The Effectiveness of Juvenile Treatment Drug Courts: A Meta-Analytic Review of Literature

REFERENCES

• *Anspach, D., Ferguson, A., & Phillips, L. (2003). Evaluation of Maine's statewide juvenile drug treatment court program: Fourth year outcome evaluation report. Augusta, ME: College of Arts and Sciences, University of Southern Maine.
   Google Scholar
• Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2006). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Applegate, B., & Santana, S. (2000). Intervening with youthful substance abusers: A preliminary analysis of a juvenile drug court. The Justice System Journal, 21, 281–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, J. C., Ventura, H., Miller, H., & Miller, J. M. (2009). Identifying leading characteristics associated with juvenile drug court admission and success. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7, 350–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, C. B., & Berlin, J. A. (1988). Publication bias: A problem in interpreting medial data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 151, 419–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begle, A. M., Hanson, R., Kmett Danielson, C., McCart, M., Ruggiero, K., Amstadter, A., Resnick, H., Saunders, B., & Kilpatrick, D. (2011). Longitudinal pathways of victimization, substance use, and delinquency: Findings from the National Survey of Adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 682–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BJA Drug Court Clearinghouse Project. (2010). Summary of drug court activity by state and county: Juvenile and family drug courts. Washington, DC: American University, Justice Program Office and School of Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• *Byrnes, E., & Hickert, A. (2004). Process and outcome evaluation of the Third District Juvenile Drug Court in Dona Ana County, New Mexico. Annapolis, MD: Glacier Consulting, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Calvin, E. (2004). Advocacy and training guide: Legal strategies to reduce the unnecessary detention of children. Washington, DC: National Juvenile Defender Center.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. M. (2004). Clackamas County juvenile drug court outcome evaluation: Final report. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
   Google Scholar
• *Carey, S. M., Waller, M., & Marchand, G. (2006). Clackamas county juvenile drug court enhancement: Process, outcome/impact and cost evaluation. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• *Cook, M. D., Watson, L., & Stageberg, P. (2009). Statewide process and comparative outcomes study of 2003 Iowa adult and juvenile drug courts. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Human Rights, Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. S. (2001). Juvenile drug court programs. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. M. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• *Crumpton, M. P. A., Carey, S., Mackin, J., Finigan, M. W., Puktas, K., Weller, J. M. & Brekhus, J. (2006). Harford County juvenile drug court performance evaluation: Program process, outcome and cost analysis, final report. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dannerbeck, A., Harris, G., Sundet, P., & Lloyd, K. (2006). Understanding and responding to racial differences in drug court outcomes. Journal of Ethnicity and Substance Abuse, 5, 1–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deschenes, E. P., Moreno, K. S., & Emami, V. M. (2001). Evaluation of the Los Angeles County juvenile drug court program. Long Beach, CA: Cal State University.
   Google Scholar
• *Dickie, J. L. (2002). Summit County juvenile drug court: Evaluation report, July 1, 2000 – June 30, 2001. Akron, OH: The Institute for Health and Social Policy, The University of Akron.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, P. M., & Roman, J. K. (2010). A Bayesian meta-analysis of drug court cost-effectiveness. Washington, DC: District of Columbia Crime Policy Institute, Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Drug Court Clearinghouse & Technical Assistance Project. (1998). Looking at a decade of drug courts. Washington, DC: American University.
   Google Scholar
• *Ferguson, A., McCole, B., & Raio, J. (2006). A process and site-specific outcome evaluation of Maine's juvenile drug treatment court programs. Augusta, ME: Office of Substance Abuse, Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• *Guerin, P. (2001a). Evaluation of the Second Judicial District Court county juvenile drug court: Quasi-experimental outcome study using historical information. Albuquerque, NM: The Institute for Social Research, University of New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• *Guerin, P. (2001b). Evaluation of the thirteenth Judicial District Court Sandoval County juvenile drug court: Quasi-experimental outcome study using historical information. Albuquerque, NM: The Institute for Social Research, University of New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• *Hartmann, D. J., & DeVall, K. E. (2005). Evaluation of the Kalamazoo County juvenile drug treatment court program. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan U. Kercher Center for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• *Henggeler, S. W., Haliday-Boykins, C. A., Cunningham, P. B., Randall, J., Shapiro, S. B., & Chapman, J. E. (2006). Juvenile drug court: Enhancing outcomes by integrating evidence-based treatments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 42–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Herz, D. C., Phelps, J., & DeBuse, A. (2003). The tri-county juvenile court evaluation study: A final report. Omaha, NE: Nebraska Commission on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.
   Google Scholar
• *Hickert, A., Becker, E., & Prospero, M. (2010). Evaluation of Utah juvenile drug courts: Final report. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah Criminal Justice Center, College of Social Work, University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, H., Shufelt, J., & Cocozza, J. (2009). Evidence-based practice recommendations for juvenile drug courts. Delmar, NY: National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice, Policy Research Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt, J., & Stein, D. M. (2012). Predictors of outcome across Idaho's juvenile drug treatment court. Unpublished manuscript, Utah State University.
   Google Scholar
• *Huff, D., Stageberg, P., Wilson, B. S., & Moore, R. G. (2002). An assessment of the Polk County juvenile drug court. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Human Rights, Division of Criminal & Juvenile Justice Planning, Statistical Analysis Center.
   Google Scholar
• *Ives, M. L., Chan, Y., Modisette, C., & Dennis, M. (2010). Characteristics, needs, services and outcomes of youths in juvenile treatment drug courts as compared to adolescent outpatient treatment. Drug Court Review, 7, 10–56.
   Google Scholar
• Jainchill, N., Hawke, J., & Messina, M. (2005). Post-treatment outcomes among adjudicated adolescent males and females in modified therapeutic community treatment. Substance Use and Misuse, 40, 975–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E., Mazurick, J. L., & Bass, D. (1993). Risk for attrition in treatment of antisocial children and families. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R. S., & Pasquarella, J. (2009). Drug courts: A review of the evidence. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
   Google Scholar
• *King County Juvenile Drug Court. (2005). King County juvenile drug court program: Program evaluation. Seattle, WA: Organizational Research Services.
   Google Scholar
• Koetzle-Shaffer, D. (2006). Reconsidering drug court effectiveness: A meta-analytic review (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Cincinnati, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• *Kralstein, D. (2008). Evaluation of the Suffolk County juvenile treatment court: Process and impact findings. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• *Latessa, E. J., Shaffer, D. K., & Lowenkamp, C. (2002). Outcome evaluation of Ohio's drug court efforts: Final report. Cincinnati, OH: Center for Criminal Justice Research, University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Lattimer, J., Morton-Bourgon, K., & Chretien, J. (2006). A meta-analytic examination of drug treatment courts: Do they reduce recidivism? Ottawa, Canada: Department of Justice, Research and Statistical Division.
   Google Scholar
• LeCroy & Milligan Associates, Inc. (2003). Juvenile drug court program evaluation: Final report. Tucson, AZ: Author.
   Google Scholar
• *LeGrice, L. (2003). Effectiveness of juvenile drug court in reducing delinquency (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Texas, Arlington.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic review. Victims and Offenders, 4, 124–147.
   Google Scholar
• *Mackin, J. R., Lucas, L. M., Lambarth, C. H., Waller, M., Herrera, T. A., Carey, S. M., & Finigan, M. W. (2010a). Anne Arundel County juvenile treatment court outcome and cost evaluation. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
   Google Scholar
• *Mackin, J. R., Lucas, L. M., Lambarth, C. H., Waller, M., Herrera, T. A., Carey, S. M., & Finigan, M. W. (2010b). Baltimore County juvenile drug court outcome and cost evaluation. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
   Google Scholar
• *Mackin, J. R., Lucas, L. M., Lambarth, C. H., Waller, M., Herrera, T. A., Carey, S. M., & Finigan, M. W. (2010c). St. Mary's County juvenile drug court outcome and cost evaluation. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O., Wilson, D., Eggers, A., & MacKenzie, D. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and nontraditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (1997). Defining drug courts: The key components. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
   Google Scholar
• National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA) at Columbia University. (2004). Criminal neglect: Substance abuse, juvenile justice and the children left behind. New York, NY: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2006). Principles of drug abuse treatment for criminal justice populations: A research-based guide (NIH Publication No. 06–5316). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• *Nebraska Commission on Law Enforcement, & Criminal Justice. (2004). The tri-county juvenile drug court evaluation study: Final report. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Commission on Law Enforcement, & Criminal Justice.
   Google Scholar
• *O'Connell, J. P., Nestlerode, E., & Miller, M. L. (1999). Evaluation of the Delaware juvenile drug court diversion program. Dover, DE: Statistical Analysis Center.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse. (1999). Juvenile and family drug courts: An overview. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project at American University.
   Google Scholar
• *Parsons, B. V., & Byrnes, E. C. (2001). Byrne evaluation partnership program final report. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah, Social Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• *Pitts, W. J. (2006). Measuring recidivism in a juvenile drug court: Systematic outcome study of a juvenile drug court using historical information. The Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 3, 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• *Rodriguez, N., & Webb, V. J. (2004). Multiple measure of juvenile drug court effectiveness: Results of a quasi-experimental design. Crime and Delinquency, 50, 292–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• *Searle, W., & Spier, P. (2006). Christchurch youth drug court pilot: One-year follow-up study. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. K., Hartman, J. L., Listwan, S. J., Howell, T., & Latessa, E. J. (2011). Outcomes among drug court participants: Does drug of choice matter? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 155–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. K., Listwan, S. J., Latessa, E. J., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2008). Examining the differential impact of drug court services by court type: Findings from Ohio. Drug Court Review, 6, 33–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sharf, J. (2008). Psychotherapy drop-out: A meta-analytic review of premature termination. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 68, 6336B.
   Google Scholar
• *Sloan, J., Smykla, J., & Rush, J. (2004). Do juvenile drug courts reduce recidivism? Outcome of drug court and an adolescent substance abuse program. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 95–115.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, H. S. (2002). Juvenile arrests 2000 (Juvenile Justice Bulletin). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, D. M., Deberard, S., & Homan, K. J. (2013). Predicting success and failure in juvenile drug treatment court: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44, 159–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauber, J., & Huddleston, C. W. (1999). Development and implementation of drug court systems. Washington, DC: National Drug Court Institute.
   Google Scholar
• *Thompson, K. M. (2002). Statistical summary of North Dakota Juvenile Drug Court-May 2000 to June 2002. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University, Department of Sociology.
   Google Scholar
• *Thompson, K. M. (2004). An adult recidivism outcome evaluation of North Dakota's juvenile drug court. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, H. B., & Turner, C. W. (2008). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for adolescent substance abuse. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37, 238–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R., & Chang, S. (2000). A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7, 138–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wright, D., & Clymer, B. (2003). Beckham County juvenile drug court: Phase II analysis and evaluation. Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma Criminal Justice Resource Center.
   Google Scholar