The influence of sample type, presentation format and strength of evidence on juror simulation research

References

• Berman , G. L. and Cutler , B. L. 1996 . Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision making . Journal of Applied Psychology , 81 : 170 – 177 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermant , G. , McGuire , M. , McKinley , W. and Salo , C. 1974 . The logic of simulation in jury research . Criminal Justice and Behavior , 1 : 224 – 233 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgida , E. 1979 . Character proof and the fireside induction . Law and Human Behavior , 3 : 189 – 202 .
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein , B. H. 1999 . The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? . Law and Human Behavior , 23 : 75 – 91 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein , B. H. and Rajki , M. 1994 . Extralegal factors and product liability: The influence of mock jurors’ demographic characteristic and intuitions about the cause of an injury . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 12 : 127 – 147 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray , R. M. and Kerr , N. L. 1979 . Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behavior. Some methodological considerations . Law and Human Behavior , 3 : 107 – 119 .
   Google Scholar
• Bray , R. M. and Kerr , N. L. 1982 . “ Methodological considerations in the study of the psychology of the courtroom ” . In The psychology of the courtroom , Edited by: Kerr , N. L. and Bray , R. M. New York : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , M. B. 1983 . “ P4F. Two-way and Multiway frequency tables. Measures of association and the log–linear model ” . In BMDP statistical software , Edited by: Dixon , W. J. Berkeley, CA : University of California Press .
   Google Scholar
• Carlson , K. A. and Russo , J. E. 2001 . Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 7 : 91 – 103 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper , J. D. , Benedict , K. and Perry , J. L. 1989 . Juror decision making, attitudes and the hindsight bias . Law and Human Behavior , 13 : 291 – 310 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis , J. H. , Bray , R. M. and Holt , R. W. 1977 . “ The empirical study of decision processes in juries: A critical review ” . In Law, justice, an the individual in society: Psychological and legal issues , Edited by: Tapp , J. L. and Levine , F. J. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston .
   Google Scholar
• De la Fuente , E. I. , García , J. and Martín , I. 1998 . Some individual differences in perception of the evidence and the verdict choice. Psychology . Crime & Law , 4 : 361 – 373 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Fuente , L. , De la Fuente , E. I. and García , J. 2003 . Effects of pretrial juror bias, strength of evidence and deliberation process on juror decisions: new validity evidence of the Juror Bias Scale scores. Psychology . Crime & Law , 8 : 197 – 209 .
   Google Scholar
• De la Fuente , L. , García , J. and De la Fuente , E. I. 2003 . Validez de la escala de sesgo del jurado en relación con las decisiones grupales de jurados simulados . Psicothema , 15 : 148 – 154 .
   Google Scholar
• Devine , D. J. , Clayton , L. D. , Dunford , B. B. , Seying , R. and Pryce , J. 2001 . Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy . and Law , 7 : 622 – 727 .
   Google Scholar
• Diamond , S. S. 1997 . Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations . Law and Human Behavior , 21 : 561 – 571 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson , N. and Dunn , M. A. 2003 . New visual technologies in court: Directions for research . Law and Human Behavior , 27 : 109 – 126 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feild , H. S. and Barnett , N. J. 1978 . Simulated jury trials: Student vs. ‘real’ people as jurors . Journal of Social Psychology , 104 : 287 – 293 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel , N. J. , Meister , K. H. and Lightfoot , D. M. 1991 . The self-defense and community sentiment . Law and Human Behavior , 15 : 585 – 602 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Cueto , E. , García , J. , De la Fuente , L. , Borges , A. , San Luis , C. Sánchez , A. 2003 . Escalamiento subjetivo de conductas delictivas en legos y expertos . Psicothema , 15 : 638 – 642 .
   Google Scholar
• García , J. , De la Fuente , L. and De la Fuente , E. I. 2002 . Una visión psicojurídica del Jurado español desde sus fundamentos y funcionamiento . Psicología Política , 24 : 67 – 94 .
   Google Scholar
• Gerbasi , K. C. , Zuckerman , M. and Reis , H. T. 1977 . Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research . Psychological Bulletin , 84 : 323 – 345 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman , L. A. 1971 . The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables: stepwise procedures and direct estimation methods for building models for multiple classifications . Technometrics , 13 : 33 – 61 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie , R. , Penrod , S. and Pennington , N. 1983 . Inside the jury , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Juhnke , R. , Vought , C. , Pyszczynski , T. A. , Dane , F. C. , Losure , B. D. and Wrightsman , L. S. 1979 . Effects of presentation mode upon mock jurors’ reactions to a trial . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 5 : 36 – 39 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin , S. and Garfield , D. 1991 . Blood and guts: General and trial-specific effects of videotaped crime scenes on mock jurors . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 21 : 1459 – 1472 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr , N. L. , Hymes , R. W. , Anderson , A. B. and Weathers , J. E. 1995 . Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgements . Law and Human Behavior , 19 : 545 – 567 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konecni , V. J. and Ebbesen , E. B. 1979 . External validity of research in legal psychology . Law and Human Behavior , 3 : 39 – 70 .
   Google Scholar
• Kramer , G. P. and Kerr , N. L. 1989 . Laboratory simulation and bias in the study of juror behavior: A methodological note . Law and Human Behavior , 13 : 89 – 99 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecci , L. and Myers , B. 2002 . Examining the construct validity on the original and revised JBS: A cross-validation of sample and method . Law and Human Behavior , 26 : 455 – 463 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman , J. D. and Sales , B. D. 1997 . What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process. Psychology, Public Policy . and Law , 3 : 589 – 644 .
   Google Scholar
• Loh , W. D. 1981 . Perspectives on psychology and law . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 11 : 314 – 355 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCoun , R. J. and Kerr , N. L. 1988 . Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: jurors’ bias for leniency . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 54 : 21 – 33 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín , M. E. 2004 . El proceso de toma de decisiones en jurados simulados: formato de presentación de las pruebas, tipo de muestra y estilo de deliberación , Jaén, , Spain : Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Jaén .
   Google Scholar
• Miller , G. R. 1976 . “ The effects of videotaped trial materials on juror response ” . In Psychology and the law , Edited by: Bermant , G. , Nemeth , C. and Vidmar , N. Lexington, MA : Heath .
   Google Scholar
• Narby , D. J. , Cutler , B. L. and Moran , G. 1993 . A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors’ perceptions of defendant culpability . Journal of Applied Psychology , 78 : 34 – 42 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nietzel , M. T. , McCarthy , D. M. and Kern , M. J. 1999 . “ Juries: The current state of empirical literature ” . In Psychology and law: The state of discipline , Edited by: Roesch , R. , Hart , S. D. and Ogloff , J. R. P. New York : Kluwer Academic/Plenum .
   Google Scholar
• Ogloff , J. R. P. 2000 . Two steps forward and one step backward: The law and psychology movement(s) in the 20th century . Law and Human Behavior , 24 : 457 – 483 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogloff , J. R. P. , Tomkins , J. and Bersoff , D. N. 1996 . Education and training in psychology and law criminal justice: Historical foundations, present structures, and future developments . Criminal Justice and Behavior , 23 : 200 – 235 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogloff , J. R. P. and Vidmar , N. 1994 . The impact of petrial publicity on jurors: A study to compare the relative effects of television and print media in child sex abuse case . Law and Human Behavior , 18 : 507 – 525 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo , A. 2002 . Análisis de datos categóricos , Madrid : UNED .
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer , J. E. 1990 . Reviewing the empirical evidence on jury racism: Findings of discrimination or discriminatory findings? . Nebraska Law Review , 69 : 230 – 250 .
   Google Scholar
• Rose , V. G. and Ogloff , R. P. 2001 . Evaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: A method and an example . Law and Human Behavior , 25 : 409 – 431 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks , M. J. 1997 . What do jury experiments tell us about how juries (should) make decisions? . Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal , 6 : 1 – 53 .
   Google Scholar
• Sears , D. O. 1986 . College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51 : 515 – 530 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuller , R. A. and Hastings , P. A. 1996 . Trials of battered women who kill: The impact of alternative forms of expert evidence . Law and Human Behavior , 20 : 167 – 187 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer , D. R. and Wheatman , S. R. 2000 . Does personality influence reactions to judicial instructions? Some preliminary findings and possible implications . Psychology, Public Policy and Law , 6 : 655 – 676 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon , R. J. and Mahan , L. 1971 . Quantifying burdens of proof: A view from the bench, the jury, and classroom . Law and Society Review , 5 : 319 – 330 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small , M. A. 1993 . Legal psychology and therapeutic jurisprudence . Saint Louis University Law Journal , 37 : 675 – 713 .
   Google Scholar
• Smart , R. G. 1966 . Subject selection bias in psychological research . Canadian Psychologist , 7a : 115 – 121 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker , C. A. , Robbennolt , J. K. , Penrod , S. D. , Pathatk-Sharma , M. K. , Groscup , J. L. and Devenport , J. L. 2002 . Studying petrial publicity effects: New methods for improving ecological validity and testing external validity . Law and Human Behavior , 26 : 19 – 41 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor , S. E. and Thompson , S. C. 1982 . Stalking the elusive ‘vividness’ effect . Psychological Review , 89 : 155 – 181 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warling , D. and Peterson-Badali , M. 2003 . The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: The effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 21 : 63 – 82 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman , D. and Robinson , J. 1980 . Extralegal influences, group processes, and jury decision-making: A psychological perspective . North Carolina Law Journal , 12 : 96 – 159 .
   Google Scholar
• Weiten , W. and Diamond , S. S. 1979 . A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: The case of defendant characteristics . Law and Human Behavior , 3 : 71 – 93 .
   Google Scholar
• Wiener , R. L. 1993 . Social analytic jurisprudence and tort law: Social cognition goes to court . Saint Louis University Law Journal , 37 : 503 – 551 .
   Google Scholar
• Wilson , J. R. (1996) . Putting the trial back into petrial publicity The medium is the message . Unpublished master's thesis , Louisiana State University, , Baton Rouge .
   Google Scholar