Behind closed doors: the effect of pretrial publicity on jury deliberations

References

• American Bar Association 1978 Standards relating to the administration of criminal justice, fairness and free press (2nd Ed.). Chicago : ABA .
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman , R Gottman , J.M 1997 Observing interaction (2nd ed.) New York Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Baron , R.M , & Kenny , D.A 1986 The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 1173 1182 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein , B.H 1999 The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior , 23 , 75 92 doi: 10.1023/A:1022326807441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein , B.H , Whisenhunt , B.L , Nemeth , R.J , & Dunaway , D.L 2002 Pretrial publicity and civil cases: A two-way street? Law and Human Behavior , 263 , 3 17 doi: 10.1023/A:1013825124011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois , M. J. , Horowitz , I. A. , Fosterlee , L. , & Graphe , J. 1995 Nominal and interactive groups: Effects of preinstruction and deliberations on decisions and evidence recall in complex trials Journal of Applied Psychology , 80 , 58 67 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyll , J.R. 1991 Psychological, cognitive, personality, and interpersonal factors in jury decision making Law and Psychology Review , 15 , 163 184 Retrieved from: http://www.law.ua.edu/lawpsychology/
   Google Scholar
• Burnstein , E. , & Vinokur , A. 1977 Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarizationock jurors Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 13 , 315 332 doi: 10.1016/0022-103190002-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson , K.A. , & Russo , J.E. 2001 Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 7 , 91 103 . doi: 10.1037//1076-898X.7.2.91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cissna , K.N. , Garvin , B.J. , & Kennedy , C.W. 1990 Reliability in coding social interaction: A study of confirmation Communication Reports , 3 , 58 69 Retrieved from http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/08934215.asp
   Google Scholar
• Cutler , B.L. , Penrod , S.D. , & Dexter , H.R. 1990 Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence Law and Human Behavior , 14 , 185 191 doi: 10.1007/BF01062972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis , J.H 1992 Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples, 1950–1990 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 52 , 3 38 Retrieved from: http://www.elsevier.com
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis , J.H. , Spitzer , C.E. , Nagao , D.H. and Stasser , G. 1978 . “ Bias in social decisions by individuals and groups: An example from mock juries ” . In Dynamics of group decisions , Edited by: Brandstatter , H. , Davis , J.H. and Schuler , H. 33 – 52 . Beverly Hills , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , R.W 1986 Pretrial publicity, the timing of the trial, and mock jurors’ decision processes . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 16 , 590 607 doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01161.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearing , E. , & Hamilton , L.C. 2006 Contemporary advances and classic advice for analyzing mediating and moderating variables Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development , 71 , 88 104 . doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2006.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine , D.J. , Clayton , L.D. , Dunford , B.B. , Seying , R. , & Pryce , J. 2001 Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups Psychology, Public Policy, & Law , 7 , 622 727 doi: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond , S.S. 1997 Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations . Law and Human Behavior , 21 , 561 571 . doi: 10.1023/A:1024831908377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulero , S.M. 2002 Empirical and legal perspectives on the impact of pretrial publicity: Effects and remedies Law and Human Behavior , 26 , 1 2 doi: 10.1023/A:1013848407173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsz , V.B. , & Davis , J.H. 1984 Persuasive arguments theory, group polarization, and choice shifts Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 10 , 260 298 doi: 10.1177/0146167284102012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope , L. , Memon , A. , & McGeorge , P. 2004 Understanding pretrial publicity: Predecisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 10 , 111 119 . doi: 10.1037/1076–898X.10.2.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd , C.M. , & Kenny , D.A. 1981 Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations . Evaluation Review , 5 , 602 619 doi: 10.1177/0193841X8100500502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jury Research Institute 2001 Jury deliberations: What goes on behind closed doors . Retrieved July 27, 2008, from http://www.jri-inc.com/article3.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kalven , H. Jr and Zeisel , H. 1966 . The American jury , Boston : Little, Brown .
   Google Scholar
• Kenny , D.A. , & Judd , C.M. 1986 Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance . Psychological Bulletin , 99 , 422 431 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr , N.L. , Niedermeier , K.E. , & Kaplan , M.F. 1999 Bias in jurors vs. bias in juries: New evidence from the SDS perspective . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 80 , 70 86 doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline , F.G. and Jess , P.H., . 1966 . Prejudicial publicity: Its effect on law school mock juries . Journalism Quarterly , 43 : 113 – 116 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer , G.P. , Kerr , N.L. , & Carroll , J.S. 1990 Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias . Law and Human Behavior , 14 , 409 438 doi: 10.1007/BF01044220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary , M.R. 1983 Social anxiousness: The construct and its measurement . Journal of Personality Assessment , 47 , 66 75 . doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4701_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecci , L.B. and Myers , B. 2009 . Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors . Psychology, Crime & Law , 15 : 619 – 634 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas , E. , Schulz-Hardt , S. , Frey , D. , & Thelen , N. 2001 Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 80 , 557 571 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon , D.P. , Lockwood , C.M. , & Williams , J. 2004 Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods . Multivariate Behavioral Research , 39 , 99 128 doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran , G. , & Cutler , B.L. 1991 The prejudicial impact of pretrial publicity . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 21 , 345 367 doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noldus Information Technology 2003 The Observer Video-Pro (Version 5.0) [Computer Software] Wageningen , , The Netherlands Noldus Information Technology .
   Google Scholar
• Otto , A.L. , Penrod , S.D. , & Dexter , H.R. 1994 The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments . Law and Human Behavior , 18 , 453 469 doi: 10.1007/BF01499050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington , N. , & Hastie , R 1988 . Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition , 14 , 521 533 . doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington , N. and Hastie , R. 1993 . “ The story model for juror decision making ” . In Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision-making , Edited by: Hastie , R. 192 – 221 . New York , NY : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Posey , A.J. , & Wrightsman , L.S 2005 Change of venue Trial consulting 53 78 New York , NY Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Preacher , K.J. , & Hayes , A.F. 2004 SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models . Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers , 36 , 717 731 Retrieved from: http://brm.psychonomic-journals.org
   Google Scholar
• Preacher , K.J. , & Hayes , A.F 2008 Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models . Behavior Research Methods , 40 , 879 891 doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard , M.E. , & Keenan , J.M. 1999 Memory monitoring in mock jurors . Journal of Applied Psychology , 84 , 340 348 doi: 10.1037/1076–898X.5.2.152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard , M.E. , & Keenan , J.M. 2002 Does jury deliberation really improve jurors’ memories? Applied Cognitive Psychology , 16 , 589 601 doi: 10.1002/acp.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotter , J.B. 1966 Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement . Psychological Monographs , 80 , (1, whole no. 609)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruva , C.L. , & McEvoy , C. 2008 Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 14 , 226 235 doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruva , C.L. , McEvoy , C. , & Bryant , J.B. 2007 Effects of pretrial publicity and collaboration on juror bias and source monitoring errors . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 21 , 45 67 doi: 10.1002/acp.1254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks , M.J. , & Marti , M.W. 1997 A meta-analysis of the effects of jury size , Law and Human Behavior , 21 , 451 – 467 . doi: 10.1023/A:1024819605652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout , P.E. , & Bolger , N. 2002 Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations . Psychological Methods , 4 , 422 445 doi: 10.1037/1082–989X.7.4.422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay , N.M. , Besirevic , J. , Fulero , S.M. , & Jimenez-Lorente , B. 1999 The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: A meta-analytic review . Law and Human Behavior , 23 , 219 235 doi: 10.1023/A:1022325019080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay , N.M. , Hosch , H.M. , Culhane , S.E. , & McWethy , A. 2006 The impact on juror verdicts of judicial instruction to disregard inadmissible evidence: A meta-analysis . Law and Human Behavior , 30 , 469 492 doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9039-9037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker , C.A. , & Penrod , S.D. 1997 Pretrial publicity: The media, the law, and common sense . Psychology, Public Policy, & Law , 3 , 428 460 doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.428 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiten , W. , & Diamond , S.S. 1979 A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: The case of defendant characteristics Law and Human Behavior , 3 , 71 93 Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1393726
   Google Scholar