Equipping witnesses with transferable skills: the Self-Administered Interview^©

References

• Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 633–642. doi:10.3758/BF03202713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised Neo Personality Inventory (Neo PI-R) and Neo Five-Factor Inventory (Neo-FFI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83–87. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, M. P., & Scoboria, A. (2012). Self-esteem predicts quality of responding to interview questions when skill in responding is low. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 363–368. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law and human behavior, 33(4), 298–307. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2012). Protecting against misleading post-event information with a self-administered interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26,568–575.10.1002/acp.2828
   Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 533–543. doi:10.1002/acp.885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R., Fisher, R., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L., Sullivan, S., Avetissian, I., & Prosk, A. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12(1), 74–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66(3), 325–331. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M.,, & Koriat, A. (2007). The strategic regulation of memory accuracy and informativeness. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 48, 1–60. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(0748001-X)
   Google Scholar
• Halamish, V., Goldsmith, M., & Jacoby, L. L. (2011). Source-constrained recall: Front-end and back-end control of retrieval quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1),1–15. doi:10.1037/a0025053
   Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Gabbert, F., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). From laboratory to the street: Capturing witness memory using the self-administered interview. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16(2), 211–226. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., Shimizu, Y., Daniels, K. A., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: Depth of retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 852–857. doi:10.3758/BF03196776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103(3), 490–517. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(1), 19–31. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(4), 340–372. doi:10.1037/a0020518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2002). Back to basics: A componential analysis of the original cognitive interview mnemonics with three age groups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(7), 743–753. doi:10.1002/acp.825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odinot, G., Wolters, G., & van Giezen, A. (2012). Accuracy, confidence and consistency in repeated recall of events. Psychology, Crime & Law, iFirst article, 1–14. 10.1080/1068316X.2012.660152
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20–27. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, L. K., & Schwartz, B. L. (2002). The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control. In T. J. Perfect, & B. L. Schwarz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 15–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352–373. doi:10.1037/h0020071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger, S. (2010). Intent to deceive? Nature, 465(7297), 412–415. doi:10.1038/465412a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar