972
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The effects of mortality salience and evidence strength on death penalty sentencing decisions

, &
Pages 199-221 | Received 20 Mar 2012, Accepted 13 Nov 2012, Published online: 04 Apr 2013

References

  • Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1997). Subliminal exposure to death-related stimuli increases defense of the cultural worldview. Psychological Science, 8, 379–385. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00429.x
  • Arndt, J., Lieberman, J. D., Cook, A., & Solomon, S. (2005). Terror management in the courtroom: Exploring the effects of mortality salience on legal decision making. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 407–438. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.3.407
  • Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91. doi:10.1023/A:1022326807441
  • Cook, A., Arndt, J., & Lieberman, J. D. (2004). Backing off the backfire effect: The effect of mortality salience and justice nullification beliefs on the influence of inadmissible evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 389–410. doi:10.1023/B:LAHU.0000039332.21386.f4
  • Cox, M., & Tanford, S. (1989). Effects of evidence and instructions in civil trials: An experimental investigation of rules of admissibility. Social Behaviour, 4, 31–55. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1989-29250-001.
  • Cunningham, M., Sorensen, J., & Reidy, T. (2009). Capital jury decision-making: The limitations of predictions of future violence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15, 223–256. doi:10.1037/a0017296
  • Death Penalty Information Center (2012). State Execution Rates. Retrieved from deathpenaltyinfo.org: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/state-execution-rates
  • Diamond, S. S. (1997). Illusions and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 561–571. doi:10.1023/A:1024831908377
  • Edwards, K. E., & Bryan, T. S. (1997). Judgmental biases produced by instructions to disregard: The (paradoxical) case of emotional information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 849–864. doi:10.1177/0146167297238006
  • Feigensen, N. R. (1997). Sympathy and legal judgment: A psychological analysis. Tennessee Law Review, 65, 1–78. Retrieved from http://www.heinonline.org.
  • Florian, V., & Mikulincer, M. (1997). Fear of death and the judgment of social transgressions: A multidimensional test of terror management theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 369–380. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.369
  • Frank, J., & Applegate, B. K. (1998). Assessing juror understanding of capital-sentencing instructions. Crime and Delinquency, 44, 412–433. doi:10.1177/0011128798044003005
  • Greenberg, J., Porteus, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1995). Evidence of a terror management function of cultural icons: The effects of mortality salience on the inappropriate use of cherished cultural symbols. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1221–1228. doi:10.1177/01461672952111010
  • Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189–212). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Breus, M. (1994). Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 627–637. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.627
  • Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., & Lyon, D. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308–318. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308
  • Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Arndt, J. (2008). A basic but uniquely human motivation: Terror management. In J. Shah (Ed.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 114–134). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, 61–139). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Haney, C. (2005). Death by design: Capital punishment as a social psychological system. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Harmon-Jones, E., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Simon, L. (1995). The effects of mortality salience on intergroup bias between minimal groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 781.1–781.5. doi:10.1002/(SCSI)1099-0992(199607)26:4<677::AID-EJSP777>3.0.CO;2-2
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Hirschberger, G. (2006). Terror management and attributions of blame to innocent victims: Reconciling compassionate and defensive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 832–844. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.832
  • Hood, R. (1996). The death penalty: A world-wide perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Judges, D. P. (1999). Scared to death: Capital punishment as authoritarian terror management. University of California-Davis Law Review, 33, 155–248. Retrieved from http://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/33/1/Articles/DavisVol33No1_Judges.pdf.
  • Kirchmeier, J. L. (2008). Our existential death penalty: Judges, jurors, and terror management. Law & Psychology Review, 32, 55–107.
  • Krauss, D., McCabe, J., & McFadden, S. (2009). Limited expertise and experts: Problems with the continued use of future dangerousness in capital sentencing. In R. Schopp, R. Wiener, B. Bornstein, & S. Wilborn (Eds.), Mental disorder and criminal law: Responsibility, punishment, and competency (pp. 135–158). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Krauss, D., & Sales, B. D. (2001). The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision-making in capital sentencing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 267–310. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.2.267
  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Lieberman, J. D., Arndt, J., Personius, J., & Cook, A. (2001). Vicarious annihilation: The effect of mortality salience on perceptions of hate crimes. Law and Human Behaviorehavior, 25, 547–566. doi:10.1023/A:1012738706166
  • Lieberman, J. D., & Sales, B. D. (1997). What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 589–644. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.3.4.589
  • McElhaney, J. W. (1987). The golden rule. American Bar Association Journal, 73, 106–107.
  • McGregor, H., Lieberman, J. D., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., Simon, L., & Pyszczynski, T. (1998). Terror management and aggression: Evidence that mortality salience promotes aggression toward worldview-threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 590–605. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.590
  • Myers, B., & Greene, E. (2004). The prejudicial nature of victim impact statements. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10, 492–515. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.10.4.492
  • Nelson, L. J., Moore, D. L., Olivetti, J., & Scott, T. (1997). General and personal mortality salience and nationalistic bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 884–892. doi:10.1177/0146167297238008
  • Newport, F. (2011). In U.S., support for death penalty falls to 39-year low. Retrieved from gallup.com: http://www.gallup.com/poll/150089/support-death-penalty-falls-year-low.aspx
  • Nietzel, M. T., Dillehay, R. C., & Himelein, M. J. (1987). Effects of voir dire variations in capital trials: A replication and extension. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 5, 467–477. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370050410
  • Ochsmann, R., & Mathy, M. (1994). Deprecating of and distancing from foreigners: Effects of mortality salience. Unpublished manuscript,University of Mainz, Germany.
  • People v. Douglas (1990). 50 Cal. 3d 468 at536–537.
  • People v. Fierro (1991) 1 Cal. 4th 173, 235.
  • People v. Garceau (1993). 6 Cal. 4th 140, 206.
  • People v. Marshall (1990). 50 Cal. 3d 907.
  • People v. Wrest (1992). 3 Cal. 4th 1088, 1108.
  • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Mack, D., & Wrightsman, L. (1981). Opening statements in a jury trial: The effect of promising more than the evidence can show. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 434–444. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1981.tb00834.x
  • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1997). Why do we need what we need? A terror management perspective on the roots of human social motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 1–20. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0801_1
  • Pyszczynski, T., Rothschild, R., & Abdollahi, A. (2008). Terrorism, violence, and hope for peace: A terror management perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 318–322. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00598.x
  • Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory I: The effects of mortality salience on reactions those to who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 681–690. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.681
  • Shapiro, M. (2008). An overdose of dangerousness: How “future dangerousness” catches the least culpable capital defendants and undermines the rationale for the execution it supports. American Journal of Criminal Law, 35, 101–156. Retrieved from http://www.heinonline.org.
  • Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Harmon-Jones, E., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., & Abend, T. (1997). Cognitive-experiential self-theory and terror management theory: Evidence that terror management occurs in the experiential system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1132–1146. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1132
  • Stevenson, M., Bottoms, B., & Diamond, S. (2010). Jurors' discussions of a defendant's history of child abuse and alcohol abuse in capital sentencing deliberations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 1–38. doi:10.1037/a0018404
  • Van den Bosden Bos, K. (2001). Reactions to perceived fairness: The impact of mortality salience and self-esteem on ratings of negative affect. Social Justice Research, 14, 1–23. doi:10.1023/A:1012501506803
  • Van den Bosden Bos, K., & Miedema, J. (2000). Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 355–366. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.355
  • Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 419 (S.Ct. 1985.
  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1992). Affects separable and inseparable: On the hierarchical arrangement of the negative affects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 489–505. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.489
  • Wiener, R. L, Krauss, D. A., & Lieberman, J. D. (2011). Mock jury research: Where to we go from here? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 467–479. doi:10.1002/bsl.989
  • Witherspoon v. Illinois,391 U.S. 510 (1968).
  • Young, R. L. (1991). Race, conceptions of crime and justice, and support for the death penalty. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(1), 67–75. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2786789. doi:10.2307/2786789

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.