Cost and benefit of a new instruction for the cognitive interview: the open depth instruction

References

• Allison, M., Brimacombe, C., Hunter, M.A., & Kadlec, H. (2006). Young and older adult eyewitnesses' use of narrative features in testimony. Discourse Processes, 41, 289–314. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4103_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ask, K., Granhag, P., & Rebelius, A. (2011). Investigators under influence: How social norms activate goal-directed processing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 548–553. doi: 10.1002/acp.1724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekerian, D.A., & Dennett, J.L. (1993). The cognitive interview technique: Reviving the issues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 275–297. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350070403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, J., & Noon, E. (1994). Changing perspectives in cognitive interviewing. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1, 59–69. doi: 10.1080/10683169408411936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, G. (1967). A multicomponent theory of a memory trace. In K.W. Spence & J. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: I (Vol. 1, pp. 230–325). Oxford: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunel, M. (2009). Une nouvelle consigne mnesique de l'entretien cognitif: la focalisation péripherique [A new mnemonic component of the cognitive interview: the peripheral focus]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Toulouse 2, France.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, L., & Alonso-Quecuty, M.L. (1999). The cognitive interview: Much more than simply ‘try again’. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 47–59. doi: 10.1080/10683169908414993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, B.R., & George, R. (1996). A field evaluation of training in three methods of witness/victim investigative interviewing. Psychology, Crime & Law, 2, 231–248. doi: 10.1080/10683169608409780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colomb, C., & Ginet, M. (2011). The cognitive interview for use with adults: An empirical test of an alternative mnemonic and a partial protocol. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 35–47. doi: 10.1002/acp.1792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dando, C., Wilcock, R., Behnkle, C., & Milne, R. (2011). Modifying the cognitive interview: Countenancing forensic application by enhancing practicability. Psychology, Crime and Law, 17, 491–511. doi: 10.1080/10683160903334212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dando, C., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2008). The cognitive interview: Inexperienced police officers’ perceptions of their witness/victim interviewing practices. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 59–70. doi: 10.1348/135532506X162498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dando, C., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2009). The cognitive interview: The efficacy of a modified mental reinstatement of context procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 138–147. doi: 10.1002/acp.1451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dando, C., Wilcock, R., Milne, R., & Henry, L. (2009). A modified cognitive interview procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 698–716. doi:10.1002/acp.1501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M.R., McMahon, M., & Greenwood, K.M. (2005). The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: Towards a shortened variant for time-critical investigations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 75–93. doi: 10.1002/acp.1048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltis, B.B., Powell, M.B., Snow, P.C., & Hughes-Scholes, C.H. (2010). An examination of the association between interviewer question type and story-grammar detail in child witness interviews about abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34, 407–413. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.P., & Geiselman, R.E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.P., & Geiselman, R.E. (2010). The cognitive interview method of conducting police interviews: Eliciting extensive information and promoting therapeutic jurisprudence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.P., Geiselman, R.E., & Amador, M. (1989). Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of the actual victims and witnesses of crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 722–727. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.P., Geiselman, R.E., & Raymond, D.S. (1987). Critical analysis of police interview techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15(3), 177–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.P., Geiselman, R.E., Raymond, D.S., Jurkevich, L.M., & Warhaftig, M.L. (1987). Enhancing enhanced eyewitness memory: Refining the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science & Administration, 15(4), 291–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.P., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 16–19. doi: 10.1177/0963721410396826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R.P. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a Self-Administered Interview Tool. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 298–307. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R.E., Fisher, R.P., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L.A., Sullivan, S.J., Avetissian, I.V. et al. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12(1), 74–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R.E., Fisher, R.P., MacKinnon, D.P., & Holland, H. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401–412. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.70.2.401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R.E., Fisher, R.P., MacKinnon, D.P., & Holland, H. (1986). Enhancement of eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 385–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginet, M., & Py, J. (2001). A technique for enhancing memory in eyewitness testimonies for use by police officers and judicial officials: The cognitive interview. Le Travail Humain, 64, 173–191. doi: 10.3917/th.642.0173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 121–133). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Fernaud, E., & Alonso-Quecuty, M. (1997). The cognitive interview and lie detection: A new magnifying glass for Sherlock Holmes? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 55–68. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199702)11:1<55::AID-ACP423>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M.R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 323–330. doi: 10.1080/00224549809600384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M.R., Milne, R., & Wagstaff, G.F. (1999). The cognitive interview: A survey of its forensic effectiveness. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 101–115. doi: 10.1080/10683169908414996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 3–27. doi: 10.1080/10683169908414991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhnken, G.L.K., Thürer, C., & Zoberbier, D. (1994). The cognitive interview: Are the interviewers’ memories enhanced, too? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 13–24. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350080103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E.F., & Fathi, D.C. (1985). Retrieving multiple autobiographical memories. Social Cognition, 3, 280–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, E.J., Tversky, B., & Hutson, M. (2005). How eyewitnesses talk about events: Implications for memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 531–544. doi: 10.1002/acp.1095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Holley, A., Milne, R., Koehnken, G., & Bull, R. (1994). Towards understanding the effects of interviewer training in evaluating the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 641–659. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350080704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Meissner, C.A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 340–372. doi:10.1037/a0020518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Wark, L., Bull, R., & Koehnken, G. (1997). Isolating the effects of the cognitive interview techniques. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 179–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Bell, M. (1996). Children's memory for traumatic injury. Child Development, 67, 3045–3070. doi: 10.2307/1131766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu, M.-M. (2006). Discourse organization and coherence. In J. Luchjenbroers (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics investigations (pp. 121–133). Bangor: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Py, J., Ginet, M., Demarchi, S., & Ansanay-Alex, C. (2001). Une démarche psychosociale d'évaluation des procédures d'instructions. [A psychosocial assesment of judicial investigation]. Retrieved from La Mission de Recherche Droit et Justice website: http://www.gip-recherche-justice.fr/catalogue/PDF/syntheses/65-qualitepy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Py, J., Ginet, M., Desperies, C., & Cathey, C. (1997). Cognitive encoding and cognitive interviewing in eyewitness testimony. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 56(1), 33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E. (1974). Cue-dependent forgetting. American Science, 62, 74–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turtle, J.W., & Yuille, J.C. (1994). Lost but not forgotten details: Repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 260–271. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkampt, F., & Ginet, M. (2010). Variations of the cognitive interview: Which one is the most effective in enhancing children's testimonies? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1279–1296. doi: 10.1002/acp.1631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A.M., & Alison, L. (2004). Questioning sequences in Canadian police interviews: Constructing and confirming the course of events? Psychology Crime and Law, 10, 137–154. doi: 10.1080/1068316031000099120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar