References
- Akhmetzaki, Y. Z., and B. M. Mukhamediyev. 2017. FDI determinants in the Eurasian economic union countries and Eurasian economic integration effect on FDI inflows. Economy of Region 13 (3):959–970. doi: https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-3-26.
- Anderson, J., C. Milot, and Y. Yotov. 2014. How much does geography deflect services trade? Canadian answers. International Economic Review 55 (3):791–818. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12071.
- Anderson, J., M. Vesselovsky, and Y. Yotov. 2016. Gravity with scale effects. Journal of International Economics 100:174–193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.03.003.
- Andreeva, E. L., A. F. Linetsky, A. V. Ratner, and D. E. Kuznetsova. 2016. Institutional factor in international economic activity of region and its socio-economic development. Economy of Region 12 (4):1050–1059. doi: https://doi.org/10.17059/2016–4–7.
- Apokin, A. Y., A. A. Gnidchenko, and E. M. Sabelnikova. 2017. Import substitution potential and gains from economic integration: Disaggregated estimations. Economic Policy 12 (2):44–71. (In Russian) doi: https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2017-2-02.
- Biryukova, O., and A. Bezhanishvili. 2017. Modern valuation methods for international trade in services. International Processes 15 (1):126–142. doi: https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2017.15.1.48.10..
- Carrere, C. 2006. Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review 50 (2):223–247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.06.001.
- Chaney, T. 2018. The gravity equation in international trade: An explanation. Journal of Political Economy 126 (1):150–177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/694292.
- Cheng, I., and H. Wall. 2005. Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 8:49–63.
- Ciuriak, D., A. Dadkhah, and D. Lysenk. 2020. The effect of binding commitments on services trade. World Trade Review 19 (3):365–314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745618000496.
- Felbermayr, G., and M. Steininger. 2019. Revisiting the Euro’s trade cost and welfare. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 239 (5–6):917–956. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2019-0015.
- Galimov, D., А. Gnidchenko, E. Sabelnikova, and V. Salnikov. 2017. Inter-industry effects from Russian trade integration into the EAEU. Voprosy Ekonomiki 10 (10):123–139. doi: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-10-123-139.
- Knobel, А., A. Lipin, A. Malokostov, D. Tarr, and N. Turdyeva. 2019. Deep integration in the Eurasian Economic Union: What are the benefits of successful implementation or wider liberalization? Eurasian Geography and Economics 60 (2):177–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2019.1627232.
- Knobel, A. 2016. The impact of service sector liberalization on trade in services and industrial productivity in Russia and other CIS countries. Applied Econometrics, Publishing House «Sinergia Press» 44:75–99.
- Kotnik, P., and E. Hagsten. 2018. ICT use as a determinant of export activity in manufacturing and service firms: Multicountry evidence. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business 36 (1):103–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2018.1.103.
- Lee, W. 2019. Services liberalization and global value chain participation: New evidence for heterogeneous effects by income level and provisions. Review of International Economics 27 (3):888–915. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12402.
- Markusen, J., T. F. Rutherford, and D. Tarr. 2000. Foreign direct investments in services and the domestic market for expertise. NBER Working Paper No. 7700.
- Miron, D., R. C. Cojocariu, and A. Tamas. 2019. Using gravity model to analyze Romanian trade flows between 2001 and 2015. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research 53 (2/2019):5–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.24818/18423264/53.2.19.01.
- Nath, K. H., and L. Liu. 2017. Information and communications technology (ICT) and services trade. Information Economics and Policy 41:81–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2017.06.003.
- Riedel, J., and A. Slany. 2019. The potential of African trade integration – Panel data evidence for the Comesa-Eac-Sadc Tripartite. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 28 (7):843–872. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2019.1575457.
- Sanjuán, A. I., G. Philippidis, and H. Resano. 2017. Pulling back the curtain on ‘behind the border’ trade costs: The case of EU-US agri-food trade. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 15 (2):e0110–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017152-10021.
- Santos Silva, J., and S. Tenreyro. 2006. The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4):641–658. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641.
- Shahriar, S., L. Qian, and S. Kea. 2019. Determinants of exports in China’s meat industry: A gravity model analysis. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 55 (11):2544–2565. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1578647.
- Tarr, D. 2012. The impact of service liberalization on industry productivity, export, and development: Empirical research in transition economies, Moscow, 216. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6026.
- Tinbergen, J. 1962. The world economy. Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
- Troekurova, I. S., and K. A. Pelevina. 2014. Gravity models of foreign trade of the BRICS countries. News of the Saratov University. New series. Series “Economics. Control. Right”, 1–2. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/gravitatsionnye-modeli-vneshney-torgovli-stran-briks.
- Walsh, K. 2006. Trade in services: Does gravity hold? A gravity model approach to estimating barriers to services trade. Journal of World Trade 183:1–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.945335.
- Xing, Z. 2018. The impacts of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and E-commerce on bilateral trade flow. International Economics and Economic Policy 15 (3):565–586. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0375-5.