The role of death qualification in venirepersons’ susceptibility to victim impact statements

References

• Booth v . Maryland , 482 U.S. 496 1987 .
   Google Scholar
• Butler , B. 2007a . The role of death qualification in capital trials involving juvenile defendants . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 37 : 549 – 560 .
   Google Scholar
• Butler , B. 2007b . The role of death qualification in jurors’ susceptibility to pretrial publicity . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 37 : 115 – 123 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler , B. and Moran , G. 2002 . The role of death qualification in venirepersons’ perceptions of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials . Law and Human Behavior , 26 : 175 – 184 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler , B. and Moran , G. 2007 . The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons’ evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 25 : 57 – 68 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler , B. and Moran , G. 2007b . The role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons’ evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 25 ( 4 ) : 561 – 571 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler , B. and Wasserman , A. W. 2006 . The role of death qualification in venirepersons’ attitudes toward the insanity defense . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 36 : 1744 – 1757 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan , C. L. , Thompson , W. C. and Ellsworth , P. C. 1984 . The effects of death qualification on jurors’ predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation . Law and Human Behavior , 8 : 53 – 79 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler , B. L. , Moran , G. and Narby , D. J. 1992 . Jury selection in insanity defense cases . Journal of Research in Personality , 26 : 165 – 182 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillehay , R. C. and Sandys , M. R. 1996 . Life under Wainwright v. Witt: Juror dispositions and death qualification . Law and Human Behavior , 20 : 147 – 165 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth , P. C. , Bukaty , R. M. , Cowan , C. L. and Thompson , W. C. 1984 . The death-qualified jury and the insanity defense . Law and Human Behavior , 8 : 81 – 93 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger , L. 1957 . A theory of cognitive dissonance , Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald , R. and Ellsworth , P. C. 1984 . Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes . Law and Human Behavior , 8 : 31 – 51 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene , E. 1999 . The many guises of victim impact evidence and effects on jurors’ judgments . Psychology, Crime, & Law , 5 : 331 – 348 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney , C. 1984a . On the selection of capital juries: The biasing effects of the death qualification process . Law and Human Behavior , 8 : 121 – 132 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney , C. 1984b . Examining death qualification: Further analysis of the process effect . Law and Human Behavior , 8 : 133 – 151 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney , C. , Hurtado , A. and Vega , L. 1994 . ‘Modern’ death qualification: New data on its biasing effects . Law and Human Behavior , 18 : 619 – 633 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hans , V. P. 1986 . “ Death by jury ” . In "Challenging capital punishment: V ol. 24. Legal and social science approaches , Edited by: Haas , K. C. and Incardi , J. A. 149 – 175 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Moran , G. and Comfort , J. C. 1986 . Neither ‘tentative’ nor ‘fragmentary:’ Verdict preference of impaneled felony jurors as a function of attitude toward capital punishment . Journal of Applied Psychology , 71 : 146 – 155 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers , B. , Godwin , D. , Latter , R. and Winstanley , S. 2004 . Victim impact statements and mock juror sentencing: The impact of dehumanizing language on a death-qualified sample . American Journal of Forensic Psychology , 22 : 39 – 55 .
   Google Scholar
• Myers , B. and Greene , E. 2004 . The prejudicial nature of victim impact statements: Implications for capital sentencing policy . Psychology, Public Policy, and and Law , 10 : 492 – 515 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne v . Tennessee , 111 S. Ct. 2597 1991 .
   Google Scholar
• Ring v . Arizona , 536 U.S. 584 2002 .
   Google Scholar
• Robinson , R. J. 1993 . What does ‘unwilling’ to impose the death penalty mean anyway? Another look at excludable jurors . Law and Human Behavior , 17 : 471 – 477 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson , W. C. , Cowan , C. L. , Ellsworth , P. C. and Harrington , J. C. 1984 . Death penalty attitudes and conviction proneness: The translation of attitudes into verdicts . Law and Human Behavior , 8 : 95 – 113 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky , A. and Kahneman , D. 1974 . Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases . Science , 185 : 1124 – 1131 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright v . Witt , 469 U.S. 412 1985 .
   Google Scholar