Victim impact statements and crime heinousness: a test of the saturation hypothesis

References

• Bandes , S. 1996 . Empathy, narrative, and victim impact statements . University of Chicago Law Review , 63 : 361 – 412 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth v. Maryland , 482 U.S. 486 1987 .
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein , B.H . 1999 . The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior , 23 , 75 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein , B.H . & Nemeth , R.J . 1999 . Jurors’ perception of violence: A framework for inquiry . Aggression and Violent Behavior , 4 , 77 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein , B.H. and Wiener , R.L. 2010 . “ Emotion and the law: A field whose time has come ” . In Emotion and the law: Psychological perspectives , Edited by: Bornstein , B.H. and Wiener , R.L. 1 – 12 . New York : NY: Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein , B.H. , & Wiener , R.L . 2006 . Introduction to the special issue on emotion in legal judgment and decision making . Law and Human Behavior , 30 , 115 – 118 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray , R.M. , & Kerr , N.L . 1979 . Use of simulation method in the study of jury behavior: Some methodological considerations . Law and Human Behavior , 3 , 107 – 119 .
   Google Scholar
• Bright , D.A. , & Goodman-Delahunty , J. 2006 . Gruesome evidence and emotion: Anger, blame, and jury decision making . Law and Human Behavior , 30 , 183 – 202 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright , D.A. , & Goodman-Delahunty , J. 2004 . The influence of verbal gruesome evidence on mock juror verdicts . Psychiatry, Psychology and Law , 11 , 154 – 166 .
   Google Scholar
• Butler , B. 2008 . The role of death qualification in venirepersons’ susceptibility to victim impact statements . Psychology, Crime & Law , 14 , 133 – 141 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassell , P.G. 2009 . In defense of victim impact statements . Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law , 6 : 611 – 648 .
   Google Scholar
• Chen , H. , Cohen , P. , & Chen , S. 2010 . How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies . Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation , 39 , 860 – 864 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen , J 1992 . A power primer . Psychological Bulletin , 112 , 155 – 159 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cush , R.K. , & Goodman-Delahunty , J . 2006 . The influence of limiting instructions on processing and judgments of emotionally evocative evidence . Psychiatry, Psychology and Law , 13 , 110 – 123 .
   Google Scholar
• Diamond , S.S . 1997 . Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations . Law and Human Behavior , 21 , 561 – 571 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas , K.S. , Lyon , D.R. , & Ogloff , J.R.P . 1997 . The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock juror decisions in a murder trial: Probative or prejudicial? Law and Human Behavior , 21 , 485 – 501 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson , N. , & Park , J . 2006 . Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: A research review . Law and Human Behavior , 30 , 143 – 161 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas , J.P . 1995 . Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM) . Psychological Bulletin , 117 , 39 – 66 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald , R. , & Ellsworth , P.C . 1984 . Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes . Law and Human Behavior , 8 , 31 – 51 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon , T.M. , & Brodsky , S.L . 2007 . The influence of victim impact statements on sentencing in capital cases . Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice , 7 , 45 – 52 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-McGowan M. , & Myers , B . 2004 . Who is the victim anyway? The effects of bystander victim impact statements on mock juror sentencing decisions . Violence and Victims , 19 , 357 – 374 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herrington , L.H. , Bobo , G. , Carrington , F. , Damos , P.P. , Dolan , D.L. , Eikenberry , K.O. , Miller , R.J. , Robertson , P. , & Samenow , S.E. 1982 . President's task force on victims of crime: Final report . Washington DC : US Government Printing Office .
   Google Scholar
• Hastie , R. , Penrod , S. and Pennington , N. 1983 . Inside the jury , Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick , C. and Shaffer , D.R. 1975 . Murder: Effects of number of killers and victim mutilation on simulated jurors’ judgments . Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 6 : 313 – 316 .
   Google Scholar
• Hester , R.K. , & Smith , R.E . 1973 . Effects of a mandatory death penalty on the decisions of simulated jurors as a function of heinousness of the crime . Journal of Criminal Justice , 1 , 319 – 326 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin , S.M. , & Garfield , D.A . 1991 . Blood and guts: General and trial-specific effects of videotaped crime scenes on mock jurors . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 21 , 1459 – 1472 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner , D. , Ellsworth , P.C. , & Edwards , K . 1993 . Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 64 , 740 – 752 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konečni , V.J. , & Ebbesen , E.B 1979 . External validity of research in legal psychology . Law and Human Behavior , 3 , 39 – 70 .
   Google Scholar
• Konečni , V.J. , Ebbesen , E.B. , & Hock , R.R . 1996 . Factors affecting simulated jurors’ decisions in capital cases . Psychology, Crime, & Law , 2 , 269 – 297 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy , J.H. 1993 . Limiting victim impact evidence and argument after Payne v. Tennessee . Stanford Law Review , 45 : 1027 – 1060 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan , W. 1999 . Through the past darkly: A survey of the uses and the abuses of victim impact evidence in capital trials . Arizona Law Review , 41 : 143 – 192 .
   Google Scholar
• Luginbuhl , J. , & Burkhead , M . 1995 . Victim impact evidence in a capital trial: Encouraging votes for death . American Journal of Criminal Justice , 20 , 1 – 16 .
   Google Scholar
• McPherson , S.B . 2002 . Heinousness in capital crimes: Myths of proportionality and social protection . International Journal of Law and Psychiatry , 25 , 459 – 472 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers , B. , & Arbuthnot , J . 1999 . The effects of victim impact information on the verdicts and sentence recommendations of mock jurors . Journal of Offender Rehabilitation , 29 , 95 – 112 .
   Google Scholar
• Myers , B. , Godwin , D. , Latter , R. and Winstanley , S. 2004 . Victim impact statements and mock juror sentencing: The impact of dehumanizing language on a death qualified sample . American Journal of Forensic Psychology , 22 : 39 – 55 .
   Google Scholar
• Myers , B. , Godwin , C.D. , Winstanley , S. , & Latter , R. 2001 . Dehumanizing the offender in victim impact statements . Poster session presented at the annual conference of the American Psychological Association , San Francisco , CA , August .
   Google Scholar
• Myers , B. , & Greene , E . 2004 . The prejudicial nature of victim impact statements: Implications for capital sentencing policy . Psychology, Public Policy and Law , 10 , 492 – 515 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers , B. , Lynn , S.J. , & Arbuthnot , J . 2002 . Victim impact testimony & juror judgments: The effects of harm information and witness demeanor . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 32 , 2393 – 2412 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers , B. , Weidemann , E. and Pearce , G. 2006 . Psychology weighs in on the debate surrounding victim impact statements and capital sentencing: Are emotional jurors really irrational? . Federal Sentencing Reporter , 19 : 13 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Nadler , J. and Rose , M.R. 2003 . Symposium: Victims and the death penalty: Inside and outside the courtroom: Victim impact testimony and the psychology of punishment . Cornell Law Review , 88 : 419 – 450 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver , E. and Griffitt , W. 1976 . Emotional arousal and ‘objective’ judgment . Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 8 : 399 – 400 .
   Google Scholar
• Payne v. Tennessee , 501 U.S. 808 1991 .
   Google Scholar
• Robinson , R.J . 1993 . What does ‘unwilling’ to impose the death penalty mean anyway? Another look at excludable jurors . Law and Human Behavior , 17 , 471 – 477 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen , R.A. 1986 . The ‘especially heinous’ aggravating circumstances in capital cases—the standardless standard . North Carolina Law Review , 64 : 941 – 992 .
   Google Scholar
• Smith , C. , & Ellsworth , P.C . 1985 . Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 48 , 813 – 838 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South Carolina v . Gathers , 490 U.S. 905 1989 .
   Google Scholar
• Thompson , W.C . 1989 . Death qualification after Wainwright v. Witt and Lockhart v. McCree . Law and Human Behavior , 13 , 185 – 216 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedens , L. , & Linton , S . 2001 . Judgments under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 81 , 973 – 988 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright v. Witt , 53, L.W. 4108 1985 .
   Google Scholar
• White , L.T . 1987 . Juror decision making in the capital penalty trial: An analysis of crimes and defense strategies . Law and Human Behavior , 11 , 113 – 130 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson , T.D. , & Brekke , N . 1994 . mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations . Psychological Bulletin , 116 , 117 – 142 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witherspoon v. Illinois , 391 U.S. 510 88 S. Ct. 1770 1968 .
   Google Scholar
• Wrightsman , L.S. and Fulero , S.M. 2005 . Forensic psychology , 2nd Ed , Belmont , CA : Thompson-Wadsworth .
   Google Scholar