Detecting concealed information: The role of individual differences in executive functions and social desirability

References

• Abe, N., Suzuki, M., Mori, E., Itoh, M., & Fujii, T. (2007). Deceiving others: Distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(2), 287–295. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.2.287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway, T.P. (2007). Automated Working Memory Assessment (AWMA). London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Alloway, T.P., Gathercole, S.E., & Pickering, S.J. (2006). Verbal and visuo-spatial short-term and working memory in children: Are they separable? Child Development, 77, 1698–1716. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00968.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambach, W., Stark, R., & Vaitl, D. (2011). An interfering n-back task facilitates the detection of concealed information with EDA but impedes it with cardiopulmonary physiology. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 80, 217–226. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birenbaum, M., & Montag, J. (1989). Style and substance in social desirability scales. European Journal of Personality, 3, 47–59. doi: 10.1002/per.2410030106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, S.E., Van Essen, D.C., Watson, J.M., Brubaker, L.E., & McDermott, K.B. (2009). The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: Evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1557–1566. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M.F., French, C.C., & Keogh, E. (1998). Self-deceptive enhancement and impression management correlates of EPQ-R dimensions. Journal of Psychology, 132, 401–406. doi: 10.1080/00223989809599274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, A.D., & Lee, K. (2011). Verbal deception from late childhood to middle adolescence and its relation to executive functioning skills. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1108–1116. doi: 10.1037/a0023425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1991). Manual of the Eysenck personality scales. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Farrow, T.F.D., Reilly, R., Rahman, T.A., Herford, A.E., Woodruff, P.W.R., & Spence, S.A. (2003). Sex and personality traits influence the difference between time taken to tell the truth or lie. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, 451–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, R.S., Forrest, J.A., & Happ, B.R. (2002). Self-presentation and verbal deception: Do self-presenters lie more? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk, J.E., & Sharp, C.A. (2003). The role of the executive system in visuo-spatial memory functioning. Brain and Cognition, 52(3), 364–381. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00183-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, S., Lewis, C.A., & Shevlin, M. (2000). Examining the factor structure and differential functioning of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised – Abbreviated. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(3), 579–588. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00220-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, J., Carpenter, C., Randolph, C., Goldberg, T., & Weinberger, D. (1997). Auditory working memory and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54(2), 159–165. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830140071013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gombos, V.A. (2007). The cognition of deception: The role of executive processes in producing lies. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 197–214. doi: 10.3200/MONO.132.3.197-214
   Google Scholar
• Gozna, L.F., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2001). The impact of individual differences on lying in everyday life and in a high stake situation. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1203–1216. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00219-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G.H. (2010). Psychological vulnerabilities during police interviews. Why are they important? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 161–175. doi: 10.1348/135532510X500064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G.H., & Moore, E. (2001). Self-deception and other-deception among admissions to a maximum security hospital and medium secure hospital. Psychology, Crime & Law, 7, 25–31. doi: 10.1080/10683160108401780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G.H., & Sigurdsson, J.F. (2004). The relationship of suggestibility and compliance with self-deception and other-deception. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 447–453. doi: 10.1080/10683160310001634278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G.H., & Young, S. (2011). Personality and deception. Are suggestibility, compliance and acquiescence related to socially desirable responding? Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 192–195. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmes, E., & Holden, R.R. (2003). The construct of social desirability: One or two dimensions? Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1015–1023. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00086-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C.J., Farrow, T.F.D., Hopwood, M.-C., Pratt, A., Hunter, M.D., & Spence, S.A. (2005). Recent developments in deception research. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 1, 273–279. doi: 10.2174/157340005774575118
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C.J., & Francis, L.J. (1999). Interpreting the correlation between neuroticism and lie scale scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 59–63. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00142-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. Jr., Barnhardt, J., & Zhu, J. (2004). The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding. Neuropsychologia, 42, 878–901. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashy, D.A., & DePaulo, B.M. (1996). Who lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1037–1051. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K.C., & Stegmeier, R. (1997). Interference in immediate spatial memory: Shifts of spatial attention or central-executive involvement? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 79–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logie, R.H., & Marchetti, C. (1991). Visuo-spatial working memory: Visual, spatial or central executive? In C. Cornoldi & M.A. McDaniels (Eds.), Mental images in human cognition (pp. 72–102). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lykken, D.T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385–388. doi: 10.1037/h0046060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykken, D.T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detector industry. American Psychologist, 29, 725–739. doi: 10.1037/h0037441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, B.A., & Genereux, R.L. (2008). Predicting the acceptability and likelihood of lying: The interaction of personality with type of lie. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 591–596. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miclea, M., Porumb, M., Cotârlea, P., & Albu, M., ( coord.) (2009). The Cognitrom Assessment System CAS⁺⁺. Cluj-Napoca: ASCR Printing House.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Witzki, A.H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T.D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C.J., LeSage, J.B., & Kosslyn, S.M. (2009). Types of deception revealed by individual differences in cognitive abilities. Social Neuroscience, 4, 554–569. doi: 10.1080/17470910802299987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyberg, L., Marklund, P., Persson, J., Cabeza, R., Forkstam, C., Petersson, K.M., & Ingvar, M. (2003). Common prefrontal activations during working memory, episodic memory, and semantic memory. Neuropsychologia, 41, 371–377. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00168-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panasiti, M.S., Pavone, E.F., Merla, A., & Aglioti, S.M. (2011). Situational and dispositional determinants of intentional deceiving. PLoS One, 6(4), e19465.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver, & L.S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L. (2006). Paulhus Deception Scales. Newbury, Berkshire: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Pitariu, H., Iliescu, D., & Băban, A. (2008). Scalele Eysenck pentru adulti – Manual tehnic şi interpretativ [Eysenck scales for adults – technical and interpretive manual]. Cluj-Napoca: Sinapsis. ISBN 978-973-1860-15-2.
   Google Scholar
• Riggio, R., & Friedman, H.S. (1983). Individual differences and cues to deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 899–915. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudkin, S., Pearson, D.G., & Logie, R.H. (2007). Executive processes in visual and spatial working memory tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 79–100. doi: 10.1080/17470210600587976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, T.L., & Kerlin, J.R. (2008). Successful detection of verbal and visual concealed knowledge using an RT-based paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 475–490. doi: 10.1002/acp.1375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, T.L., Seifert, C.M., Shafto, M.G., & Mosmann, A.L. (2000). Using response time measures to assess “guilty knowledge”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 30–37. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson, J.F., & Gudjonsson, G.H. (1996). The psychological characteristics of ‘false confessors’. A study among Icelandic prison inmates and juvenile offenders. Personality & Individual Differences, 20, 321–329. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00184-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, A.F., Sydell, E.J., & Lueke, S.B. (1999). Towards a theory of applicant faking: Integrating studies of deception. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 219–242. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00019-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, S.A. (2004). The deceptive brain. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 97, 6–9. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.97.1.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, S.A., Farrow, T.F.D., Herford, A.E., Wilkinson, I.D., Zheng, Y., & Woodruff, P.W.R. (2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport, 12, 2849–2853. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200109170-00019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöber, J., Dette, D.E., & Musch, J. (2002). Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the balanced inventory of desirable responding. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 370–389. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7802_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 643–662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., & de Houwer, J. (2011). Detecting concealed information in less than a second: Response-latency based measures. In B. Verschuere, G. Ben-Shakhar, & E. Meijer (Eds.), Memory detection. Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test (pp. 128–148). London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Degrootte, T., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). Detecting concealed information with reaction times: Validity and comparison with the polygraph. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1–11. doi: 10.1002/acp.1442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Spruyt, A., Meijer, E., & Otgaar, H. (2011). The ease of lying. Consciousness & Cognition, 20, 908–911. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.10.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visu-Petra, G., Borlean, C., Chendran, L., & Buş, I. (2008). An investigation of antisocial attitudes, family background and moral reasoning in violent offenders and police students. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 12(2), 143–159.
   Google Scholar
• Visu-Petra, G., Buş, I., & Miclea, M. (2011). Detecting concealed information from a mock crime scenario by using psychophysiological and RT-based measures. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 14(1), 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Visu-Petra, G., Miclea, M., & Visu-Petra, L. (2012). RT-based detection of concealed information in relation to individual differences in executive functioning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 342–351. doi: 10.1002/acp.1827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 141–142. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P.A., & Porter, S.B. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89–121. doi: 10.1177/1529100610390861
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walczyk, J.J., Roper, K.S., Seemann, E., & Humphrey, A.M. (2003). Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 755–774. doi: 10.1002/acp.914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, J.B.III (2005). Mapping the links between personality and communicator style. Individual Differences Research, 3, 59–70.
   Google Scholar