The Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychoanalytic Therapy: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies

REFERENCES

• Coriat I H. Some statistical results of the psychoanalytic treatment of the psychoneuroses. Psychoanal Rev 1917; 4: 209–16
   Google Scholar
• Fenichel O. Statistischer Bericht über die therapeutische Tätigkeit 1920–1930. Zehn Jahre Berliner Psychoanalytisches Institut Poliklinik und Lehranschalt, S Radó, O Fenichel, C Müller-Braunschweig. Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, Wien 1930; S13–9
   Google Scholar
• Kessel L, Hyman H T. The value of psychonalysis as a therapeutic procedure. JAMA 1936; 107: 326
   Google Scholar
• Jones E. Report of the clinic work: 1926–1936. Clinic of Psychoanalysis, London 1936
   Google Scholar
• Alexander F. Five year report of the Chicago Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1932–1937. Institute for Psychoanalysis, Chicago 1937
   Google Scholar
• Knight R P. Evaluation of the results of psychoanalytic therapy. Am J Psychiatry 1941; 98: 434–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schjelderup H. Lasting effects of psychoanalytic treatment. Psychiatry 1955; 18: 109–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orgel S. Effects of psychoanalysis on the course of peptic ulcer. Psychosom Med 1958; 20: 117–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp P H, Levin S, McCarter R, Werner H, Zetzel E. Suitability for psychoanalysis: a review of 100 supervised analytic cases. Psychoanal Q 1960; 29: 459–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham S R. The effects of psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy on levels of frequency and satisfaction in sexual activity. J Clin Psychol 1960; 16: 94–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein H. A study of changes occurring in patients during and after psychoanalytic treatment. Current approaches to psychoanalysis, P H Hoch, J Zubin. Grune & Stratton, New York 1960; 151–75
   Google Scholar
• Cremerius J. Die Beurteilung des Behandlungserfolges in der Psychotherapie. Springer, Berlin, Göttingen, Heidelberg 1962
   Google Scholar
• Bieber I. Homosexuality: a psychoanalytic study. Basic, New York 1962
   Google Scholar
• Hamburg D A, Bibring G L, Fisher C, et al. Report of ad hoc committee on central fact gathering data of the American Psychoanalytic Association. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1967; 15: 841–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman H. Results of psychoanalysis in clinical case assignments. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1968; 17: 274–300
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach H, Galatzer-Levy R, Skolnikoff A, Waldron S. On the efficacy of psychoanalysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1991; 39: 871–916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doidge N. Empirical evidence for the efficacy of psychoanalytic psychotherapies and psychoanalysis: an overview. Psychoanal Inq 1997; 17(suppl)102–50
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy P. An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis. 1999, http://www.ipa.org.uk/R-outcome.htm
   Google Scholar
• Doidge N. Is psychoanalysis effective?. Econ Neurosci 2001; 3: 41–7
   Google Scholar
• Leichsenring F. Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies effective? A review of empirical data. Int J Psychoanal 2005; 86: 841–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichsenring F. Randomized controlled versus naturalistic studies: a new research agenda. Bull Menninger Clin 2004; 68: 137–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichsenring F., Rabung S. Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008; 300: 1551–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud S. Wege der psychoanalytischen Therapie. Ergänzungsband 1919; 243
   Google Scholar
• Bateman A, Fonagy P. The effectiveness of partial hospitalisation in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 1919; 156: 1563–9
   Google Scholar
• Stanton A H, Gunderson J G, Knapp P H, et al. Effects of psychotherapy in schizophrenia: I. Design and implementation of a controlled study. Schizophr Bull 1984; 10: 520–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy P, Moran G S. Studies on the efficacy of child psychoanalysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 1990; 58: 684–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiroga S. Estudio comparativo sobre eficacia terapéutica en trastornos de la alimentación I. Factores diferenciales y determinantes comunes [Comparative study about therapeutic efficacy in eating disorders I. Differential factors and common determinants]. Paper presented at the IV Encuentro Capítulo Sudamericano de la Society for Psychotherapy Research, Montevideo, September, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Heinicke C M. Frequency of psychotherapeutic sessions as a factor affecting the child's developmental status. Psychoanal Study Child 1965; 20: 42–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• At http://www.cochrane.org Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane reviewers' handbook
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Satistical power analysis for behavioural sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1988
   Google Scholar
• Leichsenring F, Leibing E. The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 1223–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research: applied social research methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA 1991
   Google Scholar
• Derogatis L R, Lazarus L. SCL-90-R, Brief Symptom Inventory, and matching clinical rating scales. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment, M E Maruish. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1974; 217–48
   Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 1987
   Google Scholar
• Weissman M, Bothwell S. Assessment of social adjustment by patient self report. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976; 33: 1111–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy W. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. National Institutes of Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Rockville, MD 1976
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz L M, Strauss B, Kordy H. Inventory of interpersonal problems. 2nd ed. Beltz, Göttingen 2000
