Clinical effects of spinal manipulation in the management of children and young adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder – a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Pediatr. 2016;15(3):1280–1291.
   Google Scholar
• Marini N, Marini S. Improvement in Autism in a child coupled with reduction in vertebral subluxations: a case study and selective review of the literature. J Pediatr Matern Fam Health. 2010 July;107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Balon J, Aker PD, Crowther ER, et al. A comparison of active and simulated chiropractic manipulation as adjunctive treatment for childhood asthma. N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 8;339(15):1013–1020. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810083391501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauridsen HH, Hestbaek L. Development of the young spine questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14(1):185. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-185
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meldgaard E, Lauridsen HH, Hestbaek L. The young Disability Questionnaire-spine: item development, pilot testing and conceptualisation of a questionnaire to measure consequences of spinal pain in children. BMJ Open. 2021;11(5):e045580. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauridsen HH, Meldgaard E, Hestbæk L, et al. Development of the young Disability Questionnaire (spine) for children with spinal pain: field testing in Danish school children. BMJ Open. 2023;13(5):e064382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, et al. The Faces pain Scale–Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. 2001;93(2):173–183. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00314-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguet A, Stinson JN, McGrath PJ. Measurement of self-reported pain intensity in children and adolescents. J Psychosom Res. 2010;68(4):329–336. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Baeyer CL, Spagrud LJ, McCormick JC, et al. Three new datasets supporting use of the numerical rating Scale (NRS-11) for children’s self-reports of pain intensity. Pain. 2009 Jun;143(3):223–227. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaleff ZA, Kamper SJ, Stinson JN, et al. Measuring musculoskeletal pain in infants, children, and adolescents. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Oct;47(10):712–730. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon J, Smith S, Raghunandan R, et al. Systematic review of the psychometric performance of generic Childhood multi-attribute utility instruments. Appl Health Econ Health Pol. 2023 May;3:1–26. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00806-8
   Google Scholar
• Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, et al. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2021 Aug;30(8):2197–2218. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Gibbons E, et al. Inter-rater reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments) checklist. Qual Life Res. 2010 Oct;19:25–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, et al. International consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes: results of the COSMIN study. J Clinical Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–745. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Dec;10(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffiths A, Toovey R, Morgan PE, et al. Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8:1–14. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar