1,215
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A non-standard method for estimating accuracy of lie detection techniques demonstrated on a self-validating set of field polygraph examinations

Pages 577-594 | Received 04 Mar 2011, Accepted 18 Dec 2011, Published online: 09 Mar 2012

References

  • APA Model Policy . 2007 . Model policy for paired testing . Polygraph , 36 ( 2 ) : 117 – 120 .
  • Barland , G.H. and Raskin , D.C. 1975 . An evaluation of field techniques in detection of deception . Psychophsiology , 12 : 321 – 330 . doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb01299.x
  • Ben-Shakhar , G. 2002 . “ A critical review of the control questions test (CQT) ” . In Handbook of polygraph testing , Edited by: Kleiner , M. 103 – 126 . New York , NY : Academic Press .
  • Ben-Shakhar , G. and Furedy , J.J. 1990 . Theories and applications in the detection of deception , New York : Springer-Verlag .
  • Brewer , M. 2000 . “ Research design and issues of validity ” . In Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology , Edited by: Reis , H. and Judd , C. 3 – 16 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Elaad , E. 1999 . The control question technique: A search for improved decision rules . Polygraph , 28 : 65 – 73 .
  • Elaad , E. , Ginton , A. and Ben-Shakhar , G. 1998 . The role of prior expectations in polygraph examiners’ decisions. Psychology . Crime and Law , 4 : 1 – 16 . doi: 10.1080/10683169808401743
  • Ferguson , G.A. 1966 . Statistical analysis in psychology and education , New York , NY : McGraw-Hill Companies .
  • Ginton , A. 1986 . A built-in validity in polygraph field examinations . In Anti-terrorism, forensic science & psychology in police investigations , (pp. 148 – 154 ). Boulder , CO : Westview Press ; Jerusalem: Heiliger and Co ( Proceedings of IDENTA 85. The International Congress on Techniques for Criminal Identification & Counter Terrorism. Jerusalem, Israel, 1985 .)
  • Ginton , A. 1988 . Estimating accuracy of the control-questions-test, using a self validating set of real-life polygraph examinations . Preliminary oral report at the NATO advanced study institute of credibility assessment . Maratea , Italy , June 14–21, 1988 .
  • Ginton , A. 2009 . A validity study of the Comparison Question Test, based on internal criterion in field paired examinations . Polygraph , 38 ( 4 ) : 275 – 280 .
  • Ginton , A. , Daie , N. , Elaad , E. and Ben-Shakhar , G. 1982 . A method for evaluating the use of the polygraph in real-life situation . Journal of Applied Psychology , 67 : 131 – 137 . doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.131
  • Ginton , A. , & Zoltak , S. 1991 . Internal regulations and guidance [in Hebrew] . Israel National Police, Scientific Interrogation Laboratory, Behavior Section, Division of Criminal Identification and Forensic Sciences .
  • Honts , C.R. 1996 . Criterion development and validity of the CQT in field application . Journal of General Psychology , 16 : 56 – 61 .
  • Honts , C.R. , & Peterson , C.F. 1997 . Brief of the committee of concerned social scientists as Amicus Curiae, U.S. Vs. Scheffer, in the Supreme Court of the United States . [Available from the author]
  • Honts , C.R. , & Schweinle , V.V. 2009 . Information gain of psychophysiological detection of deception in forensic and screening settings . Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback , 34 , 161 – 172 . (Available online July 2009) . doi: 10.1007/s10484-009-9096-z
  • Iacono , W.G. and Lykken , D.T. 1997 . “ The scientific status of research on polygraph techniques: The case against polygraph tests ” . In Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony , Edited by: Faigman , D.L. , Kaye , D. , Saks , M.J. and Sanders , J. 582 – 618 . St Paul , Minnesota : West Publishing .
  • Krapohl , J.D. 2005 . Polygraph decision rules for evidentiary and paired-testing (Martin Protocol) applications . Polygraph , 34 ( 3 ) : 184 – 195 .
  • Krapohl , J.D. , Shull , K.W. and Ryan , A.A. 2002 . Does the confession criterion in case selection inflate polygraph accuracy estimates? . Forensic Science Communications , 4 ( 3 ) : 234 – 244 .
  • Krapohl , J.D. , Stern , A.B. and Bronkema , Y. 2003 . Numerical evaluation and wise decisions . Polygraph , 32 ( 1 ) : 1 – 13 .
  • Marin , J. 2000 . He said/she said: Polygraph evidence in court . Polygraph , 29 ( 4 ) : 299 – 304 .
  • National Research Council, NRC. 2003 . The polygraph and lie detection, committee to review the scientific evidence on the polygraph , Washington , DC : The National Academic Press .
  • Orne , M.T. 1975 . “ Implications of laboratory research for the detection of deception ” . In Legal admissibility of the polygraph , Edited by: Ansley , N. 94 – 119 . Springfield , IL : Charles C. Thomas Publishers .
  • OTA, U.S. Congress . 1983 . Scientific validity of polygraph testing A research review and evaluation , Washington , DC : Office of Technology Assessment .
  • Patrick , C.J. and Iacono , W.G. 1991 . Validity of the control question polygraph test: The problem of sampling bias . Journal of Applied Psychology , 76 ( 2 ) : 229 – 238 . doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.229
  • Raskin , D.C. and Honts , C.R. 2002 . “ The comparison question test ” . In Handbook of polygraph testing , Edited by: Kleiner , M. 1 – 48 . New York , NY : Academic Press .
  • Raskin , D.C. , Kircher , J.C. , Honts , C.R. , & Horowitz , M.S. 1988 . A study of the validity of polygraph examinations in criminal investigations . Final report to the National Institute of Justice . Salt Lake City : Department of Psychology, University of Utah .
  • Shadish , W. , Cook , T. and Campbell , D. 2002 . Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference , Boston : Houghton Mifflin Company .
  • Wygant , J.R. 2003 . Scoring cutoffs – Picking the best . Polygraph , 32 ( 2 ) : 86 – 96 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.