Geographical profiling in a novel context: prioritising the search for New Zealand sex offfenders

References

• Beauregard, E., Proulx, J., & Rossmo, D. K. (2005). Spatial patterns of sex offenders: Theoretical, empirical and practical issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(5), 579–603. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2004.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennell, C., & Corey, S. (2007). Geographic profiling of terrorist attacks. In R. N. Kocsis (Ed.), Criminal profiling: International theory, research and practice (pp. 189–203). Tolowa, NJ: Humana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Block, R., & Bernasco, W. (2009). Finding a serial burglar's home using distance decay and origin–destination patterns: A test of empirical Bayes journey-to-crime estimation in the Hague. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 6(3), 187–211. doi:10.1002/jip.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter, D. (2004). Mapping murder. London: Virgin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Canter, D. (2005). Confusing operational predicaments and cognitive explorations: Comments on Rossmo and Snook et al. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(5), 663–668. doi:10.1002/acp.1143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter, D., Coffey, T., Huntley, M., & Missen, C. (2000). Predicting serial killers' home base using a decision support system. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(4), 457–478. doi:10.1023/A:1007551316253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter, D., & Hammond, L. (2006). A comparison of the efficacy of different decay functions in geographical profiling for a sample of U.S. serial killers. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 3(2), 91–103. doi:10.1002/jip.45
   Google Scholar
• Canter, D., & Hammond, L. (2007). Prioritising burglars: Comparing the effectiveness of geographical profiling methods. Police, Practice and Research, 8(4), 371–384. doi:10.1080/15614260701615086
   Google Scholar
• Canter, D., Hammond, L., Youngs, D., & Juszczak, P. (2012). The efficacy of ideographic models for geographical offender profiling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, ISSN 0748-4518. doi:10.1007/s10940-012-9186-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter, D., & Larkin, P. (1993). The environmental range of serial rapists. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 63–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter, D., & Youngs, D.. (2008a). Applications of geographical offender profiling. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Canter, D., & Youngs, D.. (2008b). Principles of geographical offender profiling. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. J., & Grace, R. C. (2006). Analysing the offence locations and residential base of serial arsonists in New Zealand. Australian Psychologist, 41(3), 219–226. doi:10.1080/00050060600637626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwill, A. M., & Alison, L. J. (2005). Sequential angulation, spatial dispersion and consistency of distance attack patterns from home in serial murder, rape and burglary. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11(2), 161–176. doi:10.1080/10683160512331316352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, L. (2009). Spatial patterns in serial crime: Modelling offence distribution and home-crime relationships for prolific individual offenders (Unpublished doctoral thesis).University of Liverpool, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, L., & Youngs, D. (2011). Decay functions and criminal spatial processes: Geographical offender profiling of volume crime. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(1), 90–102. doi:10.1002/jip.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, J. (2003). Using functional distance measures when calibrating journey to crime distance decay algorithms (MSc thesis).Louisiana State University.
   Google Scholar
• Laukkanen, M., & Santtila, P. (2006). Predicting the residential location of a serial commercial robber. Forensic Science International, 157(1), 71–82. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.03.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, N. (2005). CrimeStat III. Crime Mapping News, 7(2), 8–10. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/111275039/Crime-Mapping-News-Vol-7-Issue-2-2005.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, N. (2009). Introduction to the special issue on Bayesian journey-to-crime modelling. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 6(3), 167–185. doi:10.1002/jip.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundrigan, S., & Canter, D. (2001). A multivariate analysis of serial murderer's disposal site location choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 423–432. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundrigan, S., & Czarnomski, S. (2006). Spatial characteristics of serial sexual assault in New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39(2), 218–231. doi:10.1375/acri.39.2.218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen, D. J. (2006a). Connecting the dots: Assessing the accuracy of geographic profiling software. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 29(2), 306–334. doi:10.1108/13639510610667682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen, D. (2006b). Human versus machine: A comparison of the accuracy of geographic profiling methods. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 3(2), 77–89. doi:10.1002/jip.46
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, D. (2007). Improving geographic profiling through commuter/marauder prediction. Police Practice and Research, 8(4), 347–357. doi:10.1080/15614260701615045
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, W. M., & Conly, C. (1981). Crime and mobility: An empirical study. In P. J. Brantingham, & P. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 167–188). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, T., & Shively, M. (2004). A methodology for evaluating geographic profiling software (Tech. Rep.). Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rossmo, D. K. (2000). Geographic profiling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Rossmo, D. K. (2001, November). Evaluation of geographic profiling search strategies. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Rossmo, K. (2005). Geographic heuristics or shortcuts to failure: Response to Snook et al. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(5), 531–678. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.1144/abstract.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snook, B., Zito, M., Bennell, C., & Taylor, P. J. (2005). On the complexity and accuracy of geographic profiling strategies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(1), 1–26. doi:10.1007/s10940-004-1785-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, J., Reboussin, R., Hazelwood, R. R., Cummings, A., Gibbs, N., & Trumbetta, S. (1998). Crime scene and distance correlates of serial rape. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(1), 35–59. doi:10.1023/A:1023044408529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. E., & Maxwell, C. D. (2007). Research in geographic profiling: Remarks from the Guest Editors. Police Practice and Research, 8(4), 313–319. doi:10.1080/15614260701615003
   Google Scholar