   Google Scholar
• Doidge N, Simon B, Brauer L, et al. Psychoanalytic patients in the US, Canada, and Australia: I. DSM-III-R disorders, indications, previous treatment, medications and length of treatment. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2002; 50: 575–614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doidge N, Simon B, Lancee W J, et al. Psychoanalytic patients in the US, Canada, and Australia: II. A DSM-III-R validation study. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2002; 50: 615–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockman J, Schlüter T, Eckert J. Therpieziele, Zieländerungen und Zielerreichung im Verlauf psychoanalytisch orientierter und verhaltenstherapeutischer Langzeittherapie. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2003; 53: 163–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockman J, Schlüter T, Brodbeck D, Eckert J. Die Effekte psychoanalytisch orientierter und verhaltenstherapeutischer Langzeittherapien. Ein vergleichende Studie aus der Praxis niedergelassener Psychotherapeuten. Psychotherapeut 2002; 6: 347–55
   Google Scholar
• Clarkin J F, Foelsch P A, Levy K N, Hull J W, Delaney J C, Kernberg O F. The development of a psychodynamic treatment for patients with borderline personality disorder: a preliminary study of behavioural change. J Personal Disord 2001; 15: 487–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dührssen A. Dynamische Psychotherapie, Psychoanalyse und analytische Gruppenpsychotherapie im Vergleich. Z Psychosom Med 1986; 32: 161–80
   Google Scholar
• Erle J B, Goldberg D A. The course of 253 analyses from selection to outcome. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2003; 51: 257–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman N, Hoffenberg J D, Vorus N, Frosch A. The effectiveness of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: the role of treatment duration, frequency of sessions, and the therapeutic relationship. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1999; 47: 741–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman R C, Bucci W, Christian C, Drucker P, Garrison W B, 3rd. Private psychotherapy patients of psychiatrist psychoanalysts. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155: 1772–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman R C, Garrison W B, 3rd, Bucci W, Gorman B S. Private psychotherapy patients of senior psychoanalysts: an effectiveness study. J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry 2005; 33: 583–610
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giessen-Bloo J, van Dyck R, Spinhoven P, et al. Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63: 649–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande T, Dilg R, Jakobsen T, et al. Differential effects of two forms of psychoanalytic therapy: results of the Heidelberg-Berlin study. Psychother Res 2006; 16: 470–85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolf G, Dilg R, Grande T, . Effektivität und Effizienz psychoanalytischer Langzeittherapie: die Praxisstudie Analytische Langzeitpsychotherapie [Effectiveness and efficiency of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy: the practice study of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy]. Psychoanalyse des Glaubens [Psychoanalysis of religious belief], A Gerlach, A Springer, A Schlösser, et al. Psychosozial Verlag, Giessen 2004
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann S, Zepf S. Einflüsse auf die Symptombesserung in der Psychotherapie bei Patienten mit unterschiedlichen Beschwerdebildern. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2004; 54: 445–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinzel R, Breyer F, Klein T. Ambulante analytische Einzel- und Gruppenpsychotherapie in ein der bundesweiten katamnestischen Evaluationsstudie. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik 1998; 34: 135–52
   Google Scholar
• Holm-Hadulla R, Kiefer L, Sessar W. Zur Effektivität tiefenpsychologisch fundierter Kurz- und Psychotherapien. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 1997; 47: 271–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller W, Westhoff G, Dilg R, Rohner R, Studt H H, the study group on empirical psychotherapy research in analytical psychology. Efficacy and cost effectiveness aspects of outpatient Jungian psychoanalysis and psychotherapy—a catamnestic study. Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Benjamin Franklin, Free University of Berlin, Berlin 1997, At http://www.uni-saarland.de
   Google Scholar
• Leichsenring F, Biskup J, Kreische R, Staats H. The Göttingen study of psychoanalytic therapy: first results. Int J Psychoanal 2005; 86: 433–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outcomes of psychoanalytic treatment: perspectives for therapists and researchers, M Leuzinger-Bohleber, M Target. Whurr, London 2001
   Google Scholar
• Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Stuhr U, Rüger B, Beutel M. How to study the ‘quality of psychoanalytic treatments’ and their long-term effects on patients well-being: a representative, multi-perspective follow-up study. Int J Psychoanal 2003; 84: 263–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luborsky L, Stuart J, Friedman S, et al. The Penn Psychoanalytic treatment collection: a set of complete and recorded psychoanalyses as a research resource. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2001; 49: 217–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsen J T, Odland T, Faugli A, Daae E, Eilertsen D E. Personality disorders changes and stability after intensive psychotherapy focusing on affect consciousness. Psychother Res 1995; 5: 33–48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsen J T, Odland T, Faugli A, Daae E, Eilertsen D E. Personality disorders and psychosocial changes after intensive psychotherapy: a prospective follow-up study of an outpatient psychotherapy project, 5 years after end of treatment. Scand J Psychol 1995; 36: 256–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Rad M, Senf W, Bräutigam W. Psychotherapie und Psychoanalyse in der Krankenversorgung: Ergebnisse des Heidelberger Katamnese-Projektes. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 1998; 48: 88–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuft G, Seibuchler-Engec H, Taschke M, Senf W. Langzeitoutcome ambulanter psychoanalytischer Psychotherapien und Psychoanalysen. Ein textinhaltsanalytische Untersuchung von 53 Katamneseinterviews. Forum der Psychoanalyse 1996; 12: 342–55
   Google Scholar
• Kordy H, von Rad M, Senf W. Time and its relevance for successful psychotherapy. Psychother Psychosom 1988; 49: 212–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolf G, Manz R, Öri C. Ergebnisse psychoanalytischer Therapien. Z Psychosom Med 1994; 40: 25–40
   Google Scholar
• Sandell R, Blomberg J, Lazar A, Carlsson J, Broberg J, Schubert J. Varieties of long-term outcome in psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy. A review of findings in the Stockholm outcome of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy project (STOPP). Int J Psychoanal 2000; 81: 921–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sashin J I, Eldred S, van Amerongen S T. A search for predictive factors in institute supervised cases: a retrospective study of 183 cases from 1959–1966 at the Boston Psychoanalytical Society and Institute. Int J Psychoanal 1975; 56: 343–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehle S. Psychotherapeutische Berfustätigkeit. Ergebnisse der DGPT-Therapeutenerhebung. Psychoanalyse des Glaubens, A Gerlach, A Schlösser, A Springer. Psychosozial-Verlag, Gießen 2004
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson J, Meares R. An outcome study of psychotherapy for patients with borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1992; 149: 358–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein R. Forty-two lives in treatment: a study of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. Guilford, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg O, Burstein E D, Coyne L, Appelbaum A, Horwitz L, Voth H. Psychotherapy and psychoanalysis—the final report of the Menninger Foundation's Psychotherapy Research Project. Bull Menninger Clin 1972; 36: 1–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harty M, Horwitz L. Therapeutic outcome as rated by patients, therapists, and judges. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976; 33: 957–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber J J, Bachrach H M, Solomon M. Factors associated with outcome of psychoanalysis: a report of the Colombia Psychoanalytic Center Research Project (II). Int Rev Psychoanal 1985; 12: 127–41
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach H, Weber J, Solomon M. Factors associated with the outcome of psychoanalysis (clinical and methodological considerations): report of the Colombian Psychoanalytic Center Research Project (IV). Int Rev Psychoanal 1985; 12: 379–89
   Google Scholar
• Weber J J, Bachrach H M, Solomon M. Factors associated with outcome of psychoanalysis: a report of the Colombia Psychoanalytic Center Research Project (III). Int Rev Psychoanal 1985; 12: 251–62
   Google Scholar
• Wilczek A, Berber J P, Gustavson J P, Asberg M, Weinryb R M. Change after long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2004; 52: 1163–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman M EP. The effectiveness of psychotherapy. The Consumer Reports Study. Am Psychol 1995; 50: 965–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey M W, Wilson D B. The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: confirmation from meta-analyses. Am Psychol 1993; 48: 1181–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopta S M, Howard K I, Lowry J L, Beutler L E. Patterns of symptomatic recovery in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62: 1009–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J C, Banon E, Floriana I. Effectiveness of psychotherapy for personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 1312–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gloaguen V, Cottraux J, Cucherat M, Blackburn I. A meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy in depressed patients. J Affect Disord 1998; 49: 59–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollon S D, DeRubeis R J, Shelton R C, et al. Prevention of Relapse following cognitive therapy vs medications in moderate to severe depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 417–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maat S, Dekker J, Schoevers R, de Jonghe F. Relative efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depression: a meta-analysis. Psychother Res 2006; 16: 562–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein R. Comment on Gunderson and Gabbert. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1999; 47: 728–34
   Google Scholar
• Westen D, Novotny C M, Thomson-Brenner H. The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychol Bull 2004; 130: 631–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maat S, Dekker J, Schoevers R, de Jonghe F. The effectiveness of long-term psychotherapy: methodological issues. Psychother Res 2007; 17: 59–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks H, Chalmers T C, Smith H, Jr. Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials. Am J Med 1982; 72: 33–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz R, Oxman A D. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ 1998; 317: 1185–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz R I. Randomised controlled trials, observational studies and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1887–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish W R, Matt G, Navarro A, Phillips G. The effects of psychological therapies under clinically representative conditions: a meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 26: 512–29
   Google Scholar
• Benson K, Hartz A J. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1878–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PDM Task Force. Psychodynamic diagnostic manual. Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations, Silver Spring, MD 2006
   Google Scholar
• Ottoson J O. Experimental studies of the mode of action electroconvulsive treatment. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1960; 35(suppl 145)69–97
   Google Scholar
• Lambert M J, Hatch D R, Kingston M D, Edwards B C. Zung, Beck and Hamilton Rating Scales as measures of treatment outcome: a meta-analytic comparison. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986; 54: 54–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